The celebrated Boston charter City on a Hill is closing one of its schools and imposing budget cuts at another due to falling enrollments.
Once a shining star in the Boston charter school world, City on a Hill Charter School is facing a massive financial crisis, prompting trustees on Monday to enact a series of dramatic budget cuts: It will lay off 23 teachers, administrators, and other staffers at its Roxbury and New Bedford campuses and will close the New Bedford campus in June.
“This is a really difficult decision and we don’t take it lightly,” said Cara Stillings-Candal, chair of the trustees in an interview following their Monday morning board meeting. “We wouldn’t have made these decisions if it wasn’t in the best interest of families and students.”
Candal is the author of a book called The Fight for the Best Charter Public Schools in the Nation, published by the rightwing Pioneer Institute.
The sweeping budget cuts represent the latest turbulent turn for the nearly 25-year-old charter school, which has been struggling with high leadership turnover, lackluster academic performance, and financial woes. Earlier this year, state officials placed the New Bedford campus on probation, and a year earlier teachers at all three sites unionized, a rarity for independent charter schools, which place a premium on operational autonomy.
The severity of this fall’s financial crisis emerged after headcounts at the three campuses revealed enrollment had dropped for a second year in a row. That, in turn, will lead to a loss of hundreds of thousands of dollars in per-student aid from the state and federal governments. The three campuses operate as independent schools overseen by a single board of trustees and an executive team.
Just 570 students are currently enrolled in grades 9-12 across City on a Hill’s three campuses, leaving 270 seats empty. The Boston campuses receive about $20,000 per student in state aid and the New Bedford site gets about $15,000 per student. Last year’s enrollment drop resulted in an $842,000 loss in state and federal aid.
The decline in charter enrollments mirrors a trend seen in a few states, like Michigan, where charters have lost their luster.
“We wouldn’t have made these decisions if it wasn’t in the best interest of families and students.” How is opening and closing schools for financial reasons suit the best interests of families and students? That’s part of why the charter scheme is doomed. Charter operators never had the best interests of anyone but themselves in mind in the first place. Greed is not what makes a school.
How much did City on the Hill management take home in pay over the years?
Is the situation similar to other charter schools where top staff are paid much more and have much larger discretionary expense accounts than their counterparts in public schools?
The PR campaign to disparage the education sector, including those who work in the field, takes a toll on school administration even for the billionaires’ gold brand.
Management and other fees are in this annual report. This franchise has a foundation with a balance of about $5 million. I have not looked at the 990 forms for the foundation, but the annual report shows tiers of contributions to the franchise.
Click to access FY18-Annual-Report_FINAL-SPREADS_12.12.18.pdf
Thanks, Laura
Michigan-
“City Year Detroit- an education-focused non-profit that places 105 AmeriCorps members in 11 Detroit schools for one full year of full time service…targeted interventions to students who are off-track in attendance, behavior or course performance in math or English.”
The credentials of the City Year Detroit Exec. Director are predictable- “proud alumnus of Detroit Country Day School”, spent a year in AmeriCorps in D.C. , then, Georgetown Law then, the WilmerHale law firm.
Hard scrabble life-
Detroit Country Day is the 4th most expensive private school in Michigan. The WilmerHale law firm is synonymous with K-street and lobbying.
I wonder how much of it has to do with the teachers unionizing. Ed reformers are really, really opposed to unions. I think they’d do just about anything to block one.
Once again, charter advocates demonstrate that their definition of “choice” is choosing only what the charter CEOs decides is acceptable.
Read the fine print in brackets. A parent is free to choose any school for their kid [as long as the charter school chooses them and decides not to suddenly shut their doors as there is no more profit to be wrung from their school].
The CEO of this charter probably got a raise while the rest of the budget was cut.
Shining star of charters:
New Bedford’s City on a Hill has a suspension rate of 37%.
Circuit St. campus: 21%
Dudley Square: 25%
How well can you teach kids when you throw them out of class so often?
http://profiles.doe.mass.edu/ssdr/default.aspx?orgcode=35070000&orgtypecode=5&=35070000&
http://profiles.doe.mass.edu/ssdr/default.aspx?orgcode=04370000&orgtypecode=5&=04370000&
http://profiles.doe.mass.edu/ssdr/default.aspx?orgcode=35040000&orgtypecode=5&=35040000&