The New York Review of Books published a fascinating and alarming comparison of the Weimar years with our contemporary world order, by Christopher Browning, a historian of the Holocaust, Europe, and the world wars.
He reviews the similar policies—-isolationism, trade Wars, hyper-nationalism, militarism, suspension of basic freedoms, purge of the civil service, elimination of free trade unions, hyperpolarization of politics, openly racial policies—and the deterioration of democratic norms. He points to Paul von Hindenburg as the gravedigger of a fragile German Democracy.
When he turns to the American parallel, he points to Mitch McConnell as the culprit.
“If the US has someone whom historians will look back on as the gravedigger of American democracy, it is Mitch McConnell. He stoked the hyperpolarization of American politics to make the Obama presidency as dysfunctional and paralyzed as he possibly could. As with parliamentary gridlock in Weimar, congressional gridlock in the US has diminished respect for democratic norms, allowing McConnell to trample them even more. Nowhere is this vicious circle clearer than in the obliteration of traditional precedents concerning judicial appointments. Systematic obstruction of nominations in Obama’s first term provoked Democrats to scrap the filibuster for all but Supreme Court nominations. Then McConnell’s unprecedented blocking of the Merrick Garland nomination required him in turn to scrap the filibuster for Supreme Court nominations in order to complete the “steal” of Antonin Scalia’s seat and confirm Neil Gorsuch. The extreme politicization of the judicial nomination process is once again on display in the current Kavanaugh hearings.
“One can predict that henceforth no significant judicial appointments will be made when the presidency and the Senate are not controlled by the same party. McConnell and our dysfunctional and disrespected Congress have now ensured an increasingly dysfunctional and disrespected judiciary, and the constitutional balance of powers among the three branches of government is in peril.
“Whatever secret reservations McConnell and other traditional Republican leaders have about Trump’s character, governing style, and possible criminality, they openly rejoice in the payoff they have received from their alliance with him and his base: huge tax cuts for the wealthy, financial and environmental deregulation, the nominations of two conservative Supreme Court justices (so far) and a host of other conservative judicial appointments, and a significant reduction in government-sponsored health care (though not yet the total abolition of Obamacare they hope for). Like Hitler’s conservative allies, McConnell and the Republicans have prided themselves on the early returns on their investment in Trump. The combination of Trump’s abasement before Putin in Helsinki, the shameful separation of families at the border in complete disregard of US asylum law (to say nothing of basic humanitarian principles and the GOP’s relentless claim to be the defender of “family values”), and most recently Michael Cohen’s implication of Trump in criminal violations of campaign finance laws has not shaken the fealty of the Republican old guard, so there is little indication that even an explosive and incriminating report from Special Counsel Robert Mueller will rupture the alliance.”
Do read it all. It is supposedly forbidden in Internet discussions to compare anyone to Hitler (“Godwin’s Law”). But when a historian makes the comparison, we should pay attention.

I will add this to my reading list.
I think there is not just fealty from the old guard Republicans.
LikeLike
Yes, and thank you. Daily Kos has a post linking to a WaPo piece by Dana Milbank written after McConnell led his democracy-hating cabal in changing the filibuster rule to get Gorsuch confirmed last year. The title is “Mitch McConnell, the Man Who Broke America.” Less scholarly than Browning, but no less informed, and more rightfully angry.
https://www.washingtonpost.com/opinions/mitch-mcconnell-the-man-who-broke-america/2017/04/07/8e12f1d8-1bbd-11e7-9887-1a5314b56a08_story.html?utm_term=.87117778564d
LikeLike
Obama was too civilized, too refined and too conciliatory; he reached across the aisle to be bi-partisan only to have his arm ripped off. You don’t win a fight by bringing a tomato to a knife fight. All that being said, that does not excuse the vile, vicious tactics of the far right wing/libertarian GOP and Mitch McConnell with his fake profound voice and his lying talking points. GOP policies are a disaster for this country and the 99%. When will the millions who voted for Trump and the GOP get a clue?
LikeLike
It’s just raw power now. Did you see all the senators whining about the protesters?
Apparently they’re too busy and important to allow political speech anywhere in that building. Apparently they’re the only people permitted to speak.
The public exists to serve senators and supreme court justices.
LikeLike
Policy “safe zones”. It’s where politicians can learn the spin of oligarch lobbyists and can avoid constituent interests. Gates funded one under the Aspen banner, for Congressional senior education staff.
LikeLike
Well, look at the bright side. I use President Trump as an example of how I DON’T want my son to behave. I can really pick any of Donald’s Trump’s statements at random and tell him “if you treat people like this when you’re grown I will be ashamed”.
Now we have a Supreme Court justice to use as a good, bad example too. Apart from the assault allegations – just based on his general behavior- It may spark many conversations on binge drinking and treating classmates like garbage, whether that’s to be admired and imitated. I’m a firm “no”, but I guess opinions differ.
LikeLike
The federal government is horrible- just packed full of clueless people who don’t serve anyone but themselves, IMO. It’s just not even “good” let alone “great”.
But, there are such bright spots in state government! So don’t despair.
“Stacey Abrams, the Democratic candidate for Georgia governor, says, “I’m not running for governor of Georgia to be the ‘education governor.’ I am running to be the ‘Public Education Governor.’”
An actual, unapologetic and passionate public education advocate in government. For a while there I was afraid we had none, and would never have any again.
You can have “the agnostics”- I want an advocate and I think public school kids deserve one. Charters and vouchers get passionate advocates- DC is packed with them. Kids in public schools deserve one too.
LikeLike
I can’t agree that so much of the current state of political and societal affairs can be attributed to any one person, like McConnell or Trump. Such individuals are just flotsam on the “Red Tide” of nationalism, exclusion, and antipathy toward elected government which is a cyclical phenomenon that cannot be embodied in any one person. This tide is a universal Zeitgeist which rises during periods of rapid social and technological change that disrupt social and economic patterns and leave people adrift and grasping for something they can “believe in”. Typically, that something is their national flag. They also search out “enemies” on whom they can place the blame for the changes and instability they are experiencing. Typically, those enemies are minority groups and immigrants.
The current Red Tide Zeitgeist in America began to arise with the social disruptions caused by the civil rights movement and the Viet Nam War, and with the economic factors of the early 1960’s, especially unemployment: During the decade of the 1950’s, unemployment had averaged only 4.5%; but in 1960, unemployment jumped to 5.5% and then to 6.7% in 1961, averaging over 5.7% through the 1964 presidential elections. Kennedy was elected President because of his hammering away at his message of “getting the economy rolling again,” which he did after his election.
