If you like high-stakes testing and charter schools, you will love “Democrats for Education Reform.”
DFER, as it is known, was condemned by resolution by the Democratic party conferences in Colorado and California for using the word “Democrat” to promote a corporate agenda that is hostile to public schools. DFER is also hostile to public school teachers and unions, but loves TFA and merit pay. All the usual Corporate Reform failures. Real Democrats, like the parties in Colorado and California think that DFERs are Republicans pretending to be Democrats.
Democrats for Education Reform is a group funded by Wall Street hedge fund managers who despise public schools. They never support candidates who are opposed to privatization or those who are fully committed to public schools. They only support candidates who want to siphon money away from public schools to support charter schools. They support candidates who love high-stakes testing. They never look at evidence that shows the damage that charters do to public schools or the evidence that shows the total failure of high-stakes testing to make any difference other than demoralizing students and teachers. They don’t care that a decade of their policies driven by the U.S. Department of Education has led to stagnation of NAEP scores.
In New York State, hedge funders supporting charter schools are pouring millions of dollars into races for the State Senate, both to support the charter school industry and to make sure that Republicans retain control of the State Senate, thus fending off higher taxes and protecting charter schools. Another DFERite dumping big money into New York State campaigns is Paul Tudor Jones, who gave $150,000 to something called “Parents Vote,” which seems to be controlled by StudentsFirst (hard to tell the Astroturf organizations apart). The treasurer of “Parents Vote” is the attorney for StudentsFirst. Jones may be a parent, but he lives in Connecticut, not New York, and you can bet your bottom dollar that he does not send his own children to public schools or charter schools. This outpouring of money is meant to keep the State Senate firmly under GOP management, to make sure that charters continue to operate without oversight and do their own thing.
You may or may not remember that Paul Tudor Jones is one of the nine billionaires who determined that it was up to them to remake the public schools of New York, although no one elected them to do so.
Just five years ago, Forbes ran a big article about Paul Tudor Jones and his plan to “save American education.” While busy saving American education, Jones also served on the board of Harvey Weinstein’s company and fought to save Harvey’s battered reputation.
Please note that the following story misidentifies DFER and treats them as a legitimate “reform” group when DFER acts only in the interest of Corporate Reform, high-stakes testing and privatization. The story also errs in not acknowledging that many DFER members are not Democrats.
FIRST LOOK: EDUCATION REFORM GROUP BETS BIG ON GOVERNOR’S RACES: Democrats for Education Reform plans to spend $4 million on campaign contributions and advertising this election cycle, boosting Democratic candidates who want to support public schools but are open to reform-minded ways of improving them.
— The organization — which advocates for a host of school reform policies nationwide like strong test-based accountability and high-quality public charter schools — through its political action committee is prioritizing gubernatorial races in Colorado, Connecticut and New York, in addition to the California state superintendent’s race and some state legislative races. DFER exclusively detailed its spending and campaign plans with Morning Education in an interview late last month. Asked the source of the $4 million, a spokeswoman the figure comes from their “supporters” and “contributors.”
— In Colorado’s battle for governor, DFER is backing Rep. Jared Polis, a House education committee Democrat who’s running against state Treasurer Walker Stapleton, a Republican.
— The race to replace term-limited Gov. John Hickenlooper has proven divisive for Colorado Democrats — the state teachers union backed another Democrat, Cary Kennedy, during the primary. Allies of Kennedy sought to tie Polis to Education Secretary Betsy DeVos and her support for private school vouchers. Polis founded two charter schools, but hasn’t shown support for vouchers or federally funded private schools in Congress. When Kennedy lost to Polis, the state teachers union released a statement that didn’t even mention Polis’ name.
— In Connecticut, DFER is supporting Ned Lamont, the Democratic hopeful looking to replace Gov. Dannel Malloy, who’s not seeking reelection. And the organization is pushing for Gov. Andrew Cuomo’s reelection in New York.
— In California, DFER wants to lift Marshall Tuck to victory as state schools superintendent. Tuck is an education reform advocate who has run both charter schools and district schools in Los Angeles. In 2014, he narrowly lost a bid for state schools chief to Tom Torlakson, the current superintendent, who had the support of teachers unions. Tuck will face another Democrat, state Assemblyman Tony Thurmond, in the general election this fall.
— DFER in addition is launching a social media campaignon what it means to be an “education progressive.” The group defines that term as fighting to spend more money on public education while embracing “new ideas” to bring about faster improvement. Some of those ideas, like stronger test-based accountability measures, have faced staunch opposition from progressive groups like teachers unions. But DFER is pushing new polling results that President Shavar Jeffries says illustrate strong support. More on that polling here.
