In a huge victory for the Florida League of Women Voters and the public, a Florida Judge struck down a proposed amendment to the state constitution that was written by privatizers and intended to confuse and deceive voters.
“A judge in Tallahassee this morning struck Amendment 8 from Florida’s November ballot, saying the three-pronged measure about schools was “misleading” and failed to inform voters about its purpose.
“The ruling was a victory for the League of Women Voters of Florida, which last month filed a lawsuit seeking to block it from the ballot, saying voters should not be asked to change Florida’s Constitution based on unclear and deceptive language.
“Amendment 8 includes three proposed changes to the state constitution, unrelated except that they all deal with public schools. The most controversial deals with charter schools and the other two with term limits for school board members and the teaching of civic literacy.
“The lawsuit focused on the section of Amendment 8 that would add a phrase that says local school boards could control only the public schools they established. It was proposed as a way to make it easier for charter schools — publicly funded privately run schools — or other new educational options to flourish. Now, charter schools need local school board approval to open, but that requirement would vanish if the proposal passed.”
In another report from Florida:
A circuit judge threw out a proposed constitutional amendment intended to advance the privatization of public schools. The amendment contained several topics including one to eliminate the state’s responsibility to provide a uniform system of public schools. Patricia Levesque, leader of Jeb Bush’s Foundation for Excellence in Education, was a member of the Constitutional Revision Commission. It is telling that the commission dared not put the question honestly to the public but concealed it.
“A Florida judge is throwing a proposed amendment dealing with charter schools off the November ballot.
“Circuit Judge John Cooper ruled Monday that the amendment proposed by the Constitution Revision Commission is misleading and does not tell voters what it really does.
“Amendment 8 combines several ideas into one amendment including term limits for school board members. But the amendment also makes it easier for charter schools to get set up around the state. Charter schools receive public money, but are run privately.”
“Cooper pointed out that the amendment does not even use the words charter schools but would affect their creation.”

Yay!
LikeLike
THE INCREDIBLE MENDACITY. Of course, a change to THE Constitution of the US, is inthe works and if Kavanaugh gets in it will happen. Our corrupt Congress is at work right now making it impossible to get all the documents from Kavanugh’s past judicial work, so that they can bring up his confirmation before the mid-term elections –where democrats — if many win–may make such a confirmation impossible.
LikeLiked by 1 person
I wonder if the accusation that he lied to Congress during his last confirmation hearing, even if swept under the rug by the Republicans (if true), that he would then be vulnerable to impeachment when the Democrats regain control of at least one house. Any lawyers around?
LikeLike
His Lawyer has his own vision of ‘truth!” Pure Orwell.
LikeLike
Thank you, for this, Diane. Amendment 8 is a stick of dynamite in the mouth of public education. Thanks also, to the Florida League of Women Voters for filing the lawsuit against the deliberate attempt by the state to confuse voters and hijack public dollars. I am sure Jeb and his lawyers will dream up another version of these bad ideas. Yesterday, Peter Greene posted one of the clearest explanations of the intent of the devious Amendment 8 http://curmudgucation.blogspot.com/2018/08/fl-taking-next-step-to-end-public-ed.html
LikeLike
This is good news!
LikeLike
As a retired teacher (in NYC) I have found much to admire in Diane’s work over the years. In recent times her politics has departed much from my own but that should not be a major concern. I would like to know what Diane thinks about recent efforts (many successful I believe) to push into sex education curricula radical ideologies – and this from preK through high school. Certainly this politicization and sexualization of very young children is something that concerns her. I fully understand that some of her political views seem to indicate that she might be sympathetic to some of this but I am genuinely interested in her ideas on this.
LikeLike
John,
I am not aware of efforts to sexualize very young children. Whatever you mean by that sounds unsavory.
LikeLike