In Oregon, parents and teachers are supporting legislation to stop standardized testing before grade 3. Even better would be a ban on all such testing. Parents, say no.
https://www.eugeneweekly.com/2019/01/10/can-children-be-too-young-to-test/
For the first decade after the No Child Left Behind Act passed in 2001 — putting into high gear the testing-based model of education — almost all standardized testing took place in grades 3-8 and 11. Little children were the only ones spared being subjected to the data-driven “business model” approach to learning, with its fixed testing targets and its multitude of accompanying charts and graphs.
No more. Little children have now caught up with their older siblings in the testing derby, on track to join them in taking more than 110 standardized tests by the end of high school. Yes, 110.
Teachers in pre-kindergarten through grade 2 have now joined their teaching colleagues in the older grades in the pressure cooker to produce “accountability” data to match predetermined benchmarks.
Little children are now joining their older siblings in experiencing the sidelining of art, music, creative play and other non-tested curriculum. They, too, are now spending more and more of their day in “seat time,” focused on tested subjects. They, too, are now being repeatedly “tested, sorted and tracked.”
Their teachers know this is developmentally inappropriate. They know it is clearly wrong. But they are not allowed to tell you that. They are not allowed to tell you that most high-performing countries in the world test once in elementary, once in middle school and once in high school. They are not allowed to tell you that teachers already know full well how to identify kids who are struggling with reading, writing and math.
Over the ages, teachers did not need multi-billion dollar testing corporations to tell them how to do their jobs…
One way to change things is for all of us to tell our legislators to support the “Too Young to Test” bill (HB 2318) that has been introduced by Rep. John Lively (D- Springfield). It would prohibit the state government and local districts from standardized testing children from pre-kindergarten through grade 2.
It is modeled on legislation in New York, New Jersey and Illinois. It would allow teachers to make their own professional decisions about which assessments to administer.
The second way is for parents to “Just Say No” to every form of standardized testing that they can.
This is where the ultimate power is: If parents say “no more” — by opting their children out — the testing juggernaut will begin to collapse. We could then join much of the rest of the world in giving a few well-constructed, classroom-based assessments, and save our kids from harm, save our teachers and principals from dispirited burnout and save taxpayers tens of millions of dollars a year.
Thank you for this post. I still substitute teach in districts all around Portland and I will print this and put it in teacher lounges everywhere I go. Frankly, this is the first I have heard of this bill. Politicians should have to take tests, not children!
Crucial to let teachers and parents in Oregon know about this bill!
“Politicians should have to take those tests, not children!” AGREE.
Every politician should have to take every high stakes test and have their scores published for all to see. Rank the scores from each state and the politicians’ scores. This should be interesting.
and endlessly threaten them with being fired if the scores don’t radically move upward
“Even better would be a ban on all such testing.”
YEP!
In reading this I see a parallel between the opt-out movement and the Luddite movement. Read the Wikipedia post on Luddites and see for yourself. The Luddites were not protesting technology per se: they were “…protesting the use of machinery in a “fraudulent and deceitful manner” to get around standard labour practices.”
From my perspective, standardized tests are doing the same thing in the early 21st Century as stocking frames did in the late 18th Century: they are replacing skilled craftsmen with machines. And when grassroots activists we now call Luddites started vandalizing machinery, legislators took note.
“Textile workers destroyed industrial equipment during the late 18th century, prompting acts such as the Protection of Stocking Frames, etc. Act 1788.”
We haven’t gotten to the point of burning boxes of standardized test scoring sheets or vandalizing the various computer centers where high-stakes tests are scored. But, as we’ve seen in NY State where the Regents want to punish schools where parents opt out of tests, we DO have legislation akin to the Protection of Stocking Frames Act of 1788. https://wp.me/p25b7q-2n0