While the state of Virginia is engulfed in a crisis of leadership, friends of public education are pushing to launch a statewide protest on behalf of public education, reports Rachel Levy.
After years of underfunding, grassroots activists have begun their campaign, hoping to ignite a movement that leads to equitable movement. The leadership crisis makes the battle for #Red4Ed even harder in what issuer to be an uphill battle.
Levy writes:
“The #Red4Ed movement has kicked off in Virginia: On January 28, as many as 5,000 public school teachers, educators, workers, parents, students, and other stakeholders marched on the Virginia state capitol in Richmond to demand fully funded public schools. The march and rally, organized by Virginia Educators United, a “grassroots campaign” of teachers, staff members, parents and community members, was one of the largest to descend on the state capitol in the last century.
“The well-organized event was supported by strategic use of social media and a user-friendly website. The group’s demands include restoring funding for education to pre-2008 recession levels, increasing teacher pay to national averages, paying education support professionals competitive wages, recruitment and retention of highly qualified teachers and more teachers of color, more funding for school infrastructure costs, and ensuring sufficient numbers of support staff like counselors and social workers….
“There is broad, bipartisan support for public education in Virginia, despite terrible funding. This support is not a sign that Virginia as a whole is getting “bluer.” In fact, support for school privatization is stronger in places like Richmond with more socially liberal but gentrifying, market-friendly forces. The problem is also that in more conservative, traditionally Republican-voting areas, while support for the institution of public education is strong, support for the policies that will make public schools more equitable, integrated, and better funded is not. And in more conservative areas, there is an inherent discomfort with advocacy and activism—I know from my own research that most people seem to understand advocacy to mean being supportive and uncritical of decision-makers.
“At the rally on January 28, David Jeck, superintendent of Fauquier County public schools, stated that, “the localities are not at fault here.” But such a statement lets wealthier communities off the hook. Local districts in Virginia have also made cuts to education, and did not restore pre-recession funding. And local districts in Virginia are hindered by restrictive proffer policies that make it difficult to collect revenues from developers or otherwise leverage sufficient taxes on businesses and non-personal property. Better-heeled parents support their local public schools not by advocating for more funding, but by funneling donations and in-kind donations directly to their school via parent groups and local businesses and foundations.
”At the state level, the structure of the General Assembly itself poses obstacles. Virginia has a part-time “citizen” legislature. And even though in 2017 a record number of women, people of color, and progressives were elected to the House of Delegates, the capacity of citizens, such as those connected with Virginia Educators United, to engage in advocacy is limited. Participants must be available at any time, including during weekends, holidays, early mornings, and late nights when the General Assembly is in session (for forty-five days and ninety days, alternatively). This means that most such advocacy efforts are left to professional lobbyists, organizations, and associations.”
It will take widespread support to get the attention of the legislature to the state’s crisis of funding.

I live in VA, and I watch the education developments here closely. The are some good things, and a lot of bad things happening.
The current governor, is thoroughly opposed to any kind of school choice. Although the state assembly has sent up some choice proposals in the past, the Dem governors keep vetoing them.
There are only eight (8) operating charter schools in the commonwealth. Richmond, has been identified as a charter school “desert”. It is almost impossible to open a charter school in this state.
Many Republican delegates, downstate, mouth support for public schools, but are loath to put up much in the way of appropriations.
20% of the state’s population lives in Fairfax county. The rural, downstate areas have more political “juice”, than the population deserves. Northern VA pays the lion’s share of taxes to the state treasury, and the downstate delegates decide the spending.
LikeLike
Virginia doesn’t need any more charter schools. It is a very unstable sector. They close with frequency, often in mid-year, stranding kids and wasting millions of dollars. Great business opportunity, lousy education
LikeLike
What possesses you to think that anyone here is sympathetic to the plight of charter vultures (apologies to actual vultures, who at least serve a useful function)?
LikeLike
Richmond VA is the state capital. Currently:
Q No Richmond middle school meets the state’s full standards, and academic performance across several of the city’s middle schools ranks among the worst in the state. END Q
This is in the state capital! In the southwestern part of the state, in places like Lee county, the public schools are even worse.
Thomas Jefferson is spinning in his grave.
LikeLike
School Choice would drag performance down even lower
LikeLike
I have lived in Virginia for many years, since 2000. (And prior to that). Virginia has yet to implement any school choice plan or program. Do you have any statistics or documentation to back up your claim, that school choice would drag performance down (in Virginia)?
The quality of public schools in my state is at best, uneven. Schools in most of the northern counties (Fairfax, Arlington, Loudoun), are fine, and often score very high in national rankings.
Public schools, downstate, are left far behind. I am appalled that the public schools in our state capital, are so terrible.
LikeLike
The lowest scoring schools in Ohio and Nevada are charters.
