I have engaged in a heated exchange off line with people who are upset about taxing billionaires. They feel sure that taxing the 1% or the .00025% is a slippery slope, and soon enough we will all pay taxes so high that we will have to give up our homes.
This is a good time, I think, to revisit Franklin Delano Roosevelt’s 1944 State of the Union Address. FDR came from the landed gentry but he somehow developed an acute social conscience.
Here is an excerpt from that speech, in which he described the “second Bill of Rights,” what he called “an economic bill of rights.”
He said, as he looked forward to the day when the World War came to an end:
It is our duty now to begin to lay the plans and determine the strategy for the winning of a lasting peace and the establishment of an American standard of living higher than ever before known. We cannot be content, no matter how high that general standard of living may be, if some fraction of our people—whether it be one-third or one-fifth or one-tenth- is ill-fed, ill-clothed, ill housed, and insecure.
This Republic had its beginning, and grew to its present strength, under the protection of certain inalienable political rights—among them the right of free speech, free press, free worship, trial by jury, freedom from unreasonable searches and seizures. They were our rights to life and liberty.
As our Nation has grown in size and stature, however—as our industrial economy expanded—these political rights proved inadequate to assure us equality in the pursuit of happiness.
We have come to a clear realization of the fact that true individual freedom cannot exist without economic security and independence. “Necessitous men are not free men.” People who are hungry and out of a job are the stuff of which dictatorships are made.
In our day these economic truths have become accepted as self-evident. We have accepted, so to speak, a second Bill of Rights under which a new basis of security and prosperity can be established for all regardless of station, race, or creed.
Among these are:
- The right to a useful and remunerative job in the industries or shops or farms or mines of the Nation;
- The right to earn enough to provide adequate food and clothing and recreation;
- The right of every farmer to raise and sell his products at a return which will give him and his family a decent living;
- The right of every businessman, large and small, to trade in an atmosphere of freedom from unfair competition and domination by monopolies at home or abroad;
- The right of every family to a decent home;
- The right to adequate medical care and the opportunity to achieve and enjoy good health;
- The right to adequate protection from the economic fears of old age, sickness, accident, and unemployment;
- The right to a good education.
All of these rights spell security. And after this war is won we must be prepared to move forward, in the implementation of these rights, to new goals of human happiness and well-being.
America’s own rightful place in the world depends in large part upon how fully these and similar rights have been carried into practice for our citizens. For unless there is security here at home there cannot be lasting peace in the world.
One of the great American industrialists of our day—a man who has rendered yeoman service to his country in this crisis-recently emphasized the grave dangers of “rightist reaction” in this Nation. All clear-thinking businessmen share his concern. Indeed, if such reaction should develop—if history were to repeat itself and we were to return to the so-called “normalcy” of the 1920’s—then it is certain that even though we shall have conquered our enemies on the battlefields abroad, we shall have yielded to the spirit of Fascism here at home.
I ask the Congress to explore the means for implementing this economic bill of rights- for it is definitely the responsibility of the Congress so to do. Many of these problems are already before committees of the Congress in the form of proposed legislation. I shall from time to time communicate with the Congress with respect to these and further proposals. In the event that no adequate program of progress is evolved, I am certain that the Nation will be conscious of the fact.
Our fighting men abroad- and their families at home- expect such a program and have the right to insist upon it. It is to their demands that this Government should pay heed rather than to the whining demands of selfish pressure groups who seek to feather their nests while young Americans are dying.
Today, in 2019, how many of those goals have been achieved?

Yes but….
By Jake Johnson, staff writer at Common Dreams. Originally published at Common Dreams
A “disturbing” New York Times story published Monday detailed how President Donald Trump’s Treasury Department, led by former Goldman Sachs banker Steve Mnuchin, has quietly weakened elements of the 2017 tax law in recent months to make it even friendlier to wealthy individuals and massive corporations.
Lobbyists representing some of the largest corporations in the world, the Times reported, targeted two provisions in the original 2017 law designed to bring in hundreds of billions of dollars in revenue from companies that had been dodging U.S. taxes by stashing profits overseas.
