The United Teachers of Los Angeles has already authorized a strik if necessary.
The proposal by Superintendent Austin Beutner brings a strike closer. He is a former equity investor, briefly publisher of the LA Times, and board member of the company that owns the National Enquirer. He grew up in Holland, Michigan, where his father was a top executive in the DeVos empire. He has no experience in dictation.
The UTLA reacted to his propsal.
Attached is UTLA’s response to Beutner’s latest (proposed two days prior to the first meeting of UTLA with a govt-appointed mediator.)
Breaking: Beutner Offers Insulting Bargaining Proposal
After refusing to negotiate for 56 days and two days before mediation, Supt. Austin Beutner today announced a bargaining proposal through the LA Times before giving it to UTLA and the 33,000 educators we represent.
In a stunning example of disrespect to LAUSD educators and students, his so-called proposal offers a 3 percent salary increase with another 3 percent contingent on district finances, increased workload and cuts to salary point opportunities, while also making it more difficult to qualify for secure healthcare in retirement. The proposal on class size is unacceptable, and makes no improvements for 90% of our schools. He made no movement on Section 1.5, which allows the district to increase class size at anytime, rendering his proposal useless.
“Beutner’s proposal does nothing to make our schools better. This is an insult to our members, to our students and to our parents,” said Arlene Inouye, Chair of the Bargaining Team. “This stunt reveals he is more interested in fighting against educators at any cost than saving our school district.”
This proposal was sent to the LA Times and various special interest blogs like Speak Up before it was sent to the UTLA bargaining team.
Beutner continues to refuse to use the $1.86 billion in reserves. His proposal does not provide relief from toxic over-testing, does nothing to address the undermining of our schools by privatization and makes no investment in community schools, counselors, nurses, or other critical staff. It does nothing to reinvest in special education, early education, adult and bilingual education.
“Our 98% strike vote and our growing parent and community support are a powerful affirmation of our bargaining proposals, which call for a better future in LAUSD. Our vote is also an indictment of Beutner, an out-of-touch millionaire whose grand plan is to starve our schools of resources rather than reinvest in them,” said UTLA President Alex Caputo-Pearl. “Beutner’s proposal attempts to buy us off with a modest salary increase. But we can see through it. This is the beginning of the war on healthcare and an acceleration of a downsizing that will drive students and families away rather than attract them to the district.”
Read Beutner’s full proposal here, which appeared in the Los Angeles Times.
Since I began work as superintendent of the Los Angeles Unified School District, I’ve visited about 50 schools and listened to the stories of many students. One young man — I’ll call him Sam — has faced a lot of adversity: an abusive and incarcerated father, learning challenges, placement in foster care and taking responsibility for his younger siblings. Yet he is still at school every day, aiming for a career as an aeronautical engineer.
Sam’s courage and resilience are inspiring. We need to demonstrate that same kind of courage and resilience to improve Los Angeles schools. District data show that out of 100 students entering high school, 12 will drop out, 79 will graduate and only 12 will earn a college degree. The status quo is not good enough. We have work to do and the kids are counting on us.
At every school I’ve visited, I have also met caring, dedicated, hardworking teachers who are doing everything they can to help students like Sam — engaging them in the classroom, overseeing after-school clubs, working evenings and weekends to develop lesson plans, and finding time to work one-on-one with youngsters who need specific help. There are great teachers in all of our schools. Los Angeles Unified needs to pay them better, and provide them with more support and more professional development.
There are great teachers in all of our schools. Los Angeles Unified needs to pay them better.
That is why Los Angeles Unified made a contract offer today to United Teachers of Los Angeles that provides for a fair pay raise for teachers, additional teachers in high-needs schools, teacher pay aligned with student needs, and increased transparency in our labor contracts.
