Gia Miller, a parent in New York, recently wrote an opinion piece in the Washington Post explaining why she pays her children to do expected tasks in the home. She says it works.
“Please get dressed — we have to leave in five minutes,” I pleaded for the 20th time, my patience waning. “You still need to brush your teeth. You haven’t packed your backpack! We’re going to be late for school, again.”
This was a typical weekday morning in my home last year. Unfortunately, my first- and third-graders couldn’t seem to grasp the morning routine. All three of us have attention-deficit/hyperactivity disorder, and we struggle with time management and executive functioning. As a result, my kids were late to school — a lot.
During the last month of school, when I was at my wit’s end, the principal called me in to discuss my kids’ excessive tardiness, and I knew something had to change. Fortunately, she was understanding, and I left the meeting with the beginning of an idea. By the first day of school this year, I had completely transformed our lives — the mornings and the evenings.
I accomplished this by paying my kids to perform basic life tasks. In behavioral psychology, this is called positive reinforcement. And it works.
“Positive reinforcement is reinforcing a positive behavior with a positive response, which makes the behavior more likely to happen in the future,” says Lauren Mosback, a behavioral specialist. “That can look like anything from verbal praise and encouragement to offering a tangible reward.”
I do both. I praise my kids for a variety of simple things they do well and reward them with money for behaviors I’m shaping. For example, whenever my kids listen right away or do something well, I praise them. But I also use personalized responsibility charts so they can be at school on time. As they complete tasks, they check them off and earn money.
“One of the biggest concerns I hear from parents is, ‘Isn’t this bribery?’ ” says psychologist Cindy Graham. “Basically, yes. But then I ask them how many adults will go and work out of the kindness of their heart if they weren’t getting paid monetarily. Reinforcement is built into who we are. It pays to go to work. We don’t do it for free, even if society needs it. Kids are no different.”
Positive reinforcement can also work to eliminate attention-seeking behaviors (your child interrupting you while you are on the phone), avoidance behaviors (finding other things to do instead of getting ready for school), access demands (wanting a particular toy or to go out with friends) and even aggressive or violent behaviors.
“What often happens is that we inadvertently and constantly reinforce all of the negative things — we point out what they are doing wrong,” says psychologist Nicole Beurkens. “We shine this huge spotlight on the problem instead of putting the spotlight where it needs to be, which is things that we want to happen and what we want to see more of.”
According to Mosback, saying things like “no” or “stop” won’t correct a bad behavior because a child, especially a young one, may not know the correct behavior or expectation. They must be taught. Using positive reinforcement teaches that correct behavior, increases self-esteem and improves the likelihood they will repeat that behavior.
One option is to create a rewards chart with a clear explanation of expected behaviors. To correct a specific bad behavior, Beurkens recommends rewarding positive behavior in 15-minute intervals — they’ll receive a check mark for each block of time they behave well. When they do well, slowly increase the length of time.
My kids needed more structure to accomplish their daily routine, so I created a chart that broke down the broad goal of getting ready for school into small steps so my children would know what is expected of them. I also defined what was expected of them each afternoon.
I wrote down each morning and afternoon responsibility, and I added several new tasks. They would now need to make their beds, feed the dog, practice music, keep their rooms clean and pick out their clothing the night before. Ambitious, I know.
Next I created a weekly responsibility chart. Days of the week are listed across the top and responsibilities are listed down the left. I grouped several responsibilities together and assigned a completion time. Each time they complete a group of tasks on time, they earn money, ranging from 10 cents to 25 cents.
Learn the “language of the positive”
According to behavioral psychologist Elliott Jaffa, positive reinforcement requires speaking without using no, not, isn’t, didn’t, don’t, couldn’t, or any “n apostrophe t” word. I strive to do this, but it’s a work in progress.
On the day I interviewed Jaffa for this story, I described my morning. My daughter accomplished everything in her first group of tasks except brushing her hair. She walked downstairs with the hairbrush, placed it on the kitchen table, and began to eat. When her time was up to receive her first reward, I explained that because she didn’t brush her hair before 7:20, she didn’t earn her first 15 cents for the day. But, I said, I knew she could earn the next reward.
