The Achievement First charter chain is committed to re-examining the value and purpose of its harsh disciplinary policies after a white principal was videotaped shoving a black student, and a behavioral specialist resigned and blasted the oppressive climate at one of the charters.
No-excuses charters claim that their draconian policies produce high test scores but critics have long criticized the inhumanity of their rules, which smack of colonialism.
Turmoil at an Achievement First high school has escalated into a larger reckoning for the charter school network spanning three states.
The spark was two videos released in January. In the first, the former principal of Achievement First Amistad High School in New Haven, who is white, is seen shoving a student. In the second, a former staff member, who is black and who released the first video, described the school as “oppressive.”
The ensuing backlash — including over the fact that the principal was not immediately fired — has pushed the network’s leaders to accelerate planned changes. Now, they say they’re open to reconsidering things big and small, from how students are expected to sit in class to even the network’s leadership.
The two CEOs have recently sent a series of candid emails to the network’s staff, who work across 36 schools in Connecticut, Rhode Island, and New York. Those emails, obtained by Chalkbeat, illustrate how the events at Amistad raised significant questions about the network’s approach to racism, discipline, and leadership.
“The last 3 weeks have been the hardest weeks we’ve ever had leading our network,” CEOs Dacia Toll and Doug McCurry wrote. “What happened at AF Amistad High School is a failure of our leadership.”
Many of those questions connect the controversy to a long-standing debate about so-called “no excuses” charter schools, which emphasize strict discipline, high expectations, and an academic focus. Research has found that these school networks, including Achievement First, substantially increase students’ test scores and, in some cases, help more of them attend college. But critics and some scholars argue that the discipline-heavy approach amounts to a racist, even abusive form of control over mostly students of color, while failing to prepare them to lead independent lives.
In the last two months, more Achievement First teachers and parents have called for change. The network’s leaders say they are committed to improving students’ experiences — and everything is on the table as its principals gather this week.
“We’re going to remain a high-expectations organization. The provocative question is, what does high expectations actually look like?” Toll told Chalkbeat in a lengthy interview. “Is it high expectations or low expectations to insist that kids fold their hands?”
‘This is not a proud moment for AF’
The controversy broke into public view because of Steven Cotton, a behavioral specialist with Achievement First who worked for the network for five years.
Cotton says he saw the security footage in October showing principal Morgan Barth grabbing and shoving a student emerging from a classroom. By January, Cotton had resigned and posted a lengthy Facebook video criticizing Amistad’s treatment of teachers and students, including its merit and demerit discipline system.
“There’s not a place in that building at this point where a kid can be a kid,” he said. “Yes, we’re here for education, but we’re not here to be robots.”
The New Haven Independent published a story featuring the security camera footage and Cotton’s video. In the piece, the brother of another student said that Barth had shoved his sibling at a Bridgeport Achievement First school Barth led in 2013. (Toll told Chalkbeat that, because it was a personnel matter, she could not comment on whether she or the network had known about that allegation.)
Barth resigned that day, hours after the Independent story.
I think charter schools need whistleblower protections for their employees.
I know they’re all anti-union but a publicly-funded entity with a “can be fired for any reason, or no reason at all” workforce and no outside oversight is a recipe for disaster.
There is a charter teacher in DC who says she was fired because she spoke out against management of the schools- she told a reporter that the schools managers were collecting very high salaries as compared to teachers, who are paid less than teachers in public schools. She was then fired.
They will continue to run into this until they offer some protection to employees who speak out. If people are afraid they will be fired for criticisms, they won’t speak out.
Why don’t we ever hear from charter teachers? It’s always the “founders” of the schools, or the managers of the schools, or one or another paid charter promoter. If their teachers are so “empowered” why do we never hear from them?
Is Morgan Barth related to Richard Barth the founder of KIPP schools?
It’s a common trope in charterworld to point to public school teacher disciplinary actions as “evidence” that public schools have more problems than charter schools. They were promoting a Chicago public schools analysis where X number of teachers had had some kind of disciplinary action or report.
But this is a fallacy. They HAVE information on public school teachers because unions and districts are required to report it. They have NO information on charter teachers. They simply don’t know how many charter teachers are fired for cause. They don’t know why they are fired, or not fired. They are once again comparing apples and oranges.
Your tax dollars at work:
ED Press Secretary Retweeted AEI Education
Assistant Secretary Jim Blew talks about #EducationFreedom Scholarships on The Report Card w/ @natmalkus
Week Three of the US Department of Education promoting private school vouchers.
