Arthur Camins warns us against the prophets of doom and gloom, the pundits who say that we can’t hope for anything better, who try to persuade us not to fight for a better future.
He begins:
Beware the apostles of dystopia. They come to destroy your hope. There are two sects. One preaches survival-of-the-fittest disdain for any social responsibility. The other preaches defeatism and accommodation in the face of wealth and power. They are all hope, destroyers.
The necessity of hope struck me hard on Saturday, January 25. In the morning, I read two provocative op-eds in the NY Times.
Trump-disdaining conservative columnist, Bret Stevens, cautions, “Anyone but Trump? Not So Fast. Let’s not exchange one reckless president for another.” Essentially he argues that Trump, while personally reprehensible, hasn’t changed life for most Americans. He goes on to plant fear of radical progressives: Too much hope for a more equitable future is dangerously destabilizing.
Historian David Motadel warns us about, “The Myth of Middle-Class Liberalism. The bourgeois are supposed to ensure open, democratic societies. In fact, they rarely have.” Historically, he argues, “the middle classes have frequently sided with illiberal forms of government when they feared for their privileges and social stability.”
In the evening, my wife and I watched the movie Just Mercy. It dramatizes the relentless efforts of Bryan Stevenson, founder of the Equal Justice Initiative, to exonerate death row victims of racial injustice and fear. Freed from jail after many years wrongful imprisonment, Walter McMillan tells Stevenson, “We’ve all been through a lot, Bryan, all of us. I know that some have been through more than others. But if we don’t expect more from each other, hope better for one another, and recover from the hurt we experience, we are surely doomed.”
Between now and the 2020 presidential primary and general election, apologists for and defenders of our inequitable, livable climate-destroying status quo will try to scare hope out of middle-class voters into selecting anyone but the dangerous progressives in the race, Bernie Sanders and Elizabeth Warren. Every fear-based, divisive scare tactic will be employed. In fact, they are our best hope. Some will allude to, but not explicitly advocate, exclusionary authoritarianism as the only viable path for America. Others will plead with voters to take the safe “moderate” path.
Progressives need to heed Motadel’s and McMillan’s warning. Anyone who gets the dire threat of Trumpism needs to heed the warning. Anyone with a mind to sit out the election or vote for third party candidate needs to heed the warning. Things always can and often do get worse long before they get better. When it does, innocent people suffer and die. However, the solution is not to bend to the illusion of a safe moderate. It is to vote for hope.
Thank you, Arthur Camis. Excellent advice.
Arthur CAMINS. I need to proof before I hit send. Sorry, Arthur.
Proof? Do you mean typos? If you find any, please let me know and I will see if I can edit online.
And it doesn’t help when HRC and Bloomberg start spewing lies and innuendoes about Bernie Sanders. It doesn’t help when Democrats are attacking their own so that they can keep on with their own status quo…as many have a lot to loose in the $ department if Bernie gets elected and enacts a Wealth Tax. I hope people will wake up and smell the fetid rot that politics has become. I hope people realize that “the government machine” (both parties) hasn’t been working for the best interest of We the People. It’s time for real Hope and Change and not Rah Rah campaign slogans.
As late as November Obama considered running an anti-Bernie campaign which, fortunately, he has not actively done. This is not a time for divisive politics. We need to let democracy decides who gets the nomination. Then, we must unite behind the candidate to defeat Trump.
I think Bernie Sanders handles these attacks very well. He cracks a stupid joke about them or doesn’t acknowledge them at all. He doesn’t fire back with name calling or mud slinging. He doesn’t go on the offensive. He is the “bigger person”. I wonder why they don’t attack Warren in the same manner, as her political positions closely resemble Bernie’s? It’s become politics before people (both sides) and it needs to change.
Bernie Sanders is the bigger threat to establishment power, hence an article in today’s NY Times stating Biden has more support than Sanders despite every poll showing that Sanders beats Trump by a wider margin than Biden or anyone else. Time will tell.
The Trump campaign machine is stockpiling negative video clips about all the potential candidates. They have not yet unleashed their smear-and-ridicule attacks. They will.
I agree. Bernie tries to be civil and rises above partisanship.
LisaM,
“It doesn’t help when Democrats are attacking their own…”
I absolutely agree.
We certainly saw lots of lies being spewed and and dishonest innuendoes by “Democrats” against the Democrat who won the 2016 primary.
I hope your comment means that you acknowledge how much spewing lies and dishonest innuendoes by supporters of a different primary candidate harms a candidate.
I will be voting for a progressive candidate and expect that candidate will win the primary. I condemn anyone who spews lies and innuendoes about that candidate – it is clear that only someone who deep down supports Trump and his neo-fascist vision of America would do so. And if the primary winner happens to be a moderate or conservative who wasn’t my first choice, I STILL condemn anyone who attacks that candidate – it would be clear that only someone who deep down supports Trump and his neo-fascist vision of America would do so.
I condemn HRC for stating something that is patently untrue about Bernie: “nobody likes him”. But I suspect HRC wishes that the attacks on her in 2016 were limited to “nobody likes her” rather than false attacks about her honesty, integrity and extremely corrupt nature. Those are the kinds of attacks Bernie, Warren, or whoever wins the primary will be subject to (which is why Trump so desperately needed a PUBLIC smearing of Biden’s character by Ukraine and was willing to break the law to get it).
