I have been posting a lot about the race for the empty seat on the LAUSD school board because it is the second largest district in the nation, the largest with an elected board, and the Billionaire Boys Club has been trying to buy control of it. Eli Broad wants half the students in LAUSD in charter schools, and “only” 20% are now in charters. The BBC thought they won control when they put Ref Rodriguez, a charter operator, on the board, and he was elected president of the board. But then he was convicted of money laundering and had to resign (but not until he voted to select financier Austin Beutner as superintendent).
Now, all their plans are in disarray because progressive firebrand Jackie Goldberg is on the cusp of winning Ref’s old seat, which she held many years ago. She is smart, tough, knowledgeable, experienced. She was a teacher, a member of the City Council, and a member of the State Assembly (and chair of the Education Committee). In the special election of March 5, she won 48% of the vote, and the next runners up got 13% each. The LA Times declined to endorse Jackie, saying she was too “ideological,” and instead endorsed a candidate who received 9% of the vote.
Poor billionaires! All that money spent and so little to show for it!
Here is the latest report on campaign funding from Howard Blume of the LA Times.
Philanthropist Eli Broad inserted himself into a pivotal Los Angeles school board race at the last second this week, making the largest individual donation to any candidate.
Broad’s $100,000 didn’t go directly to a candidate for the open District 5 seat, but to a union running its own campaign on behalf of Heather Repenning. Such independent campaigns have no donation limits.
The election day contribution went to a political action committee run by Local 99 of Service Employees International, which represents school district employees. Broad has frequently opposed unions politically.
Local 99’s ideological alliances have sometimes shifted. It has typically supported board members running for reelection regardless of who else supports them.
Repenning’s campaign is currently on hold as more than 4,700 ballots still are being counted. She is just behind Graciela Ortiz, in a virtual tie, for the second spot in a May 14 runoff for the office; after the initial vote count on Tuesday, only 53 votes separated them. Only one of them will make it to the ballot to face Jackie Goldberg, who far outpaced all other candidates.
In Tuesday’s vote, Repenning and Ortiz finished about 35 percentage points behind Goldberg, who nearly won a majority of votes, which would have eliminated the need for a runoff.
Repenning was the best-funded candidate because of Local 99, which represents cafeteria workers, bus drivers, building and grounds workers, teaching assistants and unarmed campus security aides.
The former public works commissioner is a highly qualified candidate that the union, Broad and others can agree on, said Max Arias, the union’s executive director.
L.A. Mayor Eric Garcetti also endorsed Repenning.
In all, Local 99 spent about $1 million on behalf of Repenning, the largest amount for any candidate. United Teachers Los Angeles was the next largest contributor, spending more than $660,000 on behalf of Goldberg.
Repenning has tried to position herself as a centrist, close neither to charter backers nor union interests.
Charter schools are privately operated and compete with district-run schools for students. Most are nonunion. Local 99 represents workers at only two of the more than 200 charters in the district, according to the union. But children of union members attend both charter and traditional schools.
In past elections, Broad has been a major donor to candidates endorsed by charter school advocates — who typically are opposed by candidates backed by the teachers union. Charter supporters did not coalesce around a single candidate in this election cycle.
Another major pro-charter donor, Manhattan Beach businessman Bill Bloomfield, gave $5,000 to a Local 99 PAC. He also gave $1,200 directly to the campaign of Allison Bajracharya, a charter school executive also on the ballot. Bajracharya, who finished fifth, attracted direct donations from many charter supporters. A group associated with charter backers, Students for Education Reform Action Network, spent nearly $139,000 on her behalf.
Because Broad is a high-profile figure and a major donor, his contributions tend to get noticed. And it’s not the first time that his donation has arrived too late to be part of the news cycle before voting takes place.
Both Broad and Bloomfield have made much larger donations in the past. In the final stretch of the 2017 L.A. Board of Education campaigns, Broad gave nearly $1.9 million to California Charter Schools Assn. Advocates, a political action committee that was spending heavily in the race. Bloomfield contributed $2.275 million, the vast majority of it late in that campaign.

We can tell the SEIU local 99 leadership what we think by recording a message at their site, 213-387-8393.
For a union to needlessly fund a candidate that billionaires were willing to fund, IMO qualifies as misuse of union member funds. And, in this case it reflects a shared attack against democracy.
“Only 2 out of 200 charter schools have staff represented by unions i.e. SEIU.”
