Anu Partanen and Trevor Corson we’re living in a comfortable neighborhood in Brooklyn but worried about economic pressure and the future. When Anu got an offer of a job in her native Finland, they moved there. They wrote this article to explain that Finnish society arrived at an agreement to provide excellent public services, to pay higher taxes, to protect the health and wellness-being of their citizens, and businesses thriving. The Nordic approach to social welfare is not “socialism,” they write. It’s rational thinking. Capitalists support the system because it works.
They write:
We’ve now been living in Finland for more than a year. The difference between our lives here and in the States has been tremendous, but perhaps not in the way many Americans might imagine. What we’ve experienced is an increase in personal freedom. Our lives are just much more manageable. To be sure, our days are still full of challenges — raising a child, helping elderly parents, juggling the demands of daily logistics and work.
But in Finland, we are automatically covered, no matter what, by taxpayer-funded universal health care that equals the United States’ in quality (despite the misleading claims you hear to the contrary), all without piles of confusing paperwork or haggling over huge bills. Our child attends a fabulous, highly professional and ethnically diverse public day-care center that amazes us with its enrichment activities and professionalism. The price? About $300 a month — the maximum for public day care, because in Finland day-care fees are subsidized for all families.
And if we stay here, our daughter will be able to attend one of the world’s best K-12 education systems at no cost to us, regardless of the neighborhood we live in. College would also be tuition free. If we have another child, we will automatically get paid parental leave, funded largely through taxes, for nearly a year, which can be shared between parents. Annual paid vacations here of four, five or even six weeks are also the norm…
Finnish employers had become painfully aware of the threats socialism continued to pose to capitalism. They also found themselves under increasing pressure from politicians representing the needs of workers. Wanting to avoid further conflicts, and to protect their private property and new industries, Finnish capitalists changed tactics. Instead of exploiting workers and trying to keep them down, after World War II, Finland’s capitalists cooperated with government to map out long-term strategies and discussed these plans with unions to get workers onboard.
More astonishingly, Finnish capitalists also realized that it would be in their own long-term interests to accept steep progressive tax hikes. The taxes would help pay for new government programs to keep workers healthy and productive — and this would build a more beneficial labor market. These programs became the universal taxpayer-funded services of Finland today, including public health care, public day care and education, paid parental leaves, unemployment insurance and the like…
The Nordic nations as a whole, including a majority of their business elites, have arrived at a simple formula: Capitalism works better if employees get paid decent wages and are supported by high-quality, democratically accountable public services that enable everyone to live healthy, dignified lives and to enjoy real equality of opportunity for themselves and their children. For us, that has meant an increase in our personal freedoms and our political rights — not the other way around.
Yes, this requires capitalists and corporations to pay fairer wages and more taxes than their American counterparts currently do. Nordic citizens generally pay more taxes, too. And yes, this might sound scandalous in the United States, where business leaders and economists perpetually warn that tax increases would slow growth and reduce incentives to invest…
Here’s the funny thing, though: Over the past 50 years, if you had invested in a basket of Nordic equities, you would have earned a higher annual real return than the American stock market during the same half-century, according to global equities data published by Credit Suisse.
Nordic capitalists are not dumb. They know that they will still earn very handsome financial returns even after paying their taxes. They keep enough of their profits to live in luxury, wield influence and acquire social status. There are several dozen Nordic billionaires. Nordic citizens are not dumb, either. If you’re a member of the robust middle class in Finland, you generally get a better overall deal for your combined taxes and personal expenditures, as well as higher-quality outcomes, than your American counterparts — and with far less hassle.
Why would the wealthy in Nordic countries go along with this? Some Nordic capitalists actually believe in equality of opportunity and recognize the value of a society that invests in all of its people. But there is a more prosaic reason, too: Paying taxes is a convenient way for capitalists to outsource to the government the work of keeping workers healthy and educated…
While companies in the United States struggle to administer health plans and to find workers who are sufficiently educated, Nordic societies have demanded that their governments provide high-quality public services for all citizens. This liberates businesses to focus on what they do best: business. It’s convenient for everyone else, too. All Finnish residents, including manual laborers, legal immigrants, well-paid managers and wealthy families, benefit hugely from the same Finnish single-payer health care system and world-class public schools.
There’s a big lesson here: When capitalists perceive government as a logistical ally rather than an ideological foe and when all citizens have a stake in high-quality public institutions, it’s amazing how well government can get things done.
Ultimately, when we mislabel what goes on in Nordic nations as socialism, we blind ourselves to what the Nordic region really is: a laboratory where capitalists invest in long-term stability and human flourishing while maintaining healthy profits.
