I’m reposting this because it was inexplicably cut off. Here is the full original…..
A decade ago, California parent Vicki Abeles created a documentary called “Race to Nowhere” about the toxic effects of high-stakes testing. She did it after a friend of her teen daughter committed suicide. Vicki took the show on the road and showed it in hundreds of communities. She wanted to start a grassroots rebellion against high-stakes testing, for the sake of the children. Instead, NCLB continued, unchanged, and Race to the Top ratcheted up the pressure on students and teachers to get higher scores than they did the year before–or face certain shame and punishment.
No matter how many times we tell children “you are more than a score,” our words count less than our actions.
Now Lisa Eggert Litvin explains yet again that high-stakes testing is harmful to the mental health of students.
The transformation of public education isn’t the only factor of course. Parents still get divorced and families still struggle financially and children still bully, with social media making it all worse. But when those issues are coupled with a high-intensity school environment, enforced by tests, with little room for down time, then the hard issues become insurmountable, and children collapse. It makes sense that the AAP report shows suicide and self-harm rates were lowest in the summer, and highest in the fall and spring.
Perhaps worst of all, this test-centric accountability model doesn’t even work. The “achievement gaps” between underserved groups and their peers still exist. In New York City, the gap has increased for African-American and Hispanic students.
It’s time to admit that the testing-based model of the NCLB law and its progeny was a mistake. The early opponents were right: the law is downright dangerous. Let’s press the restart button and re-examine how to help all students achieve. Let’s finally honestly address the roles poverty and family income play. Can it really be any surprise that school districts in affluent neighborhoods have higher test scores than their less affluent counterparts?
So was my childhood perfect? Far from it. But it was emotionally healthier for sure. There is nothing more important than making sure our children are healthy and aren’t filled with anxiety and aren’t harming themselves. Right now, let’s stop the madness of high-stakes testing. Our children are suffering — physically and mentally — and it has to end.
The writer is president of the Hastings-on-Hudson Board of Education and president emeritus of the Hastings-on-Hudson PTSA.
Maybe we have to insist on accountability. Create a score card of teen deaths and pin it on the door of every member of Congress and every legislator who voted to mandate annual testing and high-stakes for students, teachers, and schools. Insist that they take the tests they mandate and publish their scores. If they fail, they must resign.

The students in public high schools in Palo Alto California near Stanford are under a lot of pressure to perform. Most of the pressure comes from their parents because those parents want their children to get into Stanford.
But the pressure broke too many and one of their favorite ways out was to let local trains run them down. Palo Alto erected fences to make it more difficult for those kids to get on the tracks unseen.
“Palo Alto and Morgan Hill have the highest suicide rates in Santa Clara County among youths 10 to 24 years old, according to a final report the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention released on the topic after a year-long study of the region.
“From 2003 to 2015, Palo Alto’s youth suicide rate per 100,000 people was 14.1 and Morgan Hill’s 12.7, according to the report. Both were much higher than the county rate of 5.4 deaths per 100,000.” …
“The CDC’s study found that the 229 suicides of “youths” living in Santa Clara County mirror upward trends in California and the United States since 2003. They also show that suicides are more common among males and youths 20 to 24 years old.”
LikeLike
Thank you, Lloyd!
LikeLike
“It’s time to admit that the testing-based model of the NCLB law and its progeny was a mistake.”
Actually testing and diagnostic based teaching and learning process takes what should be a joyful, exploring time of life (childhood) and turns it into a boiling cauldron of educational malpractices that end up scalding ALL, yes, ALL students. Some of us have been fighting against these atrocities from before they were coded into law. But, hey, why listen to the teachers, they’re just a bunch of whiny women, right!
LikeLike
NCLB was a mistake in the same way that the Iraq war was a mistake
Both were based on lies.
LikeLiked by 1 person
YEP!
LikeLike
lies meant to allow a few to profit overwhelmingly
LikeLike
One group that’s not going to commit suicide is the DFER hedge funders. They must be crowing at their success. A DFER listee, U.S. House Representative, Susan Davis, third ranking Democrat on the House Education and Workforce Committee, has listed at Open Secrets her biggest contributors ….(drumroll) ….AFT.
