This is an enlightening article for those in California who don’t know the difference between Tony Thurmond and Marshall Tuck, who are running for State Superintendent of Public Instruction.
Simply put, Tony Thurmond has the overwhelming support of the state Democratic party and the state’s teachers, while Tuck is the candidate of the billionaires who want to privatize the state’s public schools.
Tony Butka explains who Tony Thurmond is:
The reason we Angelenos know not of Mr. Thurmond is that he is a Bay Area kind of guy. Born in Fort Ord with a Detroit military father and a Panamanian immigrant mother who became a teacher, he was mostly raised by his single mom in San Jose.
As an ex social worker myself, I like the fact that he was a social worker, the real deal kind with a MSW (Masters in Social Work) degree, working for non-profit agencies who dealt with young people — for example dealing with providing services to foster youth and job training for at-risk youth in the East Bay. That’s the real deal.
Before he got into the Assembly, he paid his dues on the Richmond City Council, and worked as liaison with the West Contra Costa County USD. He got directly involved in education as a member of the West Contra Costa County School Board from 2008-12. For those who know anything about the Bay Area, these are not country club schools. They are a very good learning experience for something like the LAUSD.
Anyhow, starting in 2014 Tony was elected to the California Assembly in AD15, where he has served two terms. Without being too effusive, Tony helped in the legislature to get funding for:
– keeping kids in school and out of the criminal justice system;
– helping fund foster kids being able to go to college;
– getting increased funding for early education programs;
– working to shift funding from the criminal justice system to early education and afterschool programs.
He then describes Marshall Tuck’s record, which you can read if you open the link.
He doesn’t dig into the obscene amount of money that is pouring into Tuck’s campaign, which has already raised three to four times more than Thurmond’s campaign. $4 million in new contributions just last week. Is the office for sale? The billionaire are used to buying whatever they want.
He concludes:
I am frankly worried that the lack of name recognition in Southern California will hurt Tony Thurmond, and that would be a shame. This is really a race between two totally different views of education: one view champions educating our kids wherever they live and no matter their economic/social class. That’s Tony Thurmond.
The other vision is a semi-photogenic front from the billionaire boys club of Eli Broad and the like. If you think they actually give a rat’s ass about our children, particularly in the LAUSD, you don’t know how they got to be billionaires. Wanna bet their kids go to LAUSD or the equivalent? Oh sure. That’s who Marshall Tuck is, zillions of dollars in backing or not.
We know two things for certain about the Charter School crowd. First, they’re all about siphoning money (ADA, or average daily attendance money to you and me) out of the publicly financed school system, leaving all the mandatory bureaucratic overhead of a school system to be funded out of what’s left after their take, as the School Boards try to educate the bulk of the children out of quickly dwindling funds.
The second thing we know for sure is that the Charter School folks simply don’t care if a lot of the Charter schools are run by crooks and are subject to bankruptcy and/or indictments during the school year, leaving their students on the street with nowhere to go.
He reminds readers that the charter school lobby kept charter school founder Ref Rodriguez on the Los Angeles school board just long enough to vote entrepreneur Austin Beutner into the superintendency, then resigned and was convicted of multiple felonies.
This crowd of unethical privatization-pushers should not be allowed to choose the state’s next education leader.
He doesn’t dig into the obscene amount of money that is pouring into Tuck’s campaign, which has already raised three to four times more than Thurmond’s campaign. $4 million in new contributions just last week. Is the office for sale? The billionaire are used to buying whatever they want. Only voters can stop them now.

BINGO: “The billionaire are used to buying whatever they want.”
LikeLiked by 1 person
Thurmond’s opponent is best for an oligarchy.
LikeLike
It’s astonishing to me that you write so eloquently about Thurmond yet when you move to Tuck you become vulgar (“..give a rat’s ass about our children”) and, frankly, blatantly biased. Your “facts” (”Things for certain about the charter schools” and “(the) thing we know for sure…that the charter schools don’t care if they’re run by crooks”) are opinions – like language used by Tuck supporters would most likely be dismissed.
