Veteran educator Nancy Bailey has some very clear ideas about the next Secretary of Education. All her proposals are premised on Trump’s defeat, since billionaire Betsy DeVos would want to hang on and finish the job of destroying public schools and enriching religious and private schools.
Let’s hope that the next Secretary of Education has the wisdom and vision to liberate children and teachers from the iron grip of No Child Left Behind, Race to the Top, Every Student Succeeds Act, High-stakes testing, privatization, and a generation of failed federal policies.
Bailey begins:
During this critical time in American history, that individual should be a black or brown woman, who has been a teacher of young children, and who understands child development. She should hold an education degree and have an additional leadership degree and experience that will help her run the U.S. Department of Education.
Children deserve to see more teachers who look like they do, who will inspire them to go on and become teachers themselves. A black female education secretary will bring more diverse individuals to the field and set an example. This will benefit all students.
Many individuals, including accomplished black men, have brilliant minds, and understand what we need in the way of democratic public education. Leadership roles should await them in the U.S. Department of Education, in schools, universities, or states and local education departments.
But with the fight for Black Lives to Matter and for an end to gender inequality, a knowledgeable black woman with a large heart to embrace these times should take this spot. The majority of teachers have always been women, and while men are critical to being role models for children and teens, it is time for a black woman to lead.
We have had eleven education secretaries, and only three of them have been women, including Shirley Hufstedler, Margaret Spellings, and Betsy DeVos. None of these women were educators or had experience in the classroom. Only two African American men have been in this role, and neither of them could be considered authentic teachers and educators. Both had the goal to undermine public schools.
The time is now for a black female education secretary who will set a positive example and be the face of the future for children from all gender and cultural backgrounds.
What a stupid question (yes, there are stupid questions). Obviously Diane Ravitch. And if she doesn’t want it, Carol Burris. Next question!
Amen
Indeed. And besides, content of character, not color of skin.
Agreed!
I suspect that we have had HORRIBLE Secretaries of Education because their objectives were to KEEP TEACHERS “down” and “not questioning” the BAD things put in place to control public school teachers and give them the script to recite and written by those far away from the classroom who have no clue.
Even Duncan’s “Talking to Teachers” Tour by the Dept. of Education was a SHAM. It was just a “front.”
Nancy Bailey is right.
Is that what the sound coming out of Duncan’s mouth was?
Talk?
He sure had me fooled.
I thought he communicated with his jump shot.
Powell Jobs would just be a continuation of the line of Secretaries Of Education who were selected for reasons having nothing to do with knowledge, competence or education.
Arne was selected because he plays basketball and Betsy was selected because she plays Amway.
And Powell Jobs plays tech mogul.
Appointing Powell Jobs would be a horrible decision for Biden. Any anti-union, pro-privatization deformer chosen to lead the DOE would undermine the credibility of the administration with legitimate public school educators. I would hope that Biden has more sense than this.
Does anyone think that perhaps having a national Dept of Ed is part of the problem?
“Laurene Powell Jobs recently came under criticism by President Trump for giving the Biden campaign $500K. It’s not against the law, but one report mentioned Jobs as a possible replacement for Betsy DeVos in a Biden administration. She has sought to transform public education, to privatize it.”
Oh, please, no. Can we please just STOP the abject worship of rich people? It’s embarrassing. Stop bowing and scraping in front of them. Stop handing public policy over to them. Have some self respect.
DeVos is extremely wealthy and Trump inherited real estate. It’s really not a measure of value or quality in people. This fawning all over the wealthiest people in the country by politicians is just stomach turning. Jobs hired a bunch of ed reform echo chamber members and launched a marketing campaign to “reinvent schools”. That’s all she did. She purchased some experts and ran a sales campaign. What about her would make her qualified to be handed this position, other than the 33 billion dollars she has?
a perfect line: CAN WE PLEASE just stop the abject worship of rich people
And, also, Arne Duncan has a plum job in Jobs’ Emerson Collective.
(Again, that name makes me think of some jewelry company shilling its wares on the Home Shopping Network!)
Same old same old…& horrendous. I’m sure Paul Vallas will poke his name into this somewhere. Perhaps Arne will recommend him for the job!
In all seriousness, I would like to nominate Mercedes Schneider for the position. Longtime teacher? Check. Education commensurate for position? Check. Prolific & truthful education writer? Check.
Having real knowledge of & education background? Check.
