The Toledo Blade wrote a commonsense editorial calling for repeal of HB 70, which allows the Ohio State Department of Education to take over and privatize the management of low-scoring school districts. Takeover has been tried and failed in Lorain and Youngstown. Now Toledo and other impoverished districts are threatened.
Frankly, it is shocking to see such sound logic and reasoning, but it is also gratifying. Privatization is not the answer to poverty.
Here is a demonstration of what a thoughtful editorial writer can produce:
All in one day, back in 2015, a quickie amendment was added to an education bill in Columbus and rushed through the General Assembly with no hearings and no committee research. The measure allows the state to take over failing school districts — and Toledo Public Schools is in real jeopardy of being taken over so that state officials can “fix” the struggling district.
The problem is that the state’s cure looks as if it would be worse than what ails TPS.
Under House Bill 70, signed and defended by former Gov. John Kasich, the state can take over if a school district receives an overall “F” grade on its state report card for three consecutive years.
TPS earned an overall “F” last year. Many experts rightly point out that failing grade is a more accurate measure of a community’s extraordinary poverty than it is the quality of education children are receiving.
And because Toledo probably cannot quickly fix systemic poverty problems — more homeless students than any other Ohio district, 40 percent of Toledo children living below the poverty line, one in four children suffering from hunger — the district’s state report card is not likely to miraculously look like an honor roll contender this year or next.
The idea of a state takeover for truly failing school districts mightbe a good idea. Schools cannot be allowed to fail year after year. Districts cannot be allowed to fail their children and their communities.
But the standardized tests used to determine which schools are failing are recognized by more and more experts, parents, and communities as failed measuring tools.
And in the districts that have already endured state takeover — Youngstown, Lorain, and East Cleveland — the process has been revealed as a sham. Youngstown, the first district targeted for takeover, actually posted worse standardized test scores after an outside CEO took over, dropping from 602nd in the state to 606th.
It is not as if state authorities can point to a failing management team or negligent school board. Under the leadership of Superintendent Romules Durant, TPS has increased its graduation rate from 63 percent to 78 percent in the last three years. It has created successful themed magnet schools to let students focus on art, aeronautics, and business. The district has passed a series of levies in the last three years and has a stable financial forecast.
What, exactly, would state officials expect a privatized management team do differently? There is no magic wand to be waved over poor, urban school districts. If a quick fix were possible, the TPS officials would have used it years ago.
Last year, then-State Rep. Teresa Fedor sponsored a bill to halt state takeovers. The moratorium bill was blocked by Republicans and by Mr. Kasich, who promised to veto it. But the General Assembly did agree to study the effect of takeovers on school districts.
Local control is the cornerstone of American public education. Taxes, hiring, curriculum, and policy for a community’s most important public institution — its schools — are meant to be decided by locally elected officials, not hired guns with zero accountability to parents and taxpayers.
The General Assembly must pass — and Gov. Mike DeWine must sign — a bill that halts state takeovers of school districts.
Schools cannot fail their communities and failing schools must be accountable. But the current school takeover process in Ohio does nothing to make failing schools accountable or successful.

“What, exactly, would state officials expect a privatized management team do differently? There is no magic wand to be waved over poor, urban school districts. If a quick fix were possible, the TPS officials would have used it years ago.”
Ohio newspapers have been great with questioning ed reform for about the last 5 years, but is hard to accept advice from the same editors who mindlessly cheered ed reform and ed reformers, no matter what they did, for 15 years.
They played a huge role in what was absolute ed reform dominance in Columbus, FOR YEARS.
They ALWAYS should have questioned this. Instead, they smeared and silenced any and all critics as “supporters of the status quo” or conflated any and all support of public schools as “supporting labor unions”.
Once our 50th debate over charter schools and vouchers in Ohio is over (this time) I have a suggestion: it might be time for someone in Columbus to actually produce something of value for the public schools in this state. How about putting in a couple of hours of work on PUBLIC schools? I know our schools are unfashionable, but we ARE paying these people to (supposedly) improve them. Instead, every single legislative session becomes centered on charter schools and vouchers.
LikeLike
As usual, it strikes me as very convenient that politicians have decided all of the country’s ills can be laid at the feet of public schools.