In contrast, in 1964 Johnson’s Republican presidential rival Barry Goldwater hammered away at Cold War themes aimed at demonizing various foreign and internal enemies; he emphasized military strength and the willingness to use military force to achieve U.S. interests. During his presidential nomination acceptance speech, he gave voice to this nationalistic militarism with his famous declaration that “extremism in support of liberty is no vice.” Goldwater’s message didn’t resonate with the majority of voters, but it was wildly cheered by the unemployed veterans and other unemployed workers who saw America’s unemployment as being a result of unfair foreign competition, an influx of immigrants, and racial employment preferences to black Americans. The seeds of the new cycle of nationalistic Zeitgeist had been planted, and the modern “conservative” political movement had began.
During the 1964 campaign, Ronald Reagan further cultivated this Zeitgeist and gained for himself national recognition when just before the election he gave a television speech supporting Goldwater. The speech was officially titled “A Time for Choosing”, but it is often referred to today in reverent terms by conservatives simply as “The Speech”. In this speech, Reagan attacked government, blaming it for all of the nation’s woes because of what Reagan called “socialist” programs, such as Social Security, The War on Poverty, and The Great Society.
But Reagan’s most virulent attack was on American government itself. In The Speech, Reagan characterized government as the enslaver of the people: “The Founding Fathers knew a government can’t control the economy without controlling people. And they knew when a government sets out to do that, it must use force and coercion to achieve its purpose.” And he dramatically declared that citizens had to oppose the government, telling his national television audience that “This is the last stand on Earth.”
The Speech gained for Reagan a national image and a potent leadership role in the emerging new conservative movement. “New” because unlike the former conservative politics which were focused on restraining fiscal spending, this new conservative movement was based on undermining trust in government and transferring that trust to business leaders and bankers.
Reagan used his newfound fame to become elected governor of the state with the nation’s largest population and richest economy, California. Deftly using the national platform his powerful governorship gave him, he parlayed it into becoming President. And in his presidential inauguration speech he succinctly summed up the new conservative doctrine, declaring that “government IS the problem.”
This war on government itself has continued unabated for the past 40 years…and look where it has brought us. Let’s hope that the history of these Zeitgeist cycles is broken this time, because past cycles have always led to war.
LikeLike
Excellent argument and historical background. I do not think you argued that Browning was incorrect, only that he gave McConnel too much of a role in what you see as a more organic process. Do I read you correctly?
LikeLike
Correct.
LikeLike
Muy bien dicho, Scisne
LikeLike
Well stated. It takes a whole village of evil for the common discourse to be this bad.
LikeLike
This week’s travesties of democrazy did afford me the opportunity to coin a couple of new words —
Perjurist = a jurist who perjures
Perjurisimprudence = what now passes for the law of the land
LikeLike
Good ones, Jon!
LikeLike
LOL.I will be using these!!!
LikeLike
Mike DeWine in Ohio is struggling to overcome the ed reform record in Ohio. I watched a Q and A with him where he pledged to serve “all children” then spent the entire time promoting charters and vouchers. So “all children” except the 85% in public schools.
They don’t even hear themselves. It’s such an echo chamber and they;ve been inside it so long public school students don’t even exist anymore.
LikeLike
McConnell wouldn’t be where he’s at without people like Sheldon Adelson and his wife, without the hedge fund managers steering the country toward unlimited political spending and no regulation, nor without the investment bankers of Third Way eroding the platform of the Democratic Party and thereby, its support.
Evidently, taking money trumps the threat of forced camps and confiscation of money by the power brokers who have set up a situation ripe for religious intolerance.
Economist Germa Bal identified privatization as a forerunner to the Third Reich.
The biggest player in that is Bill Gates, whose scheme has corrupted government. There’s every reason to think that Gates is like Charles and David Koch and, no reason to assume Gates is different than Robert Mercer (funder of Steve Bannon and Breitbart).
LikeLike
Colombia’s president calls for politicians to be pedagogues not demagogues to curb toxic populism. The people will vote sanely if they learn the facts. Unfortunately our schools of education train teachers not to teach facts but to impart chimerical 21st century skills instead. In other words, not even our pedagogues are being pedagogues. I have spent the past year talking to ordinary voters about politics. You would not believe the ignorance. If democracy dies, I will blame our schools of education.
LikeLike
I blame people like the Koch brothers, the Walmart clan, ALEC, Heritage, Cato, Federalist Society, AEI, US Chamber of Commerce, etc.
LikeLike
Joe what do you teach and what do your students know?
LikeLike
I’m retired but I’m not seeing schools of education as being the major problem in our right ward trend in government. Eighty or 100 years ago fewer people were graduating from high school or even going to college and we some how avoided an outright right wing dictatorship. I’m not onboard for this blame the teachers syndrome or blame the ed schools syndrome. Really, it’s the fault of the ed schools or teachers for the likes of Betsy DeVos, Mitch McConnell or Paul Ryan?
LikeLike
I truly fear the current faculty of our schools of education are incapable of rising to the challenge of creating teachers who can conserve democracy. They are the worst kind of Ivory Tower inhabitants, immune to the failure of their theories. And many are temperamentally inquisitors.
LikeLike
They are under attack too, by NCTQ and by fake ed schools like Relay.
LikeLike
That may be a good thing.
Diane, every teen in America should know what Weimar means. They don’t even know what Congress is. This is the fruit of our ed schools.
LikeLike
Ponderosa,
You should know that the ed schools are under attack by the reformers. You won’t have to worry about them much longer. NCTQ finds them to be subpar because they don’t teach CCSS. Charters have created their own ed school called Relay, which teaches only skills and discipline, no Hirsch or knowledge.
LikeLike
From Philanthropy Roundtable (“Don’t Surrender the Academy”),
“…reformers… declare ‘We’ve got to blow up the ed schools’ “.
Frederick Hess and a Gates’ employee describe instead a takeover with money.
Arnold lists his money to colleges at his site, tab, “education, evidence based”. Look at the oligarch funders of centers like Douglas Harris’ Tulane EPIC. Look at the grants on the faculty cv’s for the Directors of Michigan State’s ERA. Look at the funding for the center associated with the President of Columbia Teachers College, for Hanushek’s wife’s CREDO at Stanford. Look at Harvard’s Roland Fryer grants, the cv of the Brown University faculty member heading an education center which morphed into a R.I. center etc.
