Nancy Bailey explains here that if you are dissatisfied with your public school, blame the Disruption Machine, the ones who call themselves “reformers,” like Betsy DeVos.
They have run public schools into the ground for the decades.
They have imposed their malevolent ideas and policies on public schools, with no accountability for their mistakes.
She writes:
Frustrated by public schools? Look no further than the corporate education reformers and what they have done to public education.
Education Secretary DeVos and her corporate billionaire friends have been chipping away at the fabric of democratic public schools for over thirty years!
The problems we see in public schools today are largely a result of what they did to schools, the high-stakes testing and school closures, intentional defunding, ugly treatment of teachers, lack of support staff, segregated charter schools, vouchers that benefit the wealthy, Common Core State Standards, intrusive online data collection, and diminishing special education services.
Big business waged a battle on teachers and their schools years ago. The drive was to create a business model to profit from tax dollars. Now they want to blame teachers for their corporate-misguided blunders! It’s part of their plan to make schools so unpleasant, parents will have no choice but to leave….
I student taught in an elementary school in Detroit, in 1973. Schools were certainly not perfect, but my modest school did a good job.
The third-grade teachers were excellent reading teachers. They organized rotating small groups of students based on their skill needs decoding letters and words. There were no data walls. No child appeared to compare themselves unfavorably to other children.
Students were encouraged to read, did free reading, lots of writing, and had access to plenty of books. The school had a nice library with a librarian who often read beautiful and funny stories to the class. They spent time studying social studies, science, and art and music. Teachers worked closely with the PTA and reached out to parents.
There was no testing obsession. Students didn’t fear failing third grade. They were continually learning, and most liked school. There were twenty-two students in the class.
Teachers did their own assessment, and they discussed the results with each other at their grade level meetings. The school had a counselor and I believe a nurse stationed at the school. We worried about the students and addressed concerns about issues like why some showed up without mittens in the cold weather.
Students did class projects to help remember what they learned in their subjects. For science, we created a rocket out of a huge cardboard box. We painted it and spent time studying the solar system. Children took turns sitting in the rocket pretending they were astronauts.
This school had an excellent Learning Center where teachers could share materials to cut down on costs. They had a nice collection of resources for every subject.
My supervising teacher was kind, well-prepared, and tough. She expected daily written lesson plans which she reviewed with me before I taught. She was an excellent mentor!
Where’s that school today? I wish I could go back and visit, but it closed years ago, razed and turned into a housing development. It was shuttered like 225 other public schools in Detroit!

I was glued to this story from the start, comparing its imagery with both my own K-6 education (in Richmond, CA circa 1950), and then the schools where I taught. This piece should be put in every newspaper editorial section in the nation.
A bit of my own memory: Even when I was in the fifth grade, I remember thinking: what good is it to have these (bubble) tests if they don’t tell you how you did or what the right answers were? CBK
LikeLike
I have shared many of Bailey’s thoughts about the impact of privatization. What we have today is nothing like the original concept of child centered schools operated by teachers. In fact, it is not representative of a free market. It is a rigged system of government incentivizing privatization for wealthy privatizers. The rich buy political access to plunder the common good. This corrupt collusion has resulted in an extreme disinvestment in traditional public schools most students attend.
In order to file a lawsuit there must be a point of law on which a claim can be made. I know that the SPLC and the Education Law Center are working together to defend public education. There should be some type of violation of rights in the way minorities are targeted for privatization. Creating separate and unequal schools for students of color should be a violation of some federal law. Privatization is wholly unfair, and the wealthy should be held accountable. Whether they will remains to be seen.
Baily’s reflection on her career in public education is very similar to mine. During most of my career students were the main concern, not political manipulation and chaos. I worked in a district that was very collaborative, where we pooled our resources to address issues in order to improve outcomes for our students. In the ’90s we were working towards portfolio assessment of students. Then, NCLB hit like a ton of bricks with its impossible benchmarks, and all our efforts were abandoned. We then had to cope with the corrosive treadmill of disruption.
LikeLiked by 1 person
A truly free market is not subsidized by the public treasury
LikeLike
and “coping” often only meant surviving in our district: nothing was ever in place for long, new personnel every year or even every semester pushing new rules and ideas
LikeLike
“What we have today is nothing like the original concept of child centered schools operated by teachers.”
Ironically, this is a good description of most high-performing charter schools.
Back in 2008, 78% of charter school leaders were professional educators who earned their degrees in traditional teaching programs. I’ve been trying to find more current data without success, but what I see at the schools I’m familiar with is even more emphasis on leadership by educators.
LikeLike
You mean like Tom Torkelson of IDEA, Eva Moskowitz of Success Academy, Jonathan Hage of Charter USA, Fernando Zulueta of Academica, all non educators. Including David Levin and Mike Feinberg of KIPP.
LikeLike
I’m talking about school principals, not CMO founders.
LikeLike
Charter school principals are transient. The corporate owners are the deciders.
