Tom Ultican, a former teacher of physics and advanced mathematics in California, is diligently analyzing the tentacles of the Corporate Reform Movement, which he calls the Destroy Oublic Education Movement.
Relay Graduate School: a Slick “MarketWorld” Education Fraud
In this post, he scrutinizes the Relay “Graduate School of Education,” a program run by the charter industry to give master’s degrees to charter teachers who have mastered the arcane arts of no-excuses discipline and test-score raising.
You must read the entire post. It is carefully documented and chilling. He names the key players, the funders, and gives powerful insight the emptiness of the program.
He begins:
Relay Graduate School of Education is a private stand alone graduate school created and led by people with meager academic credentials. Founded by leaders from the charter school industry, it is lavishly financed by billionaires. Contending that traditional university based teacher education has failed; Relay prescribes deregulation and market competition. Relay does not offer “coursework in areas typical of teacher education programs—courses such as school and society, philosophy of education, and teaching in democracy ….” Rather, Relay trains students almost exclusively in strict classroom management techniques.
Ken Zeichner is one of America’s leading academics studying teacher education. In a paper on alternative teacher preparation programs he noted that Match Teacher Residency and Relay “contribute to the inequitable distribution of professionally prepared teachers and to the stratification of schools according to the social class and racial composition of the student body.” Zeichner clarified,
“These two programs prepare teachers to use highly controlling pedagogical and classroom management techniques that are primarily used in schools serving students of color whose communities are severely impacted by poverty. Meanwhile, students in more economically advantaged areas have greater access to professionally trained teachers, less punitive and controlling management practices and broader and richer curricula and teaching practices. The teaching and management practices learned by the teachers in these two independent programs are based on a restricted definition of teaching and learning and would not be acceptable in more economically advantaged communities.”
Relay is another component of the destroy-public-education infrastructure that mirrors Professor Noliwe Rooks’ definition of segrenomics; “the business of profiting specifically from high levels of racial and economic segregation.”
Founding Relay Graduate School of Education
Relay’s foundation was laid when the Dean of City University of New York’s Hunter College school of education, David Steiner, was approached by Norman Atkins of Uncommon Schools, David Levin of KIPP charter schools, and Dacia Toll of Achievement First charter schools. Dean Steiner agreed to establish the kind of Teacher Preparation program at Hunter College that these three charter industry leaders wanted. The new program which began in 2008 and was called Teacher U.
Kate Peterson studied Relay for a Philadelphia group. She noted,
“Receiving $10 million from Larry Robbins, founder of the hedge fund Glenview Capital Management and current board member of Relay, and $20 million from the non-profit The Robin Hood Foundation, the three charter school leaders partnered with Hunter College in New York to implement their program ….”
The following year the newly elected and extremely wealthy Chancellor of the New York State Board of Regents, Merryl H. Tisch, tapped David Steiner to be Commissioner of Education.
Read it all.
Personally, I find it offensive that a charter industry program calls itself a “graduate school of education” when it has no scholars on its “faculty,” no library, no research. It is a training program with one purpose only: to award master’s degrees to charter teachers who know nothing of the history, philosophy, economics, or sociology of education, who know only one form of pedagogy, who know nothing of child or adolescent psychology. Their students are indoctrinated into the charter way of thought, not educated to think for themselves, not exposed to different points of view.
Robert Hutchins, who was president of the University of Chicago and a great thinker, said long ago that the purpose of professional education is to teach people to become critics of the profession.
That will never happen at Relay.

“less punitive and controlling management practices and broader and richer curricula and teaching practices.”
True of ed tech too. They dump product in low and middle income schools, exclusively. The only difference is charters focus on urban areas and ed tech also reaches rural areas.
A lot of the blame should go to the elite leaders of ed reform who seem to have captured whole swathes of our government, but public school leaders have played a role too- they have accepted the subordinate position these folks assigned and swallowed too many of the sales pitches.
