Caleb Crain has written a wonderful essay-book review in the current issue of The New Yorker about the state of unions today, referring to several recent books about unions. Where once they were part of the fabric of American society, they have increasingly been marginalized since the Reagan era, as big bosses, automation, and a hostile political climate combined to reduce their membership dramatically.
Do you have rights at work? Franklin Delano Roosevelt thought you did. In 1936, while trying to haul America’s economy out of the bog that the free market had driven it into, Roosevelt argued that workers needed to have a say, declaring it unjust that
a small group had concentrated into their own hands an almost complete control over other people’s property, other people’s money, other people’s labor—other people’s lives. For too many of us throughout the land, life was no longer free; liberty no longer real; men could no longer follow the pursuit of happiness.
For Roosevelt, a system in which bosses could unilaterally decide “the hours men and women worked, the wages they received, the conditions of their labor” amounted to “dictatorship.” He hoped that the New Deal would bring workers and managers together in a new form of workplace governance.
New Dealers drew on an idea known as industrial democracy, developed, in the late nineteenth century, by English socialist thinkers who saw workplace rights as analogous to civil rights such as due process and the freedoms of speech and assembly. Senator Robert Wagner, who wrote the National Labor Relations Act of 1935—also known as the Wagner Act—made the point explicitly: “Democracy in industry means fair participation by those who work in the decisions vitally affecting their lives and livelihood.” In their efforts to civilize the workplace, however, Roosevelt and his allies didn’t set up a new institution for workers to speak through. They relied on an existing one: the union.
Whenever the rate of unionization in America has risen in the past hundred years, the top one per cent’s portion of the national income has tended to shrink. After Roosevelt signed the Wagner Act and other pro-union legislation, a generation of workers shared deeply in the nation’s prosperity. Real wages doubled in the two decades following the Second World War, and, by 1959, Vice-President Richard Nixon was able to boast to Nikita Khrushchev that “the United States comes closest to the ideal of prosperity for all in a classless society.”
America’s unions and workers haven’t been faring quite as well lately. Where labor is concerned, recent decades strongly resemble the run-up to the Great Depression. Both periods were marked by extreme concentrations of personal wealth and corporate power. In both, the value created by workers decoupled from the pay they received: during the nineteen-twenties, productivity grew forty-three per cent while wages stagnated; between 1973 and 2016, productivity grew six times faster than compensation. And unions were in decline: between 1920 and 1930, the proportion of union members in the labor force dropped from 12.2 per cent to 7.5 per cent, and, between 1954 and 2018, it fell from thirty-five per cent to 10.5 per cent. In “Beaten Down, Worked Up” (Knopf), a compact, pointed new account of unions in America, Steven Greenhouse, a longtime labor reporter for the Times, writes that “the share of national income going to business profits has climbed to its highest level since World War II, while workers’ share of income (employee compensation, including benefits) has slid to its lowest level since the 1940s.”
“Beaten Down” updates Greenhouse’s book “The Big Squeeze” (2008), in which he portrayed a “broad decline in the status and treatment of American workers,” with such details as fingers chopped off in a yogurt-container factory, stockers locked inside a Sam’s Club overnight, and a Walmart cashier who “menstruated on herself,” as a colleague put it, after being denied bathroom breaks. (The colleague was disciplined for buying the woman sanitary napkins and a washcloth on company time.) “Beaten Down” adds new outrages to the list, including the shuttering of the Web sites Gothamist and DNAinfo by their owner after staff writers unionized, but Greenhouse’s emphasis this time is on remedy rather than indictment. A General Motors employee recalls the union legacy she inherited from her great-grandfather, who participated in a strike at the company in 1936 and 1937 that helped launch the golden age of American labor. “Nobody realizes that all that we have is because of what was done before,” she says. The book is a kind of primer for the woman’s peers, explaining how “the eight-hour workday, employer-backed health coverage, paid vacations, paid sick days, safe workplaces” arose—and what the prospects are for keeping them.
