The British giant Pearson announced that it was creating a venture capital fund to invest in new technologies to transform education.
Yuch!
More tech trash on the way!
Protect your child from tech capitalization and monetization!
Press release:
“We are launching Pearson Ventures, a fund to invest in growth stage start-ups that are building the future of education and employment. Pearson Ventures will build on the success of Pearson’s Affordable Learning Fund and will continue to lead our ongoing partnership with Learn Capital.”
Today Pearson, the world’s learning company, made an announcement regarding how they plan to support startups in building the groundwork for the next era of education and employment.
Here’s the gist of the news:
- Because education will look very different in 2030, Pearson, like learners all over the world, will need to continue to learn, adapt and reinvent itself: finding new business models, incorporating emerging technologies into its products and services, and finding new ways to collaborate with education institutions, government, and businesses.
- To do so, Pearson is launching Pearson Ventures, a fund to invest in early stage start-ups who are building the future of education and employment.
- With an initial capital commitment of $50M over three years, Pearson Ventures will invest in companies building new market opportunities with innovative business models, future technologies and new educational experiences.
- Pearson Ventures will focus primary in early-stage startups with Series A and B rounds.
Below, please see the blog post regarding the announcement, or find it here.
Let me know if you have any other questions on the news. Thanks!
-XX
Pearson Ventures: The Future of Learning
Jonathan Chocqueel-Mangan, Chief Strategy Officer at Pearson
Students entering school today face the possibility of being the first generation of 100-year-old workers. Just let that sink in. Having a career that lasts late into life means the skills and knowledge learned in childhood, or a degree earned at 20 years old, won’t be enough for success in a rapidly changing economy. Whether it is a student seeking help with math homework, or an adult seeking a masters degree, we know learners need education that is convenient, flexible and life changing. We also know education will look different in the future, so finding new business models, incorporating emerging technologies into our products and seeking new partners for collaboration is becoming more important than ever.
That’s why we are launching Pearson Ventures, a fund to invest in growth stage start-ups that are building the future of education and employment. Pearson Ventures will build on the success of Pearson’s Affordable Learning Fund and will continue to lead our ongoing partnership with Learn Capital. PALF has invested over $20M in some of the world’s most impactful education startups, improving education for underserved populations, while returning more than $7 million to the company. But as we look to the future, this new approach is a way to shift our investment work to align more closely with Pearson’s five-year strategy, especially our focus on lifelong learning and employability.
With an initial capital commitment of $50M over three years, Pearson Ventures will invest in companies building new market opportunities using innovative business models, future technologies, and new educational experiences. While Pearson Ventures will pursue competitive financial returns, equally important is its ability to collect shareable insights and drive organizational learning to help future-proof the company. As a result, we will be doing things a bit differently than a typical venture fund.
Investment Criteria: Pearson Ventures will focus primarily in early-stage startups with Series A and B rounds, typically partnering with venture firms and accelerators through a co-investment structure. While we will have a global remit, we will focus on geographies where Pearson already has a significant footprint, both to maximize the strategic benefits to our investees and the relevance to Pearson.
Investment Focus: We will prioritize companies who are working in areas of high strategic importance, including employability, lifelong learning, and next-generation assessment; offering new technological capabilities such as artificial intelligence, mobile-first delivery, remote proctoring, or augmented/virtual reality; creating social impact through upskilling, income share agreements, or increasing higher-ed access.
Leveraging Pearson’s Scale and Reach:Pearson Ventures will deliver unique benefits beyond just capital. As a global learning company, Pearson Ventures will proactively connect its portfolio companies with relevant experts in content, product design, and business development, as well as advise on geographic and market expansion. In most cases, new investments will have a Pearson advocate or sponsor as a touch point, in addition to the investment team. On a case-by-case, and mutually agreed, basis, portfolio companies can also receive a seconded Pearson employee, or join a Pearson team or office as an entrepreneur-in-residence.
Through Pearson Ventures, we will continue our commitment to invest in businesses that have a social impact on learners. Alongside our commitments to improve learner outcomes and use digital to reach more people, Pearson Ventures is one more way we’re becoming more innovative, learner-centered, and future-focused.

Diane “. . .new ways to collaborate with education institutions, government, and businesses. . . .”
I shudder at the (potential?) Orwellian doubled-speak in phrases like the above, especially where “government” is concerned, and where collaborate-withcan oh-so-easily come to mean absorb. Do they ever ask themselves: “How big is too big?”
BTW, back in the day, I was a small-business entrepreneur and am not anti-business/capitalist. However, I also know how the “business mentality-only” can take over one’s consciousness so that we can think there is no other horizon, where anything that resembles regulation is hated, and where “the business” becomes tribal: it’s own group-think ideology and main motivator. Pretty soon we don’t understand why it’s so horrible to pass out one’s business cards at a funeral. CBK
LikeLike
I have a motto for their new fund:
“Depersonalized Education because . . . Pearson, Not Persons”
LikeLike
The fox controls the henhouse, or the pigs are in the farmhouse… either way PROFIT replaces LEARNING.
