Two articles were published recently about a new book that makes the point that billionaires pay at a lower tax rate than middle-class Americans.
The book is The Triumph of Injustice: How the Rich Dodge Taxes and How to Make Them Pay by Emmanuel Saez and Gabriel Zucman.
David Leonhardt writes in the New York Times, in a column called “The Rich Really Do Pay Lower Taxes Than You”:
For the first time on record, the 400 wealthiest Americans last year paid a lower total tax rate — spanning federal, state and local taxes — than any other income group, according to newly released data.
Christopher Ingraham writes in the Washington Post:
In 1980, by contrast, the 400 richest had an effective tax rate of 47 percent. In 1960, that rate was as high as 56 percent. The effective tax rate paid by the bottom 50 percent, by contrast, has changed little over time.
When you see these data, it becomes clear why our society can’t afford to pay for good education or healthcare that covers everyone.
Consider this:
Forbes annually publishes a list of the 400 richest people in America.
Number one is Jeff Bezos. He lost some of his net worth because of his divorce. His ex-wife collected over $36 billion from Jeff, which made her one of the 400.
The rich have gotten so rich that 221 billionaires didn’t make the cut.
Under our current tax structure, the top 400 will continue to get richer and richer, while the public sector pays more for defense and less for social welfare.
Our tax structure is a statement of our priorities.
What do we value?
Why, in a democracy, do people who are living from paycheck to paycheck—or have no steady job— support politicians who voted to reduce the taxes of the Forbes 400? Why do they put on a red hat and cheer for the man who gave the Forbes 400 a hefty tax cut?

https://www.newschoolsforneworleans.org/leap-scores-stall-as-schools-retain-teachers-and-new-curriculum-takes-root-the-city-will-see-change/
Your link is not to the Forbes list of billionaires.
LikeLike
Thanks for catching my error.
I fixed it.
https://www.forbes.com/forbes-400/#19171c207e2f
LikeLike
Because they have been convinced that those same politicians (and especially the one selling those red hats) will make sure that the people they fear the most (who just happen to be browner than they are) will never benefit from the taxes they pay. It’s classic divide and conquer, and they are the useful subjects who side with the conquerors thinking they will benefit in some way, never understanding that they too are living under the yoke and will never be allowed to rise as they wish.
LikeLike
That was the formula in the Deep South. Racist white politicians convinced poor whites who lived in tarpaper shacks to vote for them so that they could feel superior to black folk, who were even poorer. The N word was their platform.
LikeLike
“Pit Bulls”
We’re pitted against each other
Conservative v Lib
And brother versus brother
That bulls may kingly live
LikeLike
The bulls are apolitical
Only goal is profit
To public, antithetical
Goal is just to rob it
LikeLike
Keep voting GOP and this is what you get. The same people who opposed Social Security, Medicare, Medicaid, the ACA and even the idea of universal health care. I recently saw a video of JFK’s Sunday, May 20, 1962, NYC speech on health care and the need for a national health insurance program for the elderly. The man was so eloquent, cogent and rational, the exact opposite of the current buffoon-in-chief. He did mention that the AMA opposed his program and that some English man was touring the country warning that if we adopted such a program, it would turn into the UK NHS, oh horrors. The GOP/right wingers always do this, they hire some quisling from Canada or the UK to propagandize against universal health care while tens of millions of Americans don’t even have any health insurance, STILL!!!! In other countries, France for example, people would have been in the streets by the millions to protest the bull vomited up by the GOP and the royalists.
LikeLike
If only the problem were limited to the GOP. We have Democrats throwing cold water on M4All.
LikeLike
LikeLike
You ask a profound question here, Diane. Why indeed. It may be an appeal to white privilege, but I think it goes deeper than that and theoretically embraces every American regardless of color. I think it is a conscious choice of freedom over equality because the MAGA hats know that with welfare comes control, and the one thing Americans hate worse than low income is being told what to do and think. Everyone, down to the lowest peon, wants choice. (Otherwise, charters and vouchers would never fly.) But the promise of choice is such a powerful conception, even if an illusion, that democratic socialists are perceived politically as Lenins, Stalins, Maos, Pol Pots, Castros, and Maduros. They won’t vote to become Venezuela.
LikeLike
When Obama was president for eight years, Harlan, did you see the hammer and sickle flying over the White House? Did you think we had turned into Venezuela?
LikeLike
You’re right, Harlan, that some people cherish ‘freedom’ over certain unalienable Rights. It’s very interesting that some people in the United States would sacrifice equality for freedom when we’ve always held an important truth to be self-evident, that all men are created equal. After all, the American Revolution was fought because:
A Tyrant refused his Assent to Laws, the most wholesome and necessary for the public good:
For that Tyrant endeavoured to prevent the population of these States; for that purpose obstructing the Laws for Naturalization of Foreigners; refusing to pass others to encourage their migrations hither:
For cutting off our Trade with all parts of the world:
(He did not care about our climate, but instead) plundered our seas, ravaged our Coasts, burnt our towns, and destroyed the lives of our people.
And he even excited domestic insurrections amongst us.
There are 621 U.S. billionaires. There shouldn’t even be 1.
Yes, Harlan, I understand that many people have become part of an American subculture that proudly points to freedom as the defining characteristic of our society. They just forgot what we’re really all about, that’s all. It’s strange, this unpatriotic nationalism clothed as freedom of choice.
LikeLike
I shouldn’t be presumptuous and assume everyone will know what document I was borrowing from, the Declaration of Independence.
LikeLike
Harlan,
I surely hope you aren’t accusing American hero Dwight D. Eisenhower of being a traitor to American values because he embraced the patriotic notion that the rich should pay their fair share of taxes.
If you are, then you should surely embrace the treasonous Trump who agrees with the idea that this country would be better off if Eisenhower had never been President over what you and Trump keep insisting is what Americans hate. Except they don’t.
Any of Trump supporters refusing to accept their social security or Medicare? Of course not. They love “socialism” when he helps them and hate the idea of helping anyone else. That’s actually not socialism at all — it’s Trumpism.
LikeLike
Speaking of billionaires, Bill Gates’ “Epstein Problem” just got bigger.
https://www.businessinsider.com/bill-gates-jeffrey-epstein-friendship-swedish-mother-daughter-meeting-2019-10
LikeLike
“2+2=5” — Bill Gates’ previous claim
LikeLike
When Gates experiments fail, he says his really really good ideas were implemented badly by others. So hanging out “quite late” with Epstein and “a very attractive Swedish woman and her [fifteen year-old] daughter” will be called by Gates not a bad idea or truly creepy, but a good idea that was implemented creepily.
LikeLike
He must have enjoyed it as he kept coming back for more. Not clear whether Melinda was invited or just Bill.
LikeLike
The email didn’t say ‘we’ stayed quite late; it say ‘I’ stayed quite late. The way the sentence is phrased is highly suggestive. The really creepy thing is Gates and Epstein meeting and talking repeatedly about “science”, as Epstein wanted to affect the human gene pool with his DNA. Gates is heavily into DNA research and development too. My eyebrows are rising so high, they’re running out of forehead.
LikeLike
I think Gates may have stayed just a little TOO late.
As Carole King sang,
It’s too late, baby now, it’s too late.
But surely he just stayed late to discuss computer programming.
Shirley.
LikeLike