| Diane,
Growing up in Oklahoma, all I ever wanted was to be a public school teacher.
My life had a lot of twists and turns along the way, but after I graduated from a public university where tuition cost only $50 a semester, I got to live my dream as a special education teacher at a public school in New Jersey.
I believe in America’s public schools, and I believe that every kid in America should have the same access to a high-quality public education — no matter what zip code they live in, the color of their skin, or how much money their parents make.
And right now, we’re not living up to that promise.
Betsy DeVos has been a disaster as Secretary of Education, but the truth is that funding for public K-12 education has been both inadequate and inequitable for a long, long time. Right now, we’re failing to treat public school teachers, paraprofessionals, and school staff like the professionals that they are. We need to pay them well, listen to them, and give them the support that they need.
We can do so much better for our students, our educators, and our communities, so that’s why today I’m releasing my K-12 public education plan that will:
- Fund schools adequately and equitably so that all students have access to a great public education.
- Renew the fight against segregation and discrimination in our schools.
- Provide a warm, safe, and nurturing school climate for all our kids.
- Treat teachers and staff like the professionals they are.
- Stop the privatization and corruption of our public education system.
And it would all be paid for by the Ultra-Millionaire Tax, a two cent tax on fortunes above $50 million.
Our students, public school educators, and parents deserve a president that will fight for them — and that’s the kind of president I’ll be. Add your name here if you support my plan to provide a great public school education to every student.
Here’s how we’ll get it done.
→ First, we’re going to invest hundreds of billions of dollars into our public schools (paid for by the Ultra-Millionaire Tax).
That means we’ll be able to quadruple Title I funding — an additional $450 billion over the next 10 years — to help every child get a high-quality public education. And we’ll make that additional funding conditional on states improving their commitment to educational funding themselves.
We’ll finally make good on our promise to fully fund IDEA — committing an additional $20 billion a year to ensure that students with disabilities receive the educational services they are entitled to.
My plan would invest an additional $100 billion in “Excellence Grants”, which would give schools the chance to invest in programs and resources that they believe are most important to their students.
Finally, my plan would invest at least an additional $50 billion in infrastructure in schools across the country, targeted at those that need it most.
→ We’ll renew the fight against segregation and discrimination in our public schools.
Integrated communities help create a society built on mutual respect and understanding, and integrated schools — which are demanded by our Constitution’s guarantee of equal protection to every person in this country — improve educational outcomes for students of all races.
That’s why I’m committed to strengthening Title VI of the Civil Rights Act of 1964 — which prohibits discrimination on the basis of race in any program or activity that receives federal funding — and reviving robust enforcement of its terms.
My plan uses federal education funding to encourage states to further integrate their schools, and my administration will strictly enforce the right of students with disabilities to a free and appropriate public education and will protect the rights of LGBTQ+ students, English Language Learners, and immigrant students and their families.
→ We’ll ensure every student has the opportunity to learn in a traditional public school that’s welcoming and safe.
My plan will expand access to early childhood services and education, eliminate high-stakes testing, and cancel student breakfast and lunch debt to ensure the federal government plays its part in trying to bring a positive and nurturing climate to every school.
We’ll also create safer environments for our students by ending zero-tolerance discipline policies, establishing more School-Based Health Centers in communities in health professional shortage areas, providing better access to career and college readiness, and addressing chronic absenteeism without punishing parents or children.
→ My plan works with states to sustainably improve pay and support for all public school educators — and as president, I will fight for our educators and treat them like the professionals that they are.
That means making sure that classrooms are well-equipped with resources and support so that teachers aren’t paying for school supplies out of pocket. We’ll also ensure that anyone can become a teacher without drowning in student loan debt.
In a Warren Administration, public educators will have a seat at the table — and that starts with strengthening the ability of educators to organize and bargain. And we’re going to invest in students by investing in our educators — by providing continuing education and professional development opportunities to all school staff and building up a more diverse educator and school leadership pipeline.
→ To keep our traditional public school systems strong, we must resist efforts to divert public funds out of traditional public schools.
We have a responsibility to provide great neighborhood schools for every student. Under my plan, we’ll eliminate the charter school funding program and end federal funding to the expansion of charter schools.
We’ll ban for-profit charter schools, end privatization, corporatization, and profiteering in our nation’s schools and crack down on corruption and anti-competitive practices in the education industry.
Diane, it’s time to live up to the promise of a high-quality public education for every student. My plan makes the big, structural changes that will help give every student, teacher, and school administrator the resources they need to thrive.
Will you add your name to show your support for my K-12 education plan, Diane?