“The corporate lobbying campaign was a resounding success,” the Times noted. “Through a series of obscure regulations, the Treasury carved out exceptions to the law that mean many leading American and foreign companies will owe little or nothing in new taxes on offshore profits… Companies were effectively let off the hook for tens if not hundreds of billions of taxes that they would have been required to pay.”
There is an economic bill of rights for our time, and the rights have been given to big businesses who are banking the bonus, buying back stock, not reinvesting, turning a blind eye to the national debt, and undermining efforts to save the planet.
LikeLike
No working people in this country is truly free as long as Wall St and Silicon Valley use the government to “personalize” the tax system to benefit the 1%.
LikeLiked by 1 person
Correction: are
LikeLike
ditto Bob Shepherd: how stark the contrast
LikeLike
How stark the contrast.
LikeLike
Thank you, Diane, for this reminder of a time when our nation set its goals higher, when it had a leader with vision and decency. What a wonderful post with which to start the new year! And, sadly, how very unlike these times! These lines, in particular, strike me:
[T]rue individual freedom cannot exist without economic security and independence. “Necessitous men are not free men.”
Don’t talk to me about free markets as long as there are so many unfree men and women, shackled in poverty.
LikeLike
Back then FDR warned about returning to “the so-called “normalcy” of the 1920’s” and “the grave dangers of “rightist reaction” in this Nation”. Let’s hope the abnormalcy of the current Trump regime has been turned around by this time next year. Let’s hope and work in that direction….
LikeLike
Now there’s a goal for the New Year!!!
LikeLike
More like for the new decade, I am afraid.
LikeLike
Yes, well said. Happy New Year, Mate. to you and yours!
LikeLike
Libertarian conservatives are passing around the idea that property taxes are an “infringement” on property rights. Libertarians reject support for the common good.
“How can we restore actual property rights in America? So long as property taxes exist, one is simply “renting” their property from an overreaching government.”
LikeLike
“So long as property taxes exist, one is simply “renting” their property from an overreaching government.”
This is fine with me. The bigger your property, the more rent you pay. Never forget, even for a minute, that you live among other people and not alone on a deserted island. Taxes are the reminder. It’s annoying, even obnoxious, but apparently, this is the only thing people listen to.
LikeLike
All land should be leased, for a time, from the Commons. Private ownership of land originated in theft.
LikeLike
“I have engaged in a heated exchange off line with people who are upset about taxing billionaires. They feel sure that taxing the 1% or the .00025% is a slippery slope, and soon enough we will all pay taxes so high that we will have to give up our homes.”
You are more patient than I am, I guess. In my mind, anyone who could say such a thing is either too stupid or too disingenuous to be reasoned with. We already pay higher taxes than the billionaires. No honest/reasonable person can think that’s okay.
LikeLike
We have the slippery slope (more like a 90 degree angle or precipice) that goes to the wealthy and the big corporations. The GOP keeps cutting the top tax rates AND creating more loop holes for the greedy. FDR through Carter saw top marginal tax rates ranging from 91% to 70%. Then came Reagan and the top marginal tax rates were slashed. The GOP creates sky high deficits with all its tax cutting and then when a D comes to power starts screaming and caterwauling about the deficits, the deficits and the need to cut all the essential social programs. Our only chance of any kind of progress is if we have a Democratically controlled government….but forget about the SCOTUS which will be right wing/libertarian for quite some time. As bad as Obama was on education, he at least appointed 2 liberals to the court, was good on social issues and his lousy ACA did at least cover more people and got rid of all those horrible insurance strictures. The ACA is not universal health care and it’s a give away to the insurance companies and the drug cartels.
“rightist reaction”—– Yes indeed, we have a “rightist reaction” in spades, a regular tsunami of these far right wing/libertarian/Randian gargoyles who want to take us back to the 1920s when the business of government was business. We are there times 1,000 now. Vote Democratic, hopefully it will be Bernie or Warren. If not, then I would vote for any D.