Against “standardized” testing, & wasting public education $$$? Check.
Staunch defender of public educator & outspoken? Check & check.
was my comment from yesterday not accepted? should i resubmit?
WordPress often randomly places comments in moderation. The moderator has to release them. This sometimes takes a while.
WordPress also often randomly places comments.
Is, not necessarily after the comment you were responding to.
They should have called it HardPressed
WordPress keeps changing the formatting. I like the original format. Every “upgrade” is a step into confusion for me. A downgrade.
Those Happiness Engineers are just trying to keep you happy.
Prolly smoking pot too, if WordPress is any indication.
No, SDP, I rage and fume and the Happiness Engineers at WordPress do nothing to pacify me. Everything is out of their hands. They can do nothing.
I just want someone who intends to work on behalf of public school students. We’ve had twenty years of warriors against public schools at the federal level. I don’t think the results of that are good for public school students and families.
We already have a whole paid contingent of public school critics in ed reform and higher ed and the various ed reform lobbying groups. Public schools don’t lack critics. They lack practical assistance and people in government who value them.
I just don’t think it’s a coincidence that ed reformers have been fighting against public schools for 20 years and federal support of public schools and effort expended on public schools has declined for 20 years. They can’t improve the schools they oppose, and they haven’t.
Would the federal response to the pandemic re: public schools have been better (or, EXISTED) if the federal leader on education supported public schools and public school students? If we hadn’t have hired YET ANOTHER member of the ed reform echo chamber, in DeVos?
Does it matter that we keep hiring people who don’t support public schools to set public school policy? Of course it does. It harms our schools and students. No one advocates on their behalf. No one works FOR them.
RttT wasn’t FOR public school students. It was used as a political lever to expand charters and rank teachers. Public school students weren’t even considered. Did it benefit a single one of them?
My kids attended public schools thru both NCLB and RttT and this isn’t a wealthy district. I can’t point to one improvement in their schools that is due to the work of ed reformers.
I recommend Dr. Wendy Robinson, recently retired superintendent of Fort Wayne Community Schools in Indiana and a finalist for AASA National Superintendent of the year three years ago. Wendy will probably laugh at me for mentioning her, but she checks all of the boxes you mention.
“It is not helpful to demand that schools simply reopen. Instead, public officials at all levels . . . need to provide schools with the resources, tools and ideas necessary to address the legitimate health concerns of teachers and parents.”
“Public officials” are never going to allocate support to public schools as long as public education policy is led by a group of people who don’t support public schools and work every day to replace them.
Ed reformers are lousy advocates for students in public schools for the simply reason that our children are IN the schools they work to replace with the privatized systems they prefer. IN them. Therefore, working against public schools harms public school students.
None of them would question this if I applied it to charter schools- “working against charter schools harms charter school students”- every single ed reformer would accept that as true. Yet for some reason they cannot apply this truth to public schools. They ask me to believe nonsense- that they are working against public schools for the good of students who attend them. That’s nonsense and they would never apply it to charters. So why does it get applied to our schools?
Stop hiring people who work against your schools. It’s not complicated.
“A federal judge has voided a controversial rule created by Education Secretary Betsy DeVos that would have effectively directed more coronavirus relief dollars to private schools. The ruling applies nationwide.”
Ed reformers in DC have spent more time using the pandemic as a political back door to universal vouchers than they have offering or supplying ANY practical assistance to the public schools that serve 90% of students and families.
You cannot PAY these people to serve public school students. You know because you are paying them and have been paying them for 20 years. How is it working out for public school students?
Every public school in the country closed and where were the ‘public education” warriors of ed reform? Securing funding for private schools. AWOL other than that.
The new Secretary of Education must be able to step back and take a good look at the outdated system of education. They must understand that ” best practices ” are about what has been done in the pat while Innovation is a pathway to the future.
There will be a Herculean effort to drag back to the ways of the past. The current system was never designed to serve all kids.
It is time for educators to put their collective grads together and create a system for all. For this to happen there must be sufficient planning time as well as small class size.
It’s time to subvert the system for the good of children.
Well, in keeping with the trend, what about Dr. Evil?
And there are a couple jackals in a zoo in Maryland whom he could appoint to the Supreme Court. They would have the same moral code as Trump does.
Dr. Dolittle would be a vast improvement over the last two who were like busy bees undermining every aspect of public education.
How about Linda Darling-Hammond !
Sent from my iPhone
>
NO.