Los Angeles Unified proposes to add teachers and reduce class size at 15 middle schools and 75 elementary schools in communities that have the highest needs. The offer includes additional pay for teachers who take courses in STEAM curriculum (science, technology, engineering, arts and math), in dual language instruction, in early literacy intervention and other areas that help teachers better support their students. It provides for a 6% pay raise for all teachers, which would match agreements we’ve already reached with our administrators, cafeteria workers, bus drivers and office workers, who represent more than 60% of the district’s workforce. And we’ll create a “plain language” version of the UTLA contract to help students, families and communities to have a voice in all of the issues the contract covers.
We are eager to discuss these proposals with UTLA when we begin mediation on Sept. 27, as part of the state-mandated negotiation process. Our offer creates a pathway for the district and the union to avoid a strike that would hurt L.A.’s most vulnerable students and families. Los Angeles Unified is committed to the lawful bargaining process, but we also remain open to any other way to resolve the issues fairly and transparently.
Los Angeles Unified and UTLA want many of the same things — smaller class sizes, better pay for teachers, and additional teachers, counselors, librarians and support staff in every school. But we need more money to pay for those things; we can only spend what we have. UTLA’s “last, best and final” offer would bankrupt L.A. Unified and lead to the unprecedented layoffs of about 12,000 employees, including teachers. Los Angeles Unified simply cannot agree to do that.
I share the teachers’ frustration that in just a generation, California has gone from top of the charts in education funding and student achievement to near the bottom. That is not acceptable; something must be done. The question is what?
Teacher strikes across the country in the last year have been statewide, not local actions. That’s because state legislatures control education funding. Los Angeles Unified gets about 90% of its funding from Sacramento. Instead of L.A. Unified and UTLA fighting each other, we should, together with our other labor partners, students, families and communities, jump on our yellow school buses and head to the Capitol to start working to increase funding for public education. The current per student amount of $16,000 is simply not enough.
I’m the son of an immigrant and a schoolteacher and the proud product of public education. I would not have the privilege of leading Los Angeles Unified without the strong foundation my public education provided. It is my singular goal to help rebuild public education and make sure all Los Angeles Unified students get the great education they deserve.
Austin Beutner is superintendent of the Los Angeles Unified School District.
How much money is being spent on testing? Just curious.
a question seldom ANSWERED: how much does each state spend on testing, how much does each district spend on testing. It has been interesting over the years to find that this statistic is somehow considered both “unfindable” and “unpublishable.”
I believe that UTLA is asking for a reduction in testing, claiming that the district demands extra tests throughout the year on top of the spring state testing.
Great question.
Here are a few more:
How much does a district spend on Chromebooks/IPads?
How much does a district spend on unproven software that promises scripted lessons and little else?
How much does a district spend on increasing admin salaries while simultaneously keeping teacher pay so low?
“He is a former equity investor, briefly publisher of the LA Times, and board member of the company that owns the National Enquirer. He grew up in Holland, Michigan, where his father was a top executive in the DeVos empire.”
tt’s long past time to stop thinking of wealthy businessmen as moral giants. They’re wealthy not because they are kinder than everyone else, but because they are more ruthless.
The superintendent was chosen by a charter criminal on the school board who refused to resign until his court date. Charter advocates in L.A. are a bunch of thugs.
This action is a crucial test for utla. In past efforts and fights they have come out ahead only to give benefits obtained back during later fights. Teachers must have a decent wage comprobale to administrators with training and experience. I do want teachers to get their due but they will have to put it all on the line. As we all know a strong strike vote doesn’t always translate into strong strike support. Will charter teachers in the union participate? It’s telling that other lausd unions have settled when past times they did nothing until after the teachers union did. I always felt their compensation should not be tied or comparable to that of teachers. We’kk See utla if you can deliver or just talk a good game. For teachers, this fight couldn’t be more critical, own it
As with her fellow 34,000 LAUSD teachers, Amy K. Owen, a veteran 3rd Grade teacher, received an email (with accompanying video) from Beutner.
She didn’t take it well.
Having been on the receiving end of constant condescending scolding for even thinking of striking, and accusations of greed, and claims that she was already overpaid, Owen then replied with a (now) Open Letter to Beutner:
x x x x x x x x x x x x x x x x x x
From Amy K. Owen’s Social Media post:
Late Friday afternoon, I rec’d an email video from my Superintendent that was titled, “A Reminder of Why We Do the Work.” This made me profoundly ragey, and so I emailed him back.