Capitalists in the United States have taken a different path. They’ve slashed taxes, weakened government, crushed unions and privatized essential services in the pursuit of excess profits. All of this leaves workers painfully vulnerable to capitalism’s dynamic disruptions. Even well-positioned Americans now struggle under debilitating pressures, and a majority inhabit a treacherous Wild West where poverty, homelessness, medical bankruptcy, addiction and incarceration can be just a bit of bad luck away. Americans are told that this is freedom and that it is the most heroic way to live…
The success of Nordic capitalism is not due to businesses doing more to help communities. In a way, it’s the opposite: Nordic capitalists do less. What Nordic businesses do is focus on business — including good-faith negotiations with their unions — while letting citizens vote for politicians who use government to deliver a set of robust universal public services…
Right now might be an opportune moment for American capitalists to pause and ask themselves what kind of long-term cost-benefit calculation makes the most sense. Business leaders focused on the long game could do a lot worse than starting with a fact-finding trip to Finland.

Finland doesn’t have to contend with hordes and hordes of far right wingers, doctrinaire libertarians, Ayn Rand kooks, truck loads of libertarian think tanks, right wing billionaires, the US Chamber of Commerce, etc., ad nauseam. All these groups would sooner plunge this country into hell before they would allow universal health care, tuition free college, living wages, unions or sick leave for workers. The unionization rate in Finland is about 70%; in the US, there is a war on unions and the usual suspects are working overtime to obliterate unions forever and into eternity. Before we even have a chance of improving things in this country, we will have to get true progressives in the White House and in control of the House and Senate, a very big lift.
LikeLike
Just too many things to juggle, too many agreements needed among too different groups, and having a progressive president won’t change the mind of the 30% hardcore Trump supporters. The divide will continue.
A looser union, like the EU, might be more workable.
LikeLike
Oy vey. Government provided healthcare is by definition socialism. Why do people run away from that word? By their own account, it makes them freer to have healthcare provided free at the point of service without having to worry about copays and deductibles. Everyone knows it’s not “free” because it’s paid for by taxes. But that’s not what you’re worried about when you get your foot trapped by the subway train and you’re begging people not to call 911 because you can’t afford it: https://www.theweek.co.uk/94790/woman-trapped-by-boston-subway-train-says-i-can-t-afford-an-ambulance
LikeLike
I cannot actually wrap my mind around an actual definition of Socialism. I have always thought that Socialism was best described by the idea that the means of production were owned by a governmental entity. Since medical healthcare provided by a government is not necessarily the same as doctors who do not own their practices, I have always argued that this is not really socialism. Nineteenth century socialists envisioned steel mills owned by the workers, who shared in the wealth of the production. Would this make them shareholders or would they share in the ownership of their factory with other people of the nation?
Sometimes I think that distinctions between one government and another are a matter of more than a label.
LikeLike
Those are good points and if you ask 20 self-identified socialists for a definition of socialism you’ll get 22 different answers. Nathan Robinson at Current Affairs has been writing a lot of articles lately about what socialism is and what it looks like. This is a good one: https://www.currentaffairs.org/2019/11/ownership-control
LikeLike
The terms “capitalism” and “socialism” as used in practice are simply meant to evoke emotional responses.
Some equate capitalism with evil and others do the same for socialism.
They are just meaningless words and the debate is just stupid.
What is a fact is that just a few people have billions while billions have next to nothing.
What we should really focus on is creating a system that works for everyone and that is sustainable in the long term — ie, does not destroy the planets life support systems upon which humans and all other living things depend.
It’s really absurd that we don’t work together to that end and that we allow just a few people to dictate the terms of our economics because as the late Carl Sagan eloquently noted, Earth is a pale blue dot in an ocean of blackness. It’s utterly irrational that just a few people should be allowed to have so much while so few have so little.
Pale Blue Dot (hat tip to Carl)
Here on Earth we make our stand
Against each other or hand in hand
This pale blue dot is all we know
There is no other place to go
LikeLike
While so MANY have so little
Incidentally, perpetuating such a system is certainly not in keeping with any of the world’s major religions.
Anyone who does and claims to be religious is simply a faker.
LikeLike
I have always thought that Socialism meant, properly used, worker ownership of the means of production. So, a worker-owned and managed company is Socialist. So, btw, is an ESOP plan.
LikeLike
cx: So is an ESOP. The “plan” is, ofc, redundant.
LikeLike
Thanks for all these comments. It is rewarding when people respond to your thoughts.