LikeLike
The educational industrial complex at its worst
LikeLike
I don’t know if it’s an indication of anything, but online classes are getting a big thumbs down from parents at our local high school.
They were aggressively sold all the way up to the federal government, but they seem LESS popular as a result of all the marketing and hype, not more so.
I suspect the reality of these “innovations” is a big, fat disappointment to the lower and middle class families who are targeted by the marketing teams.
That “affordable” in the press release is a real “tell”. This is cheap, mass produced junk they’re pushing on the lower classes that they’ve rebranded as “personal”.
You know what’s “personal”? A person teaching another person. Not everything needs to be “reinvented”.
LikeLike
If nothing else, rhetoric of this kind serves as a powerful emetic.
LikeLike
LMAO. Yup.
LikeLike
Pearson Boardroom Banter
“We beat them with a test!
“With not a bullet fired!”
“Completed is the quest
“That King George once desired”
“The pros and cons of testing”
Pearson are the pros
At conning bureaucrat
And what do you suppo$e
They u$e to do ju$t that?
LikeLike
The Learning Company
Pearson is learning
America’s done
The tide has been turning
The Redcoats have won
LikeLike
Superb, SomeDAM!
LikeLike
Great verses about the supreme con of testing and on-line instruction.
LikeLike
“…we will focus on geographies where Pearson already has a significant footprint, …”
Man Friday ???????
LikeLike
The Center of the Learniverse
Pearson’s the inventor
Of Learniverse
They claim
Also is the center
Of Loonyverse
Insane!
LikeLike
Is Pearson still a thing?! Unbelievable!
LikeLike
Pearson misspelled a word. It should read Pearson Vampire Suck You Dry Fund
LikeLike
Public schools should be embracing new technologies. (I am an IT professional). Long-distance learning, will enable smaller, rural schools, to have additional instruction in subjects, when they could not afford to have a full-time teacher in residence.
Some specialty subjects like theater appreciation could be taught by video. The students could view a play by Shakespeare on wide-screen TV. Then they could review and criticize the play by long-distance video, with the instructor many miles away.
Foreign language instruction has benefited from the new technology.
Students can learn and practice grammar and pronunciation on individual computers, with headsets, using software like “Babbel(tm)”.
Then the students can have some traditional language instruction in the classroom.
Then students could go to a video parlor, and have real-time discussions in French, with a classroom in France, by SKYPE.
The traditional model of one instructor lecturing a class while holding a piece of chalk, is obsolete.
This is an exciting time, for education.
LikeLike
Omg, Charles. Not true. I refuse to turn over my learning to someone’s software. I know about software and I know about learning. And I know about corporate greed.
We all here know only too well about corporate greed.
We also know about the strengths of technology as well as its downfalls.
We are “for real” teachers.
LikeLike
There is a very big difference between video lessons produced by actual teachers (which have been around for decades, by the way) and “Pearsonalized learning” produced by coding monkeys at places like Pearson (the subject of Diane’s post)
Teachers actually know something about teaching and learning and monkeys don’t. In fact, by and large, the monkeys don’t even know anything about human social interaction, which is why they like IT work.
I know this from experience, having worked with such types.
LikeLike
Kentucky’s Thomas Massive (humiliated by his question about John Kerry’s degree) got his college training at a corporation, the Koch’s MIT.
LikeLike
Massie is a cynical opportunist, but he’s not stupid. I’m convinced the whole thing was a premeditated, practiced act. Massie represents the north central-to-eastern part of Kentucky ranging from the eastern Louisville suburbs north east to the Cincinnati suburbs and on to Ashland and north of Lexington (and including Covington Catholic High School). Despite how much they say they respect their constituents and how smart they are, he’s one of many Republicans who have a contempt for them and plays his politics to respond to and intensify their ignorance, xenophobia, and racism. He know that by putting on the act he did with Kerry that they will eat it up. He’s saying in public what they say in private. He could care less about the national reaction other than it confirms his “bona fides” with the people he considers to be malleable rubes. It’s the basic playbook of the Republican Party today, which is built on everything but the better angels of our nature.
LikeLike
Tribalism, McConnell cultivates it.
LikeLike
Gates-funded SETDA could have been tailored for the Pearson plan. State employees who are SETDA’s governing body, already foster private-public partnerships, have state comparisons helpful to tech sellers and, offer seminars to help start-ups scale up. SETDA is all of the states in one place as buyers for ed tech -too bad the citizens of the American democracy are left out of the process.
LikeLike
Back in October 2013, deutsch29 (Mercedes Schneider) linked Bill Gates to Pearson.
In his involvement with Pearson, Bill Gates, founder of Microsoft, is indirectly promoting an Apple product
And there is this interesting tidbit: “SEATTLE — The Bill & Melinda Gates Foundation announced today that Dr. John E. Deasy has been named deputy director of its education division within its United States Program. … In his new position, Deasy will focus on promoting policies and practices throughout the country designed to ensure that all students graduate high school with the knowledge and skills they need to succeed in college. …He is expected to begin work at the foundation on February 1, 2009.”
Apple
Microsoft
Bill Gates
John Deasy
Eli Broad
And probably more all linked together in a devil’s brew.