On a whim, I thought I’d also send it to the UTLA (Teacher’s Union) newspaper as an op-ed. Today the Director of Communications for UTLA called left me a voicemail saying she had received my “very amazing” op-ed and thought it was “pitch perfect in many ways.” She wants to “pitch” it to the LA Times. I called her back and said,* ‘have at it.’*
So, I may be famous or fired soon!
Or, third and most likely option: nothing will happen except a slight boost in my ego.
x x x x x x x x x x x x x x x x x x x x
Dear Mr. Beutner,
I am a teacher in LAUSD. I just saw your video, and I think you should know that I do not need a reminder of why I do the work of being a teacher. I do the work for my beloved ducklings, my wee pumpkins, my champions, my agents of change. I want them to have the best education possible. I do not believe you feel the same way. I do not ever need to be reminded of why I’m a teacher.
I do need a superintendent who supports students by supporting teachers. I live in a studio apartment 3 miles from my school, because I cannot afford to buy any real estate within a reasonable commuting distance of my job. I drive a 15 year-old Kia Rio, in which only 2 of the 4 windows work, because I cannot afford an expensive car payment and increase in insurance and registration. In addition to working extra hours on DonorsChoose projects to provide my students with what they need, I also spend copious amounts of my own money on my kids.
Last night, for example, I spent more than $60 on basic PE equipment like jump ropes. I buy my students books as gifts at least monthly, snacks for when they’re hungry, paper crowns and bracelets and giant cards and stickers for their birthdays, uniforms for those who cannot afford them, flashcards to practice their multiplication facts at home, not to mention unlimited printer ink and paper and labels and folders and Post-its… I could go on, but you get the point.
You have said that I am overpaid, that the average teacher salary in LAUSD is $75,000. I don’t know where this information comes from, as I have been teaching in LAUSD since 2002 and do not earn that amount.
If I am overpaid, why can I not afford to buy a house, or even a condo, or even RENT a one bedroom apartment within a reasonable distance of my school? I am embarrassed that I cannot host guests, like my friends from college who now earn six figures at the same point in their careers.
If I am overpaid, why do I drive an old, beaten up car that I am also embarrassed by? I swallow my pride because I love my job, but it is unbelievably insulting to say that LAUSD teachers are overpaid.
I work incredibly hard, every day of the week. I come in early and leave late and work nights and weekends and vacations. Last summer I spent my own money to go to Teachers College at Columbia University for two weeks. I am always trying to be a better teacher, at any cost. I am not the exception to the rule. I am the norm.
You’ve probably heard all of this before.
I am highly educated, deeply dedicated, and incredibly, profoundly angry. I have read the “Labor Updates” and “Just the Facts” on the LAUSD website. How can you live with yourself, misrepresenting information this way, and even outright lying? I am ashamed that you are our superintendent, Mr Beutner. My kids deserve so much better, and so do I.
I am angry that you are so inflexible in negotiations and seem determined to drive us out on strike. I am angry that, in a city as expensive as Los Angeles, we don’t receive Cost of Living Allowances annually, although the state gives the district that money. I am angry that we have to fight THIS HARD over a pathetic 6% raise.
I am angry that we teachers have to battle for services our students should have the right to receive.
*I am angry that you are using the LAUSD communications systems to broadcast misleading and anti-teacher information to parents and family members. *
I am FURIOUS to read, in “Just The Facts” a statement that begins, “Assuming a teachers’ strike is ever legal…” which is a spurious preface that flies in the face of our fundamental values as a society.
*I am angry that the district does not fight for higher per-pupil funding in Sacramento and DC. *
I am enraged that my integrity has been impugned. I am gobsmacked that anyone could have the unmitigated gall to tell me I am overpaid.
So, please, do not think I ever need to be reminded of why I’m a teacher. I am here because I love my students. I am here because I believe in social justice. Despite all the slings and arrows, the insults and attacks, the overwhelming challenges and obstacles, I am still here.