LikeLike
I used to think very highly of the SEIU. No longer.
LikeLike
“It’s “inevitable” that Congress will, at some point, pass a proposal similar to the tax-credit scholarship plan that U.S. Secretary of Education Betsy DeVos supports a top department official told a conservative think tank.
Jim Blew, the assistant secretary for planning, evaluation, and policy analysis, said he realizes the legislation, which would give individuals and companies a tax break for donating to scholarship granting organizations, won’t pass “next month.”
“We know there’s a longer battle here,” Blew said on “The Report Card,” a podcast run by the American Enterprise Institute. “We actually believe that enacting this bill is inevitable. The public, the constituents of our members of Congress are strong supporters of having more choices. … Eventually we will win this battle.”
Wow. That’s pretty confident. No one will ever accuse ed reformers of humility. Particularly as they haven’t bothered to explain the new 5 billion dollar federal voucher plan to anyone outside carefully selected members of the ed reform echo chamber.
Shame that none of them are doing any work outside of pushing vouchers, though.
Do we really need a federally-funded voucher lobbying organization with thousands of employees? Couldn’t the ed reform billionaires pick up the cost of this instead of billing the public?
LikeLike
AEI’s Frederick Hess called on the rich to bribe universities to do their bidding. His co-author of the scheme was an employee of a Gates-funded ed organization. The plot is found at Philanthropy Roundtable, “Don’t Surrender the Academy”.
History will condemn AEI and, the third Koch brother, Bill Gates.
LikeLike
Another giant for-profit college just collapsed:
26,000 students- most of them low income and first generation college students- ripped off and stuck with piles and debt and no recourse to ever get their money back.
This is what the DeVos Department of Education neglects in order to push her voucher plan- their work. They’re so busy pushing ed reform schemes no one worries about actual US students in actual US schools.
What are we paying these people for if not to work for these students? Can they get a refund on their tax money?
LikeLike
Just like trump university.
LikeLiked by 1 person
This is what happens when wealthy individuals pay less in taxes than what they should be paying.
They use their wealth not to get personal pleasures or an individual sense of self-gratification from it, but rather to disrupt and/or control the lives of others
Take a larger chunk of their wealth, in the form of taxes, to benefit the public, and it will provide breathing room for those bearing the brunt of the paid-for whims of the wealthy, and also a breath of fresh air for democracy.
LikeLike
77% marginal tax rate.
90% inheritance tax above $2,000,000 estates.
LikeLike
Garcetti has demonstrated that he is an enemy of both public education and UTLA, despite having Steve Zimmer as an “educational consultant,” He is unfit to hold higher office.
One could have a charterist wife and back a charter-tied, billionaire-funded political flunkie up ’til now, but that ain’t gonna fly in 2024.
Bye, Garcetti…
LikeLike
Bye, Rep. Susan Davis, who appears to be allied with George Miller.
Miller steers the new interest in higher ed at the lobby shop, BiPartisan Policy Center. Arnold and Gates sponsored a recent higher ed session at BPC that featured politician, Susan Davis.
Tom Daschle founded BPC and he is chair of the CAP board. The Gates-funded CAP is the voice of establishment Dems (DINO’S), which means CAP promotes charter schools.
LikeLike
To people who are at the age of 65 and more:
I really care about PUBLIC EDUCATION FOR ALL.
I hope that all veteran EDUCATORS from PUBLIC SCHOOLS and from PRIVATE INSTITUTIONS will self- reflect their own learning and working PRIORITIES.
REGARDLESS OF all cultural and educational specific expertise BACKGROUND, would you recognize that we can not carry with us EXCEPT our own DIGNITY AND CONTENTMENT?
I am really interested in understanding about THE TRUE DIFFERENCE BETWEEN ALL SENTIENT BEINGS who always have:
– one brain – one heart – one lung, and the same color in blood
If we stop breathing, eating, drinking, urinating, or releasing bowel movement, then we will stop living. So why do we use our privileges like higher degree, better career, and more money to take an advantage of the lesser? What kind of dignity and contentment that we will leave behind after death? Will our children and grand-children appreciate our greed, ignorance, and savage?
In short, we inherit THE BEST NORTH AMERICAN BELIEF IN HUMANITY FOR ALL.
Don’t we need to sustain and maintain this belief in humanity for many upcoming YOUNG GENERATIONS? Back2basic
LikeLike