LikeLike
The Slippery Slope
Like Wile E Coyote
We’ve stepped off Slippery “slope”
And billionaire deVOTee
Is really just a dope
LikeLike
I wonder if FDR had the same understanding of the words “pursuit of happiness” as Jefferesn, who almost certainly saw this phrase as the translated Greek word meaning participation in the operation of government through the exercise of the franchise and similar avenues.
LikeLike
In the 1930’s, FDR was sometimes called “the new Jefferson”.
LikeLike
The people who don’t want to tax billionaires are anti-American and they hate what American has stood for and they hate everything that FDR and Dwight D. Eisenhower have done and wish that those men had never been President and instead some far right Ku Klux Klan John Birchers had turned the US into the right wing neo-Fascist dream that Hitler had imagined.
It isn’t surprising that those who hate high taxes also hate with all their heart the two President who were most instrumental in defeating Hitler because they wanted higher taxes and social programs and everything that Hitler and neo-Fascism hates.
These people are given credibility because the context in which they insist that low taxes MUST happen is missing. They hated Eisenhower’t taxes, they hated FDR. they hate Social Security and Medicare and the only thing they love is power for the already privileged. They simply hate America, period, and should be called out as haters of America at every opportunity. Their embrace of Russia and Putin has shown how little they care about anything but riches and power for themselves.
LikeLike
True, true, true.
LikeLike
“The people who don’t want to tax billionaires are anti-American”
As long as you work against the majority of the people, your work is anti-American. When the majority is 99% of the population, it’s difficult to mount a counterargument. Apparently, many people are under the spell of such counterargument. When will this hypnosis end?
LikeLike
Wouldn’t it be nice if taxation to pay for social services, infrastructure, etc. was a slippery slope? It’s not. Never has been. Austerity is a slippery slope. Cutting taxes is too easy. When it comes to increasing taxes on the wealthy, organizing unions, regulating businesses, and securing equal rights, every inch gained takes collective struggle. Nothing good for the working and poor classes ever happens without a fight. Nothing. Never. Ever. That’s why Bernie says the revolution doesn’t end on Election Day. Even after he is elected, we will continue to need to organize and act.
LikeLike
In my opinion, this is the most important declaration in the 20th century in American history, yet Americans have been the last—and the majority of Americans living today have no recollection, understanding or appreciation of it—to understand what it means. When I asked a Democratic candidate for governor of Ohio a number of years ago, he dismissed it as irrelevant history. Indeed, virtually all Democrats, especially those in leadership positions, dismiss it as ancient history.
As those of you who tire of me know, I am a champion of German federal democracy. Germany is the second oldest federal republic in the world (second to the U.S.). But it strikes me that both Germany and Japan were subject to post-WWII education policy directed by the U.S. to teach their youth and citizens civic education based on U.S. ideals. This FDR speech was part and parcel of those lessons, arguably the most important. Although it wasn’t seamless, both of those nations accepted and internalized those lessons far better and more substantively that we have. Both have free elections. Both have health care and transportation systems (which I have come to believe are the two key materialistic ideas that actually promote real freedom for all citizens) that have left this nation in the dust. No one in either country argues against universal health care or state-of-the-art public transportation, yet here, as we enter the year 2020, we ain’t even close to realizing them. And they are freest societies in the world, Scandinavia perhaps excepted—but they too internalized and acted upon FDR’s ideals in even more comprehensive ways.
I do not have hope for this nation. Especially when the leading Democratic candidate for the presidency would consider having a Republican as a running mate—a running mate who would surely deride and ignore FDR’s admonition. I do not have hope for this nation when many us expect the Orange catastrophe to be reelected—when no civilized nation in the world would even let people like him or his followers get close to power (expect perhaps parts of the United Kingdom or Israel). But mostly, I do not have hope for this nation because FDR’s admonition still seems quaint or un-American to a majority of Americans. Yet it embodies the most American ideas that have ever been enunciated, the Constitution, Lincoln’s second inaugural address or anything else included.
LikeLike
the most important declaration in the 20th century in American history
nailed it
Happy New Year, Greg!
LikeLike
“…somehow developed an acute social conscience.”
His conscience was named Eleanor, not that he was a total jerk.
LikeLike
Rarely has the national stage seen her like!!! xoxoxoxxo!
LikeLike