Jan Resseger is a voice of moral clarity in a time of moral turpitude.she reflected on the NPE report “Asleep At the Wheel,” about the slipshod, failed federal program to pump money into the charter industry and concluded the program should be terminated, with the money transferred to high-needs schools.
She writes:
“The Network for Public Education published its scathing report on the federal Charter Schools Program three weeks ago, but as time passes, I continue to reflect on its conclusions. The report, Asleep at the Wheel: How the Federal Charter Schools Program Recklessly Takes Taxpayers and Students for a Ride, is packed with details about failed or closed or never-opened charter schools. The Network for Public Education depicts a program driven by neoliberal politicians hoping to spark innovation in a marketplace of unregulated startups underwritten by the federal government. The record of this 25 year federal program is dismal.
“Here is what the Network for Public Education’s report shows us. The federal Charter Schools Program (CSP) has awarded $4 billion federal tax dollars to start or expand charter schools across 44 states and the District of Columbia, and has provided some of the funding for 40 percent of all the charter schools that have been started across the country. Begun when Bill Clinton was President, this neoliberal—publicly funded, privatized—program has been supported by Democratic and Republican administrations alike. It has lacked oversight since the beginning, and during the Obama and Trump administrations—when the Department of Education’s own Office of Inspector General released a series of scathing critiques of the program—grants have been made based on the application alone with little attempt by officials in the Department of Education to verify the information provided by applicants. Hundreds of millions of dollars have been awarded to schools that never opened or that were shut down: “We found that it is likely that as many as one third of all charter schools receiving CSP grants never opened, or opened and shut down.” Many grants went to schools that illegally discriminated in some way to choose their students and served far fewer disabled students and English language learners than the local pubic schools. Many of the CSP-funded charter schools were plagued by conflicts of interest profiteering, and mismanagement. The Department of Education has never investigated the scathing critiques of the program by the Department’s Office of Inspector Genera; neither has the Department of Education investigated the oversight practices of the state-by-state departments of education, called State Education Agencies by CSP, to which many of the grants were made. Oversight has declined under the Department’s leadership by Betsy DeVos.
“One of the shocking findings in the Asleep at the Wheel report is that a series of federal administrations—Clinton, Bush, Obama, and Trump have treated this program as a kind of venture capital fund created and administered to stimulate social entrepreneurship—by individuals or big nonprofits or huge for-profits—as a substitute for public operation of the public schools. This use of the Charter Schools Program as a source for venture capital is especially shocking in the past decade under Presidents Obama and Trump, even as federal funding for essential public school programs has fallen. The Center on Budget and Policy priorities reports, for example, that public Title I formula funding dropped by 6.2 percent between 2008 and 2017.”
Betsy DeVos defended the high failure rate by saying that in the business world, some start-ups fail. Why is the federal government using education money to invest in start-ups? Why shouldn’t the federal government review the applications carefully before awarding millions of dollars? What bank will lend you money without carefully reviewing your proposal and financials? Since 1994, this program has been a giant cookie jar, filled with free money.
***Sigh**** This is so disheartening. There are too many folks who attack a person if one dares to point out that truth about Clinton/Obama’s roles in the decimation of public education.
Our District has bought into the charter/Rheeform mantra hook, line and sinker. Someone at the top read TNTP’s Opportunity Myth “study,” and decided that we, as educators,are failing our students. (Even though the study ignores the other issues – such as poverty – which affect student performance.) TNTP is coming to our district to observe and collect lesson plans and assignments, and will survey students to see what we, as educators, are doing wrong.
Our union leaders said chosen teachers must comply or face disciplinary action for insubordination, even though it is a change in working conditions. Staff is leaving in droves. The union leaders justify bringing in TNTP boot-camped “teachers” due to the teacher shortage. They do not dare look at how and where administrators spend those education dollars.
When you have your union parroting the Rheeform mantra, it’s sad.