Be the experts. Claim your earned authority. That’s why we hired you. If we wanted what ed reform churns out we would have hired THEM. Be the public school experts. Your local community will love you for it.
LikeLiked by 1 person
SUBORDINATE. That one really hurts because it is so true.
LikeLike
“public school leaders have played a role too- they have accepted the subordinate position these folks [elite ed-reform leaders] assigned and swallowed too many of the sales pitches.”
I don’t think this quite gets at the big picture. Have principals & sch supts actually accepted a subordinate role assigned to them by ed-reform leaders? The paradigm seems more to be: elite ed-reform leaders are backed by deep-pocketed orgs who buy the policy they want at the state level, which gets pushed onto district supts & from there onto principals. The latter two are in fact subordinate to state DofEd, most particularly in the 50% of states where state taxes pay for 51+% of school costs.
Granted, principals & school supts these days often come from a background that is heavier in biz than ed, which makes them more gullible to biz-based ed-reform pitches. But facts are, no one’s paying them huge bucks to take a stand against top-down pressure.
One missing link is parent/ public opinion via locally-elected Board of Ed. Any power they had in such states is diffused by the many charters (& even voucher) schools w/ independent boards. The other missing link is teacher voice, which in such states is usually muffled by lack of union negotiating power.
LikeLike
Diane posed the question and then answered it about what drives the billionaires’ attack on public education. She said that without the money, support evaporates.
IMO, the campaign against public education has a second front – prosperity Catholics like those at the Acton Institute. Additionally, Koch-linked think tanks back Catholic schools.
William Barr, Trump’s protector who was raised Catholic, supports vouchers. “We should press vouchers at every turn for the inclusion of religious institutions.” Mother Jones reported 6 days ago that Barr is giving the department’s award which normally goes to DOJ lawyers who fight organized crime, terrorists, corrupt politicians, etc. will, this year, go to Team Kavanaugh, because they got the judge’s seat for him. Kavanaugh’s religion, is Catholic. His biggest supporter was, conservative Catholic, Leonard Leo.
Which Democrats at the Barr hearings asked him about vouchers, a scheme that transforms public schools to Catholic schools?
LikeLike
Linda,
DeVos is not Catholic. The southern states are not falling for privatization because of Catholics. Don’t focus on one religious group.
LikeLike
Personally, I would be happy to see Gates, Hastings, Broad, Charles Koch, and the rest of the billionaires spend their money to save Catholic schools instead of destroying public education.
LikeLike
Thank you for allowing me to disagree at your blog- the process of corporatizing Catholic schools and funding them with tax dollars is reprehensible to me. If the situation was happening at the same frequency for evangelical, Muslim, LDS, Wiccan schools, etc., I would be citing them and looking for evidence of connections to government policy.
Religious schools that perpetuate male privilege, that encourage students to campaign against women’s rights to birth control, that discriminate in hiring based on unwed motherhood, gay lifestyle, etc. are, IMO, a threat to the values that the U.S. should have.
Emphasis on teaching “control”, specifically, related to property rights sounds like a right wing dog whistle to me. If it’s associated with Catholic schools in articles praising them, it merits examination because independent Catholic media have identified a schism in American Catholicism (National Catholic Reporter).
Just as the dogma of Arne Duncan found criticism when a Republican, DeVos, picked up the mantle, if a priest was Secretary of Education, instead of DeVos (peddling vouchers), the issue of separation of church and state would gain greater visibility.
Based on what I have read, I’ve concluded that Leonard Leo and Bill Barr’s religious beliefs are central to the agenda they promote. Therefore, honesty compels me to say it. Again, thank you for allowing me the opportunity.
LikeLike
The are no LDS private schools, Linda. Stop using that as an example.
LikeLike
TOW,
At least one person has a different perspective. 10-5-2017, Quora’s answer to the question, “Does the Church of Jesus Christ of Latter Day Saints run its own high schools… similar…to Catholic Churches?” Photos are included. The number, nationally, is statistically insignificant.
