The Arizona Republic reports that voucher advocates are undeterred by their overwhelming defeat at the ballot box on Tuesday. The fact that the public rejected vouchers by 65-35% at the same time that rightwing Governor Doug Ducey was re-elected does not deter the Koch brothers and the DeVos family. Very likely they presume that the parents and teachers who beat them exhausted their funds.
Less than a day after the crown jewel of their school choice policies was crushed at the ballot box, prominent school choice advocates doubled down by calling for the Arizona Legislature to promote school choice and vouchers laws.
Both the Goldwater Institute and American Federation for Children issued statements backing school choice in the hours after voters rejected by a 65-35 margin Proposition 305, a massive expansion of school vouchers.
The vote overturned the Empowerment Scholarship Account expansion that would have allowed all 1.1 million Arizona public school students to use public money to attend private school. The number of students receiving the money would have been capped at 30,000.
In a statement to supporters, the Goldwater Institute said “the fight for school choice continues.”
“Empowerment Scholarship Accounts help families create a custom educational experience— one as unique as each child. Unfortunately, school choice opponents were successful in denying this option to all Arizona families, regardless of income,” Goldwater Institute President Victor Riches said in the statement.
“Across the country, ESAs have garnered the support of Republicans and Democrats alike because they provide a commonsense way for families to help pay tuition, provide tutoring, and purchase the tools they need to give their students the best chance at success in school and down the road.”
He said other states — including North Carolina and Florida — have followed Arizona and instituted ESAs for selected students.
ROBERTS: Arizona voters said ‘Hell no’ to Ducey’s school voucher plan. Will he listen?
“Arizona has been a national leader on the path to greater school choice for families,” Riches said. “The Goldwater Institute will continue the fight to give students and their families a greater say in their education in Arizona and across the country.”
Meanwhile, American Federation for the Children congratulated Republican Gov. Doug Ducey for defeating “anti-school choice” candidate Democrat David Garcia in the race for governor.
“Governor Ducey is a pro-education, pro-school choice Governor whose leadership has resulted in higher pay for teachers as well as more educational choice options for families,” said the statement from AFC’s Arizona communication director Kim Martinez. “Ducey is a staunch supporter of Arizona’s Empowerment Scholarship Account program, which helps disadvantaged children, many with special needs, access different types of schools or curriculum.”
The statement didn’t mention Prop 305.
The current voucher program, which enrolls 5,600 students at a cost of about $62 million– gives parents 90% of the funding that would have gone to their local public school district. The parents get a debit card which is supposed to cover non-public school expenses, whether for private or religious or home schooling. The program has minimal oversight or accountability. A recent survey by the Arizona Republic showed that some parents were using the debit card for personal expenses, such as cosmetics or clothing.
The ESA program gives parents 90 percent of the funding that would have otherwise gone to their local public school districts. The voucher money, loaded on debit cards, is intended to cover specific education expenses such as private- or religious-school tuition, home-school expenses and education-related therapies.
A spokeswoman for SOS Arizona, the anti-voucher organization, said they would fight renewed efforts to enact a program that the voters opposed overwhelmingly.
But of course the Koch brothers and the DeVos family have unlimited resources. The parents and educators rely on volunteers.

The “choice” PR is riddled through with the lie that vouchers offer choice for parents.
In every choice plan the provider chooses students and the providers want students who bring them the most voucher money and greatest profit for an educational product or service.
LikeLike
The FACT is that this small group of Alt-Right billionaires that includes Betsy DeVos and the Koch brothers is pushing more than just the privatization of education.
These few billionaires are pushing for an end to the public sector.
That includes stripping the federal government and all of its agencies (except ICE and Homeland Security – that will become their Gestapo) of all of their power to enforce laws that protect most of the people from predators, trolls, haters, liars and and racists like Donald Trump who is also doing all he can to subvert the US Constitution and strip the federal government of its powers that are there to eventually stop people like him from cheating people out of their hard earned money.
From what I’ve read, the Alt-Right group with too much money numbers about 2,000 wealthy individuals and many of them inherited their wealth just like Trump, the Koch brothers and Betsy DeVos did. Take that wealth away from them and let them work for a living earning poverty wages.
LikeLike
Based on your comments, Lloyd, I’m sure you could envision a scenario where Betsy Devos’ brother, Erik Prince, would take over ICE and Homeland Security to operate them cheaply and efficiently… after al, this summer he claimed he could end the war in Afghanistan if Mr. Trump privatized it… https://www.businessinsider.com/blackwater-founder-erik-prince-aims-to-privatize-us-war-in-afghanistan-2018-8
LikeLike
Yes, it is an easy step for the fake Christian Kleptocracy autocrats to privatize everything public in the U.S. … even the military. Replacing the volunteer citizen military with mercenary armies run by the likes of Eric Prince fits their agenda. And Prince already comes with the name of royalty in his name so once he is runs Homeland Security and ICE with no transparency, he’ll expect others to call him, Prince instead of Eric — a prince is one step from becoming a king.
King DT would love having a military totally loyal to him until the Prince staged a Trump Palace revolt and had him executed before declaring his was the king.
