The Education Law Center has developed an excellent presentation on the shortchanging of public education in the years since 20008. The great majority of states did not keep up with the costs of educating their children. Only a handful did: Wyoming, Alaska, Illinois, Connecticut. The rest saw a sharp drop in their effort to fund the education of their children.
The two absolutely worst states, as judged by their failed effort to fund their schools, were Arizona and Florida, followed by Michigan. It is not coincidence that these are states that have put their efforts into choice, as a substitute for funding.
The report from ELC begins:
In the decade following the Great Recession, students across the U.S. lost nearly $600 billion from the states’ disinvestment in their public schools. Data from 2008-2018 show that, if states had simply maintained their fiscal effort in PK-12 education at pre-Recession levels, public schools would have had over half a trillion dollars more in state and local revenue to provide teachers, support staff and other resources essential for student achievement. Further, that lost revenue could have significantly improved opportunity and outcomes for students, especially in the nation’s poorest districts.
The states dramatically reduced their investment in public education in response to the 2007 Great Recession. Yet as economies rebounded, states failed to restore those investments. As our analysis shows, while states’ economic activity — measured as Gross Domestic Product (GDP) — recovered, state and local revenues for public schools lagged far behind in many states.
This “lost decade” of state disinvestment has put public schools in an extremely vulnerable position as the nation confronts the coronavirus pandemic. Once again, state budgets are strained by declining revenues. And once again, school districts across the country are bracing for state aid cuts and the potential for reduced local support.
This report builds on our Making the Grade analysis of the condition of public school funding in the 50 states and the District of Columbia. Instead of a one-year snapshot, this report provides a longitudinal analysis of the effort made by states from 2008 to 2018 to fund their public education systems. We measure that effort using an index that calculates elementary and secondary education revenue as a percentage of each state’s economic activity or GDP.
A key goal of this report is to give advocates data and information to use in their efforts to press governors and state legislatures not to make another round of devastating “pandemic cuts” to already underfunded public schools.
Open the report to see where YOUR state ranks in its effort to educate its students.
Arizona and Florida are the two most shameful states in their neglect of the future of their children.

A trillion here, a trillion there–pretty soon you’re talking real money.
LikeLike
A breathtaking and damning report. And in the face of this, as Diane keeps pointing out, states are ramping up diversion of taxpayer dollars away from public schools and into private, often religious, schools via so-called “scholarship” funds–a calculated misnomer for vouchers.
LikeLike
Ed reformers are lousy advocates for PUBLIC school students. It doesn’t matter if they’re in the ed reform camp that is actively opposed to the existence of public schools or in the “agnostic” camp – they simply don’t get a lot done that benefits students in existing public schools.
That’s why I think public school students need actual, committed advocates who value their schools. Public school students are not served by the dominant elite policy on public education and they are the vast majority of US students.
It’s ludicrous. We somehow ended up with a huge education policy apparatus that simply doesn’t serve 90% of students in the US, because those students attend public schools. Insanity, and it’s been the status quo for two decades now and under three Presidents.
It doesn’t matter who you vote for- what you get is Jeb Bush’s education policy. Over and over and over. Sometimes it’s dressed up with “liberal” rhetoric and sometimes it’s Betsy DeVos but it’s the same policy. They quibble over details like how to fund privatization or which testing scheme to adopt, but the basic approach is identical across the ed reform spectrum.
Since we have an entire elite policy choir cheerleading charters and vouchers, wouldn’t it just be FAIR to add some people in high places who work on behalf of students in public schools? Why are they excluded? Because their schools are no longer fashionable?
LikeLike
That money wasn’t lost. That money was gained by (1) people who will use it to pay (2) lobbyists their gainful employment to bribe (3) politicians their excess gainful employment to allocate more money to (1).
LikeLike
The continuation of the wealthy’s campaign to bankrupt Main Street-
courtesy of the Koch network and people like Bill and Melinda Gates,
the least accountable couple in the world.
LikeLike
The “open the schools!” political campaigning on the Right and in ed reform is interesting too. Most schools are open. They’re really struggling. It’s been HARD.
NONE of these people are actually going to address what’s really gone on in public schools that opened? Our public school OPENED and I think probably a quarter of our students have missed a third of the year or better. My son has been quarantined three times. Our school is half low income. “Open” isn’t magical, it doesn’t mean it all goes back to normal.
A suggestion- if you actually want to help public schools inquire into what this has been like in schools that opened. I know that’s not politically beneficial to ed reformers, who hope to abolish public schools so have seized on the pandemic to further that ideological goal, but it’s probably 40 million students.
Who serves them in government? What has anyone gotten done for them? I know the answer in Ohio- no one and nothing. We were busy putting our latest huge voucher funding law in. No one could be bothered.
LikeLike
Certainly not true in my city.
LikeLike
I follow ed reform lobbying in the Ohio legislature and when ed reformers lobby they lobby for 1. vouchers or 2. charter schools. This is accepted and celebrated in ed reform circles. Yay! Working for “the children”.
But for some reason the same kind of advocacy on behalf of public school students is not permitted or is portrayed as greedy status quo purveyors opposing ed reformers.
