The biggest battle in the fight against privatization has been to persuade the Democratic Party that it had been hoaxed by Republicans into adopting the Republican agenda. According to this article in The Washington Post, Democratic support for charter schools has evaporated, at least among the candidates.
The title of the article is “Democrats abandon charter schools as ‘reform’ agenda falls from favor.” No one has more egg on their faces than the editorial board of the Washington Post, which loves charter schools and defends them at every turn.
Until 1993, Democrats supported equity and federal funding for public schools, while Republicans supported choice, testing, competition, and accountability.
Then Bill Clinton embraced charter schools, testing, standards, and accountability. Then came NCLB and it was endorsed by Ted Kennedy and the entire Democratic Party.
Then the Obama Race to the Top gave total support to the Bush NCLB approach of charters, testing, and harsh accountability, and Arne Duncan spent seven years parroting the Republican line that the best way to improve schools was to get tough on teachers, make tests harder, and open more charter schools.
According to the Washington Post, the Democratic love affair with charters is over.
The steady drumbeat of scandals and the vivid advocacy of Betsy DeVos have killed the Democrats’ charter love.
Suddenly, the Democratic candidates for president seem to have realized that school choice is a Republican issue. Supporting the public schools that nearly 90% of all students attend is a Democratic issue.
This is awkward for Democrats like Governor Jared Polis of Governor and Senator Michael Bennett of Colorado and Senator Cory Booker of New Jersey, and Governor Andrew Cuomo of New York, all fans of charters.
Democrats have long backed charter schools as a politically safe way to give kids at low-performing schools more options. Many supported merit pay for the best teachers and holding schools accountable for test scores.
The presidential contest is proof that’s no longer the case.
If the candidates say anything about charter schools, it’s negative. Education initiatives boosted by the Bush and Obama administrations are nowhere to be found in candidate platforms.
Instead, the Democratic candidates are pitching billions of dollars in new federal spending for schools and higher pay for teachers, with few of the strings attached that marked the Obama-era approach to education.
It adds up to a sea change in Democratic thinking on education, back to a more traditional Democratic approach emphasizing funding for education and support for teachers and local schools. Mostly gone is the assumption that teachers and schools are not doing enough to serve low-performing children and that government must tighten requirements and impose consequences if results do not improve.
As a senator, Joe Biden said private school vouchers might help improve public schools. As vice president, he was atop an administration that made support for charter schools a requirement to access federal grant funding. But when asked about charters — privately run, publicly funded schools — during a recent forum with the American Federation of Teachers, Biden sounded a negative note.
“The bottom line is it siphons off money for our public schools, which are already in enough trouble,” he said….
Bernie Sanders thus far is the only candidate to call for an end to federal funding of charter schools. The safe position for Democrats is to oppose “for-profit” charters, while ignoring the fact that many “nonprofit charters” are operated by for-profit management corporations.
The story continues:
It’s an unsettling development for advocates of the structural changes that have fallen out of favor, and a sharp turn from where many Democrats were just a few years ago. Former presidents George W. Bush and Barack Obama had pushed a bipartisan drive for accountability, and charter schools were the answer for Democrats who opposed private school vouchers but wanted to offer other options to children — often children of color from low-income families — assigned to low-performing schools. They were important to some civil rights leaders and became a central plank in the drive for school accountability….
The American Federation of Teachers has been hosting candidate forums throughout the country, inviting contenders to spend a day with teachers and then answering questions town hall-style.
At the town hall with Biden last month, AFT President Randi Weingarten was so warm and complimentary that it left some with the impression she was laying the groundwork for an endorsement.
“Vice President Joe Biden was our north star in the last administration,” she said. “We didn’t always get along with the Obama administration positions on education, but we had a go-to guy who always listened to us.” She added: “He’s with us because he is us.”
During the Obama administration, the National Education Association was so angry it called forEducation Secretary Arne Duncan to resign, and the other big teachers union, the AFT, came close…
The shift underway has Democrats who support charter schools and related policies nervous. Democrats for Education Reform is circulating results of a poll that show support for charter schools is higher among African American Democrats than whites. But overall, the poll found just 37 percent of Democratic primary voters have a favorable view of charters.
Some like-minded Democrats are working on something they call the Kids New Deal, hoping to find a candidate to support it. The centerpiece of the proposal is to make children a “protected class” under the law, which would make it easier for them to file lawsuits challenging, for instance, tenure for teachers, on the grounds that it hurts children.
“The goal here is to outflank the teachers unions from the left and not from the right,” said Ben Austin, a longtime education restructuring advocate.