I’m sure if Trump ever becomes king/dictator for life, he will have the White House bulldozed and replaced with a palace fit for an Emperor with gold toilets and faucets everywhere along with 20-something hot, busty blonds running around in skimpy swim suits so he can grab them in their ***** anytime he has the urge. After all, palaces often have hundreds of bedrooms.
Then Prince will stage a revolt using his mercenary armies and turn Trump Palace into a nunnery with his sister in charge.
LikeLike
I really think the ALT right rich folks like JIM CROW Laws. If they could, we would all be indentured servants or worse, slaves.
LikeLike
Isn’t that what this is all about? The upper 1% or so inherited their wealth, did nothing to acquire it other than being born into or marrying into the “right family”, went to exclusive private schools, etc who,e the rest of us went to public schools, many of use went to state colleges and universities, and earn our living by working….in their eyes, we are the peons who work for others (even if we own our own businesses), and have been put here on earth mostly to work for the 1%……do these people even pay their employees a living wage????
My pardon of I seem cynical today, but this has been talked about so much lately that my optimism is fading. Perhaps i need a long weekend of grading papers and planning lessons for next week.
Happy Friday!
LikeLike
Excuse the typo (i’d Love to blame the iPad, but I really can’t)…the third line should read, “while the rest of us…”
LikeLike
The long weekend of grading papers and planning lessons for the next week is a distraction. I know, I did it for thirty years.
But that will not change the fact that DT (Dumb Traitor) is still in the White House and nothing is going to stop the Alt-Right billionaires from pushing their agenda for the rest of their lives and possibly beyond the end of their lives if they move most of their wealth into a foundation like Bill Gates did, designed to continue pushing their agenda for centuries.
I’ve read that’s what John D. Rockefeller did with his foundation, to destroy the Catholic Church.
LikeLike
I was just watching last night one of the Chucky doll movies where chucky never seems to die. The pummel him, burn him, cut him up, toss around upside down pulling off body parts from head to toe.
Yet, it seems like every time chucky rises up and continues his onslaught to the despise of the others in the movies. Seems like the koch bros and chucky have some gene traits in them. One is that you cannot kill them off. The other is that they are really just made of plastic and put together with screws.
LikeLike
Exactly!
Two years ago in MA, we killed off a proposal to lift the cap on charter schools at the ballot box by a vote of two to one, but the charteristas keep trying to find a backdoor workaround, enabled by the privatizers at DESE.
It’s a horror show.
LikeLike
The Waltons won’t give up on their dream of capturing Massachusetts
It is a blue state, like NY and CA. When they capture blue states, the game is over.
LikeLike
Simply put, the voucher vultures are thumbing and noses and extending their middle fingers at the 2/3 of AZ voters who rejected vouchers on 11/6, the public schools, religious liberty, church-state separation and Article 2, Section of the AZ constitution. They ignore the fact that in 30 state referenda from coast to coast between 1966 and 2018 millions of voters have rejected all gimmicks for diverting public funds to sectarian and other private schools by and average of 2 to 1.
LikeLike
Man, the stunning arrogance of these people!
LikeLike
Sounds a bit like what the Utah state legislature did to schools and teachers after voters rejected vouchers in 2006. Even before the financial collapse, the state was cutting funding, putting more and more ornerous requirements on teachers (for example: raising the costs of relicensing, requiring re-fingerprinting every five years to relicense), and just generally “punishing” schools and teachers. It’s gone on pretty much ever since. State legislators have long memories, and I wouldn’t be surprised if vouchers aren’t brought up in the next Arizona session.
LikeLike
I will give you 8 to 5, that school choice expansion, will be brought up in the Arizona legislature, and sooner rather than later.
LikeLike
Right. The public be damned.
LikeLike
The legislature of the state of Arizona, has the limited “power of attorney” of the people of the state. The legislature is NOT bound to consider any previous legislation, nor any referendum, on any topic.
LikeLike
Right. Why pay any attention to a referendum endorsed by 65% of the electorate?
LikeLike
In order for a legislature to be effective, it must have a high level of independence. The legislators may rely on information and sentiment garnered from polls and referenda, of course. The legislature can also ignore such things, and operate independently. The framers of our federal constitution rightly feared direct democracy, that is why there is no provision for referenda in the federal constitution.
Who knows why the referendum failed? Maybe it was because of the wording, or other factors? Times change, and new issues and concepts come into play.
In my home town in 1969, there was a referendum on whether or not to have cable television. The referendum was defeated. While other towns nearby had cable for years, Bowling Green did not get cable TV until 1981. The people spoke in the referendum, but times changed. We had to watch fuzzy, snowy television, for 11 years because of a referendum. The city commission decided to ignore the 1969 referendum, and passed an ordinance to get a cable franchise to set up operations.
Bottom Line: Prop 305 is dead. School choice in Arizona is NOT dead, the issue can be brought up at any time.
LikeLike
Why do voucher referenda always fail, Charles? Any thots?
LikeLike
I can only make an educated guess about the repeated failure of referenda on this issue. Each referendum is different, each electorate is unique. Politics is dynamic, there are many factors at play.