Why? If my statehouse is flooded with ed reformers lobbying on behalf of charter and private schools, and it is, why can’t public school students have an advocate?
When ed reform lobbyists talk to lawmakers they ask the lawmakers what they got done on behalf of charters and private schools (vouchers) that term. We are permitted to ask the same question about public schools. That’s allowed.
Ask lawmakers what they got done on behalf of students in PUBLIC schools. In many of these states the answer will be “nothing”. Why is that acceptable?
LikeLike
And if the answer on what they got done for public school students is “we came up with our 567th measurement scheme” tell them you expect more than that.
We know they can test. We know there is lockstep agreement that all public school students must be measured constantly. What else can they accomplish? Do our kids get anything at all out of this “movement”? Because I have yet to see a single ed reform effort “improve” my public school and I have been a public school parent for 30 years.
We’ve had some good new(er) stuff in the school over the years. NONE of it came from this “movement”.
Under Obama we got the Common Core tests. Under Trump we got nothing other than 5000 federal employees bashing our schools- great investment we made there, right? We paid them to bash our schools and students for 4 years.
Why should public school parents and supporters hire these people? Can anyone point to anything they’ve done to improve any public school, anywhere?
LikeLike
It’s similar to how Texas skimped and didn’t invest in their power infrastructure (to maximize profits) …..and now we are seeing the devastating effects. This lack of investment has it’s roots in the same place: short term financial gain for special interests and companies …… at the expense of hardworking tax payers.
All while being told a lie that it’s just being “fiscally conservative.”
LikeLike
Privatization leads to more options, but it also winds up costing more for little benefit. The public needs to wake up to the fact than more is not always better, and you cannot pay for quality public schools and parallel schools for the same dollar. All the schools will be worse quality. Public schools were designed to be efficient and operated by professionals in education. Privatization imposes inefficiencies and wastes tax dollars.
LikeLike
Here’s the ed reform brief on testing public school students this year:
https://www.crpe.org/publications/state-accountability-systems-covid-era-and-beyond
It’s the usual suspects, because God forbid we should allow anyone who isn’t already on board with ed reform dogma to speak, and they are not just demanding their usual battery of tests, they have ADDED many many more categories of data collection on our kids.
Have any of these people been inside a public school this year? They’re scrambling just to get the kids IN the school. I think half our high school students are probably clinically depressed at this point. The plan is to dump a whole new set of mandates on them?
How is this “help” or “support”?
LikeLike
And the sad thing is…. if teachers speak up to advocate for what’s best for students (and it’s not adding more data collection – which is already at a frightening level) they are told, “teachers just don’t want to do their job.”
It’s hard to collaborate and bring people to the table to understand what really needs to be done…. when one side is willfully ignorant of the deeper issues facing education. They don’t want to know or understand…. it’s easier to believe in and push false narratives.
LikeLike
Sorry….they are NOT willfully ignorant. They DO understand what they are doing. They are very deliberate in what they are doing and how they are drafting the message to the general masses. This is all about money and greed and Corporate America…the free hand of the market is G_d in this country and nothing else matters.
LikeLike
I agree that there are many bad actors who are only looking at profits and may not care about understanding how it impacts children in the long run.
But others really believe that the “free hand” of the market will produce the best results for schools – that competition brings out the best results and children will ultimately benefit. While we may know that this does not work with public and social services because social outcomes are not predictable and linear, it’s an easy narrative to believe. Therefore many are “willfully ignorant” because they aren’t digging deeper than the narrative fed to them and the lure of the short term “data.”. They aren’t getting into schools and reading a variety of research about what produces the healthiest, most informed citizens in the long run.
LikeLike
It is so counterproductive that some administrators put teachers in an adversarial position. Ideally, teachers and administrators should be working together for the benefit of the students they serve.
LikeLike
Every day, capital corporatism destroys another little piece of democracy and people just keep refusing to see it.
LikeLike
It is disheartening. And because they also control the narrative that is told over and over and in many subtle ways…. including on some tv shows and even movies that we watch (guns, violence, capitalistic values)…… it’s hard to see what is happening unless you are paying close attention.
LikeLike
Looks like Cruz just blew his chances of assuming The Orange Mantle in 2024.
Ya Cruz, ya Lose.
LikeLike
Don’t count him out yet! People in Texas will have a short memory come election time.
LikeLike
But the rest of the country? People will remember, I think. And his opponents will remind them when he starts campaigning for President in 2023.
LikeLike
Christie’s state beach vacation is the bellwether for voter memory.
LikeLike
Cruz has what it takes to get the Republican vote.
He’s an idiot and a liar.
A winning combination .
LikeLiked by 1 person
And he has a beer gut. That helps too.
LikeLike
Idiot and liar seems to work. Governor DeSatan has been practicing both. Lots of time in Trump Charm School. He’s got these down!
LikeLike
Andrew Cuomo also has the schtick down pat.
I bet he’d have an excellent chance as a Republican in 2024.
