When then Governor Christie and then Mayor Cory Booker persuaded billionaire Mark Zuckerberg to give $100 million to impose corporate reform on Newark, performance pay for teachers was the heart of their plan. Pay the “best” teachers for getting high scores, eliminate “bad” teachers, and Newark schools would be transformed.
In a major blow to the corporate reform movement, the latest teacher contract in Newark just eliminated performance pay.
It didn’t work in Newark, and it hasn’t worked anywhere else. It is a zombie idea. Teachers aren’t holding back, waiting for a bonus to goad them on. They are doing the best they know how. With help and support, they can improve, but not because of rewards and threats.
In 2012, Newark teachers agreed to a controversial new contract that linked their pay to student achievement — a stark departure from the way most teachers across the country are paid.
The idea was to reward teachers for excellent performance, rather than how many years they spent in the district or degrees they attained. Under the new contract, teachers could earn bonuses and raises only if they received satisfactory or better ratings, and advanced degrees would no longer elevate teachers to a higher pay scale.
The changes were considered a major victory for the so-called “education reform” movement, which sought to inject corporate-style accountability and compensation practices into public education. And they were championed by an unlikely trio: New Jersey’s Republican governor, the Democratic-aligned leader of the nation’s second-largest teachers union, and Facebook founder Mark Zuckerberg, who had allocated half of his $100 million gift to Newark’s schools to fund a new teachers contract.
“In my heart, this is what I was hoping for: that Newark would lead a transformational change in education in America,” then-Gov. Chris Christie said in Nov. 2012 after the contract was ratified.
Seven years later, those changes have been erased.
Last week, negotiators for the Newark Teachers Union and the district struck a deal for a new contract that scraps the bonuses for top-rated teachers, allows low-rated teachers to earn raises, and gives teachers with advanced degrees more pay. It also eliminates other provisions of the 2012 contract, which were continued in a follow-up agreement in 2017, including longer hours for low-performing schools.
“All vestiges of corporate reform have been removed,” declared a union document describing the deal.

Merit pay, VAM, market based education with private charters-vouchers and personalized learning are all zombie ideas that many Northerners are willing to abandon. The only reason any of these bad ideas survive is that that wealthy keep using their wealth as a weapon of public destruction. In the South zombie ideas are still on the move like the walking dead. Kudos to Newark for putting the ineffective, bad ideas of “reform” behind them.
LikeLike
bravo.. two thumbs up!
LikeLike
Newark wipes out performance pay for teachers.
Christie and Booker work together to wipe out $100 million.
Zuckerberg gets a “charitable” contribution.
The children of Newark, and the public school teachers who serve them pay the price.
LikeLike
In my school, performance pay meant this: the folks who were assigned the Honors classes got the pay.
LikeLike
There are a lot of issues in public school that are like that. Teachers who have the recognition get to teach the highly motivated students. Other teachers get to deal with the problems. We spend a lot of time criticizing the charter schools for cherry picking students, and private schools are pretty much out front in their mission of teaching only the highly motivated. But the underside of teaching is that some people get to teach the highly motivated and others have to pick up the pieces.
As a person who takes some pride in the tradition of teaching all of the students, I take offense when people blame the teacher for educational failure.
LikeLiked by 1 person
I taught the lowest of the low ELLs and loved it. I received the same compensation as every other teacher. However, my district had the good sense to limit my class size at 18 and provide me with a reasonable budget. Most of my career was before high stakes were attached to standardized tests. Reasonable working conditions as well as fair compensation also make for contented teachers. I can guarantee that I would have been far less effective in a class of 36 than a class of 18.
LikeLike
In my first teaching job, in darkest Indiana, in a one-factory town full of latch-key kids, there were five remedial preps in the English Department. I got all of them. LOL. Give them to the new guy.
LikeLike
Bob: It is precisely this behavior that makes me uncomfortable when we criticize the Charter sector for trying to teach the difficult kids with teachers who are inexperienced. This is exactly what we have been doing in public schools for a long time. Granted, administrators do it so veteran teachers will not leave for nice suburban schools with few problems, but it is not a good idea. Practices like these are part of the problem, and they helped lead us down the road to the ed reform and its acceptance by the majority.
I am not giving any justification for fraud, cheating, or any other of the myriad of reprehensible behaviors documented here on this web site daily. What I am calling for is some self-examination about how we train, introduce, and retain good people who can become good teachers.
LikeLike
Roy: agree with both your posts. It was because I taught all levels in that first ’70’s gig that I became intrigued with finding best ways to teach those to whom for-lang did not come easily. There was no support for that then [& little more now]. The prevailing sentiment was either you had the knack or you didn’t; no special pedagogy geared to help the latter. Any parent recognized early start would make it easier– but other than briefly after Sputnik, US continued to start late & ignore conversational methods for another 40 yrs.