— Jeffries, who recently sat down with Morning Education, stressed that more than half of Democratic primary voters, African American voters and Hispanic voters don’t think public schools are changing or improving fast enough. The poll also found broad support for public school choice — a divisive issue for the Democratic Party — and more equitable funding for public schools, particularly disadvantaged ones. The results stem from two nationwide phone polls of more than 1,000 voters each between May and July of this year. The poll was conducted by consulting firms Benenson Strategy Group and 270 Strategies.
Would it be asking too much to hope that Caitlin Emma and the crack reporters on the Politico team might consider interviewing a critic of billionaire “Reformers.” Maybe a teacher? Say, someone like Steven Singer or Peter Greene or Mark Weber, or other well-informed critics of the intrusion of billionaire know-nothings into education policymaking? Maybe Carol Burris of the Network for Public Education?
Caitlin Emma is not able to call out a push poll when it is perfectly obvious that the questions are framed to tweak a predetermined message. Look at the two page report of take away points. The poll is PR. So is the use of Democrats for Education Reform as a branding scheme to push an agenda unfriendly to public schools.
Good call. That was definitely a push poll. Asking if people support “choice” is like asking if America should be “great”. But, as long as people are informed that candidates are receiving money from billionaires, the candidates will lose. It doesn’t matter how the campaign contributions are framed, and it doesn’t matter what the billionaires call themselves, Democrat, progressive, messiah, or otherwise. The only money we have to fear is dark money.
Laura, thanks for reading that push poll so I didn’t have to read the garbage while I was eating.
The DFERS thought if they dissed public schools and public school teachers they would get votes and at the same time make $$$$$ from the corporations and the oligarchy who push this online everything, the Common Gore, and high stakes testing. And, of course, the GOP liked this, too.
We have become a country of “Separate and Unequal” almost everything.
Never forget that it was DFER who lobbied Obama to choose anyone but Linda Darling-Hammond for Sec. of Ed. and THAT is how we ended up with the appalling loser Arne Duncan getting a job he was totally unqualified for.
Jon,
Exactly right. Immediately after the 2008 election, DFER sent Obama a list of their choices for jobs. They chose Duncan for Secretary of Education. Simultaneously, editorials appeared in major newspapers across the nation attacking Linda and saying she was a tool of the teachers’ unions. Linda had been Obama’s education spokesperson throughout the campaign, and DFER killed her chance to be Secretary of Ecucation. I wonder who wrote Duncan’s book?
Democrats for Education Reform could disprove that they’re exclusively devoted to privatizing public schools really easily- they could do something positive for kids who attend existing public schools.
Ed reformers act like it’s this huge mystery why people believe they are all about charters and vouchers- it’s very simple- we believe that because that’s the track record.
Ed reform adds no value, no benefit, to children who attend public schools. Eventually this was going to become clear and it has, in many places. It was inevitable.
If you don’t do anything for existing public schools and instead devote all your time, energy and money to charters/vouchers – guess what? You’re a charter/voucher advocate, not a “public education advocate”.
Duncan couldn’t point to any benefit/upside ed reform offered to kids in existing public schools and DeVos can’t either. None of them can. That’s because they haven’t contributed anything to our schools.
This is a problem in a country where 85% of kids attend the schools ed reformers either ignore or attack! When they’re in the public sector it means they aren’t serving 85% of their public school constituents. That’s bad! They need to fix that!
That this occurs to NONE of them is an indication of what an echo chamber it is.
Oh, it occurs to them alright, and they reject it. DFERs are not playing games with their name, they are upfront, in-your-face neoliberal Democrats, just like every candidate they support. Their stand on education reflects a tenet of neoliberalism, that the private sector can deliver public services more efficiently than the government.
I’m guessing quite a few DFERs are registered Republicans.
Politico treats them as real Democrats who really care about public schools.
DFER candidates/leaders also reflect another tenet of neoliberal membership: disconnected hands-off wealth.
Peter Greene’s latest post discusses how the Democrats in Pennsylvania are still trying to have it both ways. They want to act like they are the party of the people, but they are taking money from DFER. Their sole strategy is to try to avoid the topic of education completely so they can once again try to pull a bait and switch on people. This type of duplicity is costing them votes as supporters of public education cannot get interested in candidates that refuse to discuss the topic, but take hedge fund money anyway. http://curmudgucation.blogspot.com/2018/08/pa-democrats-mia-on-education.html
I always feel sorry for public school families in these states ed reform captures, because I lived thru it in Ohio.
