Education Week describes Trump’s proposed cuts for programs in the U.S. Department of Education. Trump proposes eliminating 29 federal education programs while maintaining level funding for Title 1 and Special Education. The key quote in this article is the one from Secretary DeVos, who says the budget is about “education freedom,” by which she means, “So long, you are on your own, don’t expect the feds to help you.” The administration proposes $5 billion for vouchers and an increase in the federal charter school program to $500 million. It is not clear why the federal government needs to spend any money to start charter schools, since this project is now well covered by the Waltons, the Koch brothers, the DeVos family foundations, Michael Bloomberg, the Broad Foundation, the Dell Foundation, the Arnold Foundation, the Fisher Family Foundation, the Gates Foundation, the NewSchools Venture, the Charter School Growth Fund, and others too numerous to mention.
President Donald Trump is seeking a 10 percent cut to the U.S. Department of Education’s budget in his fiscal 2020 budget proposal, which would cut the department’s spending by $7.1 billion down to $64 billion starting in October.
Funding for teacher development under Title II, totaling $2.1 billion, would be eliminated, as would $1.2 billion in Title IV funding for academic supports and enrichment and $1.1 billion for 21st Century Community Learning Centers that support after-school programs. In total, funding for 29 programs would be eliminated in the federal budget.
On the other side of the ledger, Trump’s budget blueprint calls for $500 million for federal charter school grants, a $60 million increase from current funding levels. The president also wants $200 million for the School Safety National Activities program, which would more than double the program’s $95 million in current funding—of that amount, $100 million would be used to fund a new School Safety State Formula Grant program. There are no requirements for the grant program related to firearms, according to the Education Department. And the office for civil rights would get $125 million, the same as current funding.
On the school choice front, the department says its main proposal has already been introduced: a federal tax-credit scholarship program from Republicans. The Treasury Department’s budget proposal includes $5 billion for the cost of such a program.
Meanwhile, the Education Innovation and Research fund would be funded at $300 million, a $170 million increase from fiscal 2019. Of that amount, $200 million would “test the impact of teacher professional development vouchers,” according to a presentation from the Education Department, while $100 million would go toward innovative STEM grants. In addition, the Trump budget would provide $50 million for a pilot program under Title I to help districts create and use weighted student-funding formulas—this pilot program was created under the Every Student Succeeds Actin order to help schools focus money directly on disadvantaged students and those with special needs. Funding for the District of Columbia Opportunity Scholarships Program, which provides vouchers to students in the nation’s capital, would increase to $30 million.
Title I funding for disadvantaged students, the single-largest federal funding program for public schools, remains flat at $15.9 billion in Trump’s budget pitch. Special education grants to states would also be level-funded at $13.2 billion. Also flat-funded are the English Language Acquisition formula grants at $737.4 million.
“This budget at its core is about education freedom—freedom for America’s students to pursue their life-long learning journeys in the ways and places that work best for them, freedom for teachers to develop their talents and pursue their passions, and freedom from the top-down ‘Washington knows best’ approach that has proven ineffective and even harmful to students,” said U.S. Secretary of Education Betsy DeVos in a statement about the budget proposal.
On a Monday conference call with reporters, Jim Blew, the assistant secretary for planning, evaluation, and policy development, acknowledged that Congress and the Trump administration have not been synced up in terms of education spending priorities.
“The administration believes that we need to reduce the amount of discretionary funding for the education,” Blew said. “That is based on the desire to have some fiscal discipline and address some higher-priority needs.”
Blew indicated that the priorities should be the disadvantaged children and students with disabilities.
For more details on Trump’s fiscal 2020 proposal for the Education Department, click here. And check out our chart below to see the effects Trump’s budget request would have on different programs.

Everything about this man looks backward to a primitive state of civilization. I’ve come to think of him as some sort of evolutionary throwback, subspecies Orange Lacquer Man.
LikeLike
45 is a broken man and he doesn’t want anyone to find out.
LikeLike
Only education can reverse the tendency of an uneducated populace to vote against its own interests and in the interests of the oligarchy and its meretricious enablers. And by “education” I am not referring to the fact that people need more schooling, though they certainly need that, in well-funded PUBLIC SCHOOLS, with real teachers. I am referring, instead, to the need for progressive individuals, institutions, and politicians to explain to voters what some do not as yet understand. They must explain how vouchers and charters siphon funding from real public schools. They must explain how truly Orwellian “personalized learning is.” They must explain that no, universal, single-payer health insurance would not be too expensive, that our current system is too expensive. We spend TWICE AS MUCH, per capita, on healthcare as do those countries that have universal, single-payer systems, and we have WORSE outcomes. The issue in healthcare is not cost but generating the political pressure to pass the necessary legislation to reorganize how the tab for healthcare is met. Almost every other country in the OECD has done this. It doesn’t require magic. It requires the will to make it happen, for the benefit of all the people, for a change, instead of for the benefit of the extraordinarily wealthy few.