However, there are some factors that seem to stay stable.
I met a Lieutenant Colonel at the Pentagon some weeks back. He had never heard of school choice in his life.
Some people do not know the issue well, so they vote no. Some people feel an emotional attachment to the concept of the neighborhood school, and they vote no. Some people have no children, and they could not care less.
Less than 50% of eligible voters even show up to vote for President. The percentage who vote in school referenda is even lower than this.
Many people are xenophobic, and fear the unknown, and change of any kind. So they vote no.
Opponents of school choice often do not face the real issues, and work up bogus issues to deceive and mislead the public. The repeated mantra of “taking money away from public schools” is one.
When it comes to school choice referenda, I think of the old adage about how you can fool all of the people some of the time, etc.
People are easily fooled.
LikeLike
We know people are easily fooled. Poor people vote for Republicans who promise to take away their benefits.
Middle class people vote for Trump and McConnell, whose tax cuts favor the 1%.
But there is a consistency to votes against vouchers. Again and again the American people say “we don’t want to pay for religious schools.” Period.
LikeLike
Charles wrote, “People are easily fooled.”
Yes, and most of the ones that are the easiest to fool support Donald Trump and vote Republican.
LikeLike
OK, you say that (some) people won’t pay for religious schools. Do you ever hear these people complaining about someone getting a ROTC scholarship to attend Notre Dame?
Do the people who oppose paying for religious schools, also oppose giving families the ability to afford secular private schools? Do these people similarly oppose home-schooling? How about military schools? Are the people who vote NO on these referenda, opposed to all non-public schools? Or just the schools that are operated by religious groups?
I contend that there are many “layers” of opposition to school choice. Can we agree that the opposition to school choice, is based on a number of factors, and not all of them are religiously-based?
LikeLike
I said this to you at least 10 times before, Charles.
Voters make a clear distinction between K-12 and higher education. No one cares if a student gets federal aid to attend Norte Dame.
But they don’t want to pay for children to attend Catholic, Jewish, or Muslim or Zoroastrian or Buddhist or any other religious schools.
Last time I will write this to you.
LikeLike
OK, I will stipulate that public financial aid to students
attending religiously-operated schools at the K-12 level is abhorrent , and must not happen.
So when a student graduates high school, and starts college in the fall at a religiously operated college, and receives public aid to pay for that education, it is perfectly permissible. Agreed?
Can we agree, that the opposition to providing public aid to students attending K-12 schools, including secular non-religious schools, and military schools, and even home schooling, is based on a number of factors?
For some years, I have been trying to understand,
LikeLike
Charles,
A very simple proposition is supported time and again at the polls: The public wants public money to be spent in public schools, not religious schools, private schools, or home schooling. Legislators pass bills that contradict the wishes of the public because their votes are purchased by wealthy donors. But the public has said the same thing again and again. Read the first sentence.
LikeLike
State revenue slated for K-12 public schools does not share the same federal or state slice of budget pie that holds the money that supports public colleges. These are two different budget items.
How many states have programs that pay for a college student’s tuition and the cost of books in private and/or religious universities?
I can only think of one federal program that does that: the GI Bill. I suspect that there are federal grants and possibly some grants from some states but that money does not come from the budgets that support K-12 public schools.
Once a child becomes a legal adult and makes the decision to go to college, we are in a different education world that does not resemble K-12 in any way.
In California, if one or both parents are military veterans, their children can attend “STATE” colleges tuition free but if those children attend a private college, that free tuition does not apply. That is a program in California. I don’t know about the other states.
LikeLike
There are Basic Educational Opportunity grants also called BEOG’s or Pell Grants. This is a cash payment, directly to the student, which can be spent on anything. Food, housing, tuition at a religious school,etc. The money is provided without any restriction. I got several of those, I went to college for 5 1/2 years. I once got a grant, and used it to buy a VCR.
I was brought up in Kentucky. When I was in college (long time ago), Kentucky had a similar program. I applied for one of those, but was declined.
The feds also have student loan program, Individuals who receive a loan, may spend the money without restrictions.
If a student gets a ROTC scholarship, federal money pays for tuition, and also a stipend, which may be spent without restriction.
Bottom Line: Federal money (and state money) goes to college (and vo-tech) students by the billion, and no one has any problem with it. You can get public money, attend a religious university, and spend your money on beer and barbecue, no problem.
I am seeing the light. Public money to assist in the costs of non-public education for K-12 is bad. Public money to assist the costs of non-public education at the college (and vo-tech) level is just fine.
LikeLike
Oddly, even though the Utah state legislature has done everything possible to punish schools and teachers, they haven’t brought up vouchers again in the last 12 years. I guess they learned something from the vote…
LikeLike
It’s easier for billionaires to buy legislators than it is to buy volunteers… I hope the new House Majority introduces some kind of legislation that would override Citizens United. If they did so it would mark a distinct difference between the parties that might activate some voters.
LikeLike
Please note that the extremist right-wing American Federation for Children was headed by Betsy DeVos until Trump was elected in November 2016!!!
LikeLike