Carol Burris explains here why charter schools can never be reformed.
Here is reason number one.
1. Freedom from regulations and oversight through public governance has resulted in persistent and undeniable patterns of waste and fraud.
For the past year, the Network for Public Education, the nonprofit advocacy group of which I am executive director, has been tracking charter school scandals, posting news accounts here. Frankly, we have been shocked by the frequency and seriousness of scandals that are the result of greed, lack of oversight or incompetence. The independent California-based watchdog group, In the Public Interest, estimated alleged and confirmed fraud in California’s charter sector has topped $149 million, a figure it describes as “only the tip of the iceberg.”
Not even Massachusetts, which allegedly has the toughest supervision of the sector in the nation, is free of scandals. When public dollars freely flow without independent oversight, it is all too easy for dollars to find their way into employee pockets and bank accounts, for friends and relatives to get “sweetheart deals” and for school leaders to receive astronomical salaries that would be unheard of in public schools.
Although new regulations may decrease some abuse, private boards are insufficient to provide governance of the billions of taxpayer dollars that flow through the charter sector. Every serious legislative attempt to rein in abuse meets opposition from the charter lobby, which makes strategic donations to legislators to avoid accountability.
Read the article to learn the other four reasons.
I would add here that if freedom from regulation and oversight is the key to better schools, we should do it for ALL schools. But on its face, that’s a dumb idea, because the state needs to know how its money was spent. Except for charter qschools.

This is an excellent overview of the issues and concerns connected to privatization. Communities should look before they leap as there are long term consequences to dividing your resources.
“A study by the Pennsylvania nonprofit Research for Action found stranded costs ranged from about $8,000 to $17,000 per pupil during the first year a student enrolled in a charter school.”
If many students leave a public system, the long term impact of carrying the stranded costs will seriously impede the quality of instruction for public school students. Students are taught in larger classes with fewer resources and options. A community should also consider that public schools enhance the value of home values in a community. No such value can be attributed to charter schools. Sending local dollars to a corporate charter is a disinvestment in the local community as schools are often the hub of social life in a local area.
LikeLike
I suppose this is as good a time as any to bump up the John Oliver piece on charter schools — which just hit the 10 million (!!!) views milestone:
… an utterly hilarious classic, and dare I say, foundational piece that has formed the template for so many on-line reports that it has spawned, and that have followed in its wake.
Nowhere on the pro-charter, pro-privatization side do they have any video anywhere near rivaling the Oliver takedown’s view count (hey, forget 10 million — heck, they don’t anything that’s even 10 hundred / 1,000 views.)
That’s why the attacks on it (looking at you, Jeanne Allen) have been so virulent.
LikeLiked by 1 person
may Oliver feel the “moment” and jump in with another takedown soon
LikeLike
OMG….just read the comments of the WaPo article and see why we still have Charters. Washington and surrounding counties (MD, VA) are home to “stink tank” mentality. It just bogles my mind how adults think in relation to children.
LikeLike
I thought the same thing when I read the comments. There’s lots of misinformation related to privatization.
LikeLike
And it doesn’t help when well meaning but only slightly informed people start commenting…… the stink tank trolls start on their rants and then the whole discussion becomes a dumpster fire of rage against unions and those darn greedy and lazy teachers. I swear the stink tanks pay people to comment on Valerie Strauss’s education articles (especially the ones about Charters).
LikeLike
I’d love to ask ed reformers why an appointed,private board is inherently superior to a public, elected board.
What is this belief based on? What’s the magic ingredient? Is it expertise? Prestige? Not accountable to the public? I genuinely do not understand why they would all eagerly adopt this belief- the inherent superiority of “private”.
Has this been anyone’s experience anywhere in the country? That appointed charter boards are “better” than elected public school boards? Can they show us? Which ones, compared to which elected boards?
LikeLike
Well, ed reformers have cleverly avoided this whole debate by the magic of renaming and better political branding.
It’s not chartering- it’s innovation schools. It’s not privatizing whole city systems, it’s “adopting the portfolio approach”.
Just pay no mind that the exact same people who last year were promoting charters all over the country are now promoting “the portfolio approach” and it’s indistinguishable from the old approach in practice.
The key thing for public school families is they still offer absolutely nothing of value to students who attend existing public schools. They don’t even pretend to offer us anything- the absolute best they can do is to grudgingly allow that public schools probably have to continue to exist while they transition to their preferred privatized system, but they won’t be offering any investment or support. The corporate term for this is “winding down”. They’re winding down your schools, while your kids are still in them.
LikeLike
Public schools should fight to reduce the total sum of funds leaving the district. They should get to keep some of the funding to cover their stranded costs which will erode education quality over time. Why should so many students be penalized when the states impose privatization, and they have no say in the top down decisions? Losing money leaves public schools with fewer academic choices for their students in order to fund the “choice” of a few selected students. If charters want more money, they should have to get it from their rich donors. The money drain is rigged against public schools. They just become the host for a parasitic system.
LikeLike
6th reason- The third ranking Democrat on the House Education and Workforce Committee states publicly she thinks there should be a charter school in every state and community. And, Open Secrets reports her 2nd highest contributor is the AFT.
LikeLike
Who is that?
LikeLike
I’m still for trying her!
Sent from my iPhone
>
LikeLike