LikeLike
BATS should certify as a union.
LikeLike
The men and women of the 21st century
standards-based education reform movement
OWN this DISASTER. Lock. Stock. Barrel.
PARADE of FAILURES:
John Boehner
George Miller
Edward Kennedy
Judd Gregg
George W Bush
Barack Obama
Arne Duncan
Bill Gates
Meliinda Gates
John King
Betsy DeVos
David Coleman
William McCallum
Phil Daro
Jason Zimba
Susan Pimentel
Mike Petrilli
Campbell Brown
et. al
LikeLike
Aspen and the Center for American Progress’ role in the debacle deserves mention.
$$$$$ connect Bill and Melinda to both.
LikeLike
Don’t forget William Sanders (Inventor of VAM), Eric Hanushek (VAManure spreader), Raj Chetty (Harvard twit,chettypicker of data extraordinary and general VAMbot) and John Friedman (another Harvard twit and VAMbot who said thatTeachers should be fired sooner rather than later) and Jobak Rockoff (yet another Harvard twit – forgive the redumbdancy)
These people provided the pseudoscientific justification for all the testbased crap.
Because they KNEW what they were doing was not kosher (chetty-picking is no accident) I’d say they actually bear more responsibility than almost everyone else involved.
LikeLike
Jonah Rockoff
Self correct strikes again
LikeLike
Poet,
Is John N. Friedman, the Gates Impatient Optimist from Brown who spoke in Columbus in September at a a Gates-sponsored “Summit”, in the company of a Hoover Institute Professor (that one is married to the Stanford Credo director), one and the same as the guy you mention?
LikeLike
If the teens are trying to survive on college campuses, Foster Freiss’ Turning Point USA is despicable enough to cause them to despair. Media Matters reported about a Q anon conspiracy theory targeting Adam Schiff that was allegedly pushed by a Turning Point Advisory Council member. With justice, Schiff will meet spreaders of malicious lies in court.
LikeLike
This Jan 18 Guardian article is about depression. It traces just one of many common factors among depressives: their jobs. The author puts together a huge 2011-2012 Gallup poll– finding 13% are engaged w/their work, 63% disengaged, 24% ‘actively disengaged’ [hate it]– with a ’70’s Australian study showing lower-level bureaucrats had much higher levels of job stress/ anxiety/ risk of heart attack than bosses– & comes up w/that old bugaboo, responsibility without authority. https://www.theguardian.com/society/2018/jan/07/is-everything-you-think-you-know-about-depression-wrong-johann-hari-lost-connections
As a onetime worker in a large corp during the onset of “matrix mgt” & “mgt by objective,” it’s a familiar theme. I & my co-workers often observed & commented on the phenomenon: responsibility without authority leads directly to high stress/ anxiety, depression/ burnout.
As soon as I heard of high-stakes testing, the truism rang in my ears.
For teachers it’s obvious: one’s own job & the fate of one’s school is tied to factors over which one has minimal [if any] control: how students perform on tests we neither write nor contribute to nor even see. Small wonder teachers since NCLB experience crushing stress/ anxiety/ depression & leave the profession in higher numbers than ever.
For students– the focus of this post– high-stakes testing engenders even starker stress/ anxiety/ depression, given their young age & lack of life experience/ context. Their performance on these tests has no impact on their own grades, but will determine whether their school stays open & Mrs Jones has a job next year. One might say they have ‘no responsibility,’ as they can flunk or ace w/o affecting their course grade. But removing their personal stake makes it worse. It’s the sort of mixed message that visits a guilt trip on vulnerable children.
LikeLike
“For teachers it’s obvious: one’s own job & the fate of one’s school is tied to factors over which one has minimal [if any] control: how students perform on tests we neither write nor contribute to nor even see.”
Then, goddamnit, don’t implement those malpractices.
LikeLike
What we’re seeing coming through school now is a generation of students who were the first to be tested endlessly AND the first be looking endlessly at smart phones. It’s a double whammy.