No person nor center receiving oligarch money should be allowed to have any influence on public education, written reports or otherwise.
LikeLike
Normally I would agree, Linda, but the ed schools have been taken over by a toxic anti-knowledge ideology. How can we fix this?
LikeLike
The disease is oligarchy. Until, it is eradicated and democracy returns, all other complaints, legitimate or not, take a back seat.
LikeLike
The single person most responsible for the destruction of American democracy is Rupert Murdoch. The greatest beneficiaries are Putin, and Russian and American oligarchs like Bill Gates, who carved up the public asset- education, for ownership by the tech industry and hedge funds.
LikeLike
Exactly. I have been watching the parallels for a long time, they build and build. What do we do about it? I’m afraid it is unfixable already.
LikeLike
When I read the article, what struck me was the suggestion that no evil was too big to place on the back of the Clintons. There was now Justice K, opening his defense by suggesting that there was a left wing conspiracy led by Hillary Clinton that was after him and wanted to ruin his personal career (aside from all else, this statement alone disqualified him from the standard of impartial justice that must apply to the Supreme Court).
It seems to me that the greatest threat to democracy now is the coming wave of reaction against the Trumpists. This will not be democratic. Nor will it be pretty. It could justify the draconian reaction those on the right so desperately want. Or it could motivate the public to create a real left, something this country has not seen much of since the days of the IWW or Eugene V Debbs. Or could the Trumpists push the mainstream toward Bolshevism itself? Will they be willing to usher in the Jacibins and knit while heads roll?
Browning correctly points to the delay in confirmation of Garland as a watershed moment in American History. They could have preserved a process by allowing a fair hearing to Garland and voting him down for partisan reasons, but Republicans were justifiably afraid that rejection of Garland might have energized democratic voter before the 2016 election. So they decided to renege on the advice and consent provision of the constitution, daring instead to decry democrats for doing so during the K hearings.
What will the midterms bring? Democrats? Reactionaries? Bolsheviks?
LikeLike
If Trump survives Muller and manages to stay in the White House for a full eight years or even longer, I think he will eventually be worse than Hitler.
If Trump stays in power and continues to subvert and abuse that power with total support from the GOP, who will he and the autocratic GOP send to the concentration camps they will call “democratic resorts” for liquidation?
anyone labeled a liberal
anyone in the media that criticized Trump
anyone that belongs to a minority
anyone that repeatedly voted against Trump
any woman that refused to do what Trump or a member of the GOP wanted from them
the Clinton family
LikeLike
That has been my fear from the summer of 2016. Trump made his intentions completely clear by his scapegoating of various immigrant and non-white groups. He used pure propaganda and lies and somehow was enabled by a media who did not understand how to handle a man who told so many lies in the pursuit of power. They still do not (as is clear from the kid glove treatment Kavanaugh got for his blatant lying).
It’s why I was so angry when posters on here insisted there was absolutely no reason to vote for Clinton because she was no different than Trump.
There is only one priority here — we need to elect Democrats to put an end to the reprehensible way that Trump and the Republicans are undermining democracy. Progressives need to stop enabling Trump’s “blame the Democrats” rhetoric that he uses with as much success as Hitler used “blame the Jews” rhetoric. Know your real enemy. It is not the Democrats. It is the Republicans who are happy to see the end of democracy in this country.
LikeLike
Not all candidates that run as Democrats are real Democrats. Before voting, we have to do our homework to sift the wheat from the chaff. Do not trust any campaign literature or ads.
LikeLike
That’s true. A real Democrat has to vote with the Democrats at least on some occasions when the Republican Party does not and their vote matters.
Susan Collins is a real Republican because she will always vote for the far right Republican or the far right Republican policy when it is needed. Her true priority is pushing the Republican agenda.
Joe Manchin is not a real Democrat because his priority is doing what the Republicans want him to do. Always. Just like Susan Collins.
Joe Manchin is no different than Trump. Hillary Clinton was extremely different than Trump. A Supreme Court chosen by Manchin would please Republicans. A Supreme Court chosen by Clinton would have undermined their right wing agenda.
LikeLike
Manchin’s daughter is a big deal in Big Pharma. Her corporation owns the EpiPen, which raised prices by 600%.
https://www.cnn.com/2016/09/07/politics/manchin-defends-bresch-mylan-epipen-price/index.html
He is up for re-election in a few weeks, and Dems are stuck with him for another six years. I saw a video where women workers were on the phone with Manchin, pleading with him not to vote for Kavanaugh because he is anti-labor, and West Va is a working class state.
LikeLike
Diane, I understand why many Democratic voters are upset with Manchin’s vote (although I imagine that Democratic voters who actually live in the state that Manchin represents are less upset than the commenters on your blog). The national “Dems” may be “stuck” with Manchin, but a lot of West Virginians appear to like him just fine. Manchin is a conservative Democrat, which appears to be how most West Virginia voters like their Democrats.
The idea that Manchin is not a “real Democrat” and is therefore “no different than Trump” is neither productive nor correct. If it were correct, then West Virginia Democrats should just stay home in November and let his seat flip to a Republican who will vote to rubber-stamp all tax cuts proposed by the White House, to repeal Obamacare (or at least its pre-existing condition mandate), to end sanctions on Russia, to change all Senate procedural rules in ways that benefit the Republican majority, to confirm every single Trump cabinet appointments, and a whole bunch of other stuff that Joe Manchin has already refused to do.
I hope West Virginians reelect Joe Manchin next month. Less conservative Democrats are free to run against Manchin in the next primary, in 2024 (assuming Manchin runs again). And West Virginia Democrats will decide whether they want a less conservative candidate. This year, West Virginia Democrats, who presumably were aware that Manchin voted to confirm Justice Gorsuch, gave Manchin a 39-point blowout in the Democratic primary.
LikeLike
I’m usually sympathetic to more conservative Democrats in red states. However, there is a certain breed of Democrat — like Jeffrey Klein in the NY State Senate — who actually caucuses with the Republicans to make sure that Republicans can have total control over the legislative body in which they sit. And that is not being a Democrat if you vote to have the Republicans control everything.