One of the earliest heroes in Greenhouse’s book is a Ukrainian immigrant named Clara Lemlich, a dressmaker and a union organizer, who, in 1909, hopped onstage during a rally at Cooper Union to call, in Yiddish, for a strike against New York’s garment industry. Carried out mostly by women, the strike became known as the Uprising of the Twenty Thousand. At the time, there was little to stop bosses from dialling clocks back to steal time, or from charging employees for the water they drank, but the women won holidays, raises, a shorter workweek, and, at many factories, the recognition of their union, the International Ladies’ Garment Workers’ Union. Among the holdouts was the Triangle Waist Company, which had a factory near Washington Square. In 1911, a bin of cotton scraps there caught fire, and a hundred and forty-six workers died, most of them women and almost half of them teen-agers, trapped because an exit door had been locked to prevent pilfering and unauthorized breaks.
One witness to the disaster was Frances Perkins, the head of the New York Consumers League, whose job involved lobbying against fire hazards, child labor, and overlong hours. “People who had their clothes afire would jump,” she later recalled. Outrage about the fire inspired a reform movement, and Perkins pushed New York legislators to institute a new fire code. By the time Roosevelt was elected governor of New York, in 1928, Perkins was chairing a board that oversaw industrial safety in the state. After the stock market crashed, in 1929, she urged Roosevelt to set up a public-works program, unemployment insurance, and a workers’-compensation program—and he did. When he rose to the White House, a few years later, Roosevelt invited her to be Secretary of Labor; Perkins was the first woman ever named to a Cabinet position. Before accepting, she warned him that she expected the same programs for the whole nation, plus a federal minimum wage, a shorter workday, and pensions….
Emily Guendelsberger gives a sense of just how far we are from that dream in “On the Clock” (Little, Brown), a jaunty but dispiriting memoir of her work at three low-rung jobs: at a call center, a McDonald’s, and an Amazon warehouse. At the call center, she finds that her fellow-workers, caught between unpredictable customers and eavesdropping managers, suffer panic attacks so often that the local paramedic asks “Okay, who is it this time?” when he gets out of the ambulance. Chronic stress also predominates during Guendelsberger’s stint at McDonald’s. There are always too many customers waiting in line, and she constantly fears that their impatience may at any moment tip over into rage. Eventually, she realizes that the staffing shortfall has been carefully calibrated: “Understaffing is the new staffing.” The resulting stress, Guendelsberger warns, thwarts “logic, patience, paying attention, resisting temptation, long-term thinking, remembering things, empathy”—in short, all the faculties necessary for responsible citizenship.
At Amazon, a handheld scanner tells Guendelsberger what to do at every moment and tracks her even into the rest room. A training video warns of the work’s physical demands—“This is going to hurt”—and she’s disconcerted that painkillers are dispensed for free. But soon, she writes, “I pop Advil like candy all day.” Her shifts last eleven and a half hours, and she gets home too drained to even think of writing or reading. One day, slumped in front of “The Muppet Christmas Carol,” she finds herself “laughing almost involuntarily” at the realization that “Scrooge literally has a better time-off policy than Amazon.”
Crain gives hopeful examples of working uniting to claim rights in the workplace, one example being the educators’ “red for ed” movement, another being the well-targeted demand for a base pay of $15 an hour.
See if you can read the article online. It is worth your time.

Morrison–Knudsen (MK) was an American civil engineering and construction company, with headquarters in Boise, Idaho.
MK designed and constructed major infrastructure throughout the world and was one of the consortium of firms that built Hoover Dam, San Francisco–Oakland Bay Bridge, the NASA Vehicle Assembly Building, the Trans-Alaska Pipeline, and many other large projects of American infrastructure.
………………………………………………………
My father worked for Morrison Knutson and was within two weeks of getting a pension. He was fired and never got a penny for the years of work that he had done.
LikeLike
It’s no secret that the US has a history of rabid anti-unionism. What else would you expect from a country that was built on the backs of slaves and indentured servants. Our labor union history is rife with violence and bloodshed. Even during the highest point of union density in the 1950s, the unionization rate was in the 30% to 35% range as compared to the Scandinavian countries which have unionization rates ranging from 50% to more than 70%. Above and beyond its unions (about 18%), Germany has works councils in which the workers have a voice at the management level, unthinkable in the US. Reagan initiated a new wave of union busting in the 1980s, a renewed and reenergized war on unions. Taft-Hartley, the Janus decision, right to work laws, all carefully designed and crafted to kill off unions.