It’s more significant that Tim Busch (Napa Institute), the DeVoses, Jerry Falwell Jr. etc. supported Romney’s presidential bid.
A person, religious or not, who takes a government service or assistance of any kind should vote for the politicians that make it possible, not those destroying government so as to establish oligarchy.
LikeLike
Linda you are on this Catholic thing & it’s warping your normally hi-qual reasoning. Look at the jump you make here: “Barr is giving the department’s award which normally goes to DOJ lawyers who fight organized crime, terrorists, corrupt politicians, etc. will, this year, go to Team Kavanaugh, because they got the judge’s seat for him”…… – “Kavanaugh’s religion, is Catholic. His biggest supporter was, conservative Catholic, Leonard Leo.”
Also: “If the situation was happening at the same frequency for evangelical, Muslim, LDS, Wiccan schools, etc., I would be citing them and looking for evidence of connections to government policy.” Based on this link https://www.ncronline.org/news/people/nones-now-big-evangelicals-catholics-us US citizens self-identifying as Evangelicals and those self-identifying as Catholics are virtually equal at 23% [interesting, same as “nones,” or no religion at 23%]. I agree that that stat means folks should be looking at Catholics w/a baleful eye re: school-privatization policy, & you are raising consciousness on that. But as the article notes, Evangelicals “punch above their weight”: “white evangelicals alone made up 26 percent of the electorate in 2016, even as their share of the American population has dipped far below that.” And important: uncounted in these stats are many LDS & a fair # of Lutheran schools in play.
I note that your characterization of Catholic schools as “Religious schools that perpetuate male privilege, that encourage students to campaign against women’s rights to birth control, that discriminate in hiring based on unwed motherhood, gay lifestyle, etc.” applies universally to Evangelical schools. I question whether these features apply universally to, say, Catholic schools in the Northeast (the only area I can speak to personally). In any Northeastern community you will find parishes that reflect their congregations’ liberal views, & they certainly do not promulgate the views you cite in their schools. In fact, many Northeastern inner-city schools have for decades enrolled non-Catholic, multicultural kids; ‘religious classes’ are run after the regular curriculum.
LikeLike
Bethree,
Pope Francis and his supporters appear to consider the power of the prosperity/right wing American Catholics as a concern and he has publicly acknowledged the opposition against him. I’m not aware that there is a geographical separation. I presume the Napa Institute is in Calf. Leonard Leo is in Maine. Last year, there was a financial cut in support for the Pope/Vatican from a major Catholic institution, based on ideological difference.
You are correct my goal is to steer the “looking at”. I also agree with you that if there is an evangelical or other religious school chain equivalent to a school system like Cristo Rey, equal treatment demands my review and comment. The chain allegedly linked to Gulen has been the subject of multiple posts and I have added comment.
I think NCRonline is the National Catholic Register which has Tim Busch (Napa Institute) on the board. The National Catholic Reporter declares itself an independent voice. It supports Pope Francis.
Every American should know about the following national power brokers who operate outside of government, Bill Gates, Charles Koch, Leonard Leo, and the Acton and Napa Institutes. They have inserted themselves into the topic of public education which makes knowing them, their agendas and the nature of their coalescence important.
LikeLike
My error- your link is to National Catholic Reporter
LikeLike
I am not making a geographic distinction as to the operations of deep-pocketed politicos using religion to promote their agendas. The dioceses and how they run their schools have not been captured– yet. In my own area, you can observe a vast difference between the Archdiocese of Newark’s “Respect Life” webpage (which e.g. has a couple of sections re reporting/ healing from sex abuse by clergy, has a local retreat event for discussing abortion as opposed to busing students to March for Life), and that of Diocese of Trenton’s (which focuses on abortion, funds ‘March for Life’ busing et al).
The inroads prosperity gospel is making on Catholicism in Africa and LA (mainly via Pentacostals and Charismatics) is despicable, focused on the poorest of the poor. There’s a spate of articles in the online Catholic press warning congregants against it as un-Christian & unsupported by Vatican.
