Chris Hedges writes about what happens when corporations run government. Number one is the subjugation of workers, which cuts costs and drives profits.
He begins:
Corporate dictatorships—which strip employees of fundamental constitutional rights, including free speech, and which increasingly rely on temp or contract employees who receive no benefits and have no job security—rule the lives of perhaps 80 percent of working Americans. These corporations, with little or no oversight, surveil and monitor their workforces. They conduct random drug testing, impose punishing quotas and targets, routinely engage in wage theft, injure workers and then refuse to make compensation, and ignore reports of sexual harassment, assault and rape. They use managerial harassment, psychological manipulation—including the pseudo-science of positive psychology—and intimidation to ensure obedience. They fire workers for expressing leftist political opinions on social media or at public events during their off-hours. They terminate those who file complaints or publicly voice criticism about working conditions. They thwart attempts to organize unions, callously dismiss older workers and impose “non-compete” contract clauses, meaning that if workers leave they are unable to use their skills and human capital to work for other employers in the same industry. Nearly half of all technical professions now require workers to sign non-compete clauses, and this practice has spread to low-wage jobs including those in hair salons and restaurants.
The lower the wages the more abusive the conditions. Workers in the food and hotel industries, agriculture, construction, domestic service, call centers, the garment industry, warehouses, retail sales, lawn service, prisons, and health and elder care suffer the most. Walmart, for example, which employs nearly 1 percent of the U.S. labor force (1.4 million workers), prohibits casual conversation, which it describes as “time theft.” The food industry giant Tyson prevents its workers from taking toilet breaks, causing many to urinate on themselves; as a result, some workers must wear diapers. The older, itinerant workers that Amazon often employs are subjected to grueling 12-hour shifts in which the company electronically monitors every action to make sure hourly quotas are met. Some Amazon workers walk for miles on concrete floors each shift and repeatedly get down on their hands and knees to perform their jobs. They frequently suffer crippling injuries. The company makes injured employees, whom it fires, sign releases saying the injuries are not work-related. Two-thirds of workers in low-wage industries are victims of wage theft, losing an amount estimated to be as high as $50 billion a year. From 4 million to 14 million American workers, under threat of wage cuts, plant shutdowns or dismissal, have been pressured by their employers to support pro-corporate political candidates and causes.

AMEN!
LikeLike
I read/listen to Hedges weekly. His words keep me focused.
LikeLike
This is what happens when unions have been nearly eliminated in this country, especially in the private sector which has a unionization rate of about 6.8%.
LikeLike
Do some checking: Google (ahem) the name of a big company, along with
“class action” and see what you get, especially about wage theft. They can
set it up electronically so that it’s completely systematic. CBK
LikeLike
BTW, wage theft is what they call shaving minutes off of employee time cards, which are no longer “cards,” but computer programs. CBK
LikeLike
This behavior is similar to that of the National Socialists in Germany and to the Italian fascists when both parties came to power.
LikeLike
As Mussolini himself told us, when corporations run the state, that is fascism.
The United States of Oligarchy, in which corporations and Wall Street have immense power over government while we, the people, have extremely little power, is on its way to fascism.
Read Democracy Incorporated: Managed Democracy and the Specter of Inverted Totalitarianism by Sheldon S. Wolin. It’s one of the books often cited by Chris Hedges.
Also read Democracy In America? What Has Gone Wrong and What We Can Do About It by Benjamin I. Page and Martin Gilens
LikeLike
“Right to work” states have totally bought into the unilateral power of employers over employees. The war on public unions is all part of the same mindset. This is a great post that dispels the myth of neoliberalism. All members of Congress should get a copy of this important article.
LikeLiked by 1 person
I just want to point out something in education coverage that always sticks out to me, as a public school graduate, public school parent and public school supporter:
“In some ways, continuing to cover the war between union leaders and charter school supporters frustrates and exhausts me.”
This is the ed reform frame and journalists have adopted it whole.
Do you see what’s missing when it’s framed as ‘union leaders’ versus ‘charter school supporters’?
Public school students and families are missing.
Ed reformers use “unions” as a stand in for “public schools”.. They take our entire school communitie(s) and define them as “unions”. It’s not even that it’s ideologically driven (although it is) it’s that it’s incredibly reductive.