Thanks for being a part of this,
Elizabeth
| Elizabeth doesn’t accept contributions from PACs of any kind or federally registered lobbyists. This grassroots movement is powered by supporters like you. Chip in now to help build our movement.
|
|
Though Warren criticized high stakes testing at a July National Education Association conference, she fought inside the Senate for test-based “accountability” mechanisms as recently as 2015. Warren’s stance on charter schools — publicly-funded, but privately-run institutions — also problematic. Though she opposed a 2016 ballot initiative that would have lifted the cap on charters in Massachusetts, she simultaneously argued that “[m]any charter schools in Massachusetts are producing extraordinary results for our students” and insisted on the need to “spread what’s working to other schools.” Last year, Warren went out of her way in a Senate hearing to praise Boston charter schools, despite the fact that these have systematically siphoned off funds from the rest of the city’s school system. In response to the January 2019 Los Angeles teachers’ strike, Warren’s spokesperson came out only against “rapid charter school expansion” and hedged on whether charters have had a detrimental impact on LA schools — an evasive approach Warren repeated at a May teachers’ forum in Philadelphia. And in June, Warren’s campaign rally in Oakland was introduced by a former Teacher Policy Fellow and supporter of GO Public Schools, the billionaire-funded astroturf organization driving the privatization of Oakland’s school district. She has no history of confrontational political will for so much of what’s in her brand spanking new education plan.
Turning for-profit charters (who make “profits”) into non-profits (that make “surplus”) then calling them “traditional public schools” that still have to send a % of surplus to a headquarters that is not the public schools is nonsense. It’s a tax cut for charter operators.
LikeLike
It would be great if Diane Ravitch could sit down with Warren or at least high ranking staff and really ascertain her positions on these things, so Warren could clarify some of these points.
However, I think you have a bit of a double standard. Bernie was still supporting “pubic charters” and actively campaigning for DFER Democrats to replace pro-public school Democrats until just this year. I love Bernie’s plan and I don’t care if he was not anti-charter in the past. Just like I won’t bash Warren on her past positions. However, it is very legitimate for Warren (and frankly, Bernie, too) to have to clarify some of their positions if they are vague to make sure their support of public schools and willingness to stand up to charters is strong.
LikeLike
i find her comment that “all I wanted was to be a teacher” disingenuous since she taught for one year and moved on, to law school, ivy league job, etc. Her pregnancy firing is also questionable if you research the details. Nathan Newman has written a devastating critique of her problems as a candidate in current affairs (available for a read on twitter). I urge everyone to read this important essay.
LikeLike
“Her pregnancy firing is also questionable if you research the details.”
I question the motives of anyone who repeats this far right lie which has already been debunked multiple times by anyone who has “researched the details”. I’m getting pretty tired of people who can’t come up with a single instance of a very pregnant woman working at that school at the time as their proof.
When I hear anyone repeating the far right lie that it was just a happy coincidence that every pregnant teacher “voluntarily resigned”, I am reminded of the lies of the charter folks who insist that when the mistreated struggling students disappear from so-called “high performing” charters, it is because they “voluntarily leave”.
LikeLike
To me, the big change in the Democrats plans (those I have read, so Bernie, Biden and Warren) is broader than just charters.
The plans are a re-commitment to public schools. That’s what’s been missing over the last 20 years of ed reform. They simply don’t value existing public schools and because the vast majority of students attend public schools, that harms public school students.
I think that’s the message they took from voters. Voters (understandably) do not want to hire a large group of public employees who do not value the schools most children attend.
It’s just amazing to me how far off track they got. The original promise to voters was “we will improve public schools”. Twenty years later they’re an anti-public school lobby who proudly work against the interests of 90% of students and pat themselves on the back for their “bravery” while doing it.
LikeLike
Warrens on my list of possible people. I liked Buttigieg initially but he’s off my list. I’ve seen this movie before. I’m not backing another self-proclaimed “Best and Brightest” who gets all his bright ideas from 150 elites with impeccable resumes and no humility or common sense. Thanks but no thanks. I’m not up for the President Facebook designed. We have one of those now.
LikeLike
As I have written here, Pete worries me because he is a McKinsey technocrat.
LikeLike
“To keep our traditional public school systems strong, we must resist efforts to divert public funds out of traditional public schools.”
How can we resist privatization when we have laws that allow outside actors to use money to buy education policy? We need to do more than resist. We need to change legislation that invites them in to disrupt and destroy public education. We need to stop incentivizing privatization through tax credits and other tax diversion plans that the wealthy have used to insert themselves in policies. Likewise, we should tighten state laws regarding state certification for teachers and administrators to ensure that professionally trained staff are responsible for the instruction and management of pubic schools. We have to create a way to undo the network that has enabled the undermining our public schools for the past twenty years.