More disturbing is what I’ve learned of the US anti-Vatican movement based in neoliberal economic theory, thanks to your posts. Its history is well-summarized here: https://sojo.net/magazine/march-2019/rise-catholic-right They’re using our lax 501(c)3-4 laws to bring about a Catholic version of the politicization of Protestant Evangelists (including prosperity gospel). Yet another reason to fight publicly-funded religious schools tooth and nail.
LikeLike
Bethree,
Thanks for the link. Questions.
What percentage of Catholics, especially those who vote, are followers of the prosperity gospel?
Do the prosperity Catholics, when they join efforts with evangelicals, have outsized influence on government policy and legislation?
What process highlights for congregants, the schism within the church?
Assigning the ideological right wing a general label of conservative makes it more difficult to set up a battle front against those who attack the common good and women’s rights and, who concentrate wealth. To isolate the exact location of the attackers has a better chance at a win. Tactically, the difference between Catholics and evangelicals is manifest, how?
Is there opportunity for a political wedge between the two? Is one possibility, support for worker associations?
Jane Mayer’s book about the Koch’s made the public aware and helped generate donations to oppose the agenda of oligarchs. Diane has done the same relative to Bill Gates. The more publicity the Napa and Acton Institutes and Tim Busch and Leonard Leo get, the better. Criticism of them best comes from other Catholics. Members of denominations who oppose the prosperity gospel should be standing up to say it publicly.
LikeLike
Of course I can’t answer most of those questions. But taking a stab at “how many [US] Catholics follow the prosperity gospel?” Stats online address Prot& non-denom churches. Found only one generalized to all, an EIU researcher’s reading of a module in 2012’s Gen Social Survey: 42% Americans have no prosperity leanings; 7 in 10 scored 0.25 or less on the prosperity scale. Nothing addressing what proportion of the remaining 30% might be Catholic. BUT: ½ of LatAm US Catholics [34% of US Catholics] are pentacostal/ charismatic – who are prone to prosperity gospel – so we may be talking about as many as 17% of Catholics [who are 23% of US]. However, wikipedia says rate of conversion away from Cath/ dropping out of religion altogether is happening at a much faster rate among LatinX-Ams than among non-hisp whites, blacks or Asian-Americans, & will not overtake them– so this fertile ground for Cath prosperity-barkers is already on the wane.
LikeLike
“on the wane”- the votes at the polls are one imprecise measure.
Turzai’s win/loss will provide info. I haven’t read about racism in Catholic congregations. We can deduce a bit about one segment within a segment, from the views of Italian Americans. (Encyclopedia.com)
I was stunned to hear an intelligent, educated woman, Anglo-Saxon, who listens to NPR instead of Fox, uses birth control, strong practitioner of the Catholic faith, who voted for Trump, who believes firmly she is not racist, say recently that she had never heard MAGA associated with being white. She has resided in Las Vegas for two years, prior to that, a long time resident of Cincinnati.
Bethree, how do I make sense of that? It’s important to understanding how votes like hers can be turned Democratic.
LikeLike
I don’t think you’re going to have much luck w/someone so out of touch politically. First step might be to refrain from imagining her opinion as “Catholic.” Might have more to do w/Ohio upbringing than ed & NPR-listening, but who knows, & how would I just because I’m also Catholic? US has prox 70million Catholics, more than the entire population of the UK or Thailand—and about 17million Italian-Americans (the population of the Netherlands). It’s non-productive [if not offensive] to think of either group as some sort of same-thinking monolith.
I’ve spent more time w/my 100% Italian-American Catholic in-laws than my own family during adult life, & that group alone ranged from a couple of rabid racists [long deceased] to my own former-hippie still-liberal husband. Generalizations: mostly Democratic [which I attribute to their NYC culture], & very tolerant, live-&-let live folks, appreciative of individual differences [which I’d thought of as Italian-American, as it was common to the in-laws of the in-laws, & many other It-Am friends—but that could just as easily reflect folks attracted to like folks]. I can’t imagine any of the more-conservative & long-gone elders voting for Trump – but that’s because they were New Yorkers.