DFER is the hedge fund managers group created to persuade Democrats to act like Republicans and support privatization. It offered big money for candidates who swallowed their line. DFER was condemned by the state Democratic Party in both California and Colorado as a front for Wall Street and corporate interests.
Ben Austin is one of California’s most aggressive charter school proponents, having run the faux Parent Revolution, whose goal was to convert public schools to charter schools. He spent millions of dollars from Gates, Waltons, and other billionaires, but converted only one or two public schools. If he is behind the “Kids New Deal,”’it is probably another billionaire-funded privatization vehicle.
The great news in this article is that those who have warned Democrats to return to their roots and stop acting like Republicans have won the debate.

I wish I was as positive. But our schools are being destroyed by standards based learning and personalized learning.
LikeLike
You’d think we’d learn from the Finnish.
But then, the Fins have different values. The Fins actually don’t want their citizens to be UN-happy.
How about we start with honoring certification of public school teachers, paying teachers, and getting rid of all those tests and ridiculous homework?
LikeLike
Add socio-emotional “learning” to your list.
LikeLike
I don’t agree with Diane. The Dems blow with the wind. Unless you are AOC or a scant few others, Dems will pose one way and once in power, return to their corporate-centrist orientation.
Once corrupt, always corrupt.
I say bring in the socialist democrats and put them where they belong: IN POWER!
LikeLike
I agree. Both parties are corrupt. I don’t trust the Dems any further than I can throw them on education or anything else. Better slightly than the GOP. We need Sanders. Period.
LikeLike
I wondered why the Democrats were so far behind on the truth of this: Dumbing down the proletariat
LikeLike
The answer, ofc, as always is that a great, green river was running from the coffers of the Education Deformers into the campaigns of Democrats.
LikeLiked by 1 person
Bad, bad, sad!
LikeLiked by 1 person
Love your blog, Ms. Mykel! Fascinating!
LikeLike
yOU CAN CALL ME nAN FOR THAT COMPLIMENT! tHANKS, nAN
LikeLiked by 1 person
So much fascinating material, Nan. Wow. I love your Commonplace Book-style “Secrets.” And thank you for the work you do on behalf of survivors.
LikeLiked by 1 person
A heart-warming comment…Thank you
LikeLike
So sad that many of those kids who fall through the cracks in public schools find better solutions in charters and elsewhere. If public schools did it right from the get-go, we wouldn’t be seeing them now trying to gain back control by eliminating options. We need to allow choice- we can’t pretend that all children learn the same way, at the same time. Children don’t grow well in artificial learning environments, hence the high rate of failure in them. The standards and grading and the entire way of teaching to a test is not real learning.
LikeLike
You’re kidding, right? I teach in a somewhat poor public middle schools, and I get students back from charter schools all the time. It’s not usually because the public school has “failed” the student–it’s because the parents are frustrated and think that the charter will “fix” their child. And it doesn’t work! Charters don’t “fix” anything.
So the kids come back to public schools–academically behind. Always. Many of the parents find that, contrary to your notion of “saving” kids in charters, that charters turn away or refuse to help students with behavioral issues, learning challenges, etc.
LikeLike
Greenwood holds the common goods to the standard of perfection and the schemes of profit takers to no standard.
Elizabeth Warren described the low cost of government provided services to the mark-ups that companies like insurers and big Pharma
rake-off.
LikeLike
I would like to see the AFT issue a summary position statement from the various candidates and their meetings regarding public education for each and every candidate. I would like to see the AFT issue a statement repudiating all of the efforts to privatize our treasured public asset, our public schools. The AFT has a long history of its willingness to compromise with DFER’s bad ideas. I hope the AFT makes the candidates work for its endorsement. I still think it’s early for a victory party as many efforts continue to test and punish our schools and monetize our young people.
LikeLike
I agree. My concern is that Randi is trying to do her best to find a way to shove ABB – Anybody But Bernie – down our collective throats.
LikeLike
The teachers’ unions need to come out CLEARLY in support of repeal of the Federal testing requirement. Until they do this, they will be complicit in Deform.
LikeLike
Elizabeth Warren is the media darling now. Her smiling face, groomed hair and plans are constantly projected. She is being represented as acceptable, an acceptable mainstream substitute for Bernie, whose unruly white hair, rumpled suits, deep Brooklyn accent, 50 years of activism, and lifelong “socialism” scare the status quo, unacceptable to the corporate insiders still running the two teacher unions, the mass media, and the Democratic Party. Warren declared herself a “capitalist,” which means she can be managed more easily than lifelong activist/socialist Bernie can.(P.S.–today’s NYTimes page 2 went out of its way to note that Bernie’s hair was combed when he showed up for a recent interview.)
