The Southern Poverty Law Center is one of our nation’s most valuable organizations defending our Constitution and democratic values against extremists.
Their report today says that extremist groups are holding a hate rally in Portland, Oregon, today. There are many links, which I am not including because I would have to do each one manually. If you sign up to get their newsletter, you can get the full report with links. What SPLC describes is an example of the way the far-right is “weaponizing the First Amendment,” using it as a shield to defend hatred, racism, and incitement’s to violence. What or who incited these groups?
SPLC writes:
AUGUST 4, 2018
Weekend Read // Issue 91
The threat of violence hangs over a rally that’s being staged by far-right groups in Portland, Oregon, today, nearly a year after the deadly white supremacist gathering in Charlottesville, Virginia.
Patriot Prayer and the Proud Boys have held more than a dozen rallies throughout the Pacific Northwest over the past year, events marked by street violence and harassment and buoyed by a wide array of racist and antigovernment extremist allies.
David Neiwert, who frequently writes for our Hatewatch blog, has been covering the rallies from the beginning. In a piece for The Baffler, he describes the last violent rally they held in Portland on June 30th:
The Proud Boys and Patriots were primed for battle. Indeed, the whole point of the event was to try to provoke a fight that they were not simply prepared for, but were keen to take part in. Prior to the onset of street hostilities, the alt-right crowd bristled with warlike talk about martyrdom as the price of freedom and “taking down” the antifascists across the street. Periodically they’d break into chants of Queen’s mock-authoritarian seventies anthem “We Will Rock You,” which they dedicated to British Identitarian Tommy Robinson.
As I watched the last of the Proud Boys—waiting for the final school bus that had brought them to the rally to arrive so they could leave, clustered on a street corner and haranguing the counter-protesters across the way—I mused about how conservatives’ sudden concern to safeguard civility in American discourse is a crude, cynical manipulation. Its operational logic is very similar to the Proud Boys’ insistence on claiming that their protests are about nothing more than the assertion and protection of free-speech rights.
That, after all, has been what Gibson’s Patriot Prayer events have been ostensibly about since they were launched in Portland last year. Gibson and his comrades claim that they’re standing up for “conservative speech,” which has always translated into a lot of immigrant-bashing, Islamophobia, “constitutionalist” gun nuttery straight from the Bundy Bunch, and a heavy dose of Deep State/globalist conspiracy theorizing. Unsurprisingly, the gatherings attracted more than their share of extreme rightists, including a broad array of skinheads and white nationalists; last year one of the more unhinged such fellow travelers showed up to one of the earliest Patriot Prayer events draped in a flag, and then began shouting that he was a Nazi and using racial epithets. Organizers kicked him out.
His name was Jeremy Christian. One month later, in May 2017, while riding a Portland MAX commuter train, he began harassing two Arab teenage women, one of whom was wearing a hijab, using ethnic slurs against Muslims. Three men riding the train tried to intervene; Christian pulled out a knife and stabbed them, two of them fatally. At his arraignment, he was still protesting Joey Gibson style: “Free speech or die, Portland! You got no safe place. This is America—get out if you don’t like free speech!”
Patriot Prayer had a previously scheduled rally just over a week after the murders. Civic leaders urged the group to cancel the event amid burgeoning anger in the community, but Gibson and his cohorts held it anyway. It turned into a gigantic melee, with the Patriot crowd heavily outnumbered, and a number of assaults and arrests on both sides. It was some of the worst crowd violence Portland had seen in decades.
Since then, Gibson has organized an ongoing series of “free speech” and “freedom” rallies along the West Coast and elsewhere—in Seattle, San Francisco, San Diego, and Olympia and Vancouver, Washington. He’s denounced white supremacists after Charlottesville, but also openly embraced the Proud Boys, the group founded by the white identitarian hipster journalist Gavin McInnes, who’s long been a presence at Gibson’s rallies. The June 30 event was originally intended to commemorate the post-murder event, but it took on a life of its own after an early June rally in downtown Portland also dissolved into violence.
Gibson made a pitch for help from supporters across the nation, and the Proud Boys gladly obliged, putting out the word on their regional social media sites. As a result, a considerable number among the Patriots were wearing black polos and red MAGA ballcaps, and they came from all over the country, especially California.
