You may not be surprised to learn that gentrification means rising housing costs, as affluent people move into cities and developers demolish or upgrade low-income housing. Nor will you be surprised to learn that gentrification involves the displacement of low-income people. As they moveor leave the city, city leaders want charter schools so that the new middle-class families can separate from “those people.” I would have thought that Chicago led the list of most gentried cities. It has had a massive exodus of black families. But according to the Washington Post, it is D.C. that is the national leader in gentrification.
About 40 percent of the District’s lower-income neighborhoods experienced gentrification between 2000 and 2013, giving the city the greatest “intensity of gentrification” of any in the country, according to a studyreleased Tuesday by the National Community Reinvestment Coalition.
The District also saw the most African American residents — more than 20,000 — displaced from their neighborhoods during that time, mostly by affluent, white newcomers, researchers said. The District and Philadelphia were most “notable” for displacements of black residents, while Denver and Austin had the most Hispanic residents move. Nationwide, nearly 111,000 African Americans and more than 24,000 Hispanics moved out of gentrifying neighborhoods, the study found.
Sixty-two 62 lower-income census tracts in the District gentrified between 2000 and 2013, putting the city third behind New York and Los Angeles for the highest number of neighborhoods that had transformed. The District ranked first in “intensity of gentrification,” on the basis of the percentage of lower-income neighborhoods that experienced gentrification.
Because of the District’s intensity ranking, “you feel it and you see it,” said Jesse Van Tol, chief executive of the NCRC, a research and advocacy coalition of 600 community organizations that promote economic and racial justice. “It’s the visibility and the pace of it.”
A National Community Reinvestment Coalition study found “cultural displacement” because of gentrification in neighborhoods nationwide. In the District, more than 20,000 black residents were displaced.
The study defines gentrification as occurring when “an influx of investment and changes to the built environment lead to rising home values, family incomes and educational levels of residents.” It defines “cultural displacement” as instances when “minority areas see a rapid decline in their numbers as affluent, white gentrifiers replace the incumbent residents.”
Researchers examined U.S. census tracts that, in 2000, were in the lower 40th percentile for median home values and household incomes in their metropolitan areas.
Van Tol said gentrification has followed a national move back to cities, particularly among affluent workers. The District drew many during the Great Recession, when the city’s economy and job markets were more stable than others. Meanwhile, the amount of affordable housing has lagged, even amid new residential development.
Many residents can rattle off the D.C. neighborhoods that have undergone rapid economic change, including Petworth, Mount Pleasant, Brookland, and the U and 14th street corridors.
Gentrification can benefit areas because it signals economic investment, Van Tol said. The problem comes, he said, when longtime residents are pushed out as rents and property taxes rise, leaving them unable to benefit from the improvements. Activists also are concerned about the culture that can leave with a neighborhood’s longtime residents. Van Tol recalled the 2015 closing of the popular Jamaican restaurant Sweet Mango Cafe in Petworth and the end of the neighborhood’s annual Caribbean parade.
“I think the loss of these cultural institutions has really changed the identity of neighborhoods in a way that might be unwelcome by the people who have lived there,” Van Tol said.
Van Tol said he was surprised by the finding that gentrification was rare in small and medium cities in the country’s interior. Nationally, the study found, nearly half of all gentrified neighborhoods were in seven cities: the District, New York, Los Angeles, Philadelphia, Baltimore, San Diego and Chicago.
[Five myths about gentrification]
In an essay accompanying the study, Sabiyha Prince of Empower DC said the city “rolled out the proverbial red carpet” for tens of thousands of new residents in the past five years. But the new dog parks, bike lanes, condominiums and pricey restaurants that followed, she said, are not viewed as improvements by long-term residents, who can feel isolated because of losing neighbors, social networks and local businesses. Prince, an anthropologist, said longtime Washingtonians tell stories of “alienation and vulnerability in the nation’s capital.”