They are great kids. But they are stressed all over the place. And, they can’t put down the phones. Yet, at the same time they crave face-to-face interaction. But how to get it? Meanwhile, their parents are absorbed in working to pay for life in 2018….and sucked into their own machine-based worlds.
It’s them…and it’s us.
For example…. (Not to cast the first stone, ha, ha)
About a month ago, in the evening, my wife was sleeping over on the couch about 10 feet from where I’m typing right now. She’s on the night shift and typically grabs an hour or two more of sleep if possible.
I turned on the computer and there was a message she’d left a couple hours before: “Miss you.” So, I wrote back, “Miss you over there….”. Her ipad binged and she woke up out of a deep slumber She went right to check the message, fumbling around for the computer. I guess it’s become a conditioned response….interest mixed with concern…could there be something wrong with the kids?
She read my message and we both laughed…
Yeah, forget what life was like 10 years ago. Life is qualitatively different from even a couple years back.
A terrible case in point: look at the dolt who is running our country! Twittering away our foreign policy like a monkey banging on a keyboard. Leadership by tantrum. And, so much of our nation just… looks… on.
“What hath God wrought”.
LikeLike
Our country has been reduced to a bunch of twittering twits.
It’s really hard to say who is dumber: those who are the source of the endless stream of idiocy or those who keep responding.
LikeLike
John,
The current suicide rate among boys (and boys commit suicide at a much higher rate of girls so this drives the overall figure) is lower today than it was in the mid 1990s. The headline figure discussed here measures from a historic low to the current level.
Quoting the CDC: “The suicide rate for males aged 15–19 years increased from 12.0 to 18.1 per 100,000 population from 1975 to 1990, declined to 10.8 by 2007, and then increased 31% to 14.2 by 2015. The rate in 2015 for males was still lower than the peak rates in the mid- 1980s to mid-1990s. Rates for females aged 15–19 were lower than for males aged 15–19 but followed a similar pattern during 1975–2007 (increasing from 2.9 to 3.7 from 1975 to 1990, followed by a decline from 1990 to 2007). The rates for females then doubled from 2007 to 2015 (from 2.4 to 5.1). The rate in 2015 was the highest for females for the 1975–2015 period.”
If stress is driving teenage suicides, one would have to conclude that the most stressful time in recent history for teenagers was 1985-1995.
Source: https://www.cdc.gov/mmwr/volumes/66/wr/mm6630a6.htm
LikeLike
Is it not possible that what drove the suicide rate up then and what is driving it back up now are different phenomena? I consider it completely plausible in light of Lloyd ‘s posting, that stress as a source of tension in recent history might come from testing and related school issues, and that other issues drove the rate up during the time from 1975 to 1990.
It sounds as though you are trying to suggest that there is only one reason for teen suicide. By your logic, it cannot be testing because we had a worse time of it before testing. Why could there not be a multitude of reasons?
LikeLike
Roy,
I think there are multiple causes for teenage suicide, but it requires careful research to try to come to any conclusion which might be important at any given time.
I did not take John to be speculating that higher stress might be causing the increase in suicide rates among teenagers. I took this comment, and others made about this issue, to be claiming that the increase in teenage suicide rates compared to the historic lows of the mid 2000s was caused by higher stress generated through changes in K-12 education.
LikeLike
Are you ever NOT negative?
It must be awful for your wife. No doubt you tell her what she ought to have cooked, how she should have made the bed, everything you think she did wrong. You, of course, are always right.
LikeLike
Watching what is happening in Washington, D.C., words fail me. Trump has no work on his calendar. Just a lunch with Pence or Pompeo. He doesn’t read briefing books. He is ignorant and venal. He spends his days watching FOX news and tweeting. His chief advisors are Sean Hannity, Ann Coulter, Laura Ingraham, and Rush Limbaugh. If they get together on a point of view, he changes national policy to suit them.
LikeLike
I think a monkey banging away on a Twitter keyboard might make more sense and even wrangle some laughs from the gibberish and nonsense of monkey talk.
Trump’s Twitter mania is the dung droppings of a lunatic that should have a frontal lobotomy before turning him out to pasture where he can graze on cow plop.
LikeLike