Listening to them bait the counter-protesters with ugly speech, and talk among themselves about fighting tactics, it was clear the “free speech” they wanted to defend was bigoted and threatening. The lofty constitutional principles were little more than a pretext: they were there mostly to bash some “leftist” heads.
Patriot Prayer and the Proud Boys were emboldened by the fighting at that June 30 event. Organizers have discussed coming to the rally armed; open carry is legal in Oregon. We will be monitoring the event closely and reporting live on Hatewatch and Twitter.
The Editors

Neo-Nazi Marches in Skokie in 70s were defended by ACLU. Controversial for ACLU members, but kept everyone on their toes. (good made for tv movie for middle schools, too). But it was a rare event – not a movement inciting violence like those today.
What’s next “Trump Youth” in their brown shirts?
Excellent but sad and scary opinion in NYT today. Pictures say it all. (Thank goodness for teachers who do all they cant to assure civility, respect, and right and wrong)
The Children at the Trump Rallies
What is it like to see young people exposed to so much anger? Heartbreaking, says a Times photographer. Photographs and Text by Damon Winter
LikeLike
Thanks for posting this article. I saw a few seconds of the cult love fest the other day and noticed all the children around the dais, which I think was a first. Our Dear Leader loves to abuse children, whether it is tearing them away from their parents and putting them in cages or exposing them to the ignorant hate at his rallies. They are disposable props, just like all people are to him.
LikeLiked by 1 person
These hate groups are looking for publicity and they want to foment violence which will give them even more air time on the evening news shows. They also want to portray themselves as victims of those “mean” anti-fa protesters. My advice would be not to respond with violence to these hate mongers, protest in silence against them or just ignore them. The white supremacists and other assorted hate spewers thrive on publicity, any kind of publicity, because, for the most part, no one wants to have anything to do with these people.
LikeLike
Agreed.
The best response to hate rallies is to ignore them.
No coverage, no response.
LikeLike
There should be one response –
Dear My Current GOP Senator and GOP senator candidate:
The President of the United States of America promotes, celebrates, and endorses hate, racism, and provoking violence.
He endorses hate against anyone non-white, not born in the U.S., in the media, and others.
DO YOU, Mr. Senator and Mr. Candidate support this president and the CONTENT of his statements?
YES or NO?
No commentary, no dancing, no “he has the right to express his opinion,” no “he doesn’t really mean it,”
How do you want the history books to show your position:
Do you support this president and content of his rants?
Yes or No?
p.s. your children are watching and want to know what kind of person you are.
LikeLike
I don’t think it is wise for the press to ignore hate group rallies. No press or public outcry seems to say hate-mongering is of no consequence.
Several comments about NYTimes coverage of Trump rallies say journalists should not show up. Just stop covering these events. Stop because the “liberal” press, allows Trumpsters to target specific journalists and label the press reports on these events fake news. Trumpsters are fans of FOX news and friends. A critical and investigative press is really essential. Trump’s staged and choreographed hate-mongering events certainly need to be reported and without aggrandizing these.
Not participating in provocative events is always an option and usually wise, but the press cannot and should not be intimidated, silenced–nor should whistleblowers. Today, C-Span broadcast some of the speakers at the annual National Whistleblowers day. In this clip, the speaker is a lawyer gives some historical background for the federal whistleblower law and gives some chilling detail about a major case. Less than 10 minutes https://www.c-span.org/video/?c4742820/national-whistleblower-day-2018
LikeLike
IMHO, CNN gave candidate Trump $2 billiin worth of free TV, covering his every utterance
LikeLike
I also think that these hate rallies are staged for the media. No media, the rally dissolves.
LikeLike
I disagree. The marches you are seeing Portland are acts of intimidation to make a compliant and fearful populous. As Burke said, “The only thing necessary for the triumph of evil is for good men to do nothing.” which is exactly what happens when we choose to ignore fascists.
Antifa has some issues, but their main goal is outing fascists and they tend to stick to that goal without capitulating to violence. But they were also not the only group to attend as counter protestors. Far from it. The Proud boys, however, intentionally went against their own plans in order to avoid weapons checks by the police. When there was the Proud Boys and counter protestors converged, the police kowtowed and protected the fascists after it was very well known and publicized that it was the Proud Boys making threats of violence both at the event and prior to online.