Andrew Cuomo is also that kind of fake Democrat who actually tries his very hardest to keep Republicans in power in Albany. It doesn’t matter WHAT you vote for it your ultimate goal is working your tail off to keep Republicans in power. You might as well be Susan Collins who makes sure the Mitch McConnell stays in power or Andrew Cuomo who fights his hardest for the fake Dems who will vote to keep Republicans in control. Those fake Dems are no different than Susan Collins. Like Cuomo and the fake Dems he works so hard to elect, Susan Collins knows that keeping the Republicans controlling the Senate is the most important. So does Cuomo with the Albany Senate. That’s what being a fake Democrat means. Not the votes in specific issues, but the votes to make sure Republicans keep power.
Now I don’t know if Manchin would do what Andrew Cuomo’s very favorite faux Democrats do and actually caucus with the Republicans to make sure that Mitch McConnell has absolute control over the Senate. But I would not put it past him if the Senate was close enough that he would decide which party controlled it. Look at what Cuomo’s favorite faux Dems did in the Albany Senate with his encouragement and approval. Made sure Republicans controlled it.
But flerp may be right that Manchin is not nearly as terrible as Andrew Cuomo and his little group of fake Democrats who are truly beyond despicable. If Manchin wins — and I don’t care if he does — will Manchin pull an “Andrew Cuomo” and caucus with the Republicans to keep McConnell in power? Time will tell, but I wouldn’t put it past him because Manchin seems to have the same character as Cuomo and the fake Dems he worked so hard to elect so they could caucus with the Republicans and let them control the Senate.
LikeLike
Containing the Catastrophe
By Robert Reich, Robert Reich’s Website
08 October 18
Anyone still unsure of how (or even whether) they’ll vote in the midterms should consider this: All three branches of government are now under the control of one party, and that party is under the control of Donald J. Trump.
With the addition of K, the Supreme Court is as firmly Republican as are the House and Senate.
K was revealed as a fierce partisan – not only the legal advisor who helped Kenneth Starr prosecute Bill Clinton and almost certainly guided George W. Bush’s use of torture, but also a nominee who believes “leftists” and Clinton sympathizers are out to get him.
He joins four other Republican-appointed jurists, almost as partisan. Thomas, Alito, and Roberts have never wavered from Republican orthodoxy. Neil Gorsuch, although without much track record on the Supreme Court to date, was a predictable conservative Republican vote on the Court of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit – which is why the Heritage Foundation pushed for him and Trump appointed him.
Even under normal circumstances, when all three branches are under the control of the same party we get a lopsided government that doesn’t respond to the values of a large portion of the electorate.
But these are not normal circumstances. Donald Trump is President.
Need I remind you? Trump is a demagogue who doesn’t give a fig for democracy – who continuously and viciously attacks the free press, Democrats, immigrants, Muslims, black athletes exercising First Amendment rights, women claiming sexual harassment, anyone who criticizes or counters him; who treats the executive branch, including the Justice Department, like his own fiefdom, and brazenly profits off his office; who tells lies like other people breathe; and who might well have conspired with Vladimir Putin to swing the election his way.
Trump doesn’t even pretend to be the president of all the people. As he repeatedly makes clear in rallies and tweets, he is president of his “base.”
And his demagoguery is by now unconstrained in the White House. Having fired the few “adults” in his Cabinet, Trump is now on the loose (but for a few advisors who reportedly are trying to protect the nation from him).
All this would be bad enough even if the two other branches of government behaved as the framers of the Constitution expected, as checks and balances on a president. But under Republican leadership, they refuse to play this role when it comes to Trump.
House and Senate Republicans have morphed into Trump sycophants and toadies – intimidated, spineless, opportunistic. The few who have dared call him on his outrages aren’t running for reelection.
Some have distanced themselves from a few of his most incendiary tweets or racist rantings, but most are obedient lapdogs on everything else – including Trump’s reluctance to protect the integrity of our election system, his moves to prevent an investigation into Russian meddling, his trade wars, his attacks on NATO and the leaders of other democracies, his swooning over dictators, his cruelty toward asylum-seekers, and, in the Senate, his Supreme Court nominees.
Senate Majority Leader Mitch McConnell has emerged as Trump’s most shameless lackey who puts party above nation and Trump above party. The House leadership is no better. House intelligence chair Devin Nunes is Trump’s chief flunky and apologist, but there are many others.
Now that K is on the Supreme Court, you can forget about the Court constraining Trump, either.
K’s views of presidential power and executive privilege are so expansive he’d likely allow Trump to fire Mueller, shield himself from criminal prosecution, and even pardon himself. K’s Republican brethren on the Court would probably go along.
So how are the constitutional imperative of checks and balances to be salvaged, especially when they’re so urgently needed?
The only remedy is for voters to flip the House or Senate, or ideally both, on November 6th.
The likelihood of this happening is higher now with K on the Court and Trump so manifestly unchecked. Unless, that is, enough voters have become so demoralized and disillusioned they just give up.
If cynicism wins the day, Trump and those who would delight in the demise of American democracy (including, not incidentally, Putin) will get everything they want. They will have broken America.
For the sake of the values we hold dear – and of the institutions of our democracy that our forbearers relied on and our descendants will need – this cannot be allowed.
It is now time to place a firm check on this most unbalanced of presidents, and vote accordingly.
LikeLike
Thanks. Robert Reich is another clear voice with insider experience of the swamp.
LikeLike
There is one more parallel that is hard to avoid. The basic campaign message going forward will be “the economy is better than ever, don’t risk continued prosperity because of side shows that have nothing to do with your daily lives.”
That was pretty much the mantra in Nazi Germany from 1933-1939. I have a copy of a government magazine issued on Hitler’s birthday in April 1939—the invasion of Poland was to come five months later—that celebrated Hitler’s many achievements that made the lives of Germans better. Not much about the military, but a whole lot on the newly built, barely used Autobahn. Watching clips of Republican members of Congress get in front of cameras who repeat the “greatest president ever” schtick eerily echoes the language of the commemorative issue. And watching them justify their fantasy economy—they don’t want to talk about WHO benefits, the rising cost and inequality of health care, plundering public services for private gain, schools, etc.—is such a self-evident lie.
Beware of people who justify the exclusion of certain people and prioritizing rights. Don’t let the absence of death camps or a secret police that makes people disappear fool you from understand the depth of this party’s fascism.