LikeLike
As soon as labor takes a stand, the conservative media start calling organized labor “union thugs.” The whole “reform” education movement blames the sleeping teachers union for causing labor problems to drum up anti-union sentiments. The union, of course, supports labor, but it has not led the strikes. We really need to overturn the “right to work” ;laws that are out of the ALEC playbook. Bernie has stated that he will work to overturn them, if elected.
LikeLike
I have seen T-shirts that said UNION THUG
Take it as a compliment
LikeLike
dianeravitch
https://www.zazzle.com/union_thug_demands_t_shirt-235815513752056614?rf=238840279726397180&tc=EAIaIQobChMIpPjRrsOz5AIViZ-fCh1eNwI4EAQYAiABEgKvAvD_BwE&utm_source=google&utm_medium=cpc&utm_campaign=us_shopping&utm_term=z235815513752056614&ca_chid=2001810&ca_source=gaw&ca_ace=&ca_nw=g&ca_dev=c&ca_pl=&ca_pos=1o2&ca_cid=303811431747&ca_agid=59506841174&ca_caid=1600127682&ca_adid=303811431747&ca_kwt=&ca_mt=&ca_fid=&ca_tid=pla-579397191354&ca_lp=9004510&ca_li=&ca_devm=&ca_plt=&gclsrc=aw.ds&gclid=EAIaIQobChMIpPjRrsOz5AIViZ-fCh1eNwI4EAQYAiABEgKvAvD_BwE
LikeLike
Get your UNION THUG T-Shirt!
LikeLike
Rush Limbaugh says that “unions are basically satellite collection offices for Democrat campaign committees. That’s what the majority of union dues literally go to is Democrat campaigns.” Apparently Rush hasn’t figured out that the GOP does nothing except promote more money for the wealthy. Does Rush believe the garbage he spews, or is he just happy making millions off of selling out America? Immigrants take jobs Americans don’t want. They work hours in unbearable conditions and live in cramped quarters hoping to survive. This country has gone to the dogs.
………………………………………………….
A Millennial Union Worker for Trump
Aug 9, 2019
RUSH: Here is James in Oxford, Pennsylvania. Great to have you on the EIB Network, sir. Hello.
CALLER: Hello, Rush. Thanks for having me.
RUSH: You bet. So, I just want to say I’m a 28-year-old Millennial union worker who’s for Trump. Now, I think that us union workers are being misrepresented by our own unions. I think that our unions pay these big campaign contributions to the Democrats who say that they are for unions and they’re gonna help unions and things like this. But they talk about illegal immigration and it should be allowed in our country, and our union leaders suck up all the union talk, but they’re actually against unions —
RUSH: Exactly right.
CALLER: — by stating that they should be allowed to come here and take our jobs.
RUSH: Yeah. Exactly. We’ve marveled at this for a number of years. Now, did I hear you right? You’re 28 years old? You’re a Millennial?
CALLER: I am.
RUSH: Boy, God bless you. There are a lot of people that have been working for unions for a long time that haven’t figured this out. You’ve figured it out fairly early. You know, unions are basically satellite collection offices for Democrat campaign committees, James. That’s what the majority of union dues literally go to is Democrat campaigns.
CALLER: Yeah.
RUSH: And you don’t have any say in the matter.
CALLER: Not at all. And the thing that’s messed up also? So, there’s union president of the AFL-CIO, Richard Trumka —
RUSH: Yeah.
CALLER: — who states on Thursday that the ICE raids in Mississippi that are coming into our workforces is messed up. Well, if you are for American workers like you say you are, why are the illegal immigrants allowed to take our jobs?
RUSH: James, you’re right. They are liberal Democrats first and union or whatever else second, third, and fourth.
LikeLike
‘He’s opposed every increase in the minimum wage’: AFL-CIO Chief rips Trump’s anti-worker agenda
September 2, 2019
In an interview ahead of Labor Day, AFL-CIO chief Richard Trumka said workers across the nation are suffering under President Donald Trump’s supposedly “booming” economy and slammed the White House for refusing to raise the minimum wage, pushing for cuts to Medicare and Medicaid, and gutting workplace safety regulations.