What did the police do? Fire less leathal – not nonlethal – weapons at the counter protestors. The police literally aligned themselves with fascists yesterday. If anything, the counter protestors made it clear the police cannot be trusted to “protect and serve” when fascists come to town. Proud boys brandished weapons, bear maced counter protestors, and were actively violent. The police attacked the counter protestors instead. In several cases, they were shooting canisters at point blank range at the heads of counter protestors, embedding them in helmets and sending folks to the hospital.
Ignoring it may have avoided injuries, but would have tacitly endorsed hatred and fascism. Confronting it shows the real colors of not only the Proud Boys, but also the police who sided with them. https://www.aljazeera.com/news/2018/08/portland-rally-police-clash-counter-protesters-180805092248139.html
LikeLike
I agree, Diane. These hate instigators are seeking exposure. Ignore them. We can have our own peaceful marches and demonstrations on other dates and in other locations. And I sure would love it if we saw less coverage of every miserable Tweet emerging from the Oval Office.
LikeLike
I think the US is moving closer to the edge of a cliff and when one or both sides step off that cliff, the country will be plunged into a bloody civil war with cities burning and many casualties.
What happened in the Balkan Crises of the 1990s will be small in comparison because the US has a lot more people to take part and/or be victims.
The hate that Trump and his supporters are stirring up at Trump’s rallies and the so-called free speech protests are feeding fuel to a fire until the pot boils over.
And this is exactly what Trump, Bannon and other Trumpist insiders have always wanted to achieve.
LikeLike
Immediately after the election I posted a summary of a review I wrote about an essay by Isaiah Berlin on Joseph de Maistre. Here is the full piece. It ties into the subject of this post and hopefully provides some insight into the fascist mindset that is on the rise again throughout the globe:
Maistre was the intellectual father on modern fascism. I doubt that 20th and 21st century fascist leaders and politicians—even the current American incarnation—ever heard of him, but his ideas form the core of modern day reactionary political systems. Born in the Savoy kingdom of Piedmont-Sardinia in 1753, his views were strongly influenced by the experiences of the French Revolution. He served the king of Sardinia, first gaining prominence as a pamphleteer and later as envoy to Russia—the king wanted both to control and keep him as far away as possible—where he lived from 1803 to 1817 before being summoned home until his death in 1821.
Maistre strongly opposed the liberal thinkers of the 18th century with a counter-intuitive empiricism. “In place of the ideals of progress, liberty, perfectibility he preached the sacredness of the past, the virtue, and the necessity, indeed, of complete subjection, because of the incurably bad and corrupt nature of man. In place of science, he preached the primacy of instinct, superstition, prejudice. In place of optimism, pessimism. In place of eternal harmony and eternal peace, the necessity—for him the divine necessity—of conflict, of suffering, of bloodshed, of war.” He saw killing as a virtue, extrapolating the killing of animals for man’s benefits (from food to clothing to luxury) to the primal need for society to live in fear of the “hangman,” which, intellectually, is not far removed from contemporary rhetoric about “law and order.” Moreover, war is a good for society because it acts as an organizing force. The Church, Catholic in his case, does the same. Since, as Berlin articulates Maistre, “Man is by nature vicious, wicked, cowardly and bad…unless clamped with iron rings and held down by means of the most rigid discipline” he “need[s] to be curbed and controlled.”
Moreover, Maistre believed that irrationality—“the only things which last”—not rationality, explained how society behaved. “For example, he says, take the institution of hereditary monarchy: What could be more irrational?…Here is an institution of patently idiotic nature, for which no good reason can be given, yet it lasts…But far more rational, far more logical and reasonable, would be to abolish such a monarchy and see what happens.” Maistre felt the same about marriage, reasoning the irrationality of a couple falling in love and then staying together because of historical tradition. “So he goes on, from institution to institution, paradoxically asserting that whatever is irrational lasts, and that whatever is rational collapses; it collapses because anything which is constructed by reason can be pulverised by reason…The only thing which can ever dominate man is impenetrable mystery.”