Those false attacks that Trump will be using against whoever wins the primary will only have resonance if the disaffected supporters of losing candidates start repeating it. “Even Democrats know that (insert name if winning primary candidate here) is very dangerous and lying and dishonest and crooked and corrupt and no better than Trump” has always been the Republican blueprint for winning elections. And Trump, like Nixon, is willing to go the extra mile and break any law to help push that false narrative. One wonders how soon “investigations” will be started on Warren or Bernie by William Barr if one of them is the candidate. Remember, the only thing needed is a public announcement of the start of an investigation that upright and honest William Barr is obligated to do because there were just so many questions raised about XXXX and how corrupt XXXX has always been.
Can you imagine if instead of calling out the lying propaganda that Trump and company direct toward a progressive Democratic nominee, Biden supporters who were angry that Biden wasn’t the nominee kept repeating “we always told you how corrupt and dishonest those progressive candidates were but you insisted on nominating them anyway and they won’t beat Trump because everyone know how corrupt and crooked and dishonest they are”?? Those Biden supporters would be helping Trump defeat the progressive candidate.
Good advice from Arthur Camins. I hope the progressive ideological purists will not vote 3rd party or not vote at all if Bernie or Warren do not win in the primary. My first choice is Bernie but he may not win and we may be stuck with a moderate like Biden. I will vote for Biden in that case, he’s better than Trump and will not appoint right wingers to the SCOTUS. Remember how “certain people” told us that we should not vote for Hillary in the general election and we should vote for Jill Stein instead. Enough said. Bernie gets my vote but I know that a lot of people will not vote for him because of his age and appearance.
Bret Stephens is and always has been a right wing hack. He could have written the same column about Hitler in 1930s Germany — after all, if you were an Aryan German, your life didn’t change very much under Hitler, until it did. Stephens likely would have been one of the people who warned that the country should not exchange Hitler for someone who actually respects democracy if the person who respects democracy was “too radical”.
Stephens wrote a column that basically implied “There is no need to speak out, they are only coming for the Socialists. And there is no need to speak out, they are only coming for the trade unionists. And there is no need to speak out, they are only coming for the Muslims”. And of course, when they come for columnists like Bret Stephens because he once wrote columns for the wrong “treasonous” newspaper and round up Stephens and his entire family, there will be no one left to speak for him.
Bret Stephens is too ignorant (is that what happens when you are promoted to positions based on your connections and not your accomplishments?) to recognize what it is he is saying.
But I do think that there are those on the far left who have that same POV. And they insist that anyone who isn’t their preferred candidate but also respects the Constitution and democracy is no better than Trump.
The Democrats need to shut down and discredit every voice that says voters must vote for XXX candidate if they want to defeat Trump. The person with the best chance to defeat Trump is the primary candidate who gets the most votes by people who are voting for the candidate whose policies they like the most. I’m sick of people who say that only Biden can defeat Trump because he’s moderate, but I’m also sick of people who say that only Bernie can defeat Trump. All the candidates can defeat Trump if we don’t allow their characters to be trashed so that the public believes that nothing that they stand for is real and they are more corrupt than Trump.
If Bernie wins the primary because he has the support of Americans who like his ideas and vision for America, then everyone who is not a fascist and cares about this country should be voting for him in the general election and refraining from repeating right wing talking points about how Bernie is no better than Trump (like we just saw from Stephens).
If Biden wins the primary because he won the support of lots of union members who aren’t ready to give up their union health insurance for “Medicare for All” or because lots of older African-American voters know of his long history and support him (and don’t judge him by whatever false narrative is designed to “prove” Biden has always been a racist), then everyone who is not a fascist and cares about this country should be voting for him in the general election and refraining from repeating right wing talking points that insist Biden is no better than Trump.
But vote on platforms and principles and not because someone who enables fascism is shouting very loudly that XXX candidate can’t defeat Trump because that candidate is so (insert smear of candidate’s character the right wing wants here – i.e. “untrustworthy”, “crooked”, “liar”, “Terrorist-supporting”) that even Trump is better.
I agree with this article. That is what Obama ran on, “Hope & Change”. By doing a “180” once Obama entered office, the Democrats lost more than 1000 elective seats. Never mind what he did to public education!
Correct! The Democratic Party left the people and decided to hold hands and protect Big Business. I feel betrayed by the party, but yet I’m held hostage because I can’t vote in the primary as a registered Independent.
Obama did not do a “180”. That comment is just as untrue as anything that Bret Stephens writes about Bernie Sanders.
If anything, Obama’s White House was 180 degrees different than the Bush/Cheney White House, which was part of the “Hope and Change” that voters wanted and the reason he was re-elected.
It is absolutely true that Obama’s philosophy was not to antagonize the right but to seek compromise and his embrace of that philosophy was absolutely the wrong way to approach a Republican party that was embracing full on fascism and racism.