They can’t find time to offer anything at all to the 90% of US families who attend public schools, but they can spend months promoting vouchers for private schools.
Is there some reason I have to pay ten thousand public employees to promote the 3% of private schools they prefer? Can we possibly ask that they put in an hour or two OF WORK on the 90% of schools they disdain?
This is literally all these people do- they promote charters and vouchers. It’s freaking ridiculous that we’re all paying for these anti-public school political campaigns. They return NO value to public school students or families, and we are paying THOUSANDS of them.
ECOT in Ohio was able to steal 400 million dollars partly because our political leaders are corrupt and captured, but also because the employees of ECOT were fired when they threatened to blow the whistle on fraud.
Charters have no mechanism to allow employees to safely report fraud or abuse without retaliation by managers or owners of the schools. They’ll continue to have huge fraud scandals (and worse) until they put one in.
The franchise has 36 schools in Connecticut, Rhode Island, and New York. The policies of “achievement first” appear to be geared toward producing compliant students who learn to fold their hands, pretend to blow bubbles so they will not speak or giggle, also score well on standardized tests. no respectable educator should want to work in these schools. They are boot camps for kids.
Too many charters foster a culture of oppression rather than expression. As a white teacher that has mostly worked with diverse, mostly minority students, I have learned that a teacher must create a safe, supportive environment for students. Teachers should lead with understanding and love. Students want to be heard and understood, but a class still needs rules and consequences. The consequences should never be personal or demeaning. When I started teaching English to high school students that were mostly Haitian, the administration assumed I would fail. There was no way I could intimidate the students, and I never believed in this type of treatment anyway. These students behaved in the class and school because their needs were being met. They felt accepted, understood, and they were learning. All the problems around the school associated with these students began to fade. Of course, there are a few oppositional defiant students that cannot be reached this way, but the vast majority of students want to learn and will cooperate if their needs are being met. A positive, affirming attitude, a sense of humor and mutual respect can help build the type of relationship that will optimize learning.
I briefly taught at Amistad Middle School before I knew what No Excuses charter schools were. At the time, I needed a teaching job, and they offered competitive pay with no certification required. I was indoctrinated at their one-week training, where the mantra was Joel Klien’s “You don’t need to fix poverty in order to fix education.” They even made us memorize and recite out loud an “elevator pitch” to that effect.
There are so many things I could recount about my tenure as a teacher for Achievement First that are horrifying. I don’t believe Doug McCurry and Co. are acting in good faith. The system they built is based on keeping the “scholars” in their place, not to mention the teachers. For example, are they going to remove “The Fist” rule, whereupon, when a (usually) white teacher sticks out their arm in a 45-degree angle with a closed fist, all students are required to shut up and do exactly the same? Are they going to continue to spend time at faculty meetings debating when a “sigh” by a scholar is intended as disrespectful to a teacher, and therefore merit detention? Are they going to continue to tell teachers, “there are no warnings at Amistad, just deductions (detentions)?” The No Excuse model is morally corrupt and debased at its core. No “listening tour” is going to change that.
“The No Excuse model is morally corrupt and debased at its core.”
well stated
Peter,
Thank you for your honesty. OMG. It’s the repressive factory environment one more time, and this time it’s even laced with “subjugation” tactics on the cotton fields. Holy cow.
The “No Excuses” model is a defense mechanism used by charter amateurs that never really learned how to teach or manage a classroom. It is a 19th century perception of “discipline” applied mostly to minority students to extort compliance.
hear, hear.
Peter,
Did you stay in teaching after working at Amistad? If so, could you compare and contrast the behavior management policies of the schools you’ve worked at?
It’s not the harsh “discipline” per se that raises test scores. It’s the fact that said “discipline” is only targeted to low test-scorers, thereby driving them out of the school leaving only the good test takers behind. As a bonus, the low test scorers then return to public schools, thereby proving that public schools are “failing.
Good point. If the attrition rates were considered, these schools would be a whole lot less “successful.”
“It’s the fact that said “discipline” is only targeted to low test-scorers, thereby driving them out of the school leaving only the good test takers behind.”
Thank you for posting this comment, which cannot be said enough times.
No Excuses appears to come with significantly higher attrition rates than charters that don’t practice no excuses. The fact that the true attrition rates of no-excuses charters is kept hidden by charter CEOs and the paid researchers whose livelihood depends on them spouting pro-charter ideology should be a red flag that it is the most important thing of all.
Hair issues, uniforms, strict military protocol? Just sounds like a 2000s version of American Indian boarding school lite to me.