Prejudice is, according Maistre, a virtue because it is “merely the beliefs of the centuries, tested by experience.” Scientists “are the people who have the least capacity for understanding life, and for government…[because] science [has a] dry, abstract, unconcrete nature, something about the fact that it is divorced from the crooked, chaotic, the irrational texture of life with all its darkness, which makes scientists incapable of adapting themselves to actual facts, and anyone listening to them is automatically doomed.” He advised the Russian czar to ban German Lutherans from entering his country because “Good men—family men, men who have traditions, faith, religion, respectable morals—do not leave their countries. Only the feckless and the restless and the critical do so. This is,” as Berlin makes clear, “the first real sermon against refugees, against freedom of spirit, against the circulation of humanity…”
Maistre was, unsurprisingly, a great admirer of Napoleon. The King of Sardinia explicitly prohibited Maistre from meeting with Napoleon because he feared the consequences of what might come out of such an encounter. And although Maistre’s views were largely confined to elites and he was much forgotten after his death, his ideas predicted the worst of the 20th century and still informs how we should view demagogues and their followers today. According to Berlin, “Maistre earns our gratitude as a prophet of the most violent, the most destructive forces which have threatened and still threaten the liberty and ideals of normal human beings.”
For those who question how the Putinism, Trumpism, fundamentalist religion, and extreme terrorism can flourish today, it might be worth learning more about Maistre. They probably won’t like what they see and read, but they’ll be better able to understand why these movements exist and why the defenders of liberal democracy (writ small) must never become complacent.
LikeLiked by 1 person
Thanks for this. I have never heard of him. Mussolini certainly carried some of those themes around. Mainstre sounds a bit like Thomas Hobbes as well.
LikeLike
In my opinion there is a vast gulf between Hobbes and Maistre. While Hobbes is rightly seen as a “founding father,” if you will, of conservatism (of the classic poli sci 101 definition: that man, if given the free choice to do good or bad to his/her fellow man will choose bad, whereas the liberal would choose good) which was enunciated more precisely by Burke. I think those who attribute an advocacy of totalitarianism to him are wrong, but I do think he espoused an enlightened view of authoritarianism, which he believed would create social and political stability. Hobbes would never have conceded that irrationality was a driving human compulsion. He posited a rational, albeit, strong state explanation to man and government. He also accepted a certain empiricism to to explain he world view.
Hobbes, I believe, would have rejected many of the pillars of Maistre’s ideology such as violence as a good social determinant (Hobbes would have seen it as a last resort), irrationalism (Hobbes would have posited a coherent rationality in his theory), and empiricism (which were perverted by later faulty historical interpretations. More precisely, I think Hobbes would have been offended and alarmed by Maistre’s ideas. Hobbes thought of them as human failings, Maistre saw them as an explanation of what man was and what he (not /she) might be able to achieve.
LikeLike
There were white nationalists rallying and menacing people of color in Manhattan this week, August 2018. I can’t believe I am typing these words.
https://twitter.com/uptowncollectiv/status/1025416576374398979?s=21
LikeLike
I presume the rich racists who fund the school privatization plan, first introduced by Georgia Gov. Talmadge (now dead) to avoid integration, will avoid Portland. But, they’ll show up at the rarefied technology and hedge fund conferences where they will ask experts how to survive the fallout from the concentrated wealth that they created. (The Guardian, “Lifeboats for the Rich”)
LikeLiked by 1 person
“… how to survive the fallout from the concentrated wealth that they created.” BINGO.
LikeLike
The problem with private schools was evident this week when a Smith College employee called police to report there was a Black person (a student) in the lounge. The Smith College President apologized for the situation.
Taxpayer money has no place in private colleges (nor charter schools nor the trash heap of for-profit schools).
We should relegate tax funding for legacy admission schools to the past and, recognize that those schools reflect a continuation of a dark period in U.S. history, which we thought had been corrected with the Civil Rights Act and enlightenment.
LikeLike
“President” Trump found the time from his “busy” schedule to call and congratulate Rush Limbaugh on his 30th anniversary as a racist, xenophobe, right wing hate monger, fascist and propagandist. Excuse me while I projectile vomit. 30 years of hate wing radio, from coast to coast, talk radio is 98%+/- hate spewers like Limbaugh and all his clones across the nation. All this venom has paid off for the right wing, the Limbaughs certainly laid the groundwork for a Trump win.
LikeLike
Agree completely, Joe.
Adding – to place blame on right wing radio and tv, enables people like us to think that those who tune into Limbaugh are swayed to vote, act and speak differently than they would otherwise. The alternative, for us, is the forced realization that Fox watchers have sentiments very similar to Levine, Hannity, O’Reilly and Alex Jones. Their heroes, merely talk louder and faster than they do.