Her work at Stanford is responsible for the execrable edTPA.
Agree. That edTPA test is driving teacher education. No test should do that. PERIOD.
Linda Darling-Hammond is an academic with little classroom experience in the 1970s. Not a hands-on teacher–rather a lecturer, consultant and think tanker. Specializes in teacher preparation and certification.
She has an agent and her speeches/appearances will cost you from 5K to 10K.
A very loud NO!! Like Diane, she did a 180 degree turn.
Unlike Diane, it was in the wrong direction.
Chicago has had “many” Black Superintendents and CEOs. They all listened to the mayor. ☹️
Eddie, that’s because the Mayor appoints the school board and the superintendent. Chicago should have an elected board.
Diane, I agree and yes I know that.🙂😐
In 1983, Congressperson Harold Washington promised an elected school board, while campaigning for mayor. Sadly, it never happened during the Mayor Washington era (1983-1987), even when he gained control of City Council.
Eddie, the people of Chicago want an elected board. I am hopeful they will get it.
Boston, too.
Not good news. From Politico.
MEET JOE BIDEN’S EDUCATION POLICY ‘GHOST’: Carmel Martin’s employment history reads like the resume of a top White House adviser. And come January, that might be exactly what she is. A former staffer for Sen. Ted Kennedy, assistant education secretary under President Barack Obama and vice president for policy at the Center for American Progress, she is now a senior adviser to the Biden campaign. Education observers on the left and right agree she is likely to fill a top position if Joe Biden wins in November. But in the years since Martin served in the last Democratic administration, many in the party have distanced themselves from the education reform ethos typified by initiatives like No Child Left Behind, Race to the Top and Common Core — all of which Martin played a role in shaping, implementing or defending. Many former colleagues believe Martin’s under-the-radar pragmatism could help bridge intraparty divides on policy. According to CAP president and progressive policy maven Neera Tanden, “Carmel is very much evidence-based. She’s not like, ‘I worked on something 20 years ago, so that’s got to be the law today.’ I feel like she knows these issues really well, and that’s really guided her.” Kevin Mahnken reports.
“in the years since [Carmel] Martin served in the last Democratic administration, many in the party have distanced themselves from the education reform ethos typified by initiatives like No Child Left Behind, Race to the Top and Common Core — all of which Martin played a role in shaping, implementing or defending.”
Followed by
“Carmel is very much evidence-based.”
How’s that for cognitive dissonance?
Where do they find the nitwits who write such rubbish?
Trust CAP to preserve the NCLB-RTTT legacy.
If not Diane then Linda Darling Hammond.
NO!!! See several comments above!
A look at Betsy’s profits:
“$56M in 2019 income
“DeVos last year reported at least $56 million in income, according to a Detroit News analysis of her financial disclosures, which also report more than $400 million in assets.
“Her 2018 reported income total was at least $56 million, and for 2017, it was at least $57 million.
“The true totals are likely higher because the federal disclosure forms report values in broad ranges and, for several entries, DeVos reported income of “over $5,000,000.”
“DeVos also doesn’t have to report specific amounts for certain assets held by her husband, Republican former gubernatorial candidate Dick DeVos, heir to the Amway fortune.
“Betsy DeVos’ income in 2019 included over $10 million from the ethnic and gourmet food distributor KeHE and more than $5 million from a private equity fund with the firm AEA Investors.
“She also reported indirect income of $100,000 to $1 million in interest from a loan of more than $5 million to Neurocore, which has drawn scrutiny for promoting unproven methods to treat conditions like ADHD and depression.”
https://sarrauteducacion.com/2020/09/07/usa-how-betsy-devos-makes-millions-of-dollars-as-education-secretary/
I would strictly talk about what matters for public education. If you mention anything else, they would say something like
I appointed A. B., a black woman, and now you complain that she supports vouchers and charters. Be happy that part of what you wanted is fulfilled.
Think about King. Was his appointment helpful in any way to public education?
John King has lots of deep experience in the “no excuses”-harsh discipline charter world.
His appointment just enforced the “we want diversity as long as it serves our agenda”
I’d say, such appointments are even harmful since it sends a very bad message: if you want to get into leadership position, you need to assimilate and forget about the interest of your minority group.
And remember Chicago’s “Triple B” (endearingly named by R.E.)–Barbara Byrd Bennett? Jail time!
My last comment was supposed to be under Mate’s 9:23 AM comment.