The Celerity charter chain in Los Angeles was raided by the FBI because of the financial shenanigans of its founder and CEO, who resigned. The chain did an overhaul, worked to change the management, but one of its schools just closed due to under-enrollment. Where was that waiting list with tens of thousands of students that we always hear about?
Celerity Rojas was unable to attract enough students to balance its budget. Its doors will close, and its students are on their own. The deadline has passed for most charter schools, so–sob!–it is fortunate that public schools accept every student who walks in the door.
The closure is the first public sign that Celerity is under considerable financial strain.
In the aftermath of the January 2017 raid and news that the FBI was investigating the nonprofit and questioning its employees, Celerity was thrown into turmoil. The State Board of Education refused to renew two of its charter schools, and although both schools were able to reopen under different names, the network said some its families never came back.
At Celerity Rolas, an elementary and middle school split between two sites — one in Eagle Rock and one in Highland Park — the school needed 435 students to break even, according to the organization’s correspondence with the state. But only 309 students enrolled last year.
The loss of students meant less funding from the state. Meanwhile, the organization’s legal fees were rising.
Facing investigations by federal agencies and L.A. Unified’s Office of Inspector General, the group hired the law firm Gibson Dunn to aid it during the inquiries and help it separate from its founder, Vielka McFarlane, a target of the investigations. Celerity has also continued to pay a separate firm that specializes in charter school law.
The group’s most recent financial projections show that while its individual schools are bringing in more money than they are spending, the organization that manages them is on less firm ground.
An L.A. Unified analysis described the fiscal condition of the group as weak. Within a year, the nonprofit’s expenses are expected to exceed its revenue by $826,000. Out of its total budget of $5.3 million for the coming school year, the group expects to spend more than $500,000 on legal fees alone.
The former CEO of the chain, Vielka McFarlane, got into trouble for her profligate use of the schools’ credit card for her luxurious lifestyle. Chauffeur-driven cars, expensive dinners, designer suits, etc. It was good while it lasted. She became the poster person for the lack of oversight and regulation of charter schools in California, at least for a few days.
Don’t expect the California Charter School Association to care about the closure of another charter school. They are busy hatching more.

“Out of its total budget of $5.3 million for the coming school year, the group expects to spend more than $500,000 on legal fees alone.”
What happened to the kids? To the magic? As in—
[start]
A simpler, more direct way to boost conservative support is to remind people what made charter schools conservative in the first place. This means emphasizing personal freedom and parental choice—how charters liberate families from a system in which the government assigns you a public school, take it or leave it. Choice brings free-market dynamics into public education, using the magic of competition to lift all boats.
[end]
Link: https://edexcellence.net/articles/the-charter-schools-movement-needs-to-stop-alienating-republicans
Must feel good to be liberating all that money from the classroom and teachers and programs in order to spend so much dough on defending the right to access $tudent $ucce$$.
It’s magic!
😎
LikeLike
Not possible.
There are huge waiting lists for all charter schools because people “flee” the “government schools” which are unfashionable and also full of thugs and low performers.
That’s what charter lobbyists say, anyway, so we know it’s 100% true.
“Everyone” hates public schools. Read any ed reform think tank or lobbying shop or outlet, or, heck, you could just pick any random press release from the US Department of Education. This is KNOWN. Don’t let actual events interfere with the narrative.
LikeLike
Be apprised that in LAUSD, not only are traditional schools under enrolled, but so are charter schools. However, the law does not take this into account, so that the situation only gets worse as more and more charters are approved.
LikeLike
And the good news from Ohio is actually good news…at least for the moment.
Franklin County Judge Michael Holbrook rules that the Attorney General can pursue the recovery of millions from ECOT founder and his two for-profit companies
On July 5, the Attorney General filed a Memorandum requesting Court permission to go after funds from the ECOT founder Bill Lager and his two companies, noting that at least $199,268,313.18 had been transferred to the companies from ECOT. The Attorney General reasoned in part, that Lager as a public official had violated his fiduciary responsibility to the school.
If this court decision stands, it will be a game changer in the Ohio charter business. Operators of charter management companies will have a fiduciary responsibility to the schools they operate. This will have implications for fiscal audits, transparency of operation and accountability for how funds are spent.