“He came to our members and said, ‘I’m going to change the rules of the economy,’and they believed him. And, quite frankly, I wish he would have changed the rules of the economy,” Trumka told Fox News‘s Chris Wallace on Sunday.
“Unfortunately, the rules he’s changing has hurt them,” said Trumka. “He’s opposed every increase in the minimum wage. He’s changed the regulation to take overtime away from a couple of million people. He’s proposed a trillion dollar cuts to Medicare and Medicaid… He’s rolled back health and safety standards towards workers.”
https://www.alternet.org/2019/09/hes-opposed-every-increase-in-the-minimum-wage-afl-cio-chief-rips-trumps-anti-worker-agenda/#.XW0qR_x4p2c.gmail
LikeLike
Happy Labor Day! I often wonder how so many Americans have come to distrust unions instead of greedy bosses. Then I see a television commercial or two and I remember:
Americans are no longer union strong. We’re now built Ford tough. We take a licking and keep on ticking. We’re college and career ready because of our rigor. We are Uber hustlers. We are Walmart cheap. We don’t need corporate democracy because we have grit and Gatorade — Is it in you? Living with no labor protections is so easy a caveman could do it. We’re downright Cro-Magnon smart, see? Work long hours for little pay; don’t think, just put on those shoes you paid hundreds of dollars for, that were made by near slaves in Southeast Asia costing pennies, and just do it. You deserve a break today, not a fifteen minute break, though, just a greasy McDonalds sandwich while you hurry to work before dawn. America runs on donuts. I’m loving it.
LikeLiked by 1 person
This is poetry. Nice job.
LikeLiked by 1 person
from community protective to neoliberal’s individual bootstraps in thirty years: if you don’t have those bootstraps, who on earth should be obligated to lend you a hand?
LikeLike
Polls show a positive swing in attitudes toward unions in both parties.
LikeLike
Look for the union label. It says “Factory closed, moved to China”
LikeLike
Unions WORK. Notice the happy countries have a high percentage of Unions.
LikeLike
Americans don’t want happiness. They have been led to believe that the accumulation of “things” is what will make them happy. Until everyone realizes that they have” been had” by corporate America, we will always live unhappy and wanting…. and plugging/toiling away at the chance to buy some happiness.
LikeLike
What would truer happiness be?
LikeLike
https://www.cnn.com/2019/08/31/us/labor-day-union-support-controversy-trnd/index.html
Go UNIONS!
LikeLike
My son works for Walmart. He clocked 150 hours of overtime. But because he is an assistant manager and on salary rather than hourly pay, he received no compensation for those extra hours. This should be illegal. Teachers deal with this as well. Last week I put in five 12 hour days and then worked 8 on Saturday. That is nearly 30 hours above my contract hours. I was not alone. My whole first grade team clicked those hours. Note these were the hours in the building. One teacher commented that she worked another 2 1/2 hours at home each evening to prepare for our new math program.
LikeLike
And some whack job Libertarian or Cro-MAGAtron, will kindly tell you that you have a cushy job because you have summers, weekends and holidays off, and you get a pension and health insurance. Little do these people know how hard it is to “herd cats” and teach them the 3 R’s at the same time. Teaching isn’t for sissy’s!….and I’m not a teacher. And Walmart is a horrible employer.
LikeLike
I think I heard this parable or something like it here on this, The blog: A teacher, a plumber, and a CEO sit at a table with ten loaves of bread. The billionaire takes nine loaves and the other two take one apiece. The billionaire turns to the plumber and says, “Watch out. I think that teacher wants your loaf of bread.”
LikeLike
Make that eight loaves for the CEO. (English and history teacher here, not math.)
LikeLike
I wondered about your math.
LikeLike
It was Common Core math. Nine plus two equals ten, as long as you show your work.
LikeLike
Firstgrademonkey: In one of the districts that I worked in in Illinois, the music teachers were all working more classes than was allowed by contract district regulations. The attitude of the administrators was, “You can leave if you don’t like it. We won’t hire more teachers.”