LikeLike
Trump and the Republicans have validated Keynesian economics once again. Of course, it was a stimulus that they denied to Obama when he was in office. Tax cuts are not the most efficient way to stimulate the economy but they are stimulative none the less. Increasing deficit spending is also stimulative. Of course, as Bruce Bartlet says when Democrats take power again republicans will again be screaming about deficits. Will we have another Obama accommodate them with a debt commission?
The best economy ever! Call me a skeptic. The prime age worker participation rate 25-54 is still 2% below the trend line in the 90s. Wages are relatively stagnant. And there was an increase of those working part-time involuntarily of 250k last month. So there is some continuing argument that the economy is not running on all cylinders. Of course, listening to the media; you would never know that. When Obama left office 95.3% of Americans who were in the job market had a job. 2 years later 96.3 % are employed. Hard to see where that factor generates enthusiasm. However, a corporate-owned media will gladly cheerlead for the tax cuts.
LikeLike
Virtually everyone I know is one catastrophic disease or accident away from bankruptcy and worse. Please explain how this humming economy supports them. Rhetorical rambling, of course. You and I already know the answer.
LikeLike
McConnell may be the grave digger but Trump is in the pits destroying all that he can. Continue to lie, lie, lie and lie. Then repeat those lies over and over and over again until they become truths. [Welcome to the evil people club.]
….
Trump Blames ‘Evil’ People for K****** Confirmation Battle
President Trump reiterated his support for Supreme Court Justice Brett K on Monday, calling his confirmation process a “disgraceful situation brought about by people that are evil.” “He’s a great person and it was very unfair what happened to him,” Trump said in a speech at the International Association of Chiefs of Police Convention. “False charges, false statements, horrible statements that were totally untrue that he knew nothing about. Frankly, terms that he probably never heard in his life.” Earlier in the day, he also railed against alleged discussions about impeaching the recently confirmed nominee. “Now they’re thinking about impeaching a brilliant jurist, a man that did nothing wrong, a man that was caught up in a hoax that was set up by the Democrats,” Trump told reporters. He later called the alleged impeachment movement “an insult to the American people,” and claimed that the “dishonesty” and “charade” from the Democrats would hurt them in the midterm elections. “It was all made up, it was fabricated, and it’s a disgrace,” Trump concluded. “And I think it’s really gonna show you something come November 6th.”
LikeLike
I agree!!!!
LikeLike
Frederick Hess (well known to teachers) wrote a plan for the wealthy to
takeover colleges – a paper that solidified a bond between his employer, AEI, and the Koch’s. Their capitalism is forced austerity, low money velocity and concentrated wealth- the kind of capitalism that resulted in 1 mil. Irish dying from starvation.
This summer, AEI met with its not so distant cousin, the Center for American Progress to, purportedly, shore up democracy. From the outside, it appears to be an unlikely pairing. AEI’s driving ambition is to win at all costs. And CAP’s sentiment is, Democratic politicians losing, costs the rich nothing. CAP’s skill set is spinning the oligarchs’ privatization of common goods as democracy’s finest moment. AEI recognizes and values expertise.
LikeLike
“a plan for the wealthy to takeover colleges” is a plan to put mind control in the hands of a few super wealthy white men or white families that have a god complex and have been totally corrupted by their wealth.
LikeLike
Agree.
LikeLike
Christopher Browning is one of a couple of the pre-eminent Holocaust researchers in the U.S. today. I got to hear him speak once. If you want to be freaked out, read his “Ordinary Men.” It follows a group of Order Police (too old to be in the military, and not generally Nazis) on their killing spree of Jews across eastern Poland. At first, they were hesitant to participate. But within a few weeks, they were murdering with gusto. Then, they went back to their ordinary lives. Chilling. ANYONE can get involved in mass murder under the right circumstances.
LikeLike
While I wonder how our Republican Leaders can spew such nonsense (do they honestly believe the lies they are telling?), what is really scary is the viewers who repeat their talking points as Gospal.
I don’t believe everything the Dems say and practically nothing from the Republicans. I try to discern the facts and decide for myself. We need to teach our children to be independent thinkers so they aren’t led astray by crazy talk. Perhaps that’s the purpose of CC – a means of brainwashing the next generation of voters.
LikeLike
I think it’s important to remember that before recent Senate rule changes on appointment confirmations, the norm was 60 votes for passage, plus filibusters. So we had decades of minority Senators being able to indefinitely hold up majority-party Pres nominees until their party came back into power. That wasn’t so great either.
Now we’ve jumped the shark: majority-party Senate can refuse indefinitely to vote on opp-party Pres nominees, & when Sen majority aligns w/pres party, push thro their nominees lickety-split… but that tends to encourage quicker party turnover in response, so sooner than later we have shoe on the other foot.
I suspect the reason we saw decades of Senate approving all but outlandish Pres nominees, regardless of whether majority party was same as Pres’, is they knew what would happen as soon as shoe was on other foot if they didn’t. Today’s system has essentially the same results, but encourages quick party turnovers in response to dissing Pres nominees/ confirmation of polarizing candidates, which energizes the party not in power: result is polarizing whiplash; govtl instability.
LikeLike
The requirement of 60 votes encouraged presidents to select judges who were not extremists.
LikeLike
The 60-vote cloture requirement for judicial confirmations was on balance a good thing. I think that’s becoming clear as time goes on. The Democrats shouldn’t have have ditched it for all non-SCOTUS judicial appointments. And the Republicans shouldn’t have ditched it for SCOTUS. Like Diane says, it encouraged Presidents to nominate relatively moderate judges. I would rather seats remain open than have the federal judiciary essentially reduced to an arm of the Executive branch.
LikeLike
FLERP,
I also believe Ginsburg should have retired in 2014, so she could be replaced by a judge who had 30 years to serve in her place.
LikeLike
These comparisons w/Weimar Republic are instructive & important. However, I always find the parallel unconvincing, as Germany had so little experience w/democracy in between Kaisers & Nazism. Perhaps historical scholars can inform me.
LikeLike
Don’t ever say “it can’t happen here.” Our institutions are under extreme stress. I can’t remember the last time one part—the most extreme wing of one party—controlled all three branches of government. All in fear of a bully.
LikeLike
Agree, Diane, I would never say it can’t happen here: no complacency.
I see the issue weakening our govtl institutions as insufficient checks and balances, which goes back quite a ways, and may be harder to change now than it was 50 yrs ago. For decades, our legislative branch has been fobbing off the tough decisions and the details of law-writing onto the executive and judicial branches, leaving the public increasingly vulnerable to the decisions of appointees.