LikeLiked by 1 person
I would love to see Bernie Sanders be our next president. If the right can confuse itself into thinking that Sen. Warren is on its side, that’s great, too. They will have a surprise coming.
LikeLike
Feel the Bern! https://www.msnbc.com/katy-tur/watch/bernie-sanders-speaks-ahead-of-first-democratic-debate-62728261923
LikeLike
“Power concedes nothing without demand.”
–Frederick Douglass
It is thus, & has always been…
LikeLike
My recent school board public comments.
“I have sent all of you the NEPC research brief around Personalized learning . It states, once again, the lack of any evidence that it works. I heard the main researcher, Faith Boninger, speak to this brief. She is willing to present their work to our community. The research presented validates what I know about learning.
When I was in the classroom, my colleagues and I read and listened to actual education experts both researchers and practitioners. Richard Allington, Donald Graves, Nancy Atwell, Barry Lane, Katie Wood Ray and Ralph Fletcher to name a few. It amazes me that our district is more influenced by consultants from the Gates Foundation and other non-educators than by education experts who have studied best practice and how best to teach our children.
My colleagues and I worked hard at doing best by the children in our classroom. We saw our work as scholarly. Sometimes, I was sage on the stage and sometimes guide on the side. Fortunately, I wasn’t forced to be one or the other but knew when to do what. More importantly I was trusted as the professional educator that I was to determine when to do what worked best.
I never posted standards or learning targets in the classroom, but we all knew what we were doing and more importantly why. Quite often there were moments that we were pleasantly surprised by a new idea or possibility. We focused on the learners and quality instruction. We had a curriculum, but to rely so heavily on learning targets actually narrows the learning process. Standards based learning contradicts learning that is personal.
For reading instruction, I implemented a reading workshop model in which students self- selected their reading material. With this text, we talked about and practiced various skills, strategies, and thinking processes that would enhance our reading comprehension. I told students there is nothing passive about reading, and there are times when your brain can be quite sore from the activity. Standards based learning makes learning passive. When we’re all readers, the possibilities are limitless. I never labeled students as advanced, proficient or below proficient nor would I even think of letting a computerized test determine a child’s reading ability and because of this, we were all readers in our classroom. We didn’t rely on targets determined by someone else to define who we were.
This standardized system is not working . . . anywhere
I support increased school funding, as I get the end game for our public schools. It is to starve them by increasing class sizes, replace professional educators with technology and with people who aren’t actually professional educators. The end game is to implement bad policy created by the likes of Bill Gates and others who know nothing about learning. This is done without transparency or community input which in turn creates discontent, divisiveness and parents looking for alternative paths for their children. I will continue to be persistent in sharing all of the information I have about how your policies are not best for our children in the hopes that you will change course and use our money in ways that are best for all of our kids. Instead implement policies that support small class sizes, replaces technology with professional educators and implement best practice. These practices are supported by research.”
LikeLike
Your experiences during your career closely mirror my own. My school district did some amazing work using approaches that were based on scholarly research. Teachers had some level of autonomy and respect. Now our schools are simply viewed as consumers of products from wealthy companies. There’s no evidence or research, just marketing of products. Teachers are viewed as expensive expendables.
LikeLike
Gates paid to create a single set of national “standards” precisely with this purpose in mind: having one bullet list to key depersonalized education software to. His notion: the cost of schooling is all in facilities and salaries. Reduce, dramatically, the cost of both by educating the Proles with depersonalized education software. Sick. Clueless. Evil. What one would expect from a monopolist. But it’s working, and many educators are cluelessly abetting him.
LikeLike
Well said. My experience as well.
LikeLike
Stephanie,
One group that is promoting digital learning and public private partnerships are your state employees in the Dept. of Education. Their organization, SETDA, is funded by Gates. The group has Gold, Silver,
Strategic and Event partners from the private sector. They offer pitch fests and scale-up seminars for ed tech products.
A former director said the group lobbies government.
LikeLike
Democratic politicians’ obeisance to NEA and AFT in primary season? OMG, what a shift.(?)
But when they govern, they often need to address complex sets of circumstances like those described this week regarding Providence, RI schools.
“PROVIDENCE — Rhode Island Education Commissioner Angélica Infante-Green has been on the job for less than two months, but she already has a startling response to a litmus test question about Providence schools: Would you send your children to any of them?