My wife is a licensed real-estate professional in Virginia. The city of Alexandria, directly across from WashDC is experiencing some gentrification as well. Blighted, slum areas are disappearing, and new, high-class housing is going up.
When Amazon opens their sub-headquarters in nearby Arlington (Crystal City), with 25,000 jobs, real estate is going to skyrocket.
LikeLike
Gentrification is a fact of life in many American cities. Renters are generally those that have lower incomes, and they are the most easily displaced as developers move in. Renters are more likely to be minorities as many black and brown people have been unable to climb the property ladder. In Miami Little Haiti is gentrifying at an alarming rate because it sits on one of the highest elevations in the city. The area is losing much of its culture and many of its Haitian residents as a result.
Privatization of public education continues to play a big part in gentrification. Charter schools which have the freedom to select their students is resegregating schools in many urban areas. Typically, the selective charters serve the mostly white middle class residents while cheap charters out of the area targeted by developers serve poor, minority students. In a few cases developers are even operating their own charter schools. The public schools are caught in the middle of all this profiteering as they are left with the neediest students and few resources to adequately serve them due to charter drain. Privatization enhances segregation and depletes public education in gentrifying areas. Developers get rich, but it is a lose-lose for most public schools.
LikeLike
The diaspora of the impoverished is different from the out-migration of those searching for a better life.
LikeLike
One positive step for national education starts in the capitol -get rid of Gates’ SETDA
(State Educational Technology Directors Association). The organization appears to have juice in D.C. Every state in the nation has various Dept. of Ed. personnel identified at the site.
SETDA self appointed to “take action in important issues facing public education”… to foster public private partnerships”…prioritize digital learning…and, provide opportunities for “organizations to showcase innovative products”.
Democracy not oligarchy.
LikeLike
Gates uses his wealth like a wrecking ball to forward his technology agenda. He is not looking out for what is best for students. He is looking to sell more products. Just because technology is available does not mean it is truly “innovative” or better. The states appease Gates because of his money. It is a pitiful act of deference to the oligarchy.
LikeLiked by 1 person
it is becoming a bit transparent that the “tech” world now massively wealthy and looking for control so that they can sell endless product is intentionally dividing up communities: kids whose parents CAN afford tech product and services vs. kids whose parents cannot afford said tech and services (and therefore are considered problematic and must be pushed out)
LikeLike
Linda…Thanks for the heads up. This is a professional association, perhaps in name only.
I looked at the B&M Gates Foundation grants to SETDA. about $2.5 million since 2011 with one payment for a state to hire a director of technology. Early grants were to push tech versions of the Common Core, later grants to personalize (sic) learning with digital this and that.
Between charters and the pushers of tech the functions of public schools as institutions for community-building are being decimated.
LikeLike
Great final paragraph, Laura.
LikeLike
SETDA lists the following from Ohio
“Dan Badea, Stephanie Donofe, Lorrie German, Ed Weisenbach and an ‘education consultant-assessment’, Kirk Ross”.
Here’s a novel idea, the Ohio Dept. of Ed could seek the public’s opinion about their vision for their schools. If Ohio was a democracy, the result might be Ohio public employees’ departure from all things, Gates’ oligarchy.
LikeLike
SHAMEFUL!
LikeLike
Alexandria VA, across from WashDC is experiencing gentrification, as well.
LikeLike
The improvements in our nation’s capital are overall a good thing. I live in suburban WashDC, and parts of the city look like a third-world slum. Some areas are undergoing a renaissance.
“We live in a world, in which the only constant is change”
-Heraclitus, Greek philosopher.
LikeLike
So where do all the people living in the garbage housing go after they are forced out of their slum? Certainly not, Montgomery Co or Howard Co MD. Certainly not Alexandria or Roslyn VA. No, they push these poor people into PG county MD and deny them decent services and push their children into corrupt charter schools. Yes….DC is sure looking pretty….and awfully white.