These branches are subject to public pressure to a degree. But automation, globalization and corporate trickle-up have combined to create longterm income instability for the masses, which always brings out jingoistic nationalism, tribalism, anti-public-good suspicion that the next guy is getting more than his share, and support for autocrats who promise to fix things overnight. And current campaign laws stock the legislative branch with corporate toadies who continue to twiddle their thumbs.
All we voters can do is push to get as many public-minded Dems in office as possible, so as to begin legislative changes [campaign reform] that would bring things back in balance.
LikeLike
I disagree on one point. In my reading of your comment, your assumption implies that Americans, by virtue of geography and history, somehow have much experience with democracy. History seems to prove otherwise.
Large numbers of people who vote do so based on some idea of tribalism, to use a term in fashion today, and do not bother to inform or educate themselves about the roles and responsibilities of citizens in a democracy. Often more than 50 percent of eligible voters don’t bother to in the first place. Citizenship for them is an expression of where there’re from or who they associate with, not what they believe. They see no need to develop and strengthen traits of civic virtue. From their collective points of view, there’s little if any difference between jingoism masquerading as patriotism and their affiliations with their favorite sports teams. And I would argue a majority of them are more passionate about the latter.
Americans have no more or less propensity to be more or less democratic, whatever that may mean, than any other people in the world. We should quit deluding ourselves we are. Our current national predicament—federal and state—demonstrates we ain’t so great at this democracy thing either.
LikeLike
GregB, I am speaking of democracy as a representative style of govt, not as some benign attitude of share and share alike. We are “exceptional” only in that this is the singular style of govt we have known in the 242 yrs of our nation’s history. That gives me some comfort– at least we have the benefit of inertia on our side when autocrats seek to disrupt it. I don’t agree with your characterization of Americans as tribal types who play citizen the way they play football fan. That’s a human characteristic that tends to come to the fore when a prosperous future looks unlikely– when opportunities are thwarted by an extended period of lackluster economy.
LikeLike
We’ll have to agree to disagree on this. You give more credit and have more faith that I do. I would characterize them as ones who see the mechanisms of a democratic republic as obstacles that have to be overcome, another eerie parallel with history. Their goal is to impose a rigid order that is the opposite of democracy while maintaining its framework as a cynical ruse. The poster child for this way of thinking is Betsy DeVos. By writing “give more credit”, I concede that you may be correct and I may be wrong. I just need a lot more proof to even start to take steps to come over to your side.
And on a completely different note, perhaps the public discussion we should be having is: Should we link or divorce our views on the economy to the (non)exercise of civil liberties as we form our political views? I would argue those who would say yes are more prone to accept a cynical, utilitarian view of democracy and I would argue they do not understand the fundamental concept. That, from my perspective, is dauntingly scary. We see evidence every day of newly naturalized citizens, who came from places with repressive histories who, I would argue, are much more American than those with a DAR pedigree.
LikeLike
Trump, K and Thomas…three sexual predators celebrating. K owes a tremendous amount to Trump who continues to praise K. Now all three branches of government are under this bully’s thumb. Investing in Trump is paying off for the GOP.
…………………….
Trump, K celebrate after brutal confirmation battle
BY JORDAN FABIAN AND BRETT SAMUELS – 10/08/18 07:43 PM ED
President Trump on Monday used the ceremonial swearing-in of Supreme Court Justice Brett Kavanaugh to apologize for his brutal confirmation fight and proclaim him “innocent” of sexual misconduct allegations that nearly derailed his nomination.
In a primetime event from the East Room of the White House, Trump said Kavnaugh and his family deserved the apology “for the terrible pain and suffering you have been forced to endure.”
“You, sir, under historic scrutiny, were proven innocent,” the president told the justice.
Without detailing the allegations, Trump decried the “campaign of personal destruction” he said the Democrats ran against Kavanaugh in order to keep him off the bench.
“Those who step forward to serve our country deserve a fair and dignified evaluation, not a campaign of political and personal destruction based on lies and deception,” he said. “What happened to the Kavanaugh family violates every notion of fairness, decency and due process. In our country, a man or woman must always be presumed innocent unless and until proven guilty.”
Trump’s defense of Kavanaugh prompted applause from those in the room, including Justice Clarence Thomas, who was confirmed the court in 1991 in the face of sexual harassment allegations from Anita Hill, a former subordinate…
https://thehill.com/homenews/administration/410495-trump-kavanaugh-celebrate-confirmation
LikeLike
Aargh, carolmalaysia, I found the speech so aggravating: emphasizing the K-family pain & suffering, a not-so-subtle shot at Blasey Ford; mischaracterizing the hearing as a criminal court instead of the job interview it was. This was Trump poking the coals of anti-Dem resentment, hoping to keep the fire burning 29 more days. This is consistency, Trump-style: turn every public occasion into a partisan rally.
LikeLike
Video: Robert Reich: Are You Suffering from Presidential Dysfunction?
Robert Reich
Published on Oct 8, 2018
Robert Reich offers relief this November for an out-of-control president
LikeLike
Remember, Borowitz is satire. He’s a comedian. I LOVE Borowitz!!
……………………………
Trump: Decision to Consider Women Humans Should Be Left to States
WASHINGTON (The Borowitz Report)—Attempting to repair some of the fallout from his recent remarks about women, Donald Trump said on Sunday that the decision of whether women should be considered humans should be left to the states.
“I wouldn’t want to tell Texas whether women are humans, for example,” he said on CBS’s “Face the Nation.” “They obviously have some very strong opinions about that.”
When asked point-blank whether he considered women humans, the billionaire responded, “It should be a case-by-case thing.”
Trump also blasted the media for applying what he called a “double standard” to his remarks about women. “I can call a woman a pig and it’s totally taken out of context,” he said…
https://www.newyorker.com/humor/borowitz-report/decision-to-consider-women-humans-should-be-left-to-states
LikeLike
If you think Trump/GOP minority rule is bad now, here’s how it could get much worse
Greg Sargent, The Washington Post Published 11:57 am EDT, Tuesday, October 9, 2018
…Trump’s claim of “paid protesters” has been echoed by top Republican senators, and the GOP has adopted a party-wide message of depicting opposition to K as an “angry mob.” Trump has apologized to K for the behavior of those people “on behalf of the nation.”
