Public Schools First in North Carolina posted an analysis of the grades given to schools by the state, based mostly on test scores. Not surprisingly, the school grades measured income, not school quality, since standardized tests measure income.
School Performance Grades

School Performance Grades

Source: N&O analysis of Public Instruction data
School performance grades started in 2013-14 modeled after a program in Florida started by Gov. Jeb Bush. All North Carolina public schools, including charters, have received A-F performance grades since 2013.
Critics of a single school measurement believe that grades:
- Do not reflect the learning in our schools
- Undervalue student growth and other important measures of school quality
- Could result in more attention to borderline students while underserving the lowest and highest performing students
- Are often used by privatization advocates to support school choice measures and state takeovers of schools, removing these schools from local control and community input.
- Will have negative economic impacts on a community (lower home values/sales)
- Do not come with resources/financial support to improve grades
How did North Carolina’s Schools do This Year? Results show that these grades continue to be closely correlated with a student’s family income level.
- Schools with greater poverty earned fewer A/A+NG’s and B’s and earned more C’s, D’s, and F’s than schools with less poverty.
- Of the 21.7 percent of schools receiving a D or F grade, 95 percent were serving high poverty populations
- In schools with more than 80 percent low income students, 60 percent received a D or F grade. Less than one percent of schools with less than 20% low income student populations received a D or F grade
- Of schools with high concentrations (41 percent or more) of students who are economically disadvantaged, 71 percent met or exceeded growth, compared with 79 percent of schools serving fewer students in poverty.
- For the 2018–19 school year, 73.3 percent of all schools met or exceeded growth expectations, a slight increase from the previous year.
Read more in our fact sheet about A-F grades here!
Source: N&O analysis of Public Instruction data
School performance grades started in 2013-14 modeled after a program in Florida started by Gov. Jeb Bush. All North Carolina public schools, including charters, have received A-F performance grades since 2013.
Critics of a single school measurement believe that grades:
- Do not reflect the learning in our schools
- Undervalue student growth and other important measures of school quality
- Could result in more attention to borderline students while underserving the lowest and highest performing students
- Are often used by privatization advocates to support school choice measures and state takeovers of schools, removing these schools from local control and community input.
- Will have negative economic impacts on a community (lower home values/sales)
- Do not come with resources/financial support to improve grades
How did North Carolina’s Schools do This Year? Results show that these grades continue to be closely correlated with a student’s family income level.
- Schools with greater poverty earned fewer A/A+NG’s and B’s and earned more C’s, D’s, and F’s than schools with less poverty.
- Of the 21.7 percent of schools receiving a D or F grade, 95 percent were serving high poverty populations
- In schools with more than 80 percent low income students, 60 percent received a D or F grade. Less than one percent of schools with less than 20% low income student populations received a D or F grade
- Of schools with high concentrations (41 percent or more) of students who are economically disadvantaged, 71 percent met or exceeded growth, compared with 79 percent of schools serving fewer students in poverty.
- For the 2018–19 school year, 73.3 percent of all schools met or exceeded growth expectations, a slight increase from the previous year.
Read more in our fact sheet about A-F grades here!

“For the 2018–19 school year, 73.3 percent of all schools met or exceeded growth expectations, a slight increase from the previous year.”
Growth expectations are not based on reasoning about anything other than the false assumption that test scores can always increase, year over year, if teachers are doing a good job.
So, when 100 percent of schools meet or exceed growth expectations what happens? The testocracy will proclaim the satndards are not high enough or the tests are too easy.
The farce continues that test scores and their reduction to A-F grades is a perfectly reasonable way to judge schools. It is NOT.
LikeLike
Thank you, Laura
I don’t understand the expectation that this year’s fourth graders will get higher scores than last year’s.
LikeLike
This year’s 4th graders are college ready, while last year’s were not.
I thought everyone knew that.
College ready in kindergarten
Bachelor’s in first
PhD in second grade
Life that’s well rehearsed.
LikeLike
The idea that test scores can keep “growing” indefinitely is in the same category as the idea that the economy can grow indefinitely in a finite world.
The “just dumb” category.
Funny that both ideas are believed by some of the same people.
I’m sure that is just a coincidence.
LikeLike
Seems like states like NC, NY and lot of others expend a lot of time, effort and money getting information that they already undoubtedly possess from income tax filings by families.
Perhaps someone should tell them there are easier ways to determine family income than with a test on kindergartners.
LikeLike
Absolutely right! And… these states would save a lot of money that could be better spent on instruction.
LikeLike
Your method would not make anyone rich. What were you thinking?
LikeLike
You’re right, Roy
Never mind.
I wasn’t thinking.
LikeLike
It would be interesting to get parent education level for the students. There would probably be a stronger correlation.
LikeLike