It never mattered that we were exhausted. Just do your job and shut up.
LikeLike
Maybe sonny should try running his own business.
LikeLike
LABOR DAY: Back to School, Back to Basics
By Jack Burgess
I have to admit some nostalgia as another school year gets underway. I think back over the years to my own education, to working as a teacher, and in the teacher association. Education is in turmoil right now, but that’s nothing new. Back in the ‘50’s and ‘60’s there was a strong, reactionary “back to basics” movement that pushed for a return to the “3-R’s,”emphasizing memorization, testing, and tough discipline. Schools had gone beyond that, though, to include the arts, vocational programs, counseling, and more. Also, many teachers developed styles of learning that helped young people think for themselves, in a pluralistic society and world.
Teachers were grossly underpaid. Everybody said it, but no one did anything about it. When I began teaching in 1964, in Miamisburg, Ohio, I started at the meager sum of $4900 per year! (For comparison, though, the minimum wage was $1.75). Teacher organizations were not strong and were in no position to push for better pay. Later, they were and did.
Teachers, in industrial states, began to unionize into the American Federation of Teachers and the larger National Education Association. In 1960, the New York City teachers went on strike, and this caught the attention of the nation, especially in the big cities—like Columbus, where I had moved. In those days, there were quite a few combat veterans from World War II and Korea who had gone to college on the G.I. Bill and were now teaching. After fighting in the South Pacific, or against the Nazi’s in Europe, they were in no mood to be second-class citizens. In ’61, President Kennedy issued an executive order recognizing the right of Federal employees to unionize—though not to strike. In Ohio, strikes by teachers and other public employees were illegal, with fines and jail terms for union leaders. Nevertheless, teachers—with a strong assist from a more militant OEA—persisted in going on strike in several Ohio school districts, such as South Point.
In 1968, Columbus teachers reorganized their association into a strong union and demanded collective bargaining rights. A strike was averted with the help of consultants from the NEA and labor lawyers for the school board, and teacher bargaining began in earnest. Subsequently, Columbus teachers got big pay raises, bringing them from the bottom of Ohio’s large cities, to near the top. But the bargaining was never just about salaries. Teachers wanted smaller classes so kids could get more individual help. They wanted a reduction of large, “warehouse” study halls, and they wanted a grievance procedure so they would be treated with the dignity in their profession. The days of being told, “Shut up and sit down!” were about over.
Later, in the ‘70’s, I was privileged to head the Columbus teachers’ efforts as Chief Negotiator. We reduced class sizes and teacher workloads, got the school board to develop alternative, racially integrated, magnet schools, pushed for equal support for girls’ sports. We helped the school system peacefully desegregate its 150 buildings, as directed by Federal Court. We had a one-week strike in 1975 and were threatened with jail, but the teachers persisted to a successful settlement.
In 1982, Governor Celeste signed a law giving all public employees the right to organize unions and to strike—except safety forces, who use arbitration to settle disputes. Chillicothe teachers voted to strike in ‘96, but managed a good settlement without an actual walkout.
Reactionary forces rallied against all this, of course. President Reagan’s administration produced a report—A Nation at Risk–which claimed American public schools were failing and needed drastic changes. (Most of this was bogus or greatly exaggerated—as American education had helped make the U.S. the strongest nation in the history of the planet!) The Bush and Obama administrations pushed through bi-partisan and misguided efforts to “reform” public schools by giving families vouchers to go to private schools, giving public money to private, for-profit schools, and worst of all, pushing onerous and counterproductive testing showing schools and kids failing, and so on. (“No Child Left Behind,” the contradictory “Race to the Top,” and the “Standards” movement). We’ve eliminated most vocational education and a lot of the arts in public schools.
It’s the wrong direction. Teachers in Oklahoma, West Virginia, Seattle, Chicago, L.A. and elsewhere have struck for better schools. The current CEA in Columbus is actively fighting for public education with marches and strong leadership.
In an increasingly complex world, we need to invest a lot more in good public schools for all our kids, K through college. And we don’t need compromised corporate or political consultants to tell us how to do it! We need the arts and vocational education—the technologies of today and tomorrow. We need a more humane education, that values every youth! The very survival of our nation and our world depend on our good basic, public schools. In the richest, most powerful country in the world, yes, we can afford to do it. We can’t afford not to!