But when Trump uses the term “nation,” it should be understood in the way that exclusionary populist demagogues (of which Trump is one) generally employ such formulations: Trump is, in effect, defining “the nation” to exclude the Americans who are deeply troubled by K, the charges against him and the larger debate it encompasses. (This is also the subtext of Trump’s blithe dismissal of the charges against K as a “hoax.”) As Will Wilkinson has argued, such populism is fundamentally antidemocratic because it implicitly or explicitly limits who counts as “the people” who are said to possess legitimate political sovereignty.
Trump’s populism is ethnonationalist, but put that aside for now: When Trump derides opposition to K as having been “paid,” he is saying the opposition to him is not politically legitimate, that it sits outside the “nation” in whose name Trump apologized to him. It is no accident that Trump, conservative commentators and other Republicans are claiming that the protesters were paid by the same George Soros who had a starring role in Trump’s 2016 closing ad, which was the perfect expression of this type of exclusionary populist demagoguery.
The ultimate irony to all this is that the public backlash to K is, no doubt, partly rooted in anger over this ongoing display of minority rule – a minority-supported president picks justices confirmed by senators representing a minority of Americans – and in widespread feelings of deep helplessness over it. In choosing to continue feeding this polarization, Trump is rubbing the faces of millions of those angry Americans in that helplessness – he’s rubbing their faces in his and the GOP’s minority-rule triumphs. And he may only be getting started.
https://www.stamfordadvocate.com/news/article/If-you-think-Trump-GOP-minority-rule-is-bad-now-13293003.php?utm_campaign=email-desktop&utm_source=CMS%20Sharing%20Button&utm_medium=social
LikeLike
The GOP has a new coordinated party line: the opposition to their policies comes from a “mob.” Anytime two or more people combine to protest, they are a “mob.”
LikeLike
Diane, GOP protestors are an angry out-of-control mob but neo-Nazi’s are fine people. Trump doesn’t recognize anyone who isn’t loyal to him. That part of the US doesn’t exist in his warped mind.
LikeLike
Not true.
Trump recognizes us as people who should be locked up.
LikeLike
I sometimes tell Republicans I meet while canvassing, “Trump scares me. I think he wants to be a dictator. Don’t you agree?” Few deny this straight away; they usually pause and think. Some don’t care, but I think the idea does worry many. I wonder if Democrats should make this more of an issue.
LikeLike
Trump is projecting again. His rallies are the out-of-control mob, not the Kavanaugh protesters. His false accusations against his opponents are always true when applied to himself, e.g. “Hillary is the most corrupt politician.” My God, this man is so vile.
LikeLike
Trump is the master of projection.
Now his mobs are chanting “Lock her up” about Senator Feinstein. What was her crime? Didn’t Susan Collins say innocent until proven guilty about Kavanaugh? How about commuting a crime before lock up? The mob demands blood.
LikeLike
No wonder Trump liked Saudi Arabia so much. His photo was projected on a five story building and there were no protestors. No protest is allowed in Saudi Arabia.
If you write or talk against the Prime Minister in Malaysia you will be put in jail. The government controls the media in Malaysia.
This apparently is Trump’s idea of how America should operate. In what ‘old days’ were protestors thrown out?
…………………………..
After anti-K demonstrations last month, Trump suggested criminalizing protest altogether.
“I don’t know why they don’t take care of a situation like that… I think it’s embarrassing for the country to allow protesters,” he said of anti-K protesters in September. “You don’t even know what side the protesters are on… In the old days, we used to throw them out. Today, I guess they just keep screaming.”
LikeLike
Trump thinks any protest involving more than one person is a “mob.” Sean Hannity agrees. So does the entire Republican party. They are running against a “mob.”
LikeLike
K and Supreme Court to Planet: Drop Dead
Within a day of a frightening UN warning about global warming, the Court lets stand an anti-EPA written by then-Judge K.
On Monday, the United Nations’ Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change (IPCC) released a special report describing the effects of climate change that are already being felt today, and the disastrous effects that could come as soon as 2040 absent dramatic action. Then on Tuesday, the Supreme Court, at the request of the Trump administration, dismissed an appeal of a D.C. Circuit decision that prevented the EPA from regulating a powerful greenhouse gas.
The author of that decision: Judge K.
For anyone waiting for the impact now-Justice K will have on the Supreme Court, you need wait no longer. While K was not involved in the decision to dismiss this case, it is his opinion is now the law of the land — and is it a disaster for the environment.
David Doniger, who had argued the case for the Natural Resources Defense Council, said in a statement that “Coming only a day after the world’s leading climate scientists called for urgent action to curb dangerous carbon pollution, the court’s decision lets irresponsible companies continue harming our planet.”…
https://thebea.st/2IJKt3g?source=email&via=desktop
LikeLike
Yesterday, Trump was asked if he had read or heard about the UN statement on climate change. He said, not yet, but I will. Depends on who wrote it.
You can be assured he will not read it, he believes climate change is a hoax.
LikeLike
Trump’s marvelous ethanol plan would pollute the air, destroy the environment and wreck cars. [Cars aren’t made to run on ethanol.] He is a failed ignorant businessman and proves it daily.
………………………………
Oil industry, green groups join to oppose Trump’s ethanol plan
President Trump is creating strange bedfellows with his proposal to expand ethanol sales, with some environmental groups and the oil industry opposing the new rule….
Trump on Tuesday directed the EPA to craft a regulation that would allow for sales of E15 year-round. It’s currently prohibited during the summer months due to air pollution concerns…
Oil companies also stand to sell less traditional gasoline, while their costs could go up, if Trump’s plan is implemented.
https://thehill.com/policy/energy-environment/410675-oil-industry-green-groups-join-to-oppose-trumps-ethanol-plan
LikeLike
Senator Todd Young [R-IN]:
I proudly cast my vote to confirm Brett K to the U.S. Supreme Court on Saturday. Hoosiers care deeply about the Constitution and want justices who apply the law as written, not impose their own policy preferences. Judge K clerked for Justice Kennedy and was hired to teach at Harvard by Justice Kagan. As a D.C. Circuit Judge for the last 12 years, he has carried out his duties faithfully and consistently. Through his more than 300 opinions, 36 hours of testimony, and thousands of pages of documents, he has shown he is committed to preserving liberty.
