Danielle Holly writes in the NonProfit Quarterly that billionaires who put their philanthropic dollars into education are benefiting themselves, not children. How do they benefit? Their donations put them in control of what is supposed to be a democratic institution. Bill Gates, Mark Zuckerberg, Jeff Bezos, and dozens of other “philanthropists” have decided on the basis of their whims that schools need the change that their money buys or imposes.
Perhaps Holly would not be so blunt, but that is what her article says.
Two philosophical challenges have arisen with the nature of these investments. The first, which NPQ has discussed at length, is that it limits democratic control over the nation’s public education system. In effect, education philanthropy puts education program design in a few hands who are, by definition, outsiders, and often less expert and less informed than those who are doing the work. In the case of CZI, which was established as a limited liability corporation instead of a philanthropic foundation, there are also related issues of transparency.
“Philanthropy is the least democratic institution on earth,” says Professor David Nasaw, a historian who has researched Carnegie’s philanthropic focus on education. “It’s rich men deciding what to do.”
She puts Andrew Carnegie’s gift of free public libraries on the same plane as the gifts of Gates, Zuckerberg, and Bezos, but I disagree. Carnegie did not tell any library he funded what books to buy nor did he tell patrons what books to read. Carnegie’s gift of public libraries were good charity that did not detract from democracy. By contrast, our billionaires today have invested heavily in privatization of public schools, which is a direct attack on democracy. They buy compliance with large gifts. When they can’t buy compliance, they buy local and state school board election. That should be illegal. They should be prosecuted for attacking democracy. Their in-the-daylight efforts to buy control of state and local school boards should be seen as akin to the Russian efforts to manipulate the 2016 elections. Both illegitimate.
Diane I have often thought of the great difference between the Carnegie library and current billionaire “reformers.” From an old reading memory, Carnegie donations were for support of truly public education openly aimed at the development of a vibrant civil society–as culture.
Whereas current reformers seem to always need some sort of payback or profit, either in curriculum control for purveying a not-so-hidden ideology (social, political, and/or religious); or for developing the need for their product line; or just to end programs and institutions that don’t follow the current capitalist-only model where they MUST make a profit OR they are, heaven forbid, “Socialist!”
Institutions that are for the betterment of all, regardless of whether they make money-profit or not, fly in the face of, and even threaten, “gated” thinkers–like those who support charters, and “the wall” where, btw, I read this morning that Trump wants to let in the Irish on visas, but keep out those coming from the south. It’s going to end, but presently it’s still Alice in Wonderland down the rabbit hole. CBK
Reblogged this on David R. Taylor-Thoughts on Education.
Philanthropy should not provide a return for those making the donation. The current crop of billionaires are “villainthropists.” They not only intend to impose their agenda on the public, they are actually providing seed money for a personal investment. Both Gates and Zuckerberg use their money to insert their agenda for personal gain. It is no accident that they proposing all things cyber with data collection. The objective is to impose their will on a democratic institution while reaping profits from the sale of products and data. Gates has already been successful in inserting himself into education policy, even though no one voted for him, and his “great ideas” have failed. Bezos has just entered the preschool “market” with some perversion of “Montessori” schools. These wealthy profiteers will continue to insert themselves into education as long as there is profit, tax write-offs or social impact bonds that will benefit them and their companies. We are incentivizing and underwriting their interference.https://wrenchinthegears.com/2018/09/15/montessori-inc-pre-k-predictive-profiling-for-power-and-profit/
perfect word” VILLAINTHROPISTS.”
Maybe they should be called Infestments …
Apt re-spelling. Hope it catches on, along with Mr. and Mrs. “vermin” Bill Gates and Mr. Mrs. “lice” Arnold.
The Infestors
Infestors make infestments
In VAMming and in tests
Infestments in in-testments
For ranking what is Best
Infestors make infestments
In monetary bids
Infestments in molestments
Of teachers and their kids
Infestors make infestments
In pols and their elections
Infestments in divestments
From public steered directions
https://www.alternet.org/education/historic-union-backed-strike-yields-new-contract-win-teachers-and-students-chicago
Carnegie’s library gifts were certainly a boon for people throughout America. But the fact is he was one of the robber barons who amassed great amounts of wealth. It is true that I find much of his giving reasonable and benevolent. But it certainly didn’t occur within a democratic process.
When Carnegie sold what became US Steel, he surpassed Rockefeller as the richest man in America. His vast holdings allowed him to not only decide how that money would be dispersed, it gave him out-sized influence over things like American foreign policy.
The bottom line is that even with good intentions; vast holdings of wealth undermine democracy. Now we have the spectacle of one of his charitable foundations the Carnegie Corporation underwriting the Next Generation Science Standards and foisting these awful works on America’s public schools. In Kansas City the giant philanthropic gift by Ewing Kauffman is now being used to finance the destruction of public schools like the one he attended. Both Kauffman and Carnegie died before their wealth was used to attack public education but those giant fortunes are now controlled by obscure forces.