It’s as if there are no possible “public school supporters” IN these schools! As if charter schools consist of students and teachers and families but public schools do not. Instead “public school” is just this entity that employs unionized workers.
I went to public schools and I have been a public school parent for 25 years and in all that time I have never heard anyone characterize a school like that- doesn’t matter if they’re anti-union or pro-union, no one describes an actual public school in these reductive terms.
I think ed reformers so dominate the debate that we no longer even see that they have defined all the terms.
LikeLike
Teachers’ unions have been a convenient scapegoat for corporations. The teacher strikes are led by disgruntled teachers tired of poor wages, erosion of benefits, large class sizes, poor working conditions and unregulated charter growth. Teachers are revolting against the disinvestment in public education that so many states and communities have faced.
LikeLike
And I think we saw this play out after the 2010 elections when so many ed reform governors were elected. Scott Walker and John Kasich never talked about our schools – they characterized our schools as kind of an elaborate union hall.
And that isn’t how public schools are. I think people in Wisconsin finally said “wait a minute- although it true these employees are unionized that’s a tiny portion of “what they are”- what they are is schools. Why don’t you ever talk about our schools?”
It’s as if we had analysis of UPS and instead of a package delivery company it was characterized as “The Teamsters”. The Teamsters certainly organized UPS employees but if you’re getting a package that’s not your focus, at all:
“During a speech in Nashville on Thursday, U.S. Secretary of Education Betsy DeVos called for education reform groups to continue the fight for school choice and said rumors of her departure are false.
Her lunchtime speech at the ExcelinEd conference included a heavy focus on the benefits of school choice for students and national tax reform efforts.
She also issued a warning to teachers unions and “defenders of the status quo” that she is just getting settled into her post as President Donald Trump’s education secretary.”
Betsy DeVos looks at tens of thousands of public schools and all she sees are labor unions. That isn’t at all the lived experience of anyone who attended one. It’s bizarre.
LikeLike
Capitalists are fond of saying that capital has no nationality. But they talk too fast for most folks to draw the corollary: Corporate capitalists may pretend to care about democracy and patriotism but that’s all the biggest of lies. In a capitalist country, the government is up for sale to any force, foreign or domestic, with enough money.
LikeLiked by 1 person
Follow the money. Money never sleeps.
LikeLike
Jon Awbrey I fear the old and distorted forms of socialism (that GregB talks about) as much as anyone, and by whatever name.
However, capitalism unleashed and derived from our worst totalitarian ambitions, is a virulent cancer on the body politic, in part, precisely because it respects no national borders, it knows nothing but short-term gains, and has no regard for “the people” with whom they live on the planet. CBK
LikeLike
When billionaires and corporations can afford to buy the government, the people lose. We see first hand what happens when the government colludes with business in the charter industry. We also see it in the high price of healthcare and pharmaceuticals. We see it in the deregulation of dangerous products that harm people and the environment. We see it in all the attempts to shrink the government and replace public services by more expensive privatized options. Our government currently works a lot more for corporations than citizens.
LikeLike
Person without Country
A Corp without a country
With dollar, only friend
The ways and means are sundry
But profits are the ends
LikeLike
well said
LikeLike
Indeed. This moment in history demonstrates how the corporate world is in charge.
The reality of how the lives and the rights of our workers in America have been utterly undermined but he corporate entities is being recognized right now… but this story drives some how ruthless they are in their quest for profits. THIS IS A MUST READ ” FUEL TO THE FIRE” http://www.ashleygilbertson.com/recent-work/2018/11/25/ny-times-magazine-fuel-to-the-fire I was stunned. You will be, too!
It is the account of the devastation In Indonesia, as the land was brazenly plundered by “private business capitalizing on free markets.” Does this sound familiar!
THE COMPANIES promised to share profits with the smallholders — the villagers — who gave up their land,” because… ” to win access to protected ancestral lands, the corporations promised schools for local children and wages that far exceeded those from harvesting jackfruit and jalut timber.” And, although it destroyed the land that the people had owned for eons , it did much more..