The accusations leveled against Judge K were serious and needed to be investigated. Judge K and his accuser were each afforded the opportunity to tell their stories to the American people. Following that, the FBI investigated the claims as requested. During this scrutiny, and six previous background investigations, none of the accusations were corroborated in any way.
Hoosiers expect results, and we have more work to do to ensure all Hoosiers can meaningfully participate in this growing economy. I’m hopeful we can now move beyond the heightened rhetoric and political gamesmanship we have seen over the last several weeks and resume working together in a bipartisan way to deliver results for the American people.
…………………………………………..
Senator Todd Young
Verified account
@SenToddYoung
Follow Follow @SenToddYoung
More
I spoke with @TeamCavuto on @FoxNews about my support for Judge K and how we can come together for the good of the American people.
LikeLike
Scisne is right (I mean that in the good sense of the word) —
RWR sowed the seeds of democracy’s destruction,
XLV is merely reaping the harvest.
LikeLike
I think we all need some inspiration. This fellow is unbelievable!! Wow. Imagine growing up with him as your father!! Imagine knowing him as a friend!!
…….
The Wisest Man I Ever Met
Dr. Rick Rigsby shares an inspirational message about a third-grade dropout who was the wisest man he ever met. This wise man left school to help out on the family farm but he didn’t let that stand in the way of his education. Dr. Rigsby’s commencement address at Cal Maritime Commencement Ceremony is filled with powerful messages and life lessons and delivered with enough humor to make it enjoyable to watch. I hope you find something in this video to help you live a better life and that you share this message with others.
LikeLike
This is absolutely incredible!! What kind of president openly mocks a Senator? Trump is a loose lunatic. [I’d love to see, “Lock HIM up!”] This goon is going way too far.
……….
Trump Supporters Chant ‘Lock Her Up’ As President Mocks Dianne Feinstein At Iowa Rally
The audience at President Donald Trump’s rally in Iowa on Tuesday night erupted with a lively “Lock her up” chant, but this time it wasn’t aimed at Hillary Clinton.
The crowd jeered after Trump claimed, without evidence, that Sen. Dianne Feinstein (D-Calif.) leaked the letter that was sent to her by Christine Blasey Ford, the California research psychologist who accused Brett K, then a nominee for the Supreme Court, of sexually assaulting her in 1982.
“How about Sen. Feinstein? That’s a beauty,” Trump said. “Did you leak the documents?”
Interrupting Trump, the crowd repeatedly chanted, “Lock her up!”…
Article: https://www.huffingtonpost.com/entry/trump-iowa-rally-dianne-feinstein_us_5bbd41e8e4b01470d05690e9
LikeLike
Trump and his mob believe in imprisonment without a crime or a trial.
Where is Susan Collins?
The CrowdsourcePAC has raised $4 million for the Democrat who runs against her in 2020
LikeLike
Bernie Sanders: ‘Authoritarian leaders’ inspired by Trump
By Elizabeth Landers, CNN
10 October 18
Vermont independent Sen. Bernie Sanders — one of multiple lawmakers discussed as possible presidential candidates in 2020 — offered a line-by-line rebuke Tuesday of the current foreign policy stances that President Donald Trump has taken, saying Trump is inspiring “authoritarian leaders around the world.”
“While this authoritarian trend certainly did not begin with Donald Trump, there’s no question that other authoritarian leaders around the world have drawn inspiration from the fact that the President of the world’s oldest and most powerful democracy is shattering democratic norms, is viciously attacking an independent media and an independent judiciary, and is scapegoating the weakest and most vulnerable members of our society,” Sanders said in a speech focusing on countering authoritarianism…
Sanders warned that Trump’s affinity for leaders like Vladimir Putin of Russia and Rodrigo Duterte in the Philippines should raise red flags and these relationships are “needlessly increasing tensions with our democratic European allies.”…
He also took a swipe at Trump’s personal wealth and finances, citing a recent report from The New York Times that claims that Trump and his family committed widespread tax fraud over the last few decades of running their real estate empire. …
Check out this story on CNN: https://www.cnn.com/2018/10/09/politics/bernie-sanders-foreign-policy-speech/index.html
LikeLike
This comes as ‘True’ from Snopes. How can someone change their mind like this and live with themselves?
………………
Senator Lindsey Graham may have been one of President Trump’s biggest supporters in 2018, but that wasn’t the case during the 2016 presidential election.
“If we nominate Trump, we will get destroyed … and we will deserve it” is a genuine quote from Senator Graham that was originally posted to his official Twitter account on 3 May 2016.
This tweet was posted the day before Donald Trump became the Republican party’s presumptive nominee for President of the United States on 4 May 2016. Prior to this date, Graham, who also ran for president but ended his campaign in December 2015 before the primaries, frequently voiced opinions critical of Donald Trump.
For example, Graham repeatedly said that Trump was not qualified to be president and that his involvement in the election process was damaging to the Republican party:
LikeLike
Graham is now Trunp’s Biggest ally in the Senate. Sycophant.
LikeLike
AHHH. Poor Trump. People are no longer thrilled to hear him over and over again meander and slander and speak nonsense. Hoorah for his campaign rallies not making high ratings. I LOVE good news!! This is a step in the right direction for Faux. Personally, I can’t stand to look at or hear the creep.
…………………………….
White House Will ‘Look Into’ Fox Not Showing Trump Rallies
The White House has vowed to “look into” a decision taken by Fox News to stop broadcasting Donald Trump’s rallies live and in full because they’re no longer bringing in high ratings. Politico reports viewing figures for Trump rallies have dropped and tend to be similar to, or even below, those for regular programming. The network only showed clips of his three rallies over the last week, rather than broadcasting the whole events uninterrupted. The report states White House figures are concerned Trump is losing control of a key platform ahead of the midterms. One senior White House official told Politico they were unsure why the network is cutting away from the rallies, saying officials planned “to look into that” and that they expect White House Communications Director Bill Shine, a former Fox News executive, to be in touch with his former colleagues about the move.
LikeLike
It isn’t the thousands who will be disappointed. It is the need for Trump to hear the clapping and worshiping of HIM. Sick narcissist. Bet he’s mad at having to share the media with Michael.
………………..
Donald J. Trump
✔
@realDonaldTrump
Departing the @WhiteHouse for Erie, Pennsylvania. I cannot disappoint the thousands of people that are there – and the thousands that are going. I look forward to seeing everyone this evening.
2:52 PM – Oct 10, 2018
65.9K
26.7K people are talking about this
LikeLike