And lots of Democrats in NY would vote for him too, so he’d have a leg up (over the fire hydrant)
LikeLike
Cuomo actually had the audacity to write a book to brag about his crisis handling “performance”, which along with the second highest number of covid deaths and the second highest covid deaths per capita also includes low balling the nursing home deaths by 50%.
He and Cruz are like two rotten peas in a pod.
I wonder how those book sales are going after the latest revelation.
I’m sure the NY Times will still plug it since he’s their guy.
LikeLike
He should have titled it “The Audacity of Dope”
LikeLike
Cuomo is downright Trumpian in the way he deals with anyone who dares to criticize him.
In that regard he is much worse than Cruz.
https://www.politico.com/news/2021/02/19/andrew-cuomo-phone-bullying-screaming-470025
I understand why the arm twisting might get state Democratic reps to vote the way Cuomo wants, but why do Democratic New Yorkers keep voting for him over smarter , more reasonable people in the primaries?
LikeLike
Money. Cuomo. Wall Street money. He started his last campaign with $35 million. Cynthia Nixon raised $1 million.
LikeLike
Zephyr Teachout and Cynthia Nixon are just two examples.
LikeLike
Poet,
The irony- it is Manchin who opposes Biden’s appointee, billionaire-funded Neera Tanden.
LikeLike
You say Manchin, I say Mnuchin
Manchin, Munchkin
Let’s call the whole thing off!
LikeLike
Great word play!
LikeLike
I don’t think money is all of it.
If I h ad to guess, Id say the “Democratic” voters of NY don’t think a woman can handle the job.
They’d rather have a loudmouthed , lying bully.
LikeLike
Someone that they admire?
LikeLike
Bob
Did you hear?
DeSantis ordered the Limbaugh bar lowered after Rush’s death.
How low can he go?
LikeLike
AOC will be the coup de grace for Cruz in Texas. AOC is flying to Texas to deliver $2 million dollars in aid to the hungry, freezing people in Houston.
LikeLiked by 1 person
Coup de grace…to the Whitehouse and beyond!
LikeLike
SomeDAM, the beer gut is the key to success! (Ha, ha–that’s what I was thinking of when I saw Ted on the news.)
I’m guessing that, somehow, his Ivy League “smarts” drifted down south to his middle, & it’s not a real “beer gut” but a brain glut.
It’s the usual case of “What WAS he thinking?!” (Not just the leaving Texas in a time of crisis, but his insistence on stalling the election certification, support for the 1/6/21 insurrection & loyalty to an it that said Cruz’ father had killed Kennedy & that Cruz’ wife is ugly.)
LikeLike
Cruz Control
His Ivy league degree
Has settled in his middle
The gut is plain to see
And really not a riddle
His brains are in his rectum
And headed out the back
Though doctor might inspect ’em
The train is on the track
LikeLike
Chugga chugga chu chu! 🚂
LikeLike
Oh, noooo–laughing so hard I’m choking!!!
(& this could be a song to the tune of “Officer Krupke!”)
LikeLike
I can’t make sense of the linked report on NJ’s school funding formula. The color-coding seems to indicate higher-income people aren’t pulling their weight. But from personal experience I know that can’t be right. Our wealthy district sends most of its school $ to the state, spends less than NJ median per-pupil, with very little state support– and we’ve kept REtax increases at or well under the 2% cap established in 2008.
That’s probably just my math-handicapped brain’s inability to interpret graphs. I found a much better [prose 😉 ] explanation in a September Politico article interviewing Bruce Baker here: https://www.politico.com/states/new-jersey/story/2020/09/30/why-new-jerseys-progressive-school-funding-formula-still-isnt-working-for-some-children-1318599#:~:text=Gov.,in%20spending%20for%20all%20children.
The takeaway is that black kids are funded equitably vs white kids, but hispanic kids are underfunded– mostly because they weren’t here in large numbers to benefit from all the Abbott school funding changes since the ’70’s. Meanwhile there are lots more hispanic kids now. The funding formula changes enacted in 2008 should be correcting the situation, but haven’t fully (& fall far short in certain districts) because the state has not been fully funding the formula. Murphy has been able to avoid school cuts for the coming year, keeping funding flat despite pandemic loss of revenue, but that will effectively exacerbate/ extend that underfunding.
LikeLike
Since I was just able to stop laughing…
Linda–as to your Manchin comment up there, @ 9:45 AM: Yes, some of us were really surprised (pleasantly so). Now Bernie & some of the other Progressive Senate Dems. also need to vote against her: it will be a disaster should the appointment be confirmed. She has openly demonized Bernie before (&, in her apology, was unapologetic about that), & she will surely crush any & all ideas proposed by the OBM Committee he chairs.
Please contact your Senators & tell them to vote NO on confirming Neera Tanden.
Biden should know better…
LikeLike
Neera Tanden’s Chances
Neeras I can tell
She’s bidin’ very well
Though Munchkin likes her not
The Wicked Witch is hot
LikeLike
Good idea, Retired-
I’ll contact my senator but he is in the charter school camp of the billionaires. He’s the pseudo progressive and Rob Portman sidekick, Sherrod Brown.
LikeLike
Linda,
I thought Sherrod Brown was the working class hero. No?
LikeLike