The Washington Post published this excerpt from the new book by former Defense Secretary James Mattis, which was originally published in the Wall Street Journal:
In the excerpt, published Wednesday by the Wall Street Journal, Mattis writes about the need for leaders to appreciate the value of allies without explicitly mentioning Trump, who has made a slogan of “America First.”
“Nations with allies thrive, and those without them wither,” Mattis writes. “Alone, America cannot protect our people and our economy. At this time, we can see storm clouds gathering. A polemicist’s role is not sufficient for a leader. A leader must display strategic acumen that incorporates respect for those nations that have stood with us when trouble loomed.”
Mattis argues for “returning to a strategic stance that includes the interests of as many nations as we can make common cause with.”
“Absent this,” he says, “we will occupy an increasingly lonely position, one that puts us at increasing risk in the world.”
The excerpt follows Trump’s attendance at last week’s Group of Seven summit in France, marked by his rejection of fellow global leaders’ climate change concerns, his call for Russian President Vladimir Putin to be readmitted to the G-7 despite the annexation of Crimea in Ukraine, and his erratic behavior toward trade negotiations with China.
I don’t understand why Mattis was afraid to speak out directly and name the man who appointed him, whose policies he is now criticizing.
Mattis was a Marine general. Is he afraid of Trump? I mean, really, everyone knows who he is talking about. Why a disquisition about what leaders should do without mentioning the name: TRUMP.
Why people tiptoe around that jerk is beyond me.
No guts no glory.
There is a time for decorum, and there is a time for standing up for one’s country against someone who makes a mockery of everything it is supposed to stand for.
He who must not be named. LOL. However, Secretary Mattis, if you should chose, at some point, to mention The Name, I have some some suggestions:
Trump the Chump.
Vlad’s Agent Orange.
IQ45.
Our Part-time President.
Our Accidental President.
Donald (J for Jabba) the Trump.
Teflon Don, the Sequel.
The Great White (Supremacist) Hope.
The Don, Cheeto “Little Fingers” Trumpbalone.
Prez Pinocchio.
Trumpty Dumpty.
Don the Con.
The Man with the Plan and the Tan-in-a-Can.
Dog-Whistle Don.
Child-Man in the Promised Land
Mr. Little
The Stable Genius (i.e., compared to some animals found in stables)
The Sleezeburger
MAGAt
MAGA-man (Moscow’s Agent Governing America)
Or one might simply refer to him as the fellow with “the understanding of fifth- or sixth-grader.” That works.
Commander Bone Spurs. “King of the flag waving arm chair patriots”.
Name calling doesn’t get the Democrats a candidate, however. Every one, especially Bernie, is a communist agent. It just won’t fly in flyover country.
Unlike Vlad’s Agent Orange, hey, Harlan? LMAO. https://www.politico.com/magazine/story/2017/11/19/trump-first-moscow-trip-215842
https://washingtonmonthly.com/2019/03/11/on-the-trump-russia-conspiracy-follow-the-laundered-money/
Just won’t fly with Harlan. LOL. Thanks for the comic relief. As I have tried to explain to you a number of times, Harlan, there is a difference between the Soviet Union under Stalin and Social Democratic countries like Denmark. See if you can wrap your mind around that. Think really, really hard.
If Bernie is a Communist, you are a full blown fool.
Mattis reminded me if the German conservatives unwilling to call out Hitler. Did they really agree with him? Hope to control his insane nature to benefit their own wishes? The reason Mattis does not name trump is that they coincided on so many points. He sees his mission as a marine as protecting our people and our economy. When the economy attacks some of the people, whom do you choose. His refusal to mention trump by name suggests that the is more interested in protecting the economy than the people.
I don’t know enough about Mattis to judge what his reasons for not mentioning Trump by name were. I thought his point, though, was what is strategic to be doing as a member country in the world community. In that sense the person who occupies the White House is relevant only in how he advances the country’s common cause with our allies for the good of all. It really seemed like what a military leader would say. It is framed as advice without directly criticizing the Commander in Chief.
Mattis is priming the pump to sell his book that is coming out, just in time for the holidays.
From CBS News: Begin quote: The retired four star general does not criticize Mr. Trump directly, saying he will not speak ill of the commander in chief. But there’s little doubt when he writes “a polemicist’s role is not sufficient for a leader.” He is referring to the president’s controversial tweets and statements. “What concerns me most,” Mattis writes, “is not our external adversaries; It is our internal divisiveness.” end quote
He will not speak ill of the commander in chief? He meant to say that he will not speak of the ill commander in chief because it’s so nauseating.
Clever juxtaposition of words in your last paragraph, Joe.
Ain’t it the truth…
It’s not as if he isn’t perfectly clear whom he means. He’s only half right though. Trump wants military strength above all. Obama’s fail was that he did not. A supremely strong USA will attract allies.
Trump achieves this military superiority how, Harlan? Oh, yeah, by tweeting classified pictures; by unilaterally making major changes in defense policy by tweet in the middle of the night without consulting anyone; by alienating all of our allies and his own Secretary of Defense; by telling aides that he wants to withdraw from NATO; by cozying up to kleptocratic dictators; by diverting military funding to his stupid wall; by berating and discounting his intelligence services; by ignoring briefings; by unilaterally calling for Russia’s reentry to the G7/8 despite the forced annexation of Crimea and ongoing hostilities in Ukraine; by calling for a militarization of space; by ending arms proliferation agreements and initiating a new arms race, and lord knows what else, given that Vladimir Putin expended ENORMOUS intelligence and other resources to make him our president. How much has Agent Orange compromised his country? Who knows. This could be really, really bad.
Do we attract allies by insulting them? That’s a new idea. George H.W. Bush carefully cultivated allies, as did his sob.
Trump insults them.
When we need them, they won’t be there.
That’s what Jim Mattis said.
Do you know more more than the former Secretary of Defense?
Harlan, you are a blowhard.
Sorry if I spoke ill of the commander in chief, above. I meant to say, ofc, Individual 1.
New from Randy Rainbow: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=gW2SEpWWqXM
Thank you, Bob! My favorite, to date!
Big mistake for Mattis. Don’t think his book is going to sell well w/o the “scoop” (or, perhaps, poop) on IQ45.