LikeLike
The District of Columbia has a diverse ethnic population. see
https://www.census.gov/quickfacts/dc
There is a definite shortage of low-cost housing in WashDC.
The nation’s capital is not going to be majority caucasian. (I am a former employee of the US Census Bureau).
LikeLike
You are one sick individual, Chuck. Ask your doctor if Empathy is right for you.
LikeLike
I am not “sick” . I just call it like I see it. My wife is a real estate professional, and I can see what is happening here in Northern Virginia.
LikeLike
“The only thing constant is greed”
Enough is what we need
But only constant’s greed
The quest for ever more
Is only thing in store
LikeLike
Just ask yourself, Charles, who gentrification is good for. I doubt those being pushed out find the changes an improvement. I guess it is one way to end poverty–starve ’em out. Now if only they didn’t reproduce. ( Do I have to say snark alert?)
LikeLike
The renaissance of some of our inner cities has both costs and benefits. Filthy, crowded, crime-ridden slums are being demolished, and new, clean townhomes, and other modern housing is going up.
Of course, housing prices are increasing. Gentrification is obviously good for the individuals who are moving into the new housing.
Part of the solution, is to provide adequate housing for the displaced people.
LikeLike
Do you support low-income housing? Do you agree it should be dispersed, not concentrated?
LikeLike
“Part of the solution, is to provide adequate housing for the displaced people. “Ya think!? We all know how that goes.
LikeLike
Give them all tents!
There are lots of parks around DC, although we would not want them camping on the National Mall of course.
LikeLike
@Diane: Yes, I support housing assistance. And I would like to see lower-income persons receiving “:housing vouchers”, that can be redeemed in private housing. (My wife has helped many people find section 8 housing).
One factor, that accelerated the flight of middle-class white families from the inner cities, was when the publicly-operated schools declined. There is some very good evidence, that indicates that if inner-city areas had school choice, that more middle-income families would choose to live there.
LikeLike
Does that explain the mass exodus of black families out of Chicago? I don’t think so.
LikeLike
Inner city schools declined for some very obvious reasons connected to funding. That fact is very obvious when comparing public schools in affluent neighborhoods to those in less wealthy neighborhoods. I don’t fault people for leaving or looking for a better choice for their children when their neighborhood schools have been systematically destroyed. to suggest that public schools be further weakened by diverting already inadequate funding to charters is ludicrous. Do we need to reiterate all the reasons or do you retain some of the well researched facts that many have presented to you? Fund public schools adequately, and there will be no problem finding people willing to send their children to them.
LikeLike
@speduktr: You are seeing the light. What has happened over the past several decades is this:
The public schools in many inner cities were fine (in the 1950’s). Some were outstanding. When the neighborhoods began to integrate, and housing prices fell, and the public schools integrated, some white families sold out, and headed to the suburbs.
The property values declined, and the tax base declined, and money available for the new integrated schools declined. So more white families left the cities. The new suburban public schools , with their solid tax base, thrived.
A vicious cycle started. More middle-class families departed the cities. The public schools continued to decline, forcing more families to leave the cities.
Most polls indicate that minority families support school choice at a higher rate than white families. When your neighborhood public school is adequate, and properly funded, you are less likely to want school vouchers/choice. The new reality is “School choice is the black choice”.
You Say: Q I don’t fault people for leaving or looking for a better choice for their children when their neighborhood schools have been systematically destroyed END Q
This is exactly what happened!
As usual, minorities got clobbered. Wealthy white families have a way of gaining from the system.
LikeLike
Charles,
Charters and vouchers are a very poor choice. Black families have been lied to by propagandists hired by billionaires. Voucher schools are unquestionably worse than public schools, and the charter industry is highly unstable. Charters are likely to close mid year. Public schools do not.
LikeLike
So we are supposed to fund a private system where wealthy whites profit off of taxes that should be equitably funding a public system and drive the truly public system into bankruptcy? NO!