As long as they stand in front of microphones and do their ritual denunciations of public schools they’re let completely off the hook for poverty, racism, income inequality and wage stagnation.
No wonder they all love ed reform. It’s a politicians dream. Public schools as a national punching bag lets every single other person and entity off the hook. It’s an incumbent protection racket.
LikeLike
Our response to HB70 should be a statewide strike.
LikeLiked by 1 person
Theoretically, yes. Practically, no. Outside of our small circle of friends or those affected by takeovers, this is not an issue—like virtually all education issues—that is resonating one iota with parents or teachers in “unaffected” districts.” If a strike were ever called, all parents would complain about the “disproportionate power” of teacher unions. And most teachers would be afraid of losing a paycheck and there jobs. The slogan would be “Solidarity For Never.”
LikeLiked by 1 person
their — I must learn how to proofread and let spellcheck do my writing.
LikeLike
Sigh… You are right. “It can never happen here.”
LikeLike
ABSOLUTELY. It is a crucial understanding which must be aggressively dispersed to all parts of the state.
LikeLike
You don’t have to take my word on it that it’s an echo chamber and ed reform has uttely captured federal lawmakers.
Here’s the federal budget priorities for schools:
“Education Freedom Scholarships (EFS) would provide up to $5 billion in extra education funding to help students across the country access the education that is right for them. To learn more about EFS visit ed.gov/freedom
Doubled DC Opportunity Scholarship Program funding, for a total of $30 million.
$500 million for the Charter Schools Program which is an increase of $60 million over FY19.
$107 million for the Magnet School Program.
$50 million for Student-Centered Funding Incentive Grants to help increase transparency in education funding and allow more federal, state and local dollars to follow students to their schools.”
Public school students, who make up 90% of students, come dead last and all they get is another consultant-driven “data collection effort” which will be used to pull more funding from their schools.
90% of students, 1% of interest and effort, in DC. 90% of kids are an afterthought.
The US Department of Education released a budget that provides absolutely no upside or benefit to 90% of US families.
How did this happen? How did 90% of families end up unrepresented at the federal level? Capture, that’s how. They hire exclusively echo chamber members and only echo chamber members are promoted.
LikeLiked by 1 person
State takeovers of public school districts are UNDEMOCRATIC, UNACCOUNTABLE, AND UNACCEPTABLE.
School takeovers are UNDEMOCRATIC, because they take away the power from locally elected school boards.
School takeovers are UNACCOUNTABLE, because they give an unaccountable appointed CEO total control over every facet of the schools.
School takeovers are UNACCEPTABLE, because their reliance on test scores in underfunded schools disproportionately impacts minority families in low-income communities.
Using the following resource, Ohioans should call education leaders and ask them to REPEAL Ohio’s school takeover law – HB 70.
https://publiceducationpartners.org/2019/03/08/repeal-ohio-house-bill-70/
LikeLike
ONE voucher program in DC got an amount equal to half the special funding that 50 million public school students got in the Trump budget:
“Doubled DC Opportunity Scholarship Program funding, for a total of $30 million”
That’s insane.
Boy, if you want attention and funding from the federal government best to get your child into the nearest private school, pronto. They don’t plan to lift a finger to help the remaining 50 MILLION students in public schools.
This isn’t “markets”. It’s blatantly ideological favoritism and focus on private and charter schools and neglect of public schools. They’re deliberately sending a message that public school students are “lesser” and don’t deserve investment and support.
LikeLike
Hope Ohio wakes up.
And “NO THANK YOU” to every potus since Reagan including Reagan.
LikeLike
People who use public education as their political football need to … (fill in the blanks).
LikeLike
This editorial uses the terms accountability and failing schools. These terms, taken on their own, are the problem when applied to local school districts. These terms may have some meaning when applied to state legislatures or school boards, who have the power to bring more resources to bear on places where the teachers see themselves as struggling to get done what they desire. When applied to individual schools and based on one little test a year, all of the demonic ills described in this blog over the years come crashing in to destroy any good intention.
So let us quit using those two phrases, as they have been shown to be counter productive. Let us start suggesting instead that the people engaged in the process of helping the students learn be involved in the solution to the problem.
LikeLike
Roy,
I agree with you about accountability. I believe it starts at the top, with those who make the decisions, control resources, and bear responsibility. They like to shuffle off their accountability.
LikeLike