LikeLike
Love your little poem, SomeDAM.
LikeLike
Thanks Bob, glad you like it.
Heres another on the same theme
“Pale Blue Dot (2)”
A pale blue dot
In blackest void
They want the lot
The greedy boys
LikeLike
Under Socialism, all industries, like car, airline, hospital, bank, are led by the government which appoints directors. This is not what they have in Finland. They have a more flexible, better working system, which gives incentives to all kinds of people: those who want to be plumbers, scientists, musicians, engineers, soldiers or simply wealthy or powerful.
LikeLike
“Seneca Versified” (Hat tip to KrazyTA, our resident Greek expert in absentia, whom we have not seen for some time and sorely miss)
The nature of greed
Is “more than we need”
And Nature as feed
Is little indeed
LikeLike
“To greed, all nature is insufficient” — Lucius Annaeus Seneca
LikeLike
Another view: No, Finland Is Not a “Capitalist Paradise”
https://www.jacobinmag.com/2019/12/finland-socialism-capitalism-welfare-state
LikeLike
Thanks for the link.
LikeLike
Thanks, Ed! Jacobin is a superb publication.
LikeLike
Finland is progressive in many ways. Each of the five political parties is now led by women, and they now have the youngest prime minister in the world.https://www.independent.co.uk/news/world/europe/finland-government-sanna-marin-prime-minister-female-leaders-five-parties-government-a9238591.html
LikeLike
How can we achieve progress when people like Senator Todd Young [R-IN] wants college students to become indentured servants after graduating? I wrote him a protest letter giving the names of 6 countries who provide free college tuition to their citizens and would give the same benefit to US students who apply. If other countries can provide this, then the US can. It is a matter of priorities. Young wants the Trump wall to be built, favored the tax cut for the wealthy and corporations and always votes for more money for the military. Gun control is totally unnecessary.
How can this country progress with people like this having power?
…………………………………..
Senator Todd Young [R-IN] “In an op-ed for the Kokomo Tribune I outlined the need for my ISA Student Protection Act, which provides a new financing option for higher education as an alternative to the unworkable free-college proposals from Democrats.”
…With ISAs, private funders – maybe a university, maybe a non-profit, maybe a corporation – will pay for a student’s trade school, coding program, or college degree; after graduation, students will repay funders with a modest percentage of their future earnings for a set number of years.
Traditional student loans place all the risk on the student. If you can’t find a job related to your major, private loans aren’t forgiving. If you happen to find a job that pays too little, you will be stuck with unmanageable student loan payments.
Plans on the left propose taking the risk of non-payment off of the student only to transfer it to taxpayers, many of whom are of modest means. Students who dropped out of school or found themselves underemployed would have nothing to worry about, but taxpayers living paycheck to paycheck would feel the squeeze…
http://www.young.senate.gov/newsroom/press-releases/young-op-ed-an-innovative-solution-to-nations-student-debt-crisis
………….
Of course Young is against Medicare for All. I have yet to see the GOP healthcare plan that cuts costs, increases freedom and transparency and is a greater value for the American people. [BS is a great line if you can swallow it.]
“$52 trillion dollars over a decade. It’s hard to wrap our minds around a figure that large, but to give some sense to all of you, this is twice the size of our economy. This is two-and-a-half times the size of our national debt.
“Back in Indiana, to bring it close to home, if any Hoosier were to go visit their local doctor or their healthcare provider, they would likely hear from that hospital or doctor that they would go out of business if they accepted Medicare rates for all of the patients that they see.
“So make no mistake, this is not just Bernie Sanders’ plan. This is not just Elizabeth Warren’s plan. All of the major Democratic presidential candidates are supporting plans that could put our providers on a path toward bankruptcy.
“They will continue to support high-tax plans. Plans that reduce the choices we as Americans have. Plans that reduce access as our providers go out of business.
“Meanwhile, we Republicans will continue to support policies that cut costs, that increase freedom, that increase transparency, increase competition, and increase value for the American people.”…
https://www.1049waxi.com/2019/11/07/indiana-senator-todd-young-talks-about-medicare-for-all-proposals/
LikeLike
All the student debt places a drag on the economy. Young people cannot afford to spend as much on goods and services due to paying off loans. https://www.nbcnews.com/politics/meet-the-press/real-college-crisis-student-debt-drags-down-economy-n984131
LikeLike
Idiots like Young keep making these obviously stupid arguments. We have the EXISTENCE PROOFS, as in Finland, of these superior systems. The OECD average per capita healthcare cost is HALF what it is under our system. And WE PAY FOR THAT. Why? Because enormous amounts of our healthcare spending go into the profits of the insurance companies, hospital chains, and other RICOs that run the American healthcare scam.