And it is absolutely true that Obama was dead wrong about education reform and as a President who himself went to private schools and put his kids in one, he had no real curiosity or interest in learning about the real issues (HRC was Obama’s exact opposite in that approach).
There seems to be some belief that Obama ran as a progressive but my recollection is that he won the 2008 primary by running to the right of HRC on many economic issues. That idea of Obama being “progressive” seemed to come from the fact that HRC voted for the Iraq War and Obama didn’t support it — sort of the opposite of those who believed that LBJ’s support of Viet Nam made him a right winger. On economic issues, LBJ did some very progressive things, even if his foreign policy was bad (and even then, I believe LBJ was not making foreign policy decisions to enrich the defense industry but because he wrongly thought what he was doing was better than doing something else.)
But as someone who voted in the 2008 election, I don’t remember thinking that Obama was a strong progressive. I do remember thinking he was much more progressive than Bush/Cheney.
Okay here is one example. Obama on bank executives taking multi-million dollar bonuses while being bailed out with publc dollars: Obama stated in their defense that the “sanctity of contract” must be maintained. First there is no contract for a bonus per se. A bonus is something extra, a reward, for a job well done and not for nearly destroying the world economy. Contrast that to what Obama publicly stated about teacher contracts in R.I. when teachers went on strike (or threatened to strike but not sure) because the management decided to increase their workday hours without compensation: “their contracts should be abrogated”! So much for the sanctity of contracts.
Obama was the Democrat who chose to bypass the public funding precedent set by previous Democratic presidents and bankers were Obama’s biggest campaign contributors in 2008. Gee I wonder if that affected his decisions that left bankers off the hook while many homeowners were left out in the cold.
The most duplicitous president in my life time of 75 years. So angry for allowing myself to be duped and vote for him in 2008.
I believe Obama is at least partially responsible for the election of Trump in addition to the terrible campaign by HRC.
Michael,
I agree with all your criticism of Obama. I just never considered Obama much of a progressive – just more so than Bush/Cheney and John McCain/Sarah Palin who he was running against. And as bad as all those things were, Obama also did some good things. I used to be really angry that Obama made so many compromises with Obamacare, but I can see now that Medicare for All or any real universal health care was not going to happen without it. You have a few years on me, so like me you probably remember back when the Democrats were much more progressive in the 1970s and Ted Kennedy was talking about universal healthcare, it seemed like a no-brainer, but it never happened (maybe that’s Jimmy Carter’s fault?) And then with the election of Bill Clinton and Harris Wofford it looked like we’d have universal health insurance for sure, and it didn’t happen. I thought Obamacare was a terrible compromise, but it did help the public start to accept the notion of universal healthcare and hopefully open the door to Bernie or Warren being able to enact it without a repeat of what we saw in 2010 where the Republicans got a lot of power by scaring voters into voting for Republicans because Obamacare was so demonized.
I know that even President Bernie Sanders isn’t going to get every piece of progressive legislation he wants without some compromising — even LBJ had to compromise and he was a master at twisting arms in Congress. Obama compromised before even starting (which was a bad thing and made me angry). Bernie won’t do that — hooray! But I hope that Bernie supporters understand that when he has to make some compromises in order to get very good things done – much as LBJ did – that’s part of politics and not “corruption” or “selling out”.
The working class has already accommodated the corporations and billionaires too much. Decades of neoliberalism have resulted in the decline of the middle class and stagnant wages. In order to restore some balance to the economy, a progressive leader is what working families need and deserve. Many working Americans are already dying from our for profit health care system. Working people can ill afford to carry tax cuts and loopholes for the 1% and corporations.
Americans should be aware that the Republicans are already looking to revise “entitlements,” which working people generally consider earned benefits as a result of paying our taxes. Social Security, Medicare as well as Medicaid are in the crosshairs of Republicans even though we tax payers and paid over $115 million dollars so #45 can go golfing, and our federal deficit continues to explode mostly due to the under taxation of corporations and the wealthy and fiscal mismanagement.
cx: we tax payers have paid over $115 million dollars…
On Holocaust Memorial Day, a sickening victory for racism in the Trump-packed Supreme Court: https://www.salon.com/2020/01/28/saved-by-the-supreme-court-conservative-justices-boost-stephen-millers-anti-immigration-agenda/
All of these 5-4 victories because too many voters thought “there was no difference” between Trump and HRC.
Note to Trump (POS), Miller (POS), and Roberts (POS):
The base of the Statue of Liberty now reads,
“Give me your tired, your poor,
Your huddled masses yearning to breathe free,
The wretched refuse of your teeming shore.”
Maybe you should change that to,
“We’ve got ours, so ***k you.”
“Hope and Chains”
Regimes change
But core remains
To rearrange
The Hope and Chains
AOC: “The first time I heard about Bernie Sanders was when I was a waitress at a diner in downtown Manhattan.
I had been working 12 hour days. I didn’t have health insurance. I was being paid less than a living wage. And I didn’t think that I deserved any of those things.
I thought that was just how life was.”
Because of the Resistance, and Bernie, we know that’s not just how life is. We don’t have to accept the neoliber-tarian status quo. We don’t have to ice our desire for truth, justice, and equality. We can Bern down the system and demand what we rightfully deserve.