It takes a long time for them to weaken and deinvest in existing public schools. Ten years out you notice your local public school has lost 25% of its funding and half its programming, and all anyone ever talks about is testing schemes or how they have to bust every labor union in sight.
It sneaks up on you. 2010 was really the watershed year here. I feel like ed reform got so extreme that year people woke up and realized “they REALLY ARE coming for our schools”. That’s the year ed reform lost it’s glossy finish in Ohio and the cracks started to show.
Thanks for posting this about DFER, the hedge fund group.
However, as you might come to expect by now, eh Diane, I have a quibble with this statement on a number of levels:
“They don’t care that a decade of their policies driven by the U.S. Department of Education has led to stagnation of NAEP scores.”
To take the logical leap that NAEP scores were stagnant because of the USDoEd policies endorsed by DFER cannot be proven in any fashion. If you believe that there is a direct causal effect please spell it out for us, otherwise, logically speaking your statement lacks the force of truth.
At a different level, raising NAEP scores are not and never have been a part of any school’s mission and/or practices. Why the need to worry about the “stagnation of NAEP scores” as to do so just further embeds the false and completely invalid discourse of the supposed value of standardized testing. Diane, you rightly condemn the use of “high stakes” standardized testing. But by focusing on the NAEP scores you are elevating those tests to the status of high stakes as means of judging policy and practices (actually many are malpractices) of not only DFER and the USDoEd but state and local level. I find this focus on NAEP invalid scores to be an egregious mistake.
On another level, NAEP suffers all the onto-epistemological errors and falsehoods identified by Noel Wilson in his 1997 treatise “Educational Standards and the Problem of Error”* that render the usage of any of the results for anything whatsoever invalid, unethical, and since these testing practices harm so many students, immoral. To support any of these abominations of educational malpractice serves to legitimate illegitimate means and ends.
*See: http://epaa.asu.edu/ojs/article/view/577/700
I stopped reading info. at Politico a few months ago. The bias in favor of the donor class was too great to stomach.
“The group defines that term as fighting to spend more money on public education”
If this was the goal they’re lousy advocates. Public schools have lost every round in funding battles since ed reformers took over.
They’re “advocates” for public schools, except they’re just really bad at it?
The striking teachers did more for public schools in a month than any of these people have accomplished in a decade.
Like!
Politico has a feedback tab, at the bottom of its page, that leads to a form for comment.
I tweeted a complaint to Caitlin Emma of Politico that they never interview anyone who is a skeptic or critic of DFER-style reform, or anyone who knows that DFER was censured by the Democratic parties of CO and CA. She tweeted back that she gave a “mention” to NPE in a story today. Not equivalent. And I told her so.
Emma’s response to you was disingenuous and I presume she knows it.
This essay should win the ed reform prize for fawning over Arne Duncan:
“Not so with Duncan. His tenure was marked by the focus and tenacity of converting that guiding principle into meaningful actions. Backed by billions of federal dollars in the Obama administration’s Race to the Top competition, Duncan pushed states to raise academic expectations, reform teacher evaluations, and develop better systems for tracking students’ achievement. ”
What actually happened was they spent billions on consultants who parachuted in, scolded public schools and put in tens of conflicting and sometimes contradictory faddish junk, and at the same time cut public school funding. Then they all left, back to the think tanks and DC offices and universities from which they came.
It was genius, really- set expectations much higher while reducing funding and support, and make sure to bash public schools, teachers and students every day.
Ohio drops in education rankings every year these people are in power, but with each drop they just clap louder. For one another.
Time to clean house. Bust up this mutual admiration society and hire some new people.
https://www.the74million.org/article/review-in-arne-duncans-new-memoir-reflections-on-putting-kids-first-the-state-of-our-union-and-the-lies-we-tell-about-our-schools/
What makes Arne Duncan special is that he never admits that he failed.
I assume on the basketball court, when his team lost, he claimed that they really won but the ref was lying and cheating.
Or he blamed his teammates and said they lacked his courage and tenacity.
I don’t think it’s hyperbole to say this is truly blood money.
I just don’t understand why there aren’t more progressive Democrats to call them out.
How fast would DFER lose power if Bernie Sanders and Elizabeth Warren called them out on their lies?
DFER is the new Nazi
Hey, Politico. Call me maybe.