“No. Not one” of the schools, she said bluntly during an interview Tuesday morning.
“A scathing new report, issued hours later by researchers from Johns Hopkins University, demonstrated why even the state’s top education official would avoid Providence schools.
“The report outlines a series of recurring, disturbing issues plaguing the district, including arranged fights between female students that are promoted on social media, rodent traps stuck to students’ shoes, and ceilings collapsing in classrooms. The conditions were so concerning that members of the review team said they were left in tears.
“The review also paints the city’s school system as rife with low expectations for students but also crippled by a governance structure that leaves educators questioning who is in charge and a stifling union contract that makes it nearly impossible to terminate poor-performing teachers”
https://www.bostonglobe.com/metro/rhode-island/2019/06/25/team-hardened-school-reviewers-had-never-shed-tear-then-they-saw-providence-schools/u3lZeLaZqQXEjX32YjeCWN/story.html
And to quote below directly from the John Hopkins report:
“The Council agreed that specific schools are doing well. Examples include one elementary school that offers well-funded after-school programs, a “21st-Century grant,” and volunteer students and faculty from a nearby university. It’s a “full-service school with an open door to community organizations. One high school “is a shining star.” One Council member noted that “advanced academics have expanded into new schools.” They also agreed that charter schools work well for many students: in one charter school the “amount of support for children was night and day more than in the district schools.” However, there is divergence on whether to expand charter schools or to pause their growth. One member said: “Charter schools keep parents in the city; the main loser is parochial schools.” In response to a question about a large expansion of charters, members were cautious.
* One member said: “The pro would be we could get rid of all the obstacles and red tape and drama; but at the same time, [an issue would arise as to] how to protect the students from the wrong charter CEO.”
* Another said: “A part of me would be sad – because it’s sort of like the family you know, right? At the same time, if we do want to reset and start over, if we went the charter route, we would circumvent a lot of issues. [The question is] could we go that route? I don’t see the Providence Teachers Union going anywhere, so that is something we would have to deal with.”
* In response, a further member of the board said “I agree with that assessment; I think we owe it to the students, owe it to the parents to provide them the best possible education. If this were an option, I would not close the door on it, but would proceed with caution.
[…]
“There was general agreement that charter schools have been successful.
* One Board member mentioned the many days of PD that Achievement First charter schools in Providence provide, in comparison to the single day of PD in the district schools.
* Members spoke of Achievement First schools as having high “standards of excellence.”
o “There is a clear vision, there is a clear expectation, there is a clear function.”
o “You knew from the minute you walked in that there were expectations, that the teachers were all on the same page, that parents were welcome. There were very deliberate open-door days.”
“A few Board members noted the school-based health clinics they had put in place, and others the reduction in school suspensions, as notable successes.16 Finally, while there was consensus that many aspects of the Collective Bargaining Agreement hurt the district, members referred positively to specific areas of cooperation with the Providence Teachers Union and the PTU President herself, who “rolled up her sleeves” to address partnerships on chronic student and teacher absenteeism and suspensions.
Click to access PPSD-REVISED-FINAL-002.pdf
LikeLike
Check out the grants that J-H education professors receive (posted on their c.v’s).
Commenter Laura Chapman alerted readers to what J-H really is.
My description- J-H is a think tank with students.
R.I.’s governor loves hedge funds (read Matt Taibbi’s article in Rolling Stone). If she had anything to do with the education commissioner’s appointment, nothing the person says has any value.
Stephen,
We’re past the point where the public is willing (gullible enough) to overlook who buys the “research”.
LikeLike
While I haven’t yet read all of the report, I have read most of it and haven’t yet encountered significant dissent from the report’s conclusions either from review team members or from outsiders after the fact who have read it. If you come across any such criticisms, I’d be grateful if you’d direct me towards them.
You can find a list of review team members who conducted school visits on page 27.
The report states
“The review team members were invited to comment upon the relevant sections and, if they disagreed substantively with its consensus findings, to compose a minority viewpoint under their own name which would be inserted in the document.”
and
“We did seek consensus from each review team, each member of which has been given the opportunity to review the relevant sections of this document.”
If you’ve have not yet had a chance to read a substantial portion of the report, I would encourage you to do so, and would be interested to know if you find it persuasive… Perhaps at least the criticisms of Summit Learning as currently implemented in some schools?