The more passive giving of the robber barons seemed not so harmful, but modern activist philanthropies are a clear threat to American Democracy that must be addressed.
tultican To be brief, yes, yes, and yes to the broader coverage in your note about Carnegie and earlier philanthropists. I think this specific history points us to the answer to the more general question: Why NOT privatize public services? Briefly, NO, because, regardless of the corporate founders’ intentions, or even their written-in-stone policy, later power-holders can find “reasons” and ways to crumble the stone, so to speak, and do away with the fullness of meaning entrenched in those intentions.
Similarly, as we are seeing with democracy and its institutions, there is no guarantee of their standing strong against the demise of the wisdom that is, through the experimental phase, hopefully located in the people, the population, the demos for ongoing generations. But of course, and despite its lateness, there is more hope in the idea of democracy–as we are also seeing presently unfolding in our daily press coverage. But the severance of education (as truly “public”) from its relationship with democratic government (of all things) is especially damaging precisely because of education’s intimate relationship with the ongoing development of intelligence, wisdom, and even love in a major part of the population–not as an ideology, but as a full understanding of what’s going on, and what is at stake for all personally, in the loss of democracy and its institutions.
But just like with kings who are wise for their people, but where their wisdom rarely follows their bloodline to become evident in their children, so it is with the furtherance of intelligence and wisdom of company founders (like Carnegie’s philanthropic intentions) rarely to become evident in later power-holders. We need to keep the experiment going; and we can do this only when we teach our children about what kind of political situations they can live in and will choose for themselves.
Insofar as the rich and their privatization dispense with public education’s connection with its democratic foundations–and they do that ON PRINCIPLE just by their growing presence–they open the door to a demise of democracy and its inherent strengths. We can imagine a large crack opening in the foundations that underpin our present freedoms. With privatizers’ bells and whistles, they can set the conditions for that break to seem charming and then to actually become systematic. In in way, those who populate the “halls” of private education as it grows and goes forward, are indeed involved in an assault on the whole idea of democracy itself. CBK
There is great wisdom in this. I would add that the forces that create great republics wither even as the royal bloodlines fade. All forms of human behavior follow this pattern in history. A sobering thought.
Many billionaires are delusional: They have accumulated not only great wealth, but also phalanxes of sycophants who tell them they are geniuses. These sycophant-surrounded billionaires come to believe that they alone are responsible for the wealth they have accumulated; they rationalize away the key and essential roles played by others in the success of their businesses. In their delusional minds they see their “genius” as being applicable to other areas, such as government and public education, notwithstanding the fact that they have no experience or expertise in these areas. So what we have today are billionaires with no governmental experience who think they know best who our elected officials should be, what government should and should not do, and exactly what “reforms” are needed in public education. And, of course, what’s needed in public schools is the charter school business model because the “business model” is the only thing the billionaires know even a bit about. And of course there are plenty of simpering sycophants to tell the billionaires how insightful they are about reforms and charter schools because these sycophants see an opportunity to cash in on unregulated charter schools to bleed tax money away from children and into their own pockets. If only there was a simple cure for The Billionaires’ Disease, then perhaps cured billionaires could turn their resources to combating the true root causes of problems not only in schools but throughout our nation: Poverty and racial discrimination in jobs and housing.
We all know what it is like to live under the control of a “stable billionaire genius.” The orange one is a grotesque cartoon of a spoiled child that is threatening to shut down the government in tantrum mode. We need a wall to wall him in and away from us. Save us from the biased billionaires!
Send the Billionaires to Mars!
Send them to Mars!
The planet that’s red
On rockets with cars
That Elon has fed
Send them to Saturn!
And out of our hair
From billionaire pattern
The public to spare
Send them to Venus!
Where weather is hot
I really do mean this
And kidding I’m not
Send them to Jupiter
Planet of gas
Nothing is stupider:
Gates and his cash
Send them to Pluto!
To Pluto or bust!
Deserving of Kudo
It’s really a must
Send them to Uranus
Send them away
Really, I yearn for this
Willing to pay!
Send them to Mercury!
Hotter than hell
Billionaire jerkyery
Ending quite well
Wow, you are on a roll today. Your brain must have been busy last night when you were sleeping. For poets and writers, we do most of our creative work when we sleep.
Then we wake up full of ideas and the physical side of writing begins with the first key stroke.
Too bad we can’t totally harness our brain when we sleep and not only does the brain come up with creative ideas but types them for us so we wake up and all of the writing is typed out and ready for revisions.
See also this recent article
https://www.ineteconomics.org/perspectives/blog/toxic-philanthropy-the-spirit-of-giving-while-taking
Also a series about toxic philanthropy from Wrench in the Gears.