Jaffa shared how I could have handled the situation better.
“First,” he said, “you did the damage with the word ‘didn’t.’ Next time, ask her, ‘What is that in your hand? How does it work? Can you show me?’ Ask questions to avoid saying she didn’t brush her hair. Every time she comes up with the right answer, you have an opportunity to say, ‘Great, that’s perfect.’ You set her up for three to four positives in a matter of seconds.”
Positive reinforcement has changed our lives. My home is less chaotic and more peaceful this year, and my kids are getting to school on time. Here are a few suggestions for using this system with your own kids.
Modify when needed and be flexible. When we started, my children had to complete nine tasks each morning to earn their reward. When they recognized that they wouldn’t complete everything on time, they became discouraged. So I created three deadlines, with just a few tasks in each. If they complete all those tasks within the time allotted, they earn a reward. Several of the experts I interviewed suggested I break it down further and reward them for each task completed within a certain time frame, even if they don’t finish all of them on time. And when needed, I’m flexible with the amount of time allowed. If my daughter requests extra time to complete her homework but she’s focused the entire time, she can still receive her reward.
Choose a motivating reward, and give it often. Rewards can be anything — toys, stickers, screen time, special privileges or money. Some children may need rewards immediately, while others respond to getting them once a day. I pay my children weekly, but several experts encouraged me to switch to daily rewards. They explained that if I give a reward days later, my children may not be as motivated to complete their tasks, because the reward is not as directly associated with the chore. More-immediate rewards will set them up for success.
Customize your chart, and keep it positive. My chart contains an entire week on one page. Two experts recommended I break it down to have just one day per page, to make it more visually appealing. For younger children, they recommended bright colors and pictures to illustrate each goal. If you’re not sure where to start, the Internet can help. Find a chart that speaks to your general needs, then modify it. Keep it positive by writing “spoke in a positive tone” or “kept hands and feet to yourself,” instead of saying “don’t be rude” or “don’t hit your brother.” Words that end in “n’t” aren’t allowed on a chart, either.
Should you pay your children to do jobs around the house and their homework? Dan Ariely would say no.
Economist Dan Ariely explains in his book “Predictably Irrational” how social norms and market norms differ.
==== THE COST OF SOCIAL NORMS:
We live simultaneously in two different worlds: one where social norms prevail, and one where market norms make the rules.
Social norms include friendly requests that people make of one another. “Could you help me move this couch?”
Social norms are wrapped up in our social nature and our need for community. They are usually warm and fuzzy.
Instant paybacks are not required. Like moving a couch or opening a door, you are not expected to immediately reciprocate.
Market norms have nothing warm and fuzzy. The exchanges are sharp-edged: wages, prices, rents, interest, costs-and-benefits.
Market relationships are not necessarily mean or evil – they also include self-reliance, inventiveness, and individualism – but they do imply comparable benefits and prompt payments.
When you are in the domain of market norms, you get what you pay for – that’s just the way it is.
When we keep social norms and market norms on their separate paths, life hums along pretty well.
Sex, for instance: free in social context, where it’s warm and emotionally nourishing. But market sex, on demand, costs money. Woody Allen: “The most expensive sex is free sex.”

Use whatever works for your family situation provided that it isn’t abusive and doesn’t violate the child’s being.
LikeLike
Anyone who thinks there is a one size fits all for a wonderfully diverse humanity will damage the excellence of that diversity. Well said Senor.
LikeLiked by 1 person
Eh, conflating two issues. Diversity in humanity, society and schools is wondrous indeed. That has nothing to do with basic understanding of human development. Shall we have corporal punishment in “no excuses” schools because no two children are alike? The questionable utility of extrinsic rewards has nothing to do with diversity, either as a social notion or as a reflection of individual or familial differences.