Even today, US pubschs ignore lots of recent research & better methods. Elemsch for-lang is available only in wealthy districts. 7th-8thgr beginners are the hardest to get off the ground, needing best methods & most qualified teachers. What my kids got instead (20 yrs ago) was just what I had, 30 yrs prior: strict old Europeans w/little patience for American kids, using antique grammar-first methods. (Anecdotally, re: a few I tutor: same thing currently). Presumably the good ones “graduate” to AP after “paying their dues” w/most challenging students. Bassackwards attitude.
LikeLike
The whole idea behind meritocracy is this: The vast majority makes sacrifices to pay the select few. The VAM algorithms are designed to ensure that only a small fraction of teachers receive high ratings. If every class in a district is highly gifted or scoring high on stupid tests, the majority of teachers will still be rated average. What a farce! Merit pay and meritocracy are epic fails.
LikeLike
I remember being delighted w/modest pay in my 1st teaching gig as a private hisch French teacher (w/just a BA). 15% less than the certified pubsch teachers seemed a steal in exchange for 15-18 ave-to-gifted kids in a class. Plus I had an excellent dept-head/ mentor: it was like getting 2 yrs’ paid student teaching. I taught 5 levels; FrIV & AP French students were the easiest to teach, plus I was fresh from Fr Lit studies so the curriculum was right up my alley. I am really surprised to hear some districts pay the AP-course teachers more. I would have thought those would be the jobs attracting the most qualified applicants.
LikeLiked by 1 person
I’m having memory trauma blowback by the mere mention of the name Chris Christie, UGH! Viciously anti-public schools, (he called them failure factories), rabidly anti-union, anti-NJEA, anti-public school teacher and pro school privatization. Are you ready for this?! From huffpost: Former New Jersey Gov. Chris Christie’s new nonprofit think tank has some people on social media scratching their heads. [jump]
The Christie Institute of Public Policy will center on bringing civility back to politics.“Unfortunately our politics have gotten so ugly and divisive in the country that people are not having civilized conversations,” Christie told NJ Advance Media.” end quote
Christie is one of the reasons our politics has gotten so ugly and divisive; CC is the poster boy for ugliness and divisiveness.
The Christie Institute of Public Policy? Ha, ha, ha, sounds like satire, a joke or a skit from SNL. Christie’s new think tank takes the think out of think tank. This from the guy who said: “Take a bat to her,” “Sit down and shut up,” “Numb nuts!”
LikeLike
Christie is another foul mouth bully that insulted teachers and undermined public schools. His “think tank” wants to bring civility back! My question is what is Christie’s angle and how is he monetizing this?
LikeLike
Yes, the mere mention of the names of reformsters causes memory trauma. Former Superintendent John Deasy’s name causes me to wretch.
LikeLike
Never forget how AFT Pres Randi Weingarten pushed for this contract, as she did for merit pay in Denver which has also failed.
LikeLike
Yep!
LikeLike
A semi-dissenting view:
Teachers should be paid – well.
Teachers should be paid for satisfactory performance – meeting the standard.
No one has yet to figure out how to “measure” above the standard. Test scores don’t work. The most inter-rater reliably trained rubric is not totally objective.
However –
Teachers should be paid – well – with a sound base salary and increases annually for satisfactory teaching.
AND teachers who grow should be compensated. Pathways.
Options to take on additional learning that transfers to their professional expertise, to the curriculum, to the profession.
Action research. Micro-credential. Certificate of expertise. A self-directed (or collaborative with other teachers) “courses of study.” Additional certification – particularly in co-teach areas like ESOL, special education, reading. NATIONAL BOARD.
Learn more – earn more.
And no – this is NOT about college degrees to “move across a schedule”
And NOT about taking on a “leadership role” or extra duty.
This is about teachers who stay in the classroom – become the resident expert on Shakespeare or the Civil War or teaching reading.
Stipends or a % increase for career earnings.
We pay sports coaches and musical directors for taking on more responsibility. What more important responsibility to we need than continuously learning teachers!
LikeLike
Here’s my blog post linking the story to how the AFT backed the plan: Merit pay Dies in Newark But don’t forget Weingarten Role in Getting it passed in the first place: https://ednotesonline.blogspot.com/2019/08/merit-pay-dies-in-newark-but-dont.html. The history of our union’s support for ed deform schemes needs to be examined because at some point there is a failure in judgement by the same people running them today.
LikeLike