Thanks for the link. The “elite charade of changing the world” is a succinct summary of philanthrocapitalism. Changing the world, for the worse, one disruptive, self-serving enterprise at a time!
retired teacher the “self-serving” thing is the key. For them, it seems, everything is transactional–it’s a mental horizon beyond which they cannot see, by definition; thought I am sure in some parts of their lives, they do LIVE beyond it. It’s just that they do not recognize it or the difference between it and merely transactional relationships and interactions. CBK
I think there is a case for Seditious Conspiracy here:
If two or more persons in any State or Territory, or in any place subject to the jurisdiction of the United States, conspire to overthrow, put down, or to destroy by force the Government of the United States, or to levy war against them, or to oppose by force the authority thereof, or by force to prevent, hinder, or delay the execution of any law of the United States, or by force to seize, take, or possess any property of the United States contrary to the authority thereof, they shall each be fined under this title or imprisoned not more than twenty years, or both.
(June 25, 1948, ch. 645, 62 Stat. 808; July 24, 1956, ch. 678, § 1, 70 Stat. 623; Pub. L. 103–322, title XXXIII, § 330016(1)(N), Sept. 13, 1994, 108 Stat. 2148.)
https://www.law.cornell.edu/uscode/text/18/2384
Sedition is overt conduct, such as speech and organization, that tends toward insurrection against the established order. Sedition often includes subversion of a constitution and incitement of discontent towards, or resistance against established authority. Sedition may include any commotion, though not aimed at direct and open violence against the laws. Seditious words in writing are seditious libel. A seditionist is one who engages in or promotes the interest of sedition.
Typically, sedition is considered a subversive act, and the overt acts that may be prosecutable under sedition laws vary from one legal code to another. Where the history of these legal codes has been traced, there is also a record of the change in the definition of the elements constituting sedition at certain points in history. This overview has served to develop a sociological definition of sedition as well, within the study of state persecution.
Subversive actions can generally be grouped into three interrelated categories:
FIRST: Establishing front groups and penetrating and manipulating existing political parties
(CHECK — because this is what ALEC has done for more than a decade and is still doing)
SECOND: Infiltrating the armed forces, the police, and other institutions of the state, as well as important non-government organizations
(CHECK — because this is why extremist billionaires are donating HUGE, record breaking sums of money to get their minions elected to public offices. For instance, Tuck vs. Thurmond. In addition, Trump’s appointments of outspoken critics that worked for corporations that now run federal departments of the government that regulated those same corporations.)
THIRD: Generating civil unrest through demonstrations, strikes, and boycotts.
(CHECK — because this is what Trump is doing with his motor mouth at his rallies and through Twitter. For instance, Trump says “People Would Revolt” if he was impeached.)
I urge everyone who follows this blog to read Anand Giridharadas’s 2018 book Winner Takes All: The Elite Charade of Changing the World, which is referenced in this blog post. It is eye-opening!
The Billyanthropist”
Billyanthropist am I
I gave you Common Core
And testing to the sky
I’d like to give you more
Billyanthropist am I
I gave you teacher VAMs
A lovely Chetty pie
And lots of charter scams
Billyanthropist am I
I gave you pseudo-science
And sellebrate the lie
With test and VAM reliance
Billyanthropist am I
Billyanthropy I do
Democracy I buy
Impose my will on you
The Robbertunist”
The opportunist makes
The most of every day
But robbertunist takes
The most in every way
I’ve posted this before, but I think it sums up the billionaires philosophy toward public education
The Billionaire’s Burden” (based on “The White Man’s Burden”, by Rudyard Kipling”)
Take up the Billionaire’s burden, In
patience to abide,
To veil the scheme for teach-bots, The
prime intent to hide;
With coded speech of Orwell, you really
must take pains
To make a hefty profit, And see the
major gains.
Take up the Billionaire’s burden, The
public schools to fleece—
Fill full the days with testing And
Common Core disease;
And when your goal is nearest The end
that you have sought,
Destroy the Opt-out movement Lest
work be all for naught.
Take up the Billionaire’s burden, A
tawdry rule of Kings,
The toil of IT keeper, The sale of
software things.
The data ye shall enter, On privacy to
tread,
To make a “decent” living, Until they all
are dead.
Take up the Billionaire’s burden And
reap his old reward:
The blame of those ye better, The hate
of those ye guard—
The cry of hosts ye humour (Ah, slowly!)
toward the light:—
“Why brought he us from bondage, Our
Stupid blissful night?”
Take up the Billionaire’s burden, Ye dare
not stoop to less—
So fulminate ‘gainst Apple To cloak your
Siri-ness;
And strategize in whispers, For all ye
leave or do,
Or silent, sullen peoples Shall weigh
Diane on you!
Take up the Billionaire’s burden, Have
done with childish ways—
The Kindergarten playing, The test-less
former days
Come now, to join Reform-hood, The
pride of Duncan years
Cold, edged with Gates-bought wisdom,
The plan of Billionaires!