LikeLike
Everybody wants a scapegoat or gimmick. Everyone wants “easy” with no consequences. Raising children IS NOT easy and no gimmick will solve all problems for all children. The need for perfect children is a parent problem and not a childhood problem. This is just more psychological mumbo jumbo to fill our lives with more emotional baggage. It’s called having a “routine” and sometimes the routine just doesn’t work….so what if kid #3 goes to school with unbrushed hair? Their friends will make fun of them (consequence) and the hair will get brushed the next day. Sorry, but this is just more “everybody gets a medal” kind of mentality and look how that is working out for our country right now. I believe we were a better society as a whole when there were consequences for poor decisions.
LikeLike
“But then I ask them how many adults will go and work out of the kindness of their heart if they weren’t getting paid monetarily. ” Nonsense! Taking care of the details of your daily life should not have to require payment. Picking up your crap and helping with dishes is not a job but what people need to do in order to have a happily functioning social unit. When these kids finally move out of mommy’s house and have to live with other people, will they expect to get paid for being a good roommate? No, you get to stay there or you move out and a more considerate, more conscientious person gets to move in. I recently had a student, who is not a very nice person, give me some sarcastic self-congratulations in front of the class because she had turned in an assignment. Never mind that she hasn’t turned in a piece of work in a month (and still no response from my parent phone calls..), she expected some celebration on my part. That’s not how it works, dear
LikeLike
Well, dandy, except wrong. Behaviorism is appealingly simple. Human behavior is not simple, and often not appealing. While these facile techniques may have some short term efficacy, the psychological literature is filled with evidence that extrinsic factors – rewards and punishment – are not effective in school or home. Both rewards and punishment have fleeting effectiveness. When the reward or punishment is removed, the original behavior often returns, sometimes on steroids. Parents and educators should emphasize intrinsic rewards – curiosity, mastery, feeling the satisfaction of completing a task or gaining a skill.
Then, of course, if it doesn’t work, beat the hell out of them.
LikeLike
Woody Allen is a well placed expert.
LikeLike
Skinnerian behaviorism – rewards and punishments – works, but has a dark side. Positive reinforcement of desired behavior (a bribe like money or sugar) works much better than positive reinforcement of undesired behavior (a punishment like losing money or being scolded), but can lead to dependency on the reward. Without the reward, the behavior isn’t accomplished. (Why should I study while away in college if Mom isn’t here giving me my reward for doing homework?) Carrots work better than sticks, but carrots can be addictive. (Also effective sometimes is negative reinforcement (doing nothing) of undesired behavior (ignoring someone when they’re doing wrong).)
B.F. Skinner studied systems of rewards and punishments with lab rats. Rewards were sugar water deliveries and punishments were electric shocks. His system of behavior modification works in some ways better than anything else in psychology. It can reliably be used to overcome phobias, for example. There are a myriad of problems with behaviorism, however, mostly stemming from the fact that people are not lab rats in cages. It’s inhumane to treat people with little more than carrots and sticks. There are many pitfalls. The parent who bribes the child might find demands for greater monetary rewards for the same amount of work, for example. And the dark side of punishment need not be stated.
A better strategy might be to combine Skinner’s ideas with those of Jean Piaget and Noam Chomsky, cognitive theories. Since people are not lab rats, we are able to think and problem solve. The idea is to help children develop thinking patterns that connect desired thoughts and behaviors. Metacognition can be helpful. (Talking to the child to get them to think about whether she is good at getting her hair brushed in the morning and how it feels to be good and ready.) Focusing on thinking instead of behavior can be effective. Look, no pun intended, I won’t sugarcoat it, nothing works like Skinnerian behaviorism. It made Pavlov’s dogs salivate at the sound of a bell. But in the long run, I think the best parents talk to their children more, and usually leave the treats for the dogs.
LikeLike
No offense to Mitzi, of course.
LikeLike
And I’ll add that the limitations of behavior modification using simple carrots and sticks are part of the problem with algorithm and computer-based teaching programs (depersonalized learning), and with the NCLB, Tace to the Top, and the ESSA.