Can you share your state, and which union represents you?
I have no ulterior motive, just a free-lance special to regional PreK’s, so I have no experience with the union sector. I am a pro-union person in general, especially as regards teachers, & have been trying to figure out how it is that despite leadership sentiments per their publications, many teachers find their unions do not support them at all when it comes to classroom realities. Your case in point runs directly opposite to the speech Weingarten just delivered at the DC Press Club, for example.
Illinois ….IFT
Thanks. I was thinking maybe an anti-pubsch southern state w/a weak union. Sheesh. Your post confirms my sense that the reforms ushered in by Bush & Obama continue to be far worse threats to the quality of ed than anything the school-choicers can do on their own. These laws can& are used punitively by state DofEds (and even local school pubsch admins as you show)– they are the handmaiden to charter/ voucher laws, & in many places push families into charters/ vouchers thro frustration.
The 46th president needs to reverse decades of maniacal education policy wrought by greedy billionaires. The U.S. Department of Education has become yet another department of destruction. The federal government forces states to waste time and money on annual testing, and throws money down the privatization drain. That’s what they do. That’s all they do. There is no support for public schools in Washington D.C. I have a “radical” idea — restore the Elementary and Secondary Education Act to its former progressive nature, and get the money to public schools in need instead of to private businesses. Anyone ready to fight for public schools against the privatizing, profiteering billionaires — we will vote for you.
Evidence alone will not change our national drive for privatization as it is backed by so much dark money. We need to get the results of NPE’s research widely distributed so that state groups can demand change from representatives. At this point fighting privatization is more about politics than education. It is about fighting whole networks of “think tanks” which are mostly lobbying groups. We need large numbers of outraged, disgusted citizens to demand change in our education policy.
BINGO.
bethree5 Exactly. We should call reformers what they are:
Anti-democratic and a blight on the whole idea of lawful equality and a constitutional democracy. They are anti-democratic because, and though there remains a place for “private” and capitalism, the incremental takeover and destruction of PUBLIC by private concerns strikes at the root of democracy itself insofar as it is of/for/by all of the people, regardless of wealth, social position, or religion. CBK
Diane . . . a tweaked relevant note from another thread today:
A major oversight (or worse, intention) by those who champion charter schools is that DEMOCRACY and the whole idea of PUBLIC-anything grow from the same root. That means that ALL of THE PEOPLE can partake of and contribute to the public domain, regardless of wealth, origin, religion, etc.
Further, public education is even more foundational than other public entities because it is charged with preparing the children who live in a democracy become as developed as can be, to be free and responsible citizens, to understand their form of government, and to preserve it for others to do the same, if they will.
At its core, the takeover of PUBLIC by PRIVATE entities, especially for education, constitutes a sickening, damage, and ultimately destruction of that root and the intimate relationship between all-things-public and the democracy that we all live in and hopefully want to keep.
About CHOICE: The irony about charters is that, insofar as charters engage in, or even CAN engage in, avoiding some students while accepting others (not enough $$$ or this-or-that phobia) via their written or covert policies, it’s the charter and not the families who actually CHOOSE who goes where. CBK
Reblogged this on Crazy Normal – the Classroom Exposé and commented:
Hundreds of millions of dollars have been awarded to schools that never opened or that were shut down: “We found that it is likely that as many as one third of all charter schools receiving CSP grants never opened, or opened and shut down.”
Thank you Jan Resseger. I am just SO PLEASED that Jan Resseger wrote the following, for it is true.
“One of the shocking findings in the Asleep at the Wheel report is that a series of federal administrations—Clinton, Bush, Obama, and Trump have treated this program as a kind of venture capital fund created and administered to stimulate social entrepreneurship—by individuals or big nonprofits or huge for-profits—as a substitute for public operation of the public schools. This use of the Charter Schools Program as a source for venture capital is especially shocking in the past decade under Presidents Obama and Trump, even as federal funding for essential public school programs has fallen. The Center on Budget and Policy priorities reports, for example, that public Title I formula funding dropped by 6.2 percent between 2008 and 2017.”