LikeLike
The governor of RI is herself a hedge funder. Her husband was Cory Booker’s law school roommate and they share charter love
LikeLike
The Providence report gave a scathing review of Mark Zuckerberg’s Summit Learning Platform:
Excerpt from Providence Journal below. “The district’s much-ballyhooed online learning platform, Summit Learning, came under heavy criticism. Instead of using the software to do school work, students were using it to watch YouTube videos, listen to playlists, or work on assignments from other classes.
“Students almost universally disliked the Summit program,” the authors wrote. “They told the team that they were burned-out through over-use of screen time and bored.”
Because of the way Summit is set up, one student missed about half of the school year and still earned a B.”
See also full Johns Hopkins report here: http://edpolicy.education.jhu.edu/wp-content/uploads/2019/06/PPSD-REVISED-FINAL-002.pdf
Excerpts:
Finally, we witnessed significant problems in the use of the Summit Learning Platform. In one school, Summit was the major mode of mathematics instruction; in other classrooms, it seemed to be used for supplemental (e.g., remedial or practice) instruction. When we observed students using Summit, they were not engaged with the software in optimal ways. Instead of watching videos or reading tutorial texts, students went straight to the exam and attempted to answer questions. When they answered incorrectly, corrective text popped up, which students did read; they then tried again with the next question. Even if students progressed according to plan, their learning would be limited to how to answer problems in the format presented by the Summit exam. In one school, we did not observe a single Summit math teacher engage in whole-class or even small-group math instruction. Instead, teachers either completed work at their desks, and/or answered questions when students raised their hand. Finally, the lack of teacher surveillance of student progress in some Summit classrooms meant that students worked very slowly through the material.
Off-task student behavior was the same as, or worse than, in the more traditional classrooms, with some students observably working on assignments from other classes, viewing YouTube videos (or similar), queuing songs on playlists, toggling between Summit and entertainment websites, or pausing on work screens while chatting with neighbors.
To paint a picture of one Summit classroom at a given moment during our visit: Four students were working on history, one student stalled on an index screen, one stalled on a choice screen, one focused on a screen with other (non-math) content, two doing mathematics well below grade-level work, and two doing mathematics at, or close to, grade level. There was an aide in this room, but he did not interact with kids. One team member asked him what his role was, and he said, “Supporting students, I’m an ELL teacher.” He did not speak Spanish, however (which many kids were doing), and he did not have content expertise. He explained that his role is not to teach language, but only to offer support—he can “break down” problems well for students. When asked what he was doing in that moment, he said he was marking PPT projects (for another class) as “complete” or
“incomplete.”…
[in one school] The Summit platform (personalized learning) did not seem to be serving students’ needs. The content was low-rigor (6th graders spent a lot of time defining the word community, for example). Students did not have time to interact with one another or with teachers. Teachers interacted with one student at a time, and students became off-task for long periods of time….
[In another]
Students almost universally disliked the Summit program. They told the team that they were burned-out through the overuse of screen time, and bored. Some claimed that students actively left school as a result of the platform. There were classes we visited in which teachers appropriately integrated a blended learning model, but in most cases, students were just staring at the screens, totally disengaged.
· Large numbers of students seem to be chronically absent. Because of the way the Summit is set up, one student missed about half of the school year and still earned a B….
Interviewees spoke consistently and frequently about a lack of rigor and also the generally low expectations. They cited the following as contributing factors:…
Multiple instances of very poor implementation of the Summit learning platform, which is part of a general perception that a lot of money spent on technology but with very inadequate professional support….
It must be said that there is significant skepticism about Summit Learning Platform.
· Only two principals were positive about Summit technology. One said: “There was successful implementation and good buy-in following initial success.” A few teachers were also positive: “Summit makes students work harder. It brings themes to instruction.”
· Other principals, and teachers, said mixed to negative things. The most common reaction was a variation on what one principal said: “In a way it has helped but there has been no training for it.” From another principal: “Summit is used for grades 9 and 10 because of high teacher and student absenteeism.”
· Many students had a negative view: in one school, all students reported disliking Summit. “I don’t like the projects because it takes away from teachers teaching.” Another said: “With Summit you can basically finish in one week and then coast.”
https://www.providencejournal.com/news/20190625/heartbreaking-dysfunction-investigation-reveals-chaos-in-providence-schools
PROVIDENCE — Students in the Providence public schools aren’t learning much, bullying and fighting are rampant, bad teachers are nearly impossible to fire, and a thicket of bureaucracy makes it difficult to know who is in charge.
Those are some findings of a scathing review of the city’s public schools released Tuesday afternoon.
Angélica Infante-Green, the state’s newly arrived education commissioner, said the city schools are so dysfunctional that she will not send her own two children there. She said she doesn’t know where she will enroll them.
