Remember when Laurene Powell Jobs announced that she was running a competition for ideas to reinvent the high school? She was offering $10 million to each winning proposal, which she called “Super Schools.”
Nearly 700 proposals were entered, but only 10 were chosen.
One of the winners was in Oakland, California, a district that has been subject to nonstop disruption, charters, and and constant meddling by the Eli Broad foundation. For years, the district has been led by Broadies, who have run it into a ditch and failed to revive its fortunes.
The Oakland winner planned to open a Super School that incorporated Mark Zuckerberg’s Summit Learning online platform.
But things went poorly after Oakland’s Broadie superintendent Antwan Wilson was lured to the District of Columbia to be its chancellor (where he was soon ousted after it was revealed that he pulled strings to get his daughter into one of the best public schools, a practice that Wilson had forbidden for others. Wilson is now running an education consulting business.)
Two years ago, the Oakland Super School was abandoned before it opened.
The turmoil in the district, which has been a near constant for years, made it impossible to open.
Summit Public Schools, which operates a chain of charter schools, with support from the Oakland school district and Mayor Libby Schaaf’s office, submitted a winning proposal for a charter school focusing on personal learning and real-world experiences. The goal was to open the new school at the California College of the Arts on Broadway in Rockridge in fall 2018.
But the effort started to fall apart over the last several months and was ultimately abandoned in recent weeks, The Chronicle has learned. Now, Summit leaders will use the money for one of their existing charter schools in Daly City.
“There are just better ways for us to help kids in the Bay Area,” said Jason Solomon, senior director of advocacy and engagement at Summit Public Schools, which operates eight charter schools in the Bay Area and three in Washington state.
Solomon noted that the team’s entry to build the new school included the support of former Oakland Superintendent Antwan Wilson, who resigned this year to lead the Washington, D.C., schools. On top of the turnover in leadership, the district is grappling with the need to close or consolidate schools given declining enrollment while juggling a $30 million budget shortfall over the next year.
Community groups were unhappy that the proposed charter would be sited very close to an existing Oakland public school that had not yet been disrupted and destroyed.
With Antwan Wilson gone, Summit charters was not sure they would have a champion so they shifted the funding to one of their schools in Daly City.
Summit substitutes computer-based instruction for real teachers, and it has driven out in places as distant as Connecticut and Kansas, by parents and students.
I simply don’t believe that parents and students in these places love the constant chaos and disruption. I think “disruption” is faddish corporate culture stuff that ed reformers have eagerly introduced into schools without giving any thought at all to how it affects communities that are subject to these experiments.
I don’t know any parents who want their children’s school constantly upended. I don’t know any children who love chaos, either. I think children want consistency and trust and connections.
Schools aren’t businesses. That’s the wrong model. All the ed reform tweaking in the world won’t help because they started with the wrong model.
In addition, every time anything they do is analyzed or criticized by anyone outside the echo chamber they all live in, they respond by saying “people are afraid of change”
This is patronizing and insulting and intended to cut off debate – it also completely dodges any real questions about their plans. It’s an unacceptably arrogant response, and we have seen these folks hide behind it on everything from testing to the Common Core to charter schools. We are PERMITTED to question what they’d doing in our schools. That’s allowed.
Kids need stability. I see kids shuttled from mother to father back to mother then back to father.
Kids tell me that THEY HATE not having a permanent place. They do not look at being uprooted each week as something good for their emotional, physical, and intellectual health.
Maybe that’s what wrong these DAZE? Parents have no clue how all this shuttling affects their children’s lives, and of course, their children won’t tell them.
SAME thing happens with SCHOOLS.
The school that Summit wanted to poach students from was a district school, Oakland Technical High, currently the most popular high school in Oakland. Lots of kids on the waitlist to get in. It is a community school situated in a wealthy part of town(several district high schools also offer a similar program) with wraparound services and a rich curriculum. Naturally the perfect opportunity for Summit to get its hands on some motivated students….was happy to see it go away…not needed or wanted…
“…get[ting] its hands on some motivated students” Those are actually very frightening words — more and more we see big tech money invading schools in the name of “helping” kids, but in the end only carefully separating those kids whose parents can afford tech services from kids whose parents can not
How does one counter rhetoric such as that found here:
https://napavalleyregister.com/opinion/columnists/dan-walters-why-is-our-achievement-gap-so-stubborn/article_498c921e-9efb-5de5-9cde-4520a8e16737.html
Here is a link to another grand fiasco.
https://nonprofitquarterly.org/2019/04/26/another-silicon-valley-incursion-into-the-schools-another-parent-protest/
We need a vast increase in personal and business income taxes to disable the billionaires who feel free to disrupt the 99% with pocket change from their portfolios. They are able to finance such disruption and self-serving overhauls(lots of tech and testing and cheap teaching staffs)b/c their great wealth is not taxed, left in their hands to make more money and to make society follow their plans. Warren Buffett first called for higher taxes on the super-rich 13 yrs ago, long overdue, has to be pushed as a central plan in any Pres. candidate’s agenda.