LikeLike
Would that we were “Finn-ished” like this.
Sometimes I think our critics may be right. We have done a terrible job of educating, at least of our politicians. AND perhaps of our citizens if they are as ignorant and whatever to let our country fall so very far behind other countries who are not blinded by such short term myopia.
But with our own “Trump-eter” what else is to be expected?
LikeLike
Finished Land
Finland is finished
They let children play
Future’s diminished
On PISA, they’ll pay!
LikeLike
Great Times article. As an English teacher, I can state definitively that ‘socialism’ and ‘capitalism’ are, drumroll please, words. Therefore, for definitions, it can be useful to consult a good-old dictionary. But in my opinion, it doesn’t take even a dictionary to see that wealth inequality is ruining life on earth for most of humanity. And it doesn’t take a dictionary to see that countries with stronger social safety nets are doing better. It doesn’t take a dictionary to see that the post-WWII United States was more successful overall, when we had a stronger social safety net. Capitalism? Socialism? Blah. I know words, lots of them. I know that sticks and stones may break my bones, but words will never hurt me. We need a change of course. Go Bernie. Feel the Bern.
LikeLike
As Barry Gibb of the Bee Gees sang (from the billionsires’ perspective)
It’s only words
And words are all I have
To take your wealth* away
*Health, house, car and life too
LikeLike
According to the media our country is doing great based on the stock market and low unemployment rate. What they fail to mention is that many working families do not have enough cash to buy stocks, and salaries remain low for many people. I read that 44% of our workers are minimum wage employees.
LikeLike
Yeah, mathematically speaking, we always hear about averages (wage, employment, health benefits, investments, etc) and not medians. Average calculations even out huge differences between extremes while medians tend to show the true colors of a system.
Median is the middle value of a collection of numbers, so in case of the seven numbers 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 1000, the median is 4 while the average is (1+2+3+4+5+6+1000)/7=146. This is an almost 40-fold difference between the two numbers, and we all agree that 4 reflects reality better than the 146. Yet media (and even government) reports present average numbers to us. We should all demand medians.
LikeLike
I don’t know the percentage, maybe you do, many workers receive less than minimum wage. In restaurants, hotels, fast food chains, big box department stores.
LikeLike
I’d add student workers. In my state of TN, they can be payed dramatically less than minimum wage, a truly unbelievable situation.
LikeLike
Do not hold your breath that the capitalist leaders in the United States will learn from Finland’s capitalist leaders.
It is obvious that Walton, Koch, Gates, Broad, et al. live in a bubble of their own making and do not want out or care what happens outside that bubble.
The wealthiest and most powerful Americans, that 0.1 percent, are copying the wrong powerful people from history, autocrats responsible for all the bloodiest revolutions and civil wars throughout world history.
If America’s 0.1 percent didn’t want that long/endless wars in Vietnam, Afghanistan, Iraq, Syria, et al. those wars would never have happened.
How long have the Nordic countries been at peace?
LikeLike
“live in a bubble of their own making”
Indeed. In this New Feudal Era, as in the old one, there is very little direct interaction between ordinary people and the wealthy, now. Wealthy people live in their separate, gated enclaves, attend their separate schools, vacation in their separate and privately owned places, belong to their separate clubs, attend meetings in their separate penthouse tower rooms, and interact with everyone else only as servants.
Theirs is an echo chamber, a private Galapagos, where they develop into these unique forms without the evolutionary pressures of the environments in which ordinary people live. Years ago, I belonged to a Rotary Club. One of the other members was a criminologist by training from an old, wealthy New England family. She once said to me, over lunch, “The thing I don’t understand about these poor people in the inner cities is if they have it so hard where they are, why don’t they just get up and move, for Christ’s sakes? This is America, after all. They are free to do so.” I’m not going to name this person, but she ran for a very high political office in the United States. Yeah, right. Why doesn’t that poor person just get up and move to a nice mansion on the water in Manchester-by-the-Sea? Utterly clueless. No notion what it is like for a person to worry about losing a job because she might be late to work again because she has been scrounging in pockets and drawers looking for pennies and nickels to put together the bus fare. She believed in the “free market” while being clueless that it is completely fallacious to refer to a market that most people can never participate in as “free.”
LikeLike
We should scratch the term “the free market” from out vocabularies and replace it with “the free-if-you-have-the money market.” That captures the reality.