The report is the result of a deep dive into the state’s largest school district ordered by Gov. Gina Raimondo and Mayor Jorge Elorza in the spring after students scored alarmingly low on the state’s newest standardized test.
Almost two dozen educators spent several weeks visiting 12 schools and conducting dozens of interviews. Their findings, included in a 93-page report by the Johns Hopkins Institute for Education Policy, conclude that everyone — from the school district to the teachers union to the state Department of Education — is failing the city’s students.
LikeLike
Read Valerie Strauss on the Providence report and the neglect by the city and state:
https://beta.washingtonpost.com/education/2019/06/26/blistering-report-details-abject-dysfunction-dangerous-schools-providence-ri/?outputType=amp
LikeLike
Stephen,
I encourage you to review the National Advisory Council of the J-H School of Education …so few with experience outside of the military and business? J-H’s alternative certification programs are pairings with TFA and TNTP. (Pro Publica recently wrote about TFA as the charter schools’ “arm”). Thirdly, “Education + Disruption” which scrolls on the first webpage of J-H’s site…not very original in thought, eh?
Going forward, we won’t have to personally make the distinction between universities and think tank’s with students, between shills and professors. The website Academic Capture Warning System is planned to assist and warn us.
All who assess education policy today should expect “research” to be tailored to the patron and, to be used to provide cover for politicians.
Think tanks may throw a bone or two out as guise for some credibility but, once trust is lost, it’s gone.
Universities are additional institutions that the ruling class tried to hijack from their intended purposes. Read, “Don’t Surrender the Academy”, by Fredrick Hess and an employee of a Gates-Funded ed organization. (Philanthropy Roundtable)
I’m not paid to do my part to save Main Street and democracy. You, paid?
LikeLike
If you haven’t had a chance to review the report yet, Linda, you’ll find that it consists largely of notes of conversations with folks including teachers, students, School Board, City Council, current and previous Mayor, current and past Superintendent of schools, President of the teachers’ union, and State and district administrators. And classroom observations by review teams including, for example, the 2016 and 2017 RI Teachers of the Year. Let’s keep an eye out for any credible assertions that there are significant inaccuracies in regard to what’s reported. And, if those appear, join then in speculating as to why that may have occurred.
LikeLike
Fool the public once, shame on the scammer. Fool the public twice…
Has “Nat Morton” been identified yet?
LikeLike
I think Democrats probably could have threaded the needle had they continued to support public schools along with charter schools, but they were so captured by “the movement” they neglected to offer anything of value to 90% of students and families, other than telling them to go enroll in a charter or private school. They don’t believe existing public schools have any value, and they assumed everyone believed that, because it’s an echo chamber. They had to tear down public schools in order to sell charters and vouchers, and they neglected to consider that 90% of students still attend the schools they were now in the ridiculous position of “opposing”.
I mean think about how nuts that is. We have the ludicrous situation where our federal and (some) state representatives are opposing the schools 90% of our kids attend. Not just that! The schools 90% of us attended! How is that tenable or sustainable? Why would we hire these people? To work on an abstract theory of the privatized system of their dreams? No one hired them for that. That isn’t what they sold to the public, either.
LikeLike
Democrats still don’t have anything to say to public school families. I read some of Beto O’Rourkes education event and the whole thing revolves around whether not he is as zealously committed to promoting charter schools as he was rumored to be.
Our schools and students disappeared. We are discussed only in the context of what our schools and students mean to the continued expansion of charters and vouchers. We’re the default they measure the schools they care about by. They’re apparently terrified to do any actual advocacy on behalf of students in public schools. That’s a violation that would indicate they’re not sufficiently committed to “choice”. The best they offer is a grudging recognition that, yeah, sure public schools probably have to continue to exist, but only during this transition period while we attain choice nirvana.
My youngest will have entered and graduated Ohio public schools entirely encompassing a period where they were unfashionable in elite policy circles. Tough luck for him, huh? They should have warned us they were abandoning ship. Maybe we could have converted to a charter.
LikeLike
Thank you, Diane, Carol, and NPE! It’s your consistent data, messaging and unwavering commitment to public education that turned many of us around, myself included, as you know.
As a candidate for NC State Superintendent, my stance is that charter schools are starving and re-segregating our schools. I am anti-charter. Our current Superintendent, the first Republican in the position in the last 100 years, is tied to charters & Republican power and is morally and ethically corrupt.
LikeLike
Thank you, Ms. Mangrum, and all the best to you! North Carolina desperately needs a state super who understands these issues!!!