LikeLike
Sick.
LikeLike
It seems that the neo-nazis are having some parking issues. https://www.alternet.org/portland-alt-right-extremists-have-rally-plans-foiled-store-manager-who-calls-tow-trucks-them-our
LikeLike
Thanks for the amusement at the not-so-bright neo-nazi’s expense.
LikeLike
All conservative meetings and rallies are Nazi rallies. All speech which is not progressive is hate speech. These meetings must be stopped by any means necessary. When progressives regain government power, these ideas must be outlawed. Violence against Trump supporters and all Republicans is absolutely justified, and I’m glad to see Diane Ravitch supplying the justification for it.
LikeLike
Growing up in Central Coast California, I always thought Oregon was a progressive state. The news of these hate filled rallies are very disappointing.
LikeLike
In Oregon’s defense, I would bet that few of these right-wing loonies are not from the state. But I understand your dismay. I feel the same way about Wisconsin and Minnesota. I long for the good old days when Oregon, Wisconsin, and Minnesota stood for the best social ideals in the nation.
LikeLike
I think the leaders of the groups behind these-hate rallies are deliberately focusing on progressive states on purpose — to bring their hate where it will not be welcome. It’s part of their plan to fracture the country and plunge it into a bloody civil war with cities burning and no one safe anywhere.
In fact, I wouldn’t be surprised if they are planting some of their own people among the antifascist progressive demonstrators to start the shooting and make it look like the progressives started the Civil War.
Once the shooting starts, the racist haters will use it as justification to ramp up the violence. If you tune in to their thinking, you will discover that many of these racists think so-called liberals are all love-in peaceniks that abhor violence and have no firearms making them easy to slaughter.
The Alt-Right mob has a HUGE surprise coming there way if they think that.
If you click the link, you will see that even though 41% of Republicans own firearms vs 16% of Democrats and 36% of independents.
“Percentage of population in the United States owning at least one gun in 2017, by political party affiliation”
https://www.statista.com/statistics/249775/percentage-of-population-in-the-us-owning-a-gun-by-party-affiliation/
But, Party Affiliation tells another story.
26% of Americans consider themselves Republicans
41% of Independents
30% Democrats
https://news.gallup.com/poll/15370/party-affiliation.aspx
If these stats are correct, this means that only 10.6% of Americans that are Republicans own guns vs 14.76% of independents and almost 5% of Democrats. The GOP is heavily outgunned and they don’t know it because they have been programmed to think they are the ones that own most the guns.
LikeLike
I didn’t even consider the argument you made in your first three paragraphs. Very thought provoking. I’m uncomfortable with the rest of your argument but can’t think of a counterpoint.
LikeLike
Trump has said more than once he loves chaos.
Bannon wants much more than chaos. He wants a total collapse of US civilization so when the survivors start to rebuild, he or someone like him can move into the leadership position and create the country they want without a US Constitution designed to protect the people from brutal autocrats. Bannon hasn’t said he wants to be the leader, but it isn’t a stretch to know that’s what he thinks he will achieve.
Narcissists and psychopaths have a difficult time thinking that someone else is smarter than they are.
“Steve Bannon, Donald Trump’s Closest Advisor, Just Wants to See the World Burn”
https://www.gq.com/story/steve-bannon-shadow-president
I read recently that Trump still calls (using a mobile phone) Bannon for his advice, and Bannon isn’t alone in what he wants.
LikeLike
Bannon also said he wants the total destruction of “the administrative state.” That means our government.
LikeLike
What you call chaos, Isaish Berlin called irrationality. If you haven’t read it, see my comment above from yesterday about how Maistre’s vision of irrationality is a cornerstone of fascism.
LikeLike
I read that comment about Maistre’s vision of irrationality is a cornerstone of fascism.
It seems that there is a guru for every faction on the planet, even the narcissists and psychopath nut cases.
LikeLike
The Southern Poverty Law Center has identified the Federation for American Immigration Reform (FAIR) as a hate group as well. Some of those associated with FAIR are Jeff Sessions, Stephen Miller, Kellyanne Conway, Kris Kobach (of the faux voter fraud commission) and Julie Kirchner, (ombudsman for US Citizen and Immigration Services).
Kinda tells you all you need to know.
LikeLike
The Huffpost described the incident as though the police had sided with the fascist.
LikeLike