In this post, Jan Resseger challenges Cory Booker’s newly rediscovered support for privately managed charter schools. She says “that school choice privileges the few at the expense of the many.” That’s not quite right. If the charter school is staffed with inexperienced, under qualified teachers, if the charter is operated by grifters intent on profit, if the charter exercises harsh disciplines and has high suspension and dropout rates, if the charter lacks the financial stability to keep its doors open, then the children who enroll in them are by no means “privileged.” Instead they are marks, dupes, collateral damage.
She writes:
The essential point to remember about school choice—whether it is a system of private school tuition vouchers or privately operated but publicly funded charter schools—is that school choice privileges the few at the expense of the many.
The scale of the provision of K-12 education across our nation can best be achieved by the systemic, public provision of education. Rewarding social entrepreneurship in the startup of one charter school at a time cannot possibly serve the needs of the mass of our children and adolescents. In a new, September 2019 enrollment summary, the National Center for Education Statistics reports: “Between around 2000 and 2016, traditional public school… enrollment increased to 47.3 million (1 percent increase), charter school enrollment grew to 3.0 million students (from 0.4 million), and the number of homeschooled students nearly doubled to 1.7 million. Private school enrollment fell 4 percent, to 5.8 million students.”
Booker argues for well-regulated and high-performing charter schools. The problem he fails to acknowledge is that charter schools were established beginning in the mid-1990s by state legislatures smitten with the idea of innovation and experimentation. None of these legislatures, to my knowledge, provided adequate oversight of the academic quality of the schools, and none imposed protections to guarantee the stewardship of public tax dollars. Malfeasance, corruption, and poor performance plague charter schools across the states. Charter schools have now been established by state law across 45 states where stories of outrageous fiscal and academic scandals fill local newspapers. The Network for Public Education tracks the myriad examples of outrageous fraud and mismanagement by charter schools. Because advocates for school privatization and the entrepreneurs in the for-profit charter management companies regularly donate generously to the political coffers of state legislators—the very people responsible for passing laws to regulate this out-of-control sector—adequate oversight has proven impossible.

As usual with ed reformers, Booker neglected to offer anything of value to the students in the unfashionable “public school sector”
This is SOP in ed reform. Absolutely consistent across the echo chamber. Read any of the leading lights in the “movement” and search their work for something, anything, positive that they offer to public school students or families.
Here’s one of the most prominent paid ed reformers explaining what ed reform offers students who stay in public schools. Budget cuts:
https://www.the74million.org/article/do-charter-schools-help-or-hurt-district-schools-both-sides-are-right-and-wrong-we-need-better-data-to-find-the-answer/
It’s such an echo chamber they don’t even speak to public school families. The entire focus is on charters and vouchers. Public school policy is only analyzed as to its effect on charters and vouchers. Public school students themselves? Never mentioned.
They’re confused about why their agenda is becoming unpopular and it literally does not occur to them that it MIGHT be because they offer nothing at all to public school students.
LikeLike
The worst thing about Booker or Buttigeig isn’t their belief in market-based ed reform.
The worst part if they will hire the same roster of echo chamber denizens who Bush then Obama then Trump hired. They probably already have.
Elect someone who will allow a different perspective in. Twenty years of this is enough.
LikeLiked by 1 person
scariest reality: it is unknown if ANY of the candidates are truly free from ‘re-hiring’ and thus very depressingly pushing the same old game, but certainly we know that Booker and Buttigieg are extremely dangerous in this area
LikeLike
Unfortunately I don’t think Biden will be any better. They all hire from the same narrow pool with the same rigid entry requirements. The Obama people will return from the billionaire foundations and charter management orgs and it’ll be 2008 all over again.
I don’t think public schools will survive another ed reform President, which may be the actual goal.
LikeLike
Unfortunately, I think public schools are more likely to survive even a Democrat like Booker (as reprehensible as he is) than a Trump type Republican who would simply privatize all public education.
Remember, even a Democrat like Biden needs the support of his own party, and the good news is that there are a growing number of Dems in Congress who support public schools. In the days of Obama, the pro-charter rhetoric still ruled — I mean, even Bernie and Elizabeth were supporting charters under Obama! That is not the case now and that is a huge difference.
But if we have 4 more years of right wing Republican rule, then yes, public schools are not that likely to survive.
LikeLike
The article is exactly what all politicians want. It’s all about them and the money they can get into their offshore accounts.
LikeLike
Booker is delusional. He wants us to ignore waste, fraud, corruption, inequity, increased segregation, suppression of democracy, legal rights under IDEA and damage to public education for little to no academic gain except for a few lucky “strivers.” Real Democrats support public education.
LikeLike
Booker wrote, “About 15 years ago, when I was living in Brick Towers, a high-rise, low-income housing community in Newark’s Central Ward, a neighbor stopped me and told me about how her child’s public school was failing its students…” But he decided not to fight for better funding for the school. He decided not to fight for better financial assistance for Brick Towers and the students. He instead decided to rob Brick Towers and the public school of funding with school privatization. He didn’t care about Newark’s Central Ward then. Anyone paying attention knew he didn’t care when he was (sort of) a presidential candidate. He doesn’t care now. Why would anyone who cares about children listen to someone who doesn’t care? Cory Booker will eventually go the way of Chris Christie, a lump of word soup on cable television trying in vain to get Democrats to respect his old friend, Betsy DeVos.
LikeLike
Got damn it. This POS is a pandering, silver-tongued devil if there ever was one. It’s been a long time since I’ve been as disgusted by a Dem like this one.
LikeLike