Have you ever worked worked closely w/ a charter school principal? I have spent 6 of the past 8 years doing just that – facilitating monthly problem-solving sessions w/ charter and traditional school (both public, I might add) principals and their teams in making hard decisions about how to lead their schools in ways that best serve all students and communities.
As a union-paying teacher and administrator in LAUSD for over 38 years I have seen it all. I am a product of LAUSD, as were my 3 children. I believe in public schools and (at age 70 continue to work for LAUSD in downtown high schools.) I have witnessed and had to live w/ the results of poor choices made by those who speak most vehemently for “our students”. There is error and mis-handling of funds and circumstances in both charter and traditional schools. To be honest I have seen less dedication in traditional school staff than in charter school staff – observing that the latter actually have more say in where to invest their school’s funding and how to best serve their students.
All this is to say that I believe that we need change – we’re going to get the same results if we continue to elect the “same” candidate. For this reason, I feel confident in voting for Marshall Tuck, knowing that we must be diligent in holding him to his word, in demanding equity between charter and traditional schools, supporting systems that are demonstrating strong results (academic, social, and emotional) for all students, in all zip codes, and in pushing back hard on any measures that deny any groups of students from receiving the best education possible.
And – by the way – Marshall Tuck’s son attend the local neighborhood public school.
LikeLike
You’re referring to the author of the referenced article. Diane doubtfully ever had a vulgar thought in her upstanding and outstanding life.
LikeLike
I absolutely agree. I have been a Diane Ravitch fan for years.
LikeLike
Gates’ New Schools Venture Fund stated its goal in Philanthropy Roundtable, “to develop charter management organizations that produce a diverse supply of different brands on a large scale.”
No collection of hedge funders and tech tyrants ever made a concerted effort to do anything except enrich themselves. Janette Tovar can be a cheerleader for oligarchs taking national assets and for the GDP-dragging financial sector but, Ohioans and Michiganders paid the price for charter school corruption (Ohioans were fleeced of $1 bil ) and, the students enrolled in the charter scams received no education (25,000 in Michigan)
Presumably, Jeanette’s condescending blather will please the richest 0.1% who corrupt local, state and national government.
No doubt she prefers people be civil while they are robbed of their democracy.
LikeLike
Do you understand why some of the text is italicized in a blog post like this? If not, you should learn–especially before leaving ill-informed like this one.
LikeLike
There’s more:
Ballotpedia reports that Tuck has been endorsed by Arne Duncan and if you look at the list of State Assembly members that have endorsed Tuck, there is a Republican on the list. Not one Republican endorsed Thurmond.
The Orange County Register has also endorsed Tuck.
The Democratic Party endorsed Thurmond.
Tuck is clearly a kleptocrat, libertarian-conservative claiming to be a Democrat.
Tuck is a FAKE Democrat. Running FAKE Democrats and FAKE Republicans is one of the methods ALEC has infiltrated both political parties while having more success taking over the GOP.
LikeLike
And you know this is true because you have engaged in conversation w/ Marshall Tuck, personally? Seriously – you believe you possess the ability to look into a person’s heart and mind and make an empirical statement about his character and motives? You may be able to observe the political stance of many of Tuck’s supporters and derive conclusions about how THEY might move forward, but to second-guess any person’s personal statements about their beliefs is not only unfair, it is illogical. I cannot let your Fox-News-type fear-inducing predictions go out to so many who feed on sound-bites that stir their experience-void minds.
LikeLike
Considering your position at the typical billionaire boys club funded New Teachers Center, I would expect nothing from you except to shill for the privatization of public schools. https://newteachercenter.org/about-ntc/our-funders/
I have met Marshall Tuck. He’s a nice guy truly. But his beliefs are shaped by markets, not children, not the public good. You may advocate for a segregated, two-tiered system but the rest of us believe in public schools for the common good – not the individual.