LikeLike
Eva Moskowitz and her handpicked board of billionaires and hedge fund managers own Success Academy. David Levin owns KIPP; Mike Feinberg stepped aside due to MeToo issues. Fernando Zulueta owns Academica. Michael and Olga Block own Basis. Etc
LikeLike
Do you own the Network for Public Education? Seems like saying that would discount the work of your volunteer Board as well as the concept of a not-for-profit. If Eva leaves SA or Dave Levin leaves KIPP, what do they get to take with them? Answer: nothing, because they don’t own anything.
LikeLike
No, I don’t own the Network for Public Education. I am president and I am paid a salary of exactly $00.00. That is, zero.
Eva is Success Academy. Last I heard , she is paid near $700,000. She and the board are one. The Blocks—MIchael and Olga— own Basis, which pays them $10 million a year. Zulueta owns Academica, which has amassed a fortune of more than $100 million. Tom Torkelson owns IDEA, which pays him More than $500,000 plus perks. Jonathan Hage owns Charter Schools USA. Dennis Bakke owns the Imagine charter network , along with its related real estate and construction companies. Fethullah Gulen owns the Gulen charter chain.
LikeLike
Diane John is either oblivious or willfully anti-public/democratic. If oblivious, and if he cannot see the HUGE difference between corporate and public institutions to the very idea of democracy, perhaps the attack on public education over the last 40 years has done a better job than they thought. CBK
LikeLike
Catherine, my point is that the vast majority of charters are not-for-profits and don’t have “owners” any more than Diane’s NFP does.
LikeLike
There are TECHNICALLY no for-profit charters in Michigan but 80% of all charters in the state are operated by for-profit managers.
LikeLike
John What Diane said.
Also, it’s come to pass that we all have to read reformers’ statements from a place of knowing about their professional familiarity with logical fallacies and Orwellian double-speak. CBK
LikeLike
I’m not a fan of for-profit charters or those that contract with for-profit operators. In NY, both have been prohibited for new charters for a long time and there are only a handful left.
LikeLike
Apparently, even non-profit charters have for profit managing companies. Also, many nonprofit companies have directors and other leaders making way too much money compared to those who do the actual work: hospitals, schools, universities.
LikeLike
Yes, I think in most cases where a not-for-profit charter contracts with a for-profit operator, they should just be considered a for-profit operation.
I don’t know of not-for-profit charter schools on which directors get paid. I suppose they could exist somewhere.
LikeLike
JOHN All fine and good. But see what happens when teachers raise questions about the practices or even the existence of corporations who fund or sit on the boards of charter schools. CBK
LikeLike
Going after the federal government is usually a lost cause.
Student families and teachers should go after Bill Gates and Gates Foundation since they were largely responsible for many of the most damaging deforms (eg, for COmmon Core and teachers getting fired from VAM) and have lots of money to pay for damages.
Make Bill Gates pay a large fine or at least do damage to his image and that of his Foundation and he will think twice about tangling with teachers and student families in the future.
The “discovery” phase of a class action suit (which would bring forth emails between Gates and Duncan and DOE) would alone be fruitful.
LikeLike
I agree with the sentiment. It feels like if you’ve suffered a loss (of education) you should be able to get restitution from someone, perhaps. But this is a tricky road to go down. Even though plenty of new trouble started with this administration, there’s plenty of blame to go back to the previous administration.
Remember who was in charge when Race to the Top was the order of the day and common core came into being.
We live in dangerous times. Starting a lawsuit could come back to haunt.
I think it’s best to figure out a way forward with this issue.
Just sayin’
LikeLike
MJacobs The view of what constitutes a good education has been increasingly truncated in the U.S., commonly, it seems, on the similarly-truncated pattern of the technical-capitalist “education” of the oligarchs in our “culture.” So now truncated-techno-oligarchs are in league with the the corporate neo-liberal rich who falsely use the name “conservative” and apparently think they are the best that “upper class” can offer humanity and that everyone else should work for them and BTW kiss Trump’s ring.
If the lawsuits just raise the right questions (about what constitutes a truly good education, and is my child getting one), it’s a good thing. CBK
LikeLike
“My supervising teacher was kind, well-prepared, and tough. She expected daily written lesson plans which she reviewed with me before I taught.”
Some teachers are required to spend 8 to 16 hours a week preparing lesson plans in various schools that are in some prepared format. Most teachers report having to spend extra time really planning the class due to its nature. As for myself, the “best laid plans of mice and men gang oft aglay ”
Sometimes it seems to me that the best plan is to let nature take its course. Serendipity is never planned. When I first started teaching, I remember getting off the subject for two or three days, working with students to answer some question they had raised or I had raised without understanding its complete implications. The older I got and the more pressured we were to teach “standards”, the more wooden I became, despite all my attempts to the contrary.
LikeLike
I guess there hasn’t been any lawsuits against reformers and privatizers because it’s not possible to suit somebody who screws people using the federal and state governments. Perhaps we need an appropriate replacement for the 2nd amendment: instead of having the useless and dangerous right to carry, we need a 21st century weapon, such as free access to suitably certified and highly competent lawyers who’d suit any government official on behalf of, say, at least a million complainers.
Better yet, when the government plans on doing something stupid like Race to the Top, there would be the possibility of a large opposing group to mount a debate.
LikeLike
The right to bear witness?
LikeLike
What does his mean in this context?
LikeLike