I think you are onto something when you examine the machinations of deep-pocketed politico-Catholics attempting to sway the flock to their own privatization agenda, because such people—given our corrupt politics—can sway national policy. Especially important w/Catholicism, as [unlike w/Evangelists] there’s a unified hierarchy [USCCB]. But you can’t get much traction trying to generalize attitudes among 17million Americans.
LikeLike
I like Tom Ultican because he calls things by their real name — eg, fraud — rather than by the term that deformers have given them (Relay Graduate School).
If more people did this, such frauds would never have got off the drawing board.
LikeLiked by 1 person
exactly!
LikeLike
“Rebecca Kantar: I started Imbellus to offer assessments that measure “21st-century” cognitive skills that we talk about often but have thus far been unsuccessful in quantifying at scale across the education system. Rather than assessing what people know, Imbellus is assessing how they think. Our assessments are designed to measure skills like problem solving, systems thinking, critical thinking, adaptability, and metacognition.”
These people. I swear. The BELIEF in measurement is near-religious.
It is ALL they offer students. They are developing a whole new suite of tests, in addition to the tests they all sell now.
It is just a relentlessly grim and WHOLLY market-based view of the world. It’s quite literally commercial. The kids are product to churn out for the market.
I feel sorry for a 5 year old coming up now. There’s no joy in it.
So here’s what public school leaders could do. They could do their own thinking and STOP buying everything they sell. It’s not required. Don’t be bullied into swallowing this stuff. Why do you care if Betsy DeVos smears you? You’re all much more an expert than she is if you’re working in a public school. Claim your expert status, because if you don’t these folks will.
https://www.educationnext.org/straight-conversation-woman-whos-trying-reimagine-testing-rebecca-kantar/
LikeLike
How did legitimate colleges of education end up being called “monopolies?” It is the same way public schools were perceived by those misguided enough to believe that public services are “monopolies.” Public education is not a market, nor should it be.
Relay is a fake institution of education. They teach antiquated ideas about how to control and make poor, minority students comply. It is educational colonialism from Doug Lemov. “His list of techniques expanded to 49 and that became TLC. It was a behaviorist approach to classroom management and teaching.” As someone that spent a career teaching poor, minority students, I know that there are other more humane and effective ways to deal with discipline that are more respectful and positive with the ultimate goal being self control. However, I am a professional teacher with a master’s plus degree.
Relay, charters and vouchers are supporting separate and unequal education for poor minority students. This separatist world view is unhealthy in a diverse society. We need opportunities for all people to find common ground, and this is one of the tremendous benefits of an integrated public school.
LikeLike
I keep holding out hope (however unlikely) that some day some whistleblower (from inside Gates Foundation?) will release the “Deform playbook” that includes the grand plan to market fake “reform” including all the fake terminology . I would bet good money that it exists somewhere within the bowels of some server (even if they have made every effort to delete it, such stuff has a way of surviving)
LikeLike
CAEP’s board chair is a Fellow of the Gates-funded Pahara Institute which was founded by the same person who founded/co-founded TFA, NSVF and Bellwether.
LikeLike
Hi Diane – here in the UK the Growth Mindset is being is being misrepresented and rubbished. See my article in its defence
LikeLike
Here in the UK the Thinking School movements in Exeter and Cambridge universities are fighting back against tedious knowledge based instruction and behaviourism – Read about it here
LikeLike
Diane Wasn’t sure where to put this, but it’s important background to any discussion where Trump is concerned. In today’s New York Times, Michelle Goldberg writes about Roy Cohn, who BTW reminded me right off of Stephen Miller by way of her first paragraph in the article:
SNIP: “Near the beginning of “Where’s My Roy Cohn?” the new documentary about the lawyer and power broker who mentored Donald Trump, an interviewee says, “Roy Cohn’s contempt for people, his contempt for the law, was so evident on his face that if you were in his presence, you knew you were in the presence of evil.” He wasn’t being hyperbolic.”