Since Michigan went charter-mad, its scores on national tests have fallen sharply.
New Orleans is all-charter, and its scores are below the state average in one of the lowest scoring states in the nation.
If Virginia allows more charters, they will take the kids they want and resources from the schools that enroll 85-90%, which will weaken the whole state.
LikeLike
Diane is correct.
LikeLike
I am not convinced that school choice (in Virginia) would drag performance lower in my state. The charter schools in WashDC generally perform as well as, or in many cases, higher than the traditional public schools in DC. see
https://www.dcpcsb.org/more-students-ever-attend-top-ranked-public-charter-school
You can’t necessarily extrapolate data from Nevada and Ohio, and transfer the results to Virginia.
(I am a former statistician, with the US Dept of Commerce)
LikeLike
“No Richmond middle school meets the state’s full standards….”
You mean no Richmond middle school is 100% above average. Guess it just ain’t Lake Wobegon.
LikeLike
By the way, Chuck, do you think this might have anything to do with Richmond middle schools’ failure to meet state standards: https://www.richmond.com/news/virginia/richmond-s-poverty-rate-is-second-highest-in-virginia/article_379d6968-ea24-5239-8f7b-5d4cc3e66394.html ? What do you propose to do about poverty?
Money quote: “There’s a central city with a high degree of poverty and racial minorities surrounded by more affluent, whiter suburbs.”
How do you suppose the middle schools in those affluent white suburbs are doing, Chuck? Do you think, just maybe, that affluence and privilege (or lack thereof) have more to do with how a school “performs” than anything about the school itself?
LikeLike
School located in prosperous areas with a solid tax base, can afford to have superior schools. Schools located in depressed areas, without a tax base, have fewer financial resources than wealthy areas. Stop the Presses!
As long as we finance schools through property taxes, that will be the case.
I am an engineer, not a social scientist. I can see that the “war on poverty” is lost. After $5 Trillion in spending, poverty is worse than when the “war” started. The same government that conducted the war in Vietnam (and lost), and the war on drugs (and lost), has lost the war on poverty.
There is no one easy answer to controlling poverty. One first step is to encourage marriage (prior to childbearing). Stable two-parent families are more economically sound than unmarried females with children.
I live in suburban WashDC. The public schools here are excellent, and many of them score very high in national rankings. Northern VA has a very high number of citizens with advanced degrees (because of the federal government workers). The citizens here demand excellent public schools, and they pony up the cash to pay for these schools.
If you wish to see how the middle schools in VA suburbs perform, just check the VA dept of education websites.
See my previous comments. Wealthy areas have excellent schools in Virginia. The central city of Richmond, and areas like Lee county, have terrible public schools.
My grandparents lived in Richmond in the 1950s and early 1960s. When the public schools integrated, this accelerated the “white flight”, and many of the higher-income (white) people departed the city for Henrico county. The collapse of the tax base, resulted in the city schools losing their financing.
Good schools cost money. Stop the Presses.
LikeLike
@Dienne: You asked about how middle schools in affluent areas of Virginia are performing. See this site:
https://www.niche.com/k12/search/best-public-middle-schools/s/virginia/
The highest performing middle schools in VA are located in Fairfax, Loudoun, Norfolk, Arlington, Falls Church, Alexandria, etc.
Schools in the high-income areas are excellent in Virginia. Schools in Appalachia, and the central city of the state capital are terrible.
What is your point?
You ask Q Do you think, just maybe, that affluence and privilege (or lack thereof) have more to do with how a school “performs” than anything about the school itself? END Q
Of course, affluence and financing contribute a great deal to the overall performance of a public school. The suburban schools here in Fairfax county, VA are excellent, and many earn superior national rankings. (There are problems, some students in Fairfax go to school in trailers).
Higher income families generally are better educated, and will demand that the public schools hold to a high standard.
LikeLike
Virginia is one of the most affluent states in the country. Yet, average teacher pay has dropped steadily, and teacher pay now ranks about 34th in the nation, nearly $10,000 below the national average.
Meanwhile, more than a decade ago, Virginia eliminated its estate tax, which generated an average $150 million a year in revenue.
Seems that Virginia legislators favored the rich over public schooling.
Sad.
LikeLike
An American failure, in addition to concentration of wealth, is corporate media’s silence about it.
LikeLike
I do not live in Virginia. I am happy that the Governor of Virginia opposes school choice. He, however, has a fuzzy grasp on the implications of racist behavior. He mischaracterized slavery as indentured servitude. The number two man in the administration has been accused by two women of sexual assault. Man number three has admitted to past racist behavior. The heightened segregation engendered by school choice is unlikely to be effective in facilitating Virginia’s confrontation with its Confederate past.
LikeLike