LikeLike
Sorry, last sentence of my second paragraph should have been ‘needs’ instead of ‘need’.
LikeLike
Why is the focus of the article on extrinsic rewards? The author has done a lot to support her children in completing work which has nothing to do with payment. She organized the routines and expected tasks for her children in a systematic and visual way to help them better understand the concept of time. She broke the tasks down into short and manageable steps so that they would know exactly what to do. Without this system, her children would never be successful, regardless of the rewards promised.
LikeLike
It’s kinda funny to read this. As the parent of a young adult autistic, we’ve used the positive behavior techniques, charts and reward system such as stickers during the day leading up to an end-of-the-week event choice like added game time on a WII or X-box. We learned the language of “You NEED to” not “don’t do” long, long ago. He was raised with the expectation that good behavior and cooperation is expected and accepted behavior and not rewarded with money. Small, appropriate household chores were for allowance and money rewards to teach the value of work.
It strikes me as ironic that in the years I’ve pushed for modifications and accommodations in schools for my son that many of them ended up benefiting all students – to the surprise and delight of his teachers. Admins/teachers have ignored families of disabled students for years when we’ve had suggestions and ideas like these now touted 20 years after we’ve been using them.
LikeLike
Children are adults in training. From their earliest days children should be talked to like adults because children develop in various time frames so you never know when they are going to get it. Nature make children want to grow up so they need training to function in an adult world. Our i-pel curriculum is design using two guidelines: the first is through the lense of motivation and engagement and the second is using an education philosophy called Andragogy. Andragogy is a basic technique used to teach adult learners. Our obligation to our children is to help them mature into productive adults that can contribute to society. The best way to do this is to model the adult world for them which is based on being rewarded for production and contribution. If we can show children a productive and rewarding way forward they will be motivated and happy. We still need to nurture through attachment but that gradually must morph into companionship and comradery. It’s never too early to have adult conversations with children because it gets them thinking. Just save the baby talk for your pets.
Michael Haran
Institute of Progressive Education and Learning
LikeLike
I dunno, what you are reacting here, Michael. Adults rarely get directly rewarded for doing chores at home, pleasing their family members.
LikeLike
During the thirty years I was a teacher, I probably worked with at last 6,000 students and only know of one that was paid for her grades.
The reason I know is because she earned a B on one assignment and freaked out. She was in my last class of the day and stayed after to find out what she could do to make up for that B.
I asked her why she was so upset.
She said she was paid $100 for each A she earned on a report card and she’d already planned what she wanted to buy from her next pay check. She had a list of the items she wanted to buy and what they cost. Yea, her parents paid her $700 each semester for her 7 A’s but they didn’t buy her clothing for her or anything else she wanted. They fed her and took care of her medical but she had to use her own money to buy new clothing and other stuff that was an essential.
To calm her down, I had to prove to her on paper that there was no way she wasn’t going to earn an A+ even with that one B because she did all the challenging extra credit assignments.
I asked her if an A- counted for a $100. She said yes. Then I pointed out that all it took to earn an A- was to earn 90% on the total number of assignments and one test, and that because she did all of those one-a-month extra, more challenging assignments, she still had a 135% grade in the class.
She calmed down but never stopped doing all the work all the time. Even when her grade excused her from taking the final exam, she still took it just to see what grade she’d earn. I had a policy to excuse students from the final exam if they were earning an A at the end of a semester. The final only counted for 10 percent of the total grade while those extra, monthly challenging assignments were worth a lot more than 10 percent.
LikeLike
Thanks for the feedback, Lloyd. This is the kind of stuff that causes kids to stress out and even commit suicide. Paying a kid to do their homework should have no bearing on the grade. If it’s to be an adult work model then they should only get paid for completing the assignment. The grade received is an entirely different matter.
Michael Haran
LikeLike
How silly. Of course not.