“After the palm-oil COMPANIES gained control of the land, the clearing began. The fastest method was to rip out the forests with excavators and torch what remained….What the Walhi crew found that week in Kalimantan was not just deforestation and misery but a virtual hole ripped into one of the largest banks of concentrated carbon in existence. This apocalyptic landscape stretched as far as they could see, punctuated by only the rare tuft of scorched but otherwise healthy juvenile palm. They traced what they describe as telltale signs that the fires had been started by the palm companies — which is illegal and which all the palm-oil companies strongly deny doing, but which is also the fastest, cheapest way to raze the land.”
And we have the HAND OF BUSH in this demolition; “The last thing anyone expected from President George W. Bush’s 2007 State of the Union address was a proposal for the largest-ever cut in the nation’s use of gasoline.”
Within months of Bush’s speech, the House and the Senate were reconciling a draft of a sprawling omnibus bill that would eventually be called the Energy Independence and Security Act, or EISA. In addition to requiring carmakers to improve fuel standards, a longtime priority for Democrats, the bill updated and expanded renewable-fuel standards, requiring fuel producers to mix in soy, palm and other kinds of vegetable oil with diesel fuel and to use ethanol from corn and sugar in gasoline.
.”Timothy Searchinger spent a year researching cropland demand, and in February 2008, just two months after Bush signed the biofuels mandate into law, he and eight co-authors published their findings in the journal Science. “Almost everywhere in the world, planting more corn or soy for biofuel would involve creating more farmland, which in turn would involve cutting down whatever was already growing on that land. And that would mean releasing a huge amount of carbon into the air, with nothing to balance the books. As Searchinger watched Bush’s call for an unprecedented increase in biofuel production, his hunch was that the biofuel balance sheet would turn out to be tragically shortsighted.
Searchinger had done something important. He had tried to quantify how increasing the demand for biofuel would change land use. According to his calculations, the ripple effects from land use would be so great that ethanol wasn’t going to be better for the climate at all; instead, it would create nearly double the greenhouse-gas emissions of conventional fuels.” AND TO THIS DAY, THE TRUTH is ignored
“When Nancy Pelosi took the stage, she looked back on the 2007 fuel-economy bill and biofuels mandate she shepherded into law. The initiative should be credited, she said, with “charting a new path to clean energy, reducing emissions, increasing the use of renewables.” She made no mention of Indonesia. When I asked her about the deforestation in an earlier email, her office wrote back defending the bill, citing the Union of Concerned Scientists and arguing that even with the Indonesian forest effect accounted for, biodiesels were cleaner than fossil fuels. “Bottom line,” the office responded, “the biofuels in your tank are better for the planet than 100 percent fossil fuels.”
“Lawmakers never anticipated that their well-intentioned plan — to help the climate by helping American farmers — might instead transform Indonesia and present one of the greatest threats to the planet’s tropical rain forests. But as Indonesian palm oil began to flood Western markets, that is exactly what began to happen.”…Within months of Bush’s speech, the House and the Senate were reconciling a draft of a sprawling omnibus bill that would eventually be called the Energy Independence and Security Act.
“In ideal circumstances — unvegetated land planted for the first time — this balancing out really happens. When corn grows, it soaks up carbon, and when it is consumed (whether as food or fuel), it releases that carbon back into the air. But the analysis breaks down when faced with the reality of land use. “
LikeLike
Many of the protests and riots in France are against the neoliberal policies of Macron.
LikeLike
Wow. Really well said. I realize now that many are saying this all the time in comments to articles I read, but using language that doesn’t compute for me. The sentiment is expressed as tho corporations were a conspiracy looking to develop dumb, compliant worker-bees. But this is clear & dead-on. No conspiracy required, just clout & lack of competition, both of which we’ve been furnishing for decades via deregulation.
I now understand the total appeal of 2nd & 3rd gigs my sons have acquired as needed. DoorDash & Uber, for example, when done PT in available time-slots, are completely at-will employment. No need to take guff from anybody, it’s just you & your smartphone app. And delivering for a family-owned local caterer who treats you like family.
And why hasn’t my engr husband ever been treated as described in article? Simple. Competition for his skills & experience. He could walk whenever; it would take two to replace him. He could quit & hire out as a self-employed consultant at higher pay, so they’d best make it convenient & rewarding for him to stay.
LikeLike
More evidence that Thomas Jefferson was right about what we the people have to do to nourish the Tree of Liberty.
LikeLike