Resseger used the word “SHOCKING.” Yes, I sure was shocked when Obama and Duncan clapped on camera when the first pubic high school in this nation was closed because of test scores. I mean really, how stupid, short-sighted, and plain MEAN.
And just remember, Arkansas’ mistake became this Nation’s mistake. No thanks, Bill and Hillary. And no thanks to every potus since and including Reagan.
Now the old guard of the DNC is attacking Bernie and AOC. Bernie and AOC must be doing something right. I plan on blasting Bernie with information. Maybe we all should do the same.
–
You make some excellent points, but the “old guard of the DNC” are attacking Bernie and Corey Booker, who both have mouthed the basic “public charters can be so great” propaganda.
I believe it is wrong to blame the “old guard” of the DNC for the pro-charter positions that candidates who define themselves as “progressives” take. The “old guard” at the DNC supported Ralph Northam and Tim Kaine who have stood up to keep Virginia one of the last standing large states that hasn’t been completely taken over by DFER Democrats or worse. The “old guard of the DNC” didn’t embrace the DFER Democrat that Bernie endorsed who would have turned Virginia into a pro-charter state.
Please don’t make this about anything but the candidates themselves and judge them on the positions they take. Public education loses if we smear the moderates who have stood up for public education just because the DNC may like them and if we defend the progressives who won’t stand up for public education just because the DNC supposedly doesn’t like them.
How about we just agree that candidates take the positions that they take because they have differences of opinions and we can try to defeat them because of their DFER positions or vote for them despite knowing they will throw public education under the bus because we like their positions on some other issue.
I don’t care why a politician embraces the DFER position — I’m not going to give them a pass because they embrace some other progressive ideas or condemn them as corrupt because they embrace other less progressive ideas.
But in the primary, I will vote for the candidate whose position on the issues that are most important to me align closest to mine. And I will vote for any Democrat in the general. And I won’t spend my time smearing the Democrat who eventually wins the primary in the hopes that it will undermine his or her chances against Trump. And that is what I hope everyone else does, too.
And I absolutely agree with Jan Resseger and the Democrats who embrace this idea of shutting down the federal charter program will likely get my vote. And I don’t care whether the DNC likes or doesn’t like that candidate.
I also don’t care about the position that the candidate had 30 years ago, 20 years ago, or 10 years ago. I care about what position they have now and whether it sounds like they did their homework and know what they are talking about or are just mouthing some meaningless slogans without taking a real stance on public education.
What strikes me is that the government has only looked at education from an economic perspective once they tossed it into the for profit realm. Nobody has been asking what the impact of all this disruption is on students. The whole purpose of this grand experiment was supposed to be innovative with improved outcomes for students. It has done neither. It has created mass instability for mostly poor students for no better results. “Reform” has been through enough reincarnations of bad ideas. It is time to end this marketplace madness.
“It’s time to close down” the anti-democracy ruling class starting with Facebook’s board-
Susan Desmond-Hellman who is the Gates Foundation’s CEO, Marc Andreesen who said India was better off under colonialism, Reed Hastings who called for democratically elected school boards to be eliminated, Peter Thiel who said women voting in an capitalistic democracy is an oxymoron, and Sheryl Sandberg and Mark Z-berg who hired Republican operatives to further Facebook’s strategy.
Accurate assessment, Linda.
Speaking of heavens-to-Betsy, there was a round table discussion on school choice with Madam Secretary and Governor Matt Bevins on Wednesday in Lexington, Kentucky, which was open to the press. But when some high school journalism students went to cover the event, they were turned away. No representative of public schools was on the panel, either.
https://www.kentucky.com/news/local/education/article229449929.html
Good GAWD! They look so chummy and smug.
A picture is worth a thousand words.