LikeLike
Underfunding is not the only–or even the main –reason low-income public schools struggle. The truth is more complicated and contains elements that many of my fellow liberals do not want to face. The French movie “The Class” (Entre les Murs) shows, better than any movie I’ve ever seen, what an ordinary class is like in many public schools, especially low-income schools. Few journalists or lay people will ever see this reality first-hand because no principal will let them see it. It’s a secret that teachers keep to themselves because they know that no one wants to hear the truths they have to tell. Everyone who is interested in the truth about public education should watch this film. It shows a wonderful, caring teacher and wonderful, lovable, interesting students with whom he has excellent rapport, but also a level of disorder, obstruction, and defiance that radically reduce the efficiency of the educational process. It striking to me how rarely this reality is acknowledged on this blog or in any liberal milieu. For the reformers, the problem is teachers’ unions. False. For liberal defenders of public schools I know, it’s always “underfunding of the schools”. I’m all for more funding — it will help –but underfunding is not the heart of the problem. Here’s the sobering reality: even with a very bright, caring teacher like the one in the film (the actor who plays this wonderful teacher is a former teacher himself, and you can tell), the kids themselves throw up so many road blocks that learning, if it happens at all, moves along at a very slow pace. Sorry to break the bad news. Now, start attacking the messenger. Or…watch the film.
LikeLike
I saw the film when it came out. Mostly Muslim kids in the banlieue in the suburbs of Paris. Totally disconnected. Hopeless. Despressing. I’m not sure what lessons we can draw other than to give up.
LikeLike
Oh, I disagree. I thought so much good transpired in that film, as it does in many rough classrooms. Just establishing warm rapport is an accomplishment. But the next to last scene, where the French (our ELA) teacher queried students on what they’d learned in all their subjects that year, showed the students had indeed been learning some academics. What I took away from the film is that a caring and dedicated staff can make progress with kids like that, though it’s a herculean task that demands skill, wisdom, discipline and subject matter mastery –and even with all that, the progress is slow. If you were hoping there was an easier and faster way, then I can see how you would find this depressing. Depressing or not, it’s the most truthful portrait of a tough school I’ve ever seen. And it seems to me we’ll only make progress with our public schools when we start working with the facts and living with the truth (as my liberal talk show host hero Norman Goldman always used to say) instead of clinging to pleasant fantasies about the nature of the situation.
LikeLike
DC Gentrification
Drain the swamp
Of DIstrict’s poor
Fill with pomp
And Gucci store
LikeLike
The history of American migration does not include replacement of a population except for the original displacement (violent in both biology and in a martial sense as well).Europe has experienced several of these displacement events, the most violent being the Nazi genocide in which Hitler’s Germany sought to supplant various ethnic populations to achieve “liebenstraum”
Does the gentrification of American cities indicate a maturation of the euro-American story?
LikeLike
Gentrification, not reform, probably explains test score gains.
LikeLike
Winning Combination
Combination
That can’t be beat
When gentrification
And cheating meet
LikeLike
DC Gentrification (2)
Dearth of places
For the poor
“Fix” displaces
Them with store
LikeLike
Showing races
To the door
All their faces
Never more
LikeLike
It struck me rather late that gentrification of the rural areas, a process a euphemism like “suburban growth” hides behind innocuous language, is very similar to the activity that is going on in the cities.
One group of people is being displaced by another. One difference is that the rural people displaced by suburban development are generally landowners and leave without the trauma of poverty. Another is that they are primarily of European descent, owing to the out-migration of African-American farm day laborer so during the generation of the mechanization of agriculture.
A really important similarity is that the in-migration is bringing people who do not want to be a part of the community, or see the community as dysfunctional and desire to live apart from it. They create a separate, often transitory suburbia where community is subservient to individual goals and desires.
Oddly enough, we often see the suburban process in a positive light, whereas we see the gentrification process in a negative light because of the effect on the impoverished people displaced. I suggest we re-examine the suburban process.
LikeLike