And I am not going ANYWHERE, except on strike to fight for my kids and myself.
Sincerely,
Amy K. Owen
Teacher, 3rd grade
Los Angeles Unified School District
Dang, I wish everyone knew how fierce la teachers are and heck no, you are not overpaid. I really hope things work out for you and your colleagues.
A message that needed to be said…and needs to be broadcasted.
Claims are being made that Beutner’s release of the offer to the press instead of to the union is illegal. Apparently, it’s a way to “negotiate” with the public instead of with the teachers. Beutner has hired a public relations firm and it’s clear that he is getting desperate as his message of teacher bashing and ignoring conditions like huge class size is not a winning strategy after all. He forgets that his selection received very negative reactions from every part of the LAUSD community and that disgraced Ref Rodriguez was part of the charter block that went against the wishes of the community.
“Teacher strikes across the country in the last year have been statewide, not local actions.”
No shit Sherlock. Really? I guess little Austin needs to prepare himself for that local strike that is about to eventually cost him his job. His type don’t have the cojones to stick it out, unless they were to be properly bought off of course. But he doesn’t need to be bought off being an avaricious SOB so he’ll be gone sooner rather than later.
Stick with this UTLA you can force his hand and force him out.
Well stated! In times of strife and even in times of peace, stick with the UTLA.
I like the way you think, Duane.
Another aspect of this was Beutner’s unprecedented “Gag Order” issued to teachers, and to be carried out by principals, threatening teachers with discipline — up to and including termination — if any teachers spoke to parents about the strike, or enlisted parental support in any way for the strike: a total violation of teachers’ First Amendment rights, as these specific teacher rights have been upheld by the courts, and in judges’ rulings multiple times.
This is settled law, Austin. You can’t do this, Dude.
In response, UTLA filed an Unfair Labor Practice against Beutner’s fascist power play.
UTLA Press Release:
https://www.utla.net/news/utla-files-unfair-practice-charge-against-lausd
x x x x x x x x x x x x x x x x x x x x x x x x x x x x
UTLA filed an Unfair Practice Charge today with the Public Employment Relations Board√ (PERB) against LAUSD for trying to silence educators and for interfering with our members’ rights.
The charge involves the district’s clear violation of established law that protects teachers’ rights to talk to parents on or off campus during non-instructional time about issues that impact their children, including contract negotiations.
In August, the district sent a directive to principals asserting that educators cannot discuss negotiations-related topics on school grounds with parents, with special emphasis on Back to School Night.
Simultaneously as the district was trying to silence teachers, Beutner appeared at a meeting of Student Body Presidents at the Diego Rivera Learning Complex, where he openly criticized UTLA and our bargaining proposals to a captive audience of teachers and students—in other words, they couldn’t leave and had to listen to him—and he passed out the dishonest LAUSD “Just the Facts” flyer to students.
UTLA is calling on PERB to require LAUSD to immediately cease and desist from interfering with the rights of our members and that LAUSD acknowledge its responsibility to maintain an environment free of interference.
Also this week, on our previously filed UPC charge for LAUSD’s refusal to provide important documents, PERB issued an initial complaint, which is an indication of the merit of our charge.
Beutner’s attempt to intimidate educators and his holding of captive audience meetings are illegal and reflect an anti-union animus. We can and we will talk to parents—our partners in their children’s education—about our contract fight for better learning and working conditions.
x x x x x x x x x x x x x x x x x x x x x x x x x x x x
Here’s the total 19 pages of the Unfair Labor Practice filing just submitted to the State of California’s quasi-judicial PERB Board (Public Employee Relations Board):
(lots of juicy details contained within, including quotes from past legal precedents where judges upheld teachers’ rights to engage in outreach to parents.)
Click to access 2018.09.21.filed_.upc_utla_v_lausd_bts.pdf
I would accept a raise of zero percent and no decreases of class size in exchange for the immediate resignations of Beutner, Melvoin, and Garcia.