LikeLiked by 1 person
Actually, I currently work (and have worked for over 40 years) as a teacher and instructional coach in LAUSD. I spent 10 months working in an adjunct position w/ public school principals, funded by NTC, and I must say I don’t disagree w/ your summation of their backers.
However, to suggest that you know my motives and personal experiences is offensive. My own kids were 3rd generation LAUSD students and I have worked hard to preserve the rights of under-served students as a bilingual teacher, mentor, and coordinator of new teacher trainings that reflect whole child learning in an equitable environment. Those who actually believe that there is only one size to fit all students and all school systems is narrow and ignorant approach to one of the most complex and demanding work of helping all students learn..
LikeLike
Instructional coach! There are many quasi-administrators in LAUSD hired by the lapdogs of billionaires who think, wrongly, like you do.
LikeLike
Disengaging….you’ve proved my point about being narrow and ignorant.
LikeLike
And I cannot stand it when people use that phrase, “one size fits all” to mislabel integration and equality. No one is supposed to get a ‘petite’ education.
LikeLike
Earlier this month, in a post at Tultican.com, all of the deceits used by those who endorse Tuck were exposed.
LikeLike
Call me what you want. Unlike some people, I care about students too much to push test score data driven nonsense on them, or to vote for Broad’s buddies who want to create separate and unequal education systems. And don’t forget to ask me why I am ready to strike if Broad’s pal Beutner can’t be reasonable.
LikeLike
Then perhaps you should change your LinkedIn profile Janette. And yes, you do push to privatize schools – and are guilty of what you blame me for.
LikeLike
Well done, my friends! Her comments have a bit of a Brer Rabbit vibe.
LikeLike
BEST DESCRIPTION for long, long years of Test-Based school invasions: decisions “shaped by markets, not children…”
LikeLike
Jeanette,
I could use a laugh. Spin how Bill Gates and his co-founder of Microsoft spent $1/2 mil. to defeat Washington state judges who made decisions favorable to public schools. Spin the oligarch plan written by a Gates’ employee and Frederick Hess, in Philanthropy Roundtable, “Don’t Surrender the Academy”. Spin Roland Fryer’s prescription ($1 mil. in Gates’ grants) for testing every day for some kids but not the kids in wealthy suburbs like his kids. Spin the Pahara Institute for us.
It’s founder also created Gates funded Bellwether and NSVF and she founded TFA. Spin for us the Hanushek and Chester Finn (Fordham) association with the right wing Hoover Institute. Spin for us Reed Hastings in a YouTube video calling for an end to democratically elected school boards….
LikeLike
To all greedy and gullible believers:
In the past 50 years that I have lived and worked for both real and faked people who are authorities and leaders in communities.
Truthfully and luckily if people have good eyes and ears to observe, to read and to listen from history, from modern news and from their own working condition, then they MUST recognize that whoever say and do what they say accordingly, his/her family members, relatives, friends, subordinates, and neighbors will somehow reflect their conscience.
As a result, those billionaire boys/men are buying and creating a front runner who must be their puppets and subservient workers to follow to their commands. Therefore, all greedy and gullible believers need to wake up and to smell the coffee.
There are 24 hours in a day, how do we become rich if we only work straight forward without rip off the GREEDY AND GULLIBLE BELIEVERS? Take an example of the past Mr. Donald Trump who made construction workers to work for him free; to get government subsidize post office building which become his earning rental income hotel; and to provide all empty promises to all voters last Presidential election in November 2016…
It is very sadden to admit that all good and past events keep repeating in the past 5000+ years.
C’est la vie! and what will be, it will be…Some will ascend to Heaven and some will descend to Hell and the majority will stay on this beautiful planet of Earth as a training school to enjoy or to suffer both peace and war eras, or both entertainment or slavery in working condition. All the best for now and forever to Saints, Human Beings and Savage Beasts. Truly yours. Normal human being.
LikeLike