The Orange County School of the Arts is one of the most popular, most sought after, and most elite charter schools in the nation. Now it is locked in a battle with the local board of Educatuon about its admission policies.
Its students are whiter and more affluent than the surrounding community.
The Santa Ana Unified School District had made demands for change.
Last fall, OCSA applied to renew its charter with SAUSD, something state rules require must be done every five years. The district staff responded with a scathing 37-page report that found:
The schools “admission/enrollment policies and practices have encouraged applications from high achieving and well-resourced students and discouraged applications from those in the under-represented protected classifications.”
The numbers of “Hispanic/Latino, English Learners” and low-income students were so small at OCSA, it was impossible to meaningfully compare achievement to other district schools.
In sharp contrast to other middle and high schools in Santa Ana, OCSA reported no students who were homeless.
Mandatory meetings where school representatives set expectations that parents make donations of more than $4,000 a year to cover the costs of teaching the arts.
Since that report came out, KPCC/LAist got access to details Santa Ana Unified investigators did not uncover, including the current “Parent Funding Agreement” distributed at mandatory meetings.
While district officials openly say that OCSA is a high-quality school, they also say its policies exclude local, mostly Latino students while welcoming a wealthier, whiter student body that isn’t reflective of Santa Ana.
For example, while apparently struggling to find qualified local disadvantaged students, OCSA has admitted students from other counties, states and occasionally even other countries…. The board decided not to go as far as denial — instead, board members went with another recommended course: Vote to renew OCSA’s charter on the condition that the school work with the district to correct the alleged violations.
OCSA reacted swiftly, and fiercely. The school’s founder said the pushback from the district is payback over a lawsuit OCSA filed against the district last year over special education funding (that’s a whole other act in this drama — we’ll get to that). He also said there was nothing for OCSA to correct.
So the school stopped trying to work it out with the district, and started looking for another oversight agency.
Now, the issue is in the hands of the Orange County Board of Education, the body charged with taking up appeals of charters denied by their local authorizers. They don’t have long to make a decision — OCSA’s current charter expires on June 30.

I have looked at the Wikipedia entry for this school. It has its own foundation (about $30 million, 990 form, 2017-2018). It is a selective admission 7-12 school with an academic program but that seems to be overwhelmed by pre-professional training for all of the arts programs it offers.
That pre-professional mission seems to be flourishing, in part, because it occupies a large building and can offer a huge number of arts programs–with a definition of the arts that includes culinary arts.
In my opinion, this should be a private school. It should give up any pretense of being for everyone. It should call on the arts donors in the region and those supporting the foundation to gin up money for scholarships. It should charge tuition in addition to that current $4000 fee. If public money is tapped, that should take the form of grants solicited from the California Arts Council and/or from the National Endowment for the Arts, especially if many of the arts faculty identify with the role of “teaching artist.”
The academics in the school should serve the pre-professional programs. In effect, the school should seek a higher profile as exclusively talent-oriented and actively recruit students from anywhere in the US and internationally.
This opinion reflects my knowledge of more than one selective admission arts schools, and especially in Cincinnati, where our public school for the arts has a crazy governance scheme with an “artistic director” in addition to a principal, audition requirements (demanded by some parents and some the local arts community), and a chronic problem in trying be “a neighborhood” school for all. In this school, the performing arts also overwhelm all others, are highly competitive, and “thrive” by sending kids to Broadway, Juilliard, and if not there, then doing performances for local and regional audiences. Those gigs are rationalized as good for practice. These gigs also produce some income for the school.
LikeLike
Laura,
Exactly. Agreed.
LikeLike
Yep, let those selective private schools compete in the marketplace of private schools without “gubmint” aid.
LikeLike
YUP!! Change your classification to a Private School and you can do whatever you want. Stop taking public money if you are not going to serve ALL OF THE PUBLIC. They are taking public school funding right now since they are still under the Charter School classification without opening their academic rigor to all of the public’s population.
LikeLike
A bit of time has passed since these posts. SAUSD lost OCSA, rightfully so in my opinion, and OCSA just graduated another class at Honda Center.
UCLA is the number one public university in the US, It gets public money, and it is highly, highly selective. It would not be #1 if it weren’t.
UCLA, and places like OCSA, serve “all of the public” in the sense that if you are good enough, anyone can get in. That is, and rightfully so in my opinion, their only obligation.
LikeLike
I want to point out that Orange County, California, for decades was “the” fortress of John Birch conservatives.
“In terms of conservatives’ impact on the nation, Orange County really was the land of tomorrow in the ‘60s, on the cutting edge of conservative activity.” …
“For example, in 1962 there were about 800 members of the ultra-right-wing John Birch Society in the county, McGirr said, a group so conservative that it believed that President Eisenhower was part of a Communist conspiracy. Three years later, the number increased sixfold.”
https://www.latimes.com/archives/la-xpm-1998-apr-27-mn-43520-story.html
LikeLike
“. . . A group so REACTIONARY REGRESSIVE that it believed. . . “
LikeLiked by 1 person
there it is
LikeLike