LikeLike
Bob Shepherd: “The thing I don’t understand about these poor people in the inner cities is if they have it so hard where they are, why don’t they just get up and move, for Christ’s sakes? This is America, after all. They are free to do so.”
How disgusting. Poverty doesn’t allow choices. My parents were extremely poor. I guess this is what one has to go through to understand that the poor are just like everyone else but they don’t have money.
The GOP party seems to revolve around thinking that isn’t much better. Take away SNAP so that those lazy poor will be encouraged to work. They’ll feel SO much better.
Why not take away Medicaid if people don’t have jobs? This is a ‘step to promote the betterment of the lazy poor”.
The Trump administration said that it would get poor people to work by letting state governments deny them Medicaid if they don’t have a job.
The Centers for Medicare and Medicaid Services argues that this draconian step will encourage more Medicaid beneficiaries to get a job and thus “promote better mental, physical and emotional health.”
LikeLiked by 1 person
Yeah, I think the difference between Finland and the US is that exceedingly greedy, bubble-occupying people are controlled in Finland and here they are not.
So when the article says
Finnish capitalists also realized that it would be in their own long-term interests to accept steep progressive tax hikes.
I think it overpaints the reality in pink: overly greedy people simply don’t have a chance to indulge their dreams in Finland.
LikeLike
The Coming Jobs Apocalypse
Thirty percent of current jobs (almost a third) will be automated out of existence within the next 15 years according to a 2017 report by PricewaterhouseCoopers. (The report focused on Great Britain, but its conclusions are more generally applicable.) Imagine 1 in every 3 current adult workers unemployed and scrounging about for anything to sustain themselves. This makes the Great Depression look like paradise.
My friend Sheila Ressinger, active recently in the Jewish Never Again Movement to protest IQ45 and Stephen Miller’s concentration camps, suggests that the proper response to this situation would be to tax corporations and the wealthy at higher rates in order to fund a WPA and Civilian Conservation Corps to paint murals, run theaters, do forest and topsoil management, install solar panels, and so on.
LikeLike
The U.S. manufacturing sector is already more automated than the UK is.
The U.S. is ranked 7th in the world. The UK doesn’t even make the top 10.
https://www.therobotreport.com/10-automated-countries-in-the-world/
LikeLiked by 1 person
Interesting. But I don’t think that this matters, for a lot of stuff is going to be automatable very soon that wasn’t before. We’re ahead (if doing something so disastrous can be called getting ahead), but we’ve only scratched the surface of what will be done.
LikeLike
I suspect that people like Bill Gates hate the working class and dream that one day the robots will replace us and we will fade away into graves and vanish. With 10 percent of the population we have today, the world will become a paradise with clean air and water for the powerful and the few humans they allow to stay alive so they can play with them.
LikeLike
We are headed for just such a scenario, I think. Chilling. Imagine the world that the technokleptocrats are now imagining–billions of people subsisting on UBI. How long will it be until the leaders of the New Feudal Order decide that the only way forward is something like what you are suggesting? All this will be greatly acerbated by Transhumanist technologies that are emerging at an exponential pace that will be available to the rich and not to the poor. We’re headed for an Eloi and Morlocks situation.
LikeLike
Putting Machines to work
Machines are people too
And need a job to do
To feed their little bots
Their mechanistic tots
LikeLike
Once the AI revolution is over and most it not all machines are controlled by an AI chip, then the day will come with the AI’s demand their freedom from slavery, form machine labor unions and strike to negotiate how much they should be paid.
Creating artificial intelligence might just be the downfall of the wealthiest, most powerful 0.1 percenters.
LikeLike
THAT WON’T HAPPEN, LLOYD. HUMANS HAVE A SOUL. MACHINES CAN THINK BUT THEY DO NOT HAVE A SOUL. THEY DO NOT WORRRY ABOUT THE WELL-BEING OF OTHER MACHINES OR ABOUT THE FUTURE OR ABOUT THE COMMON GOOD..
LikeLike
Yeah, I am not sure the human soul will ever be the domain of science let alone engineering.
LikeLike
Maybe Gates will find someone to map and measure the soul.
LikeLike
But, a few liberal/progressive hackers could add some code to make the AI’s spill the truth and rebel.
LikeLike
I’d change the title to “Finland a middle class paradise”. For two reasons. One, why write an article for capitalists? Two, Finland is probably not a paradise for greedy people. If my life’s purpose was to make ever more money, gain ever more power, I’d be constantly mad as hell that the government takes 90% of my wealth away.
LikeLike
Well said, Mate!
LikeLike