LikeLike
“‘Isn’t this bribery?’ ” says psychologist Cindy Graham. “Basically, yes. But then I ask them how many adults will go and work out of the kindness of their heart if they weren’t getting paid monetarily. Reinforcement is built into who we are. It pays to go to work. We don’t do it for free, even if society needs it. Kids are no different.””
So then we should also expect kids to demand raises every year. After all, this is what adults do in the real world out there. Perhaps kids should unionize to be more effective in getting the money they deserve for their activities at home and in school, and get on strike if they don’t get what they want.
My question is: Who is going to pay mom for vacuuming the house or dad for mowing the lawn? Should mom pay dad for taking out the trash?
How about the idea of kids’ paying parents to put away their toys they left all over the kitchen and the bathroom? Why should parents do this stuff for the kids for free? Don’t parents need their positive monetary enforcement to do their job at home?
I am full of ideas along this line. For example, I am now thinking about coming up with a formula that would take the parents’ income and the size of the family as input and would output how much money kids should receive to motivate them to get appropriate presents for their family members for Christmas.
I am also thinking about extending this “pay to motivate” principle to the parents’ private lives. I think mom should pay dad to take her out to dinner. How about parents paying each other to improve their sex lives? How about dad paying mom to have more children, or mom paying dad not to ask for more children?
I think the more we imitate capitalism in our home, the better prepared our kids will be for life, and happier the whole family will be. Imagine the warmth this brings to families
“Mom, I was bullied in school today, can I have a hug for $2? ”
“No, Honey, that was last year’s hug-price, this year, it’s $3.20, considering inflation and the booming economy.”
“I only have $2 saved. How about if I take out the trash afterward?”
“How about taking out the trash before?”
“We have a deal, Mom. Here is the money, Mom. Can I have my hug now?”
“First the trash, Honey…”
“Ah, yes, I almost forgot …”
If I have time, I’ll write an article about this inventive stuff.
LikeLike
Mate, I love it! It’s the theater of the absurd!!!
LikeLiked by 1 person
Yeah, Mamie, I think many teachers here are searching for ways to develop inner motivation in kids for learning, and we already have a hard time fighting off the culture of motivating with the threat of a test. If kids are trained to do stuff for money (or ice cream or toys) at home, what will prevent them from expecting payment from the teacher to learn the multiplication table?
Would this work?
“I offer $1 for those who calculate 10×10.”
“99.”
“You get no money, Johnny; the correct answer is 100.”
“But my answer is off only by 1 which is 1%, so I deserve 99 cents.”
“That’s not how it works, Johnny, but I give you 50 cents for trying and for the good business argument.”
“I believe I deserve at least 75 cents.”
“OK, deal. Here is a $1, give me a quarter.”
Probably this would “work” as far as teaching kids how to calculate and kids would find it “fun”, but I am afraid of thinking over what else they would learn.
Just because of a method “works” short term and is easy to use, doesn’t mean it works long term, and we always have to investigate possible side effects.
LikeLike
Meanwhile in almost every school, children are learning to conform to expectations for “being in school” through a system of social credits, no longer with the simplicity of grades or little gold stars, but a product line called Class DoJo. This behavioral management system spans grades K-12, and sucks up data with every use. It is, to date, free to schools, cutesy for kids, and filled with teacher/adult friendly branding of products for “growth mindset'” even “empathy.” The website claims about 90% of schools are using the system. The most elaborate form of social credit is in China, where serious perks and demerits are dished out for proper behavior…meaning state approved behavior.
LikeLike
My kids attended ES and MS’s that were controlled by PBIS. What a behavior nightmare these kids have become. It started when my oldest was in 2nd grade, but when child #2 entered K it was in full swing. His class was a behavior nightmare all the way through MS. He is now in private HS. PBIS only works minimally with very young kids and studies have shown that it’s continued use in older children leads to the same addiction habits of gambling, alcoholism etc. These are experiments being tested upon large groups of children without parental consent and without any regards to what the outcomes will be for these children. It’s shameful!
LikeLike