LikeLike
Good luck with the campaign Jen. Thanks for running.
LikeLike
I know not all agree with me on this, but I consider this a direct result of the Betsy DeVos appointment. Nonetheless, our national unions are tactically so obtuse in their efforts to get presidential candidates to support the NPE agenda. Past DFER policy support must be accounted and atoned for. Cheerleading for breadcrumbs like those surrendered by Biden in that Rhode Island example must be curtailed. Are we going to waste another opportunity in 2020?
LikeLiked by 1 person
“atoned for” — way past time for current leadership to step down. There should be little patience with this endless string of tentative apologies for past blindness.
LikeLike
This is a typical ed reform article:
https://www.the74million.org/article/charters-child-care-more-5-ways-education-could-come-up-at-the-democratic-debates/
“How education could come up at the Democratic debates”
The only mention of public schools is school shootings. Charters, on the other hand, get an entire section.
They simply don’t consider your schools or your students. Public school students don’t exist in edreformworld. They can’t imagine an actual, positive policy directed towards public school students. The one and only mention of public schools and public school students is as a silent “default” population as compared to charter schools and charter school students.
In this they are exactly like Betsy DeVos, who seems to be suffering under some delusion that all public school students are violent, bullying drug addicts. She addresses us only on crime prevention and drug use. 50 million of us.
LikeLike
Charter schools and testing are finally being shown as the attack on the 99% they always have been. That was truly a heartening article until the part about Randi hinting that she’s going to hand the White House over to Trump for four more years with another premature endorsement of the Wall Street Dem candidate. That was very disheartening. Is she with Third Way or what? With friends like that who needs enemies. And speaking of enemies, Ben Austin sure made it clear that he perceives himself as at war, again using warlike language such as desiring to “outflank” the teachers from the left instead of the right. Oh, Ben, if you were progressive enough to be a real Democrat you would know, war is not the answer. War! Good God y’all, what is it good for? Absolutely nothing.
LikeLike
What is the best way to enact change in the teachers union so that a leader like Randi Weingarten is not in charge?
The teachers union is like the DNC. Sometimes its members will vote to elect people who are not great but are still better than those who want to destroy the union altogether.
Imagine there is a primary, with Randi Weingarten and a more progressive union head. Even though you wish teachers would vote for the more progressive union head, Randi wins that primary.
Then she faces off with the guy who wants to destroy the teachers union, who wants to ban it altogether and will use his power to do everything to undermine unions and all progressive policies, and work to ban all teachers unions as illegal.
Do you say you hope the other guy who wants to destroy the union wins because you believe the only way to enact change is to empower a leader who wants to destroy the union altogether?
In my view, undermining the entire teachers union as the most corrupt and evil organization and helping to convince the public that is true is NOT the best way to have a more progressive teachers union. Replacing Randi with a right winger who wants to destroy the teachers union altogether is not going to make the teachers union more progressive. But it very well may destroy the teachers union for a long, long time.
The way to make a more progressive union is to not elect a leader who promises to destroy the entire union, but to elect a flawed leader who believes in unions and then work hard to keep changing the minds of those who vote so that next time they will support a more progressive union leader.
You may disagree, but I believe if the teachers’ union were led by those who hate unions who are empowered to make all union activity illegal, it would not lead to a more progressive situation.
LikeLike
AFT President Randi Weingarten: “We didn’t always get along with the Obama administration positions on education, but we had a go-to guy who always listened to us.” She added: “He’s with us because he is us.”
Biden: “The bottom line is it siphons off money for our public schools, which are already in enough trouble,” he said….
He seems to be following the direction that the current wind is blowing. Moderate corporate owned Biden is NOT ‘us’. How about listening to Bernie?
LikeLike
[stifles gag reflex, replies] “He is us” if by “us” you mean “the Bill and Melinda Gates Foundation and all the Vichy collaborators with it.”
LikeLike
Anyone gonna pay me the $100 (which I will donate to N.P.E.!) I bet that AFT (AND NEA) endorse Biden at their summer conventions?!
Hoping for that Sanders-Warren (or Warren-Sanders) ticket.
Again, would just LOVE to see Liz eviscerate IQ 45 in debates.
&, of course, IQ 45 couldn’t wait to Tweet a dumb, “BORING” comment after tonight’s debate. Yeah, boring in the sense that the candidates were actually civil, made intelligent comments, didn’t ravage each other & were respectful.
How refreshingly “boring.”