LikeLike
I dissent. There IS an invidious monopoly of groupthinky Schools of Education. Proof? None of them advocate anything like Doug Lemov’s approach. It’s group think. I have issues with Doug Lemov, but he, E.D. Hirsch and others are blackballed at most major Schools of Education (please correct me if I’m wrong). They are serious thinkers who would be given a fair hearing at a respectable education school.
Tom’s and Zeichner’s tendentious characterization of Relay does not make it sound that great. I’d like to know more about it before I pass judgement on it.
I laughed when I read the criticism that Relay’s pedagogy is ” not supported by research, by theory”. Is inquiry learning, a Ed School fave, supported by research or theory? No, it is not. There are mountains of evidence against it, yet it keeps getting taught to tyro teachers at these “serious and professional” Schools of Education. The evidence firmly establishes the superiority of direct instruction. Direct instruction seems to be central to Relay’s gospel. Thus Relay is the more respectable school on this front at least.
Tom paints all Reformers with the same broad brush and makes them all seem part of a conspiracy to destroy public schools. I’m sure some of these folks really are die-hard neoliberals. I know some of them, like Hirsch, are just fed up with the education establishment and have hitched their stars to this alternative establishment because of the mainstream’s narrowmindedness. He is a progressive Democrat and I’m sure he’d prefer good public schools to this dual system. I doubt Steiner is a neo-liberal ideologue either; he’s just a die-hard humanities guy who is dismayed, as I am, by the harebrained ideas that dominate our public schools these days.
Can we have nuance, or is the world all angels and demons?
LikeLike
There is nothing respectable about Relay.
It does not teach E.D. Hirsch or Ravitch.
It does not teach a knowledge-based curriculum.
It’s faculty includes no scholars of any subject.
What do you like about it, Ponderosa?
LikeLike
Diane,
One think I like about it is that, if it follows Lemov’s book, it promotes direct instruction. DI is supported by research; many conventional ed school faves are not. In other words, Relay is promoting scientifically-supported pedagogy while the others are promoting ideological pedagogy. This is no small matter.
I like the Hutchins quote you included. If the mark of a good professional education is the capacity of its graduates to criticize the profession, Relay may fail, but so do most conventional ed schools as it is a rare conventionally-educated teacher who questions the orthodoxy. I know: I talk to teachers from all over.
LikeLike
Ponderosa,
Relay represents exactly what Hirsch’s opposes: skills/pedagogy, not cultural literacy/knowledge/content.
Do you support a knowledge-based approach or not?
Hirsch’s initially supported Common Core because he thought it emphasized a common curriculum. When he realized it was content-Free, he turned against it.
LikeLike
Diane,
I’m not sure I understand your comment.
Are you saying Relay teaches teaching skills, and thus is anti-Hirsch? I have less problem with the idea of teaching domain specific skills like classroom management than the idea of fake generic skills like reading comprehension. That said, I do think it is a fallacy that it’s the set of teaching skills one supposedly gets in ed school that makes or breaks a teacher. Subject-area expertise is at least as important.
To the extent that conventional programs teach more history of education and education theory (in my own program, these courses were not taught well), I agree that Relay would be somewhat wanting.
On the other hand, if Relay does derive most of its gospel from Doug Lemov, it encourages its graduates to use direct instruction and robust content-delivery (Lemov likes Daisy Christodoulou, England’s Hirsch), so in this sense Relay does advance Hirsch’s mission to teach knowledge.
LikeLike
I thought you care about content knowledge.
Relay has no courses related to content knowledge.
It emphasizes skills and ignores content.
I wrongly assumed that’s what you reject.
LikeLike
Speaking of fraud, I would like then entire tuition of my “masters in educational leadership cum ed certificate” program at my state university to be reimbursed. What did I learn from it that I could actually use in the classroom? NOTHING. Speaking from 24 years of experience.
s
LikeLike
Troll much?
LikeLike