Jack Burgess is a retired Ohio teacher and former Executive Director of the Columbus Education Association. He also served as Chief of Arbitration, Office of Collective Bargaining, in the Celeste Administration, and as Ohio Council Coordinator for the Service Employees International Union. His columns have appeared in The Chillicothe Gazette, Circleville Herald, BBC Muckrack, and elsewhere. The opinions expressed are his own.
LikeLike
What percentage of a school’s budget should be devoted to instruction vs. administration?
LikeLike
I was one of six children. My father was a member of the ILA ( international Longshoreman’s Association) we lived through many strikes in the 50s and 60s.my father fought along with his union brothers for decent wages, healthcare, vacation time and sick days. We often lived hand to mouth, but we knew that it was well worth the fight. The Workers won good wages and many other benefits. We were the recipients as children but unfortunately my parents did not live long enough to enjoy the benefits of the hard won pension plan. But we had a roof over our heads, food on the table, money coming in regularly, even when there was little work on the docks (due to a hard won guaranteed wage). We knew all of this was because of the union and the willingness to fight for workers rights, including job protections and safety.
Two of us went into union jobs (teaching and the police force) and are now enjoying comfortable retirements because of our union benefits. No matter our criticisms, and there are many, those who work union jobs in NYC are better off than they would be with out the protections and benefits the unions have won for us over the years.
LikeLike
“Real wages doubled in the two decades following the Second World War…”
Admittedly, the reason for this spike was not totally the union membership. Europe and Asia were destroyed, and American factories were ready to produce, having just spent five years turning out guns and uniforms. What is remarkable about this period was that in other periods of dramatic rise in productivity, income at the top has outstripped worker’s wage increase. This certainly happened when the industrial explosion of the Guilded Age ushered in the age of steel and corruption. It happened again when the computer dramatically increased productivity, and the resulting wealth gap is a major political issue.
It was obviously the union contracts that distributed the wealth all around rather than making the post-World War II era a time of more wealth at the top. But is is even more important, because subsequent tax cuts and incentives to spend on homes and autos have been a big part in the health of the economy after that generation. Moreover, unity in support for the country has been remarkable. Past eras have seen hostile feelings that sometimes spilled blood.
The trump tax cut has been a remarkable failure. Is this because wage inequality has sapped the ability of the American consumer to seriously fire up the economy? Or has trump just screwed up the effect with his quasi-trade war.
LikeLike
“One must accentuate especially the role which —- —— attributes to the labor bureaucracy and to the labor aristocracy in the further fate of mankind. Thanks to their support, the American plutocracy not only succeeds in defeating the worker’s insurrection……”
One does not have to be Leon Trotsky commenting on Jack London’s 1908 “Iron Heel ” to see the failures of the American Labor movement . When unions cease being in the forefront of the fight for economic justice they empower the plutocracy. Individual Unions and our members have been all to willing to cut their own deals with oligarchs at the expense of other workers and other Unions.
One need not look any further than Trumka’s statement on M4all. We again become a broad based movement for social and economic justice or we perish.
LikeLike
Since about 1980, all of the rewards for labor’s productivity gains went exclusively to America’s richest.
LikeLike
Corporate media devotes news time to exalting the bargains available on Amazon- they wouldn’t want to expose the loss of American democracy.
LikeLike
In 2011 I was invited by CNN.com to write a piece for their website in light of the protests then going on in Wisconsin. I do not own the copyright, CNN does, which prevents me from posting the entire text here. But I can post this link to take you to it
http://www.cnn.com/2011/OPINION/02/23/berstein.labor.unions/index.html
I am proud of this piece, which got 3x as much traffic as a piece posted the same time by Michelle Rhee, which CNN heavily promoted (they did not promote mine).
BTW, the piece got me an invite to appear on Ali Velshi’s CNN show to debate unionism with Stephen Moore, whom Trump just tried to appoint to the Federal Reserve. I declined because I would have had skip an entire day of school only a few months before the AP exams, and that was not fair to my students.
LikeLike