LikeLike
Devil’s brew…
Democrats don’t belong to ALEC.
At a minimum some states should decide to leave SETDA. That would make it clear, the organization is partisan- democracy vs. oligarchy.
LikeLike
Bill Gates belonged to ALEC for a short while. Then he left ALEC and formed his own group of billionaires and millions but what do we call them – the Gaters? He probably left as soon as he discovered he’d never rise to the top and become the leader because the Koch brothers had that nailed down.
From what I’ve read, The Gaters (for want of a more fitting label – sort of lame, I know. Maybe someone else will think of something more fitting) meet once a year just like ALEC does, but most of them are probably Democrats with cultural manipulating tax shelters similar to The Gates Foundation or they hand over their money directly to the Gates Foundation like a few others have already done.
Gates even went to China and met with some of China’s billionaires in an attempt to recruit them to his group but that flopped. China’s billionaires were probably warned with a hint during a CCP tea party to not join The Gaters agenda to take over the world.
LikeLike
Lloyd Lofthouse quotes: “. . . Deasy will focus on promoting policies and practices throughout the country designed to ensure that all students graduate high school with the knowledge and skills they need to succeed in college. …”
Okay . . . and this is NOT already the ideal of (unsupported) public schools? Also, this . . . while these and other oligarchs attempt to mold the college/university and its curricula to fit their own political ideologies? What could go wrong?
Also, a totalitarian business model, run by those who do or don’t know that’s what they are doing, is still a totalitarian business mode. CBK
LikeLike
Deasy didn’t achieve those lofty goals in LA.
Now his goal is the nation?
LikeLike
dianeravitch Didn’t work in La? Kicked up? Why am I not surprised? CBK
LikeLike
This Lloyd Lofthouse never said, “Deasy will focus on promoting policies and practices throughout the country designed to ensure that all students graduate high school with the knowledge and skills they need to succeed in college. …”
LikeLike
Lloyd Lofthouse The quote was from a text that you quoted in your note. Sorry if I wasn’t clear. CBK
LikeLike
Oh, you mean a quote you found at the site I linked to.
LikeLike
Lloyd Lofthouse Yes, but it was actually quoted in your note? I don’t think I had to link to it? CBK
LikeLike
Deasy’s vision for America: everybody’s fired. You’re severance pay is an iPad.
LikeLike
Thanks, Obama. This could have stopped with you.
But…no…you just had to pick Arne~Race to the Top~THEN John King.
Leading up to DeVos.
PLEASE organize & stage some parent/child/educator/community protests at your nearest Pear$on headquarters this summer (as did Class Size Matters in Manhattan, after the Pineapple ? debacle.)
LikeLike
Former Obama lawyer, Craig, indicted- related to Manafort/Ukraine. The brother of John Podesta came up in the Ukraine story but, no indictment.
LikeLike
retiredbutmissthekids,
You are so right. You took the words out of my mouth. I felt betrayed.
Btw, Joe Biden wrote a very positive review of the book, How Schools Work by Arne Dunce. Sigh. No surprise.
LikeLike
There is definitely a place for new technology in the classroom. Teachers should be embracing tech, and not trying to hold it back. The maxim is still true, though.
“Things don’t teach. Teachers teach” – Marva Collins.
LikeLike
Yes, Charles, teacher teach and that means teachers decide what tools they want to use to help them teach a lesson and that means technology.
Technology, no matter what it is or how it is designed, is still a tool and it is up to teachers to decide when those tools fit the lessons they are teaching.
You see, no matter how technical our culture becomes, the one thing that will not change is the fact that we are all humans and teachers can teach younger children without the need of any fancy technology just like teachers have been doing for thousands of years.
LikeLike
Thank you. Agree with YOU, Lloyd.
LikeLike
I know students from the young and all the way to the elder, who have taken online courses. Guess what? So have I. Our opinion? They suck.
Why do you think my husband, an aerospace engineer, takes a Spanish class once a week rather than take an online course?
Not saying learning using technology is bad, but goodness we do learn from having interactions with one another. Even animals learn from other animals.
Charles, technology is technology, not the end all and be all.
LikeLike
On that note, I gave tablets and smartphones their chance and then rejected that technology and returned to a dumb phone that I use less than five minutes a month. Oh, and I have discovered life is so peaceful when I escape my desktop and its multiple screens. I’m even happier when I go outside to sweat and do yard work like mow the grass and pull weeds.
Technology is not a panacea.
LikeLike
Astronomers just took the very first picture of Pearson, which gobbles up everything within range (especially money) and from which no student or teacher can escape
LikeLike
By the way, based on the side of the anular ring they estimate the mass of the (A)hole at 200 student masses.
LikeLike
200 million!
LikeLike
Pearson Education stock…
11.01 USD +0.090 (0.82%)
Closed: Apr 12, 4:02 PM EDT · Disclaimer
After hours 11.01 0.00 (0.00%)
LikeLike
Lloyd Lofthouse The quote in question was in your Aprill note and began: “And there is this interesting tidbit: “SEATTLE — The Bill & Melinda Gates Foundation announced . . . ” CBK
LikeLike