This privatizing of education is another in the long list of plays, on the part of the leaders of the New Feudal Order, to reduce the people to serfdom and to expand the oligarchs’ private fiefdoms. Their current rackets, healthcare, for example, aren’t big enough. They want education too. Turn it into a profit mill. Milk it dry. This is the United States as Banana Republic. Utterly corrupt.
The US will either evolve into a Social Democratic state, like Denmark or Finland, or it will collapse from within. The agenda of the oligarchs and their useful idiot enablers like Trump and McConnell is unsustainable. They will keep pushing their toy until it breaks, or rather, use people like Trump and Ryan and McConnell to do the pushing, and if that happens, if it breaks, it’s going to be terrible. Truly, truly terrible. Terrible on a scale that the world has not yet seen. Let’s avoid that, shall we?
LikeLike
YOU are right, BOB.
This stood out for me:
“The agenda of the oligarchs and their useful idiot enablers like Trump and McConnell is unsustainable. They will keep pushing their toy until it breaks, or rather, use people like Trump and Ryan and McConnell to do the pushing, and if that happens, if it breaks, it’s going to be terrible.”
LikeLiked by 1 person
It kills me that these people hide behind their “patriotism.” Anyone with any sense who really loved this country can see this coming and will work to make changes to prevent it. The Trumps and Devoses of the nation are totally out of touch with the realities of life in the US today. They are enjoying themselves in their private club cars while the the runaway train they are on is headed for a crackup. The conductors are drunk or asleep.
LikeLike
“The Trumps and Devoses of the nation are totally out of touch with the realities of life in the US today. ”
Well, they make a lot of money and gain more power every minute. I’d say, they are very much in touch with the realities in the US. (But I understand, what you mean, Bob).
LikeLike
“The US will either evolve into a Social Democratic state, like Denmark or Finland, or it will collapse from within. ”
I think it will split up. One part will evolve into a more social democratic state, God help the other part.
LikeLiked by 2 people
I have thought this possible. And yes.
LikeLike
an interesting way to pass the time: imagine new border lines
LikeLike
A lot of Trump’s budget will funnel increasing amounts of money into privatization. Lots of the budget items call for “evidence based” initiatives. There is absolutely no evidence that supports the merit of privatization. It makes the rich, richer while the poor get ignored. Let’s hope the Dems refuse to pay for this terrible budget.
LikeLike
Yes Bob he is an atavism – Australopithecus Orangensis
LikeLike
There is no possibility of Nancy Pelosi’s democratic house, of ever approving any federal school choice program. This proposal has no more chance than a kerosene cat in hell, with gasoline britches on. DEAD ON ARRIVAL.
Liberal elites, send their children to private schools, and deny any possibility of choice to the rest of us.
Trump/DeVos’s proposal is only a “sop” to their supporters. This is the worst kind of political theater. Politics is like wrestling, only it is more fake.
I am ashamed of this proposal. It deserves to die.
“Politics is the art of the possible”- unknown.
LikeLike
Are you suggesting that Trump and DeVos are part of the “liberal elites”? They both went to private schools and sent their own children to private schools. The schools they attended cost about five times more than the typical voucher. In Trump’s case, ten times more than the typical voucher. What a fraud!
LikeLike
I am suggesting no such thing. Wealthy people get choices, on where to send their children. Liberal or conservative, it makes no difference.
The difference is that liberals will deny any possibility of school choice. Conservatives favor school choice.
LikeLike
Charles, that is ridiculous. There are many choices within the public school world. Public money should pay for public schools, not for private and religious schools. Anyone who wants to leave the public world should pay for their choice.
We have been through this again and again and again. I don’t like the police, but the public refuses to pay for me to have a private security guard. I don’t like the highways, they are too crowded, but I can’t get the public to pay for a private route for me. I don’t like the public mail service, so why should I have to pay for Fedex, UPS, or another private service? Public services are free and universal. Private choices must be paid for.
LikeLike
Charles, you know that I delete most of your comments about choice because they are stale. From now on, I will delete them all. I have answered your questions multiple times, and you waste my time.
LikeLike
You claim Q Public services are free and universal. END Q
I disagree. Public services are paid for with TAXES. Nothing that the government “gives” anyone is free.
Delete as you wish.
LikeLike
Public services are paid for with taxes.
Taxes are the price we pay for civilization.
LikeLike
It would be interesting to interview now the teachers who would not vote for Hillary.
LikeLike