I love the precision in saying “at least” $199,268,313.18 was taken.
LikeLike
Another charter, another raid by the Department of Homeland Security with the FBI. Or was that, another Deasy, another raid? It’s hard to keep track of FBI raids in the city with the most charters and the most billionaires named Eli Broad.
LikeLike
“Don’t expect the California Charter School Association to care about the closure of another charter school. They are busy hatching more.”
Whenever CCSA is pressed for comment on the multi-million-dollar embezzlements going on at Celerity, their response has been to change the subject and say,
“Hey, nothing’s been proven yet, but even if it is proven later on … why, would ya look at their test scores!”
Here’s the exact quote:
CCSA:
“We do know that Celerity’s schools in Los Angeles continue to provide an excellent education for their students, including many from historically underserved student populations. Whatever the outcome, we hope this process takes the schools’ strong academic performance (i.e. students’ test scores) into account, as our foremost concern is, above all, that students receive a high quality education.”
That’s right. “Take” those test scores “into account”, because according to CCSA, if a charter org embezzles millions — millions that never did get, and will never get to the classroom — all that larceny can all be balanced out by and excused with good test scores.
http://www.ccsa.org/blog/2017/01/ccsa-statement-on-federal-investigation-of-celerity-schools.html
A bit of history: way packc in 2010, the first and first failed attempt to implement Parent Trigger occurred in Compton, CA. The L..A. WEEKLY covered this, gushing about the wonderful charter school organization that would be taking over the school in Compton.
Celerity.
At the time, PARENT REVOLUTION spokesman, an outside invader trying to execute this Parent Trigger, enthused about Celerity, calling it “the only charter school Parent Revolution felt could handle the challenge of children who have fallen as far behind as the students at McKinley.”
Good call, P-Rev! We can always rely on you folks for accurate info on the moral probity of a particulary charter org.
https://www.laweekly.com/news/comptons-parent-trigger-feud-2168463
LikeLike
Celebrity Charter … what a name…ugh. Guess there are a lot of wanna be celebrities in the area.
LikeLike
LAUSD authorizes four of Celerity’s schools: Cardinal, Nascent, Octavia, Palmati. These have been around for a while, with other agencies [the State and LA County] authorizing the operator’s remaining schools (including the one indicated in the article – Rolas).
Celerity’s schools are small (like most charters in LA), and the LAUSD schools have had the following enrollment numbers for the last three years:
Cardinal 96 122 155
Nascent 231 225 251
Octavia 253 218 221
Palmati 205 206 218
They do have SpEd numbers that reflect the surrounding LAUSD schools, more or less, but you can see that they have not been actively increasing their enrollment [and, as was indicated upthread, most of LAUSD’s and LAUSD-authorized independent charters’ schools are underenrolled.] Instead, they have been expanding into non-LAUSD zones…all in an effort to keep the $$$ flowing into the officers’ pockets. It truly has been a ponzi scheme.
LikeLike
It is hard enough to get the general public to have an understanding about what a charter school is really about …but to explain to people about these ‘management companies ‘ … well … very few people even know about that part of it. Hey folks, you know that chunk of money taken out of your paycheck …well…your education dollars are being spend on someone’s Armani suit…while over at your local free and public neighborhood school, all monies go to education.
LikeLike
Caligirl, thank you for a great point. In California, most charter chains call themselves public schools, but they are not. A corporate charter chain is not a public school. A charter that hires a for-profit management company is not a public school. A charter that pays its CEO an outrageous sum is not a public school. A charter that is neither accountable nor transparent is not a public school. The challenge is always, how do you get the public to understand that vandals are stealing what was paid for by the public and belongs to the public?
A good place to start: download Carol Burris’ “Charters and Consequences” about charter fraud in California.
LikeLike
The privatization of public services and “assets” is expanding and the latest target is public libraries. This was a gleam in the eye of profit seekers back in 2012, but now the vultures are saying that Amazon- like efficiencies are needed and several businesses are literally capitalizing on the precarious state of public funding for public libraries… And there is not a word about the corporate welfare leading to the dire financial condition of public libraries… Not different from the issue of funding for public schools.
LikeLike