Robin Lake is one of the key figures in the Center for Reinventing Public Education, which is generally recognized as the inventor and chief promulgator of the “portfolio” district, in which the central board is supposed to open and close public schools, charter schools, and every other kind of school like a stock portfolio. Recently she wrote a post at The 74 (Campbell Brown’s site) saying that she was not a reformer.
Peter Greene dissected the logic behind Lake’s argument, which is sometimes hard to follow. Who’s stereotyping whom?
Lake says she no longer knows what the term “Reformer” means.
To which Greene responds, “True that. One of the implicitly insulting parts of the “reformer” narrative has been that only they are really interested in making schools better, and the people who have actually dedicated their entire careers to working in schools somehow have no desire to make things better.”
He is troubled by her insistence that “reformers” are not a monolithic group, coupled with her implication that those who resist “reformers” are a monolithic group. Which they are not.
He adds:
Sigh. But here we go. Lake segues into a call for the reformy flavor of the month– Personalized [sic] Competency Proficient Mass Customized Algorithm Driven Learning Education. She does a better job than many of describing it in glowing glossy terms. Oh, and as always, change must happen right now. Staying still is not an option, just as it wasn’t an option for Common Core or teacher test-based accountability or turnaround/takeovers or charters etc etc etc.&
It occurs to me that Lake could avoid the reform monolith perception by not using the same old used-car-salesman pitches. In fact, as I look around at all the reformy folks who are suddenly fans of Personalized [sic] Competency Blah Blah Blah Learning Tech Product, I’m thinking another way to avoid the perception that “reformers” operate in one unified block would be to NOT all come out in favor of the exact same Next Big Thing at the same time.
He closes. By offering an olive branch:
Lake’s desire to seek out new types of discussion is fine, but– Did I mention that this is published at The 74, a website established by reform supporter and teacher union hater Campbell Brown. Ms. Lake, let me invite you to cross some boundaries and publish elsewhere. Drop me a line and we can work something out here.

more on Robin Lake…https://www.eclectablog.com/2018/11/please-save-me-from-the-wisdom-of-self-appointed-education-experts-part-293.html
LikeLike
Really enjoyed reading this. Thanks for posting.
LikeLike
While there may be theoretical differences among deformers, they can all unite in their collective disdain for pubic schools, educators and unions. They can unite in the shared vision of transferring billions of public dollars into private pockets. As Greene has said, they want to break open the $6 billion dollar piggy bank of public education. While their methods of accomplishing this may vary, the ultimate goal is to shift public money away from the public, suppress democratic input, eliminate the teaching profession and put corporations in charge. They are continuing to do this by buying democratic representatives that stage a hostile takeover, and/or political manipulations opening doors to vouchers or infiltration through various personalized learning platforms.
LikeLike
Diane The cure: FIRST you have to dissipate and defraud the Orwellian double-speak that went before (aka: “dissect the logic”).
The operative question: WHAT EXACTLY did you MEAN, and in what context, when you used terms like: reform, personalized learning, freedom of choice, etc.? We have to first “deprogram” the language because those terms, BEFORE, were all USED IN FRAUDULENT FASHION (double-speak), that is, in an attempt to snow the trusting public into “buying-into” the fraud. CBK
LikeLike
He is troubled by her insistence that “reformers” are not a monolithic group
What’s to be troubled by?
I always thought deformers were a Neanderthalic group.
But perhaps I was wrong?
LikeLike
Ha ha ha ha ha. Try, “reform” fraudsters, try as you may, try as you might, try as you will to distance yourself from Betsy ‘Grizzlyphobe’ DeVos. You’re still simply anti-democracy, union-busting reactionaries just like her. TFA, CBE, privatization, high stakes testing… all one monolithic group of classist destruction. You made your bed with Betsy, now lie with her in it. Ha ha ha ha ha! “Don’t call me a reformer anymore”, my foot.
LikeLike
The poor dears don’t want to be called what they are: a bunch of real life welfare queens trying to profit off of schools.
LikeLike
this is why I get worried when I hear newly elected Governor Newsome state:” I’m not interested in solving the us vs them debate, I’m looking for solutions” (paraphrase)…….see that’s what this lady is trying to do and is being disingenuous, as is pointed out repeatedly by the author. So I continue to worry that Newsome is going to do some “portfolio” move that’s going to make everyone hurt….
LikeLike