‘Kill the joy in the child, Save the student’ ?
Lots of racism and classism = oppression in charter schools.
Reblogged this on David R. Taylor-Thoughts on Education.
The cv of Prof. Sarah Cohodes of Columbia Teachers College shows a grant from the Walton and Arnold Foundations, which she received through Harvard.
She concluded in a paper in 2018, “Urban charter schools and those serving low-income and minority students, a number which share a ‘no excuses’ philosophy, tend to produce the largest gains.” (NEPC criticized the paper in a review.)
Meanwhile, the Harvard Crimson, on 12-3-2018, posted, “Billionaire and Convicted Sex Offender Jeffrey Epstein Boasts Deep, Long-standing Ties to Harvard”.
The irony of “no excuses” for the “low- income and minority” communities, while the Lolita express ensnares so many of the rich and influential…..
The “scholars” consist of mostly the survivors of the selective charter purge. Attrition numbers should be considered before making sweeping statements about so-called success. Losing students should never be considered a “success.” Attrition rates should be calculated in with the total.
I challenge Sarah Cohodes – if she is reading this blog – to tell us what the longitudinal attrition rates of the students who enter the urban charters she studied was.
In other words, can Sarah Cohodes tell us the following about the charters she studied that had the top results:
What percentage of the original lottery winners accepted their spots and enrolled the very first day of school? Was it 50%? Less? And was she at all curious why parents who won a coveted lottery spot would then refuse to enroll their child and was anything told to them to dissuade them?
What percentage of those students who enrolled the first day of classes in Kindergarten moved up with their cohort over the next years so that they reached the testing grades with their cohort and proceeded on to the final year of the school? And remember, no cheating,Sarah Cohodes, by not telling anyone how many kids who are still in the school have actually been held back and did NOT progress with their cohort as they should have. Cohodes should be able to tell us how many of those students in urban charters need extra years to handle the work but apparently she can not or will not since her funders don’t want the public to know so therefore she doesn’t seem to want them to know either.
In other words, can Cohodes provide us with real longitudinal attrition rates of any of these urban charters she studied? And that means not fudging results by including replacement kids who come in later to hide how many leave.
FYI — that is exactly what the college Common Data Set does and if a researcher like Cohodes tried to hide those numbers or fudge them they would be drummed out of academia. Cohodes does not present a Common Data Set for any of the charters she studies even though that would be very useful information – I can only assume it is because doing so might reveal that unlike colleges or public schools, the charter schools with the top results actually have far higher attrition rates than the charter schools with mediocre results.
The Common Data Set was devised so that colleges could not lure students to enroll as freshmen without telling them that the likelihood of them actually graduating in 4 years was very slim.
A college cannot fudge high attrition numbers by including transfer students in their common data set to claim high retention rates. A college cannot claim that there is no need to provide that information – as Sarah Cohodes certainly seems to do — because the only thing that matters is that more of the freshmen graduate in 4 years than at that nearby community college. In what universe can a researcher say “you don’t need to know real attrition rates as long as I assure you they are not any worse than a nearby community college”??
Colleges that did that would be rightly shamed as trying to hide something, just like Sarah Cohodes seems to want to do.
Can Sarah Cohodes – with all the money and time she spent researching urban charters – simply provide the information that any legitimate researcher would have at her fingertips:
What IS the likelihood that a child who enters the first day of the earliest grade of each of the urban charters she studied will proceed with his class and graduate from the final year of the school in the appropriate number of years? And why does Cohodes believe that is such useless information that she refuses to reveal it?
Sarah Cohodes should provide a Common Data Set for every single one of the charters she studied. No transfer students included to hide attrition rates. No claiming that as long as a failing public school also loses kids, she doesn’t have to tell us how many kids the top ranked charter would lose.
Why wouldn’t Sarah Cohodes think it was important for a family seeking a charter to know that if they enroll their child in a mediocre charter their child is more likely to remain at the charter than if they enroll their child in a top-ranked charter?
I hope Cohodes will tell us why she believes that is information that should be kept hidden from parents who choose charters. Provide us with the Common Data Set of all the urban charters she studied so parents can know whether they are enrolling their child in a charter Kindergarten where their child only has a 30% chance or 50% chance or an 80% chance of graduating with that same cohort.
In the American oligarchy, citizens concluded they had no legal basis to sue those in ed deform who promoted harmful practices. The Sackler case, if it opens the door so that not just distributors but think tanks, professors and foundations can be subject to legal action, will be one of the most significant advancements for U.S. democracy.