LikeLike
The Democrats are posturing … There is no constituency, in either party, for the expansion of traditional public schools. Under the Obama administration there was no oversight for funds diverted to charters, some of them “ghosts” according to the University of Wisconsin study. What are the implications of withholding federal funds from charters, under the present situation? Many will seek direct corporate sponsorship, or simply close their door, as many charters do anyway. All this talk of “new deals” by the Democrats is so much chatter. They have no intention of carrying any of this out.
LikeLike
Bernie does and WILL, given the opportunity.
He’s the real deal.
Did you read Diane’s post RE: his stance on charters?
LikeLike
It’s shame WaPo enjoyed being the fan club for the power elite instead of Main Street. States like Ohio might not have lost as much to grifters. When Senators like Sherrod Brown hire a TFA’er to advise him, what else but the infliction of the schemes of the ruling class is expected. We assume that all of the Republican politicians have TFA, Walton and Gates Foundation staff, or other advisors representing wealthy donors but, the “liberal” WaPo gave cover to the Democrats to do the same.
LikeLike
You must read today’s The Borowitz Report: “Debate Viewers Struggle With Concept of President w/o Glaring Personality Disorder.”
NOT “BORING!” Hilarious!!
LikeLike
I have no idea who Delaney is but this is what he thinks about public education.
……………….
DELANEY: I think we need to do real things to help American workers and the American people, right? This is the issue that all of us hear on the campaign trail. We need to make sure everyone has a living wage, and I’ve called for a doubling of the earned income tax credit, raising the minimum wage, and creating paid family leave. That will create a situation where people actually have a living wage. That gets right to workers. Then we’ve got to fix our public education system. It’s not delivering the results our kid’s needs, nor is college and post high school career and technical training programs doing that.
LikeLike
More DELANEY:
I mean, we should give everyone in this country healthcare as a basic human right or free, full stop. But we should also give them the option to buy private insurance. Why do we have to stand up for taking away something from the people? And also, it’s bad policy. If you go to every hospital in this country and you ask them one question, which is how would it have been for you last year if every one of your bills were paid at the Medicare rate? Every single hospital administrator said they would close. And the Medicare for All bill requires payments to stay at current Medicare rates. So, to some extent, were basically supporting a bill that will have every hospital close.
LikeLike
So it’s okay to drink on the golf course while golfing and to carry a gun inside a church that is connected to a school. Nurses, pharmacists and physician assistants now can refuse to provide help for abortions if it goes against their religious or moral beliefs. And now, the governor can appoint a secretary of education. Somehow I don’t see all graduates from schools in this state passing the same naturalization test that is administered to immigrants hoping to become US citizens.
Gets ‘better’ every day in this great state.
……………………………………………………
Get to know these new Indiana laws that take effect Monday
Jun 30, 2019
Any person legally authorized to carry a firearm may possess it in a church or religious building that’s connected to a school, so long as the religious institution permits guns within its facilities. Similarly, a gun owner can bring his or her weapon into a school building when it’s being used by a house of worship that allows guns. (HEA 1284)
A governor-appointed secretary of education will lead the Indiana Department of Education starting in 2021, instead of an elected state superintendent of public instruction. (HEA 1005)
Beer, wine and liquor, instead of only beer, can be sold from the back of golf carts roving across the links at public and private golf courses that hold the required alcohol sale permits. (HEA 1518)
Nurses, pharmacists and physician assistants gain the same right as physicians, hospital employees and health clinic staffers to opt out of providing abortion care, including the provision of an abortion-inducing drug, if they have an ethical, moral or religious objection to abortion. (SEA 201)
All Indiana high schools must administer to students, as part of the mandatory U.S. government course, the naturalization test that’s typically taken by immigrants hoping to become American citizens. (SEA 132)
School districts are authorized to hold a voter referendum on whether to hike property taxes by up to 10 cents per $100 of assessed valuation for up to a 8-year period to pay for school safety needs. (SEA 127)
A minor between ages 16 and 18 who is pregnant, in labor or postpartum can consent to pregnancy-related health care without the approval of a parent or guardian, so long as a reasonable effort is made to contact the child’s parent or guardian. (HEA 1547)
School corporations are required to provide student curricular material to any child who is detained in a juvenile facility for more than seven days, if requested to do so by the child’s parent or the facility. (SEA 29)
https://www.nwitimes.com/news/statehouse/indiana/get-to-know-these-new-indiana-laws-that-take-effect/collection_b898ab7e-8c8f-56f6-9b63-7286d68db70b.html?utm_medium=social&utm_source=email&utm_campaign=user-share#1
LikeLike