LikeLike
How does it compare to Bernie’s plan which I think you approved of?
LikeLike
Bernie was fast out of the gate with an excellent plan. Warrens is even stronger that Bernie’s for two reasons: 1) She pledges to quadruple funding for Title 1 (he proposes to triple it); 2) she proposes to eliminate the federal Charter Schools Program, while Bernie pledged a moratorium while studying the charter problems. Anyone who wants to eliminate the DeVos charter slush fund is on the right track. That’s $440 million wasted that could be used for better purposes.
LikeLike
Diane, hope you can see your way to do more to counter efforts to keep Warren out of the White House. Had a disconcerting conversation with another friend with whom I once agreed on political matters more than with anyone else. She is for and against the opposite candidates to those I am most against and most for.
LikeLike
Diane, hope you can see your way to do more to counter efforts to keep Warren out of the White House. Had a disconcerting conversation with another friend with whom I once agreed on political matters more than with anyone else. She is for and against the opposite candidates to those I am most against and most for.
LikeLike
Peggy, I will vigorously support the nominee of the Democratic Party. My number one priority is to oust the Orange Blob from the White House. I don’t know yet if I will support a candidate in the Democratic primary.
LikeLike
Does anyone else notice the anonymous names appearing here — that seems to be here for the first time — bashing Warren?
I wonder if they are agents paid by Trump’s reelection campaign to sow discord among the ranks of the Anti-Trumpers. This election is probably going to be the dirtiest ever.
With Trump involved, the lies will become a blinding blizzard.
LikeLike
Actually, both have posted here before, although it’s been a while since pnwarriorwoman has posted.
LikeLike
Yes, and posting the same ugly innuendoes about Warren “lying” about not being able to continue teaching while very pregnant.
There is legitimate discussion to be had about the candidates with legitimate discussion and criticism of their policies. You can tell a troll by their use of character attacks and innuendo. Their double standard and hypocrisy. Their non-stop attacks on a candidate’s personality or supposedly dishonest character instead of their policies. Or whenever policies are discussed, they say that their chosen candidate changed his mind for upright and honest reasons but every Democrat changes their mind for political reasons and can’t be trusted.
If Bernie Sanders wins the nomination, and is up against Trump, those character attacks will be turned on him. And the legitimacy his supporters have given those kinds of right wing/Russian propaganda attacks will come back to bite them. And when they scream “foul, it’s not true”, there will be no one left because they have worked so hard to convince everyone that those kinds of attacks are perfectly reason able and we should all believe everything we read on Facebook.
They will have no one to blame but themselves. (But I’m sure they will blame someone else for not stopping the attacks that they themselves condoned when they were directed toward their opponents.)
LikeLike
Check out the latest on Warrens Ed plan. Mom
Peggy
>
LikeLike
It is fairly obvious tome that the progressive democratic candidates want to appear to be supportive of public schools. This is at least a trend that is affecting those who want to separate themselves from the field. Two of the three front running democrats, Warren and Sanders, have now made statements that support public schools. While I have no confidence that either would ever be able to enact such proposals in a divided congress, I nonetheless applaud the notion that is is coming back into style to say good things about public schools and teachers.
Those who expect their political leaders to be saviors will always be disappointed in the extreme. Political leaders are notoriously pragmatic, opportunistic, and are constantly playing hard and fast with the truth as a part of their public survival. Few political leaders have ever been idealistic. Thus I look for those who at least allude to some of my ideals in their speech. I feel this is more important than their actions in the long run. Leaders often plant seeds with their rhetoric that do not sprout for a generation. But they will sprout.
This is why the noise trump makes is so troubling. Suggestion that immigrants are criminals has not produced much anti-immigrant legislation so far due to checks on the president by the congress and judiciary. But people who listen to him will fertilize this hatred for their whole life. Good people who are willing to accept his attitudes are completely unable to see that their support for this kind of thing will produce a society they abhor.
So I am glad we are finally saying g ood things about educators in political rhetoric.
LikeLike
Roy,
You are right. Our campaign to get Democrats to act like Democrats is succeeding.
LikeLike
There’s no grey area in this policy plan. It’s a completely positive good. So heartening!
LikeLike
And we regular followers well know the grey area of corporate, Orwellian language. I’m a Berniecrat who just developed a place in my heart for Elizabeth Warren.
LikeLike
This declaration on charter schools makes it guilt free to vote for her. What does she say about testing our kids to death?
LikeLike
She seeks to eliminate high stakes testing is not exactly a pledge to year end standardized tests. I think it just means the high-stakes are taken out, that is, teachers are not evaluated by these tests.
LikeLike