John Thompson of Oklahoma attended the NPE Conference in Indianapolis and learned a lot about how allies in other cities and states are resisting the Corporate Goliaths invading public schools.
He writes:
“Previously, I overestimated how much of Goliath’s failure was due to the arrogance of power. Today’s Silicon Valley Robber Barons’ hubris can match that of their 19th century counterparts, but their control of data makes them uniquely dangerous. As the latest NPE presentations enlightened me on what is working for us Davids as we successfully resist Goliath, I was mostly struck by the evidence that he only continues to exist for the purposes of privatization, profits, and the monetization of data.
“Fortunately, the 2018 NPE conference was extremely positive, so I can move beyond my errors to a post which provides an overview of a) what I learned and b) some ideas on future messaging.”
Thompson attended many workshops and all the keynotes and he weaves together a coherent narrative, answering the question:
“Why do they [the Corporate Goliaths] keep infusing money into charters?
“The answer, it is now clear, is that they are monetizing data. Pearson testing company thinks it knows more about the children they test than their parents do. As Leonie Haimson has shown, Goliath has bought 400 identifiable data points on students. And Summit Learning says it will follow your child through her entire life.
“Pasi Sahlberg’s presentation on GERM, the Global Education Reform Movement, showed graphically how the corporate reform assault undermined schools around the world. He then described counter-attacks against GERM in New Zealand, Australia, Singapore, Liberia, Scotland, Chile, and elsewhere. Educators have a duty to reclaim our professional autonomy. But we also must be willing to state some hard truths.
“Sahlberg says that people want to believe that the kids are “alright.” But, globally, they face a threat that must be explicitly addressed. The well-being of students is declining as screen time increases. Students and teachers must push back against the Goliath which profits from more eyes being glued to digital devices.
“Susan Ochshorn and Denisha Jones brought this dangerous trend closer to home. They condemned children being placed in front of keyboards before they are ready. And this may be the narrative that will really take off. Silicon Valley elites don’t put their 4-year-olds in online courses.
“During the previous generation, Goliath used charters that increased segregation to supposedly undo the damage done by segregation, but most voters didn’t send their children to the high-poverty schools that were targeted. So, many people didn’t understand why those corporate reforms were doomed to fail. Surely the broader public will grasp the absurdity of placing 70 students and 2 teachers in “personalized” learning to address toxic stress that is made worse by premature exposure to too many hours in front of keyboards.
“Helen Gym’s account of victories in Philadelphia is also encouraging. Goliath won when they rushed implementation of policies without an open discussion of their theories. After the Reformers got so overconfident they consulted parents, they lost. In other words, to know Goliath’s agenda is to understand that they grasp very little about what students need and parents want.”

To know Goliath’s provatization agenda is to understand that they CARE very little about what students need and parents want.”
They grasp what students need and parents want, all right, which is why the Deformers go out of their way to ensure that students get only what is beneficial to Goliath and that students and parents do NOT get what they need and want.
LikeLike
Love this statement in the article: ““The answer, it is now clear, is that they are monetizing data.”
KA_CHING!
LikeLike
What they are really monetizing is students –at every level.
With data is just one of the ways they are doing it.
They are also doing it with Common Core (through textbooks and other curriculum materials)
They are also doing it with tests (PARCC, Smarterbalance, SAT, ACT)
They are also doing it with AP courses and tests.
They are also doing it with charters
Students are worth tens (if not hundreds) of billions every year and the schools are a cash cow that will keep giving milk in perpetuity.
LikeLike
Monetizing Schools
They’re monetizing data
And monetizing texts
There’s really nothing greata
Than monetizing tests
They’re monetizing learning
And monetizing class
The students they are turning
To bullion and to cash
LikeLike
They’re doing it with “school experience” surveys too. Gates got the Broadie superintendent of my district to sign a memorandum of understanding agreeing to have everyone — everyone, students, parents, and teachers — to fill out online surveys annually. It forces everyone — everyone — to click the “like” or “dislike” button dozens of times a year. (I read somewhere that 25 “likes” is enough to create a personality profile strong enough to predict and change human behavior.) My L.A. admin is forcing me to, under protest, use class time (history class, of course, as the subject content has been degraded by Common Core and testing to worthless) to force the students to fill out the surveys in the computer lab. What a mess!
LikeLiked by 1 person
oh that union leadership knew enough to address issues like these: years ago I was already getting tons of MANDATED (as in you have no choice in this matter) paper surveys my students were supposed to “take five minutes to fill out” — and yet over and over half the class hour would be sucked up into that “five minute” void
LikeLike
Can we save any part of our republic from giant corporate conglomerates and from billionaires?
LikeLike
Not without massive, and I mean massive demonstrations which will result in the deaths of many by the reactionary forces in this country. The banksters and oligarchs are not going to give up their control and wealth without a fight.
LikeLike
Actually, yes. We can save our republic from corporate conglomerates & billionaires. Monopolies can and should be broken up and regulated by the government. The US government grants permission for these corporate mergers & can break them up if they are in violation of their anti-trust laws. But for at least 20 years nothing has been done to regulate corporate consolidation. The last anti-trust case brought by the Justice Dept was in the mid 1990’s against Microsoft. We need politicians with the political will to follow in the footsteps of the trust-busting Teddy Roosevelt.
As far as billionaires, I don’t think anyone needs to be that darned wealthy & not pay their fair share to have the opportunity to make that money. Billionaires should be taxed at 90% of all income above $1 million. That’s what the tax rate was in the 1950’s 60’s & 70’s when we had the lowest wealth inequality in the country.
LikeLike
Dean Baker is an economist who has been studying & publishing on corporate power & economic inequality. He makes difficult topics easy to understand. In this piece he lays out a rationals and solutions to th problems of monopoly power.
http://cepr.net/publications/op-eds-columns/monopoly-power-is-it-time-to-bring-back-anti-trust
LikeLike
Oh come on
What incentive would Jeff Bezos have to create wealth if all of his earnings were taxed at 90%?
He would probably just give up on capitalism and on life in general, becoming a slovenly couch potato as opposed to the fit Rambo that he now is.
So, you have to make a choice: which do you want? Rambo or couch potato? You can’t have both.
LikeLike
I really wish I could have attended that conference. I desire much more information about the monetizing of data, for one thing.
LikeLike
Thinking about leaving teaching to become a used data salesman?
I hear the pay is good.
LikeLike
The Used Data Salesman
The data were bad
By God, I’ve been had!
By data that’s used
I’ve just been abused
The salesman it seems
Was selling me dreams
A data charade
For which I have paid
LikeLike
I’d change the question from “Can we. . . ” to “How do we. . . “
LikeLike