These systems of discipline are, as D77 pointed out above, a weeding mechanism used not only by charters, but also by individual teachers. Some teachers make their classes so tough that only a few students can pass. These teachers are often considered to be the best, and awarded the joy of teaching highly motivated students. Their classes work well because they have successfully weeded out those who are poorly motivated.
Is this good pedagogy? Should our goal in education be to act as the refiner’s Fire? Whose idea is this?
Again the emphasis on test scores! We need to take education back from Big Testing.
Melania is now an expert on education and shows it by visiting a ‘public charter school’ and ‘promotes the role that tech companies can play in child welfare’. [I can see why she wants to leave the WH.] I’m sure Be Best is making a HUGE difference in so many lives. [sarcasm]
……………………………
1600 Daily
The White House • March 4, 2019
First Lady Melania Trump takes off on three-state tour
This week, First Lady Melania Trump is taking her “Be Best” initiative across America, with visits to Oklahoma, Washington, and Nevada beginning today.
Be Best lifts up children—both in America and throughout the world—by focusing on three pillars that the First Lady announced last spring: encouraging childhood well-being, promoting positive social media use, and supporting families hurt by opioid abuse. Her efforts included a major trip to Africa last fall, where she met with leaders in Ghana, Malawi, Kenya, and Egypt.
First on today’s trip was a visit to the Dove School of Discovery in Tulsa, Oklahoma. Recipient of the 2018 National School of Character Award, Dove School prides itself on the first pillar: the well-being of children. It’s one of a group of five public charter schools that aims to incorporate character development into all of its classrooms from pre-kindergarten through 12th grade.
The First Lady sat in on three classrooms, getting a firsthand look at the unique curriculum across different grade levels. She joined pre-K children for an activity that encouraged young students to think about how they can show kindness in their own lives, and she observed sixth-grade science students broken up into teams to emphasize communication and teamwork skills.
“I cannot emphasize further the importance of character-based education for our children,” the First Lady said. “[Dove schools] are sculpting our next generation by creating a foundation of youth with strong character. I know they will go on to do great things.”
At her next stop, the First Lady traveled to Seattle, Washington, to promote the role that tech companies can play in child welfare—including applications to teach children online safety. “She is a mother herself first and foremost, so she understands the importance of social media and the impact it has on children as they’re growing up,” the First Lady’s spokeswoman Stephanie Grisham said.
This is pure insanity.
…………………………..
‘Safety’ In U.S. Schools Means More Cops And Fewer Counselors
An estimated 14 million students attend a school without a single counselor, nurse, psychologist or social worker, according to a new report from the American Civil Liberties Union. But their schools do employ cops.
This disparity is poised to get worse after the 2018 mass shooting at Marjory Stoneman Douglas High School in Parkland, Florida, inspired the federal government and many state legislatures to push for enhanced security on campuses and prioritize the “hardening” of schools.
“There’s a dangerous trend in prioritizing law enforcement as a response to school safety when no evidence suggests that’s going to improve things,” said Amir Whitaker, staff attorney with the ACLU of Southern California and co-author of the report released Monday…
Article: https://www.huffpost.com/entry/aclu-report-school-safety_n_5c7d3e01e4b0e5e313cd5e00
Great shot for such a small target. This is what happens when one HAS to have a gun. Two phallic symbols and one worked. [Off topic but I like the revenge of owning a gun.]
…………….
Unlicensed Gun Owner in Indiana Accidentally Shoots Himself In Penis
An unlicensed gun owner in Indiana is recovering in a hospital after accidentally shooting himself in the penis.
Mark Anthony Jones, 46, told police in Marion that he was taking a morning walk when the Hi-Point 9mm handgun he was carrying in his waistband “began to slip,” according to The Smoking Gun…
Article: https://www.huffpost.com/entry/mark-anthony-jones-penis-shooting_n_5c7d9493e4b0129e36bdd2bc
I have no first hand info on this issue, but I do recall that one of J. L. Motts teachers set up a match with a student who used an anti Semitic remark toward him. The teacher prevailed. I assume he had some training. They were besties after that. It was the kid that wore a bullet around his neck and stood up in class and threatened to kill me and all white people like me. I told him in my firmest, no nonsense voice to sit down and open his book. Then I went to him later and told him how my father would have agreed with him about gun control but that I agreed with neither. I think he needed a father and also approval of teachers. He was probably bright but confused by the late sixties and how to fit in with differing groups. Our lack of rejection probably helped. Hope he got out of the 70’s OK.
Sent from my iPhone