Eugene Robinson, staff writer for the Washington Post, wrote this today:
Before this harebrained and reckless administration is history, the nation will have cause to celebrate the public servants derided by Trumpists as the supposed “deep state.”
The term itself is propaganda, intended to cast a sinister light upon men and women whom Trump and his minions find annoyingly knowledgeable and experienced. They are not participants in any kind of dark conspiracy.
Rather, they are feared and loathed by the president and his wrecking crew of know-nothings because they have spent years — often decades — mastering the details of foreign and domestic policy.
God bless them. With a supine Congress unwilling to play the role it is assigned by the Constitution, the deep state stands between us and the abyss.
Witness, with horror and shame, Trump’s disgraceful performance on the world stage during the past week. The lowest of several low points was his joint appearance Monday in Helsinki with Russian President Vladimir Putin, who smirked with obvious glee as the president of the United States soiled himself. Metaphorically, I mean.
Trump said that Director of National Intelligence Daniel Coats and other officials had told him “they think” Russia meddled with the 2016 election. But Putin issued an “extremely strong and powerful” denial when the two leaders met privately, and Trump concluded that “I don’t see any reason why it would be” Russia. Coats fired back within hours, issuing a statement that reiterated the intelligence community’s consensus view, which is not “we think” but “we know.” Trump’s ridiculous claim Tuesday that he meant to say “wouldn’t” instead of “would” amounted to nothing more than a moment of comic relief.
Thanks to a New York Times article published Wednesday night, we now know that the nation’s top intelligence officials briefed Trump in detail about the Russian meddling on Jan. 6, 2017 — two weeks before his inauguration.
According to the Times, the officials shared with Trump powerful evidence that the interference, meant to boost Trump’s chances of winning, was ordered by Putin himself. So we know that when Trump casts doubt on Russia’s culpability, he’s not speaking from a position of ignorance. It’s not that intelligence officials have asked him to take their conclusion on faith. They’ve shown him the goods. He’s just lying.
Who were the anonymous sources for the Times story? I have no idea. But if I had spent a career fighting for my country in the secrets world, and I heard my president give more credence to the former KGB officer who rules an undemocratic Russia than to his own intelligence chief, I would be angry.
And if I had also heard my president welcome what he called an “incredible” offer from Putin — that he would allow special counsel Robert S. Mueller III to observe questioning of the 12 Russian spies he indicted last week if Russian authorities were also allowed to interrogate Americans they speciously accuse of crimes, including a former ambassador to Moscow, Michael McFaul — I would be furious and alarmed. I would have to wonder about the loyalty of my commander in chief. And I would have to think about my duty to the nation.
Russian officials have said publicly that they are ready to begin implementing agreements reached by Trump and Putin during their two-hour private meeting, which only one Russian and one American translator were allowed to attend. But according to The Post, in an article also published Wednesday night, high-ranking U.S. diplomatic and military officials did not know what those agreements were. Did they reach some sort of understanding about nuclear arms? About Syria? About Russia’s illegal annexation of Crimea? If you worry, as I do, that Trump may have intentionally or unintentionally given away the store, you have to root for the deep state to find out what transpired in that room — and find ways to reverse, or at least mitigate, the damage. Is Trump so obsequious to Putin because his ego will not allow him to acknowledge that the Russian strongman helped him beat Hillary Clinton? Or does Putin have something on him?
We will get answers at some point, but we can’t ignore what we appear to be seeing right now: ongoing collusion, between Trump and Putin, to impede and denigrate the Mueller investigation. It’s happening before our eyes. Democrats in Congress are powerless; the Republican leadership, spineless. Experienced government officials know that their job is to serve the president. But what if the president does not serve the best interests of the nation?
In this emergency, the loyal and honorable deep state has a higher duty. It’s called patriotism. Read more from Eugene Robinson’s archive,

Quote of the day: was applied to Mexico but could become a project in the USA:
The state is obliged to fight corruption within the government. Enrique Pena Nieto https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Enrique_Peña_Nieto
As a Canadian, I am amazed at how almost 300 years of democracy could come crashing down!
Cliff Boldt Retired Teacher and school trustee Comox Valley, Vancouver Island, province of British Columbia, Canada
>
LikeLike
I will be visiting the Comox Valley soon for a family wedding. While it’s reassuring to have a family member marrying a Canadian, I’m not quite ready to throw in the towel yet. We have become far too complacent and lazy. Perhaps it is time that we learn that democracy not only gives us rights but demands that we take responsibility for its health. It’s time we relearn (or learn) the lessons of history. Immigrants who have become citizens probably know more about the U.S. system of government than most American born citizens. They know the promises which we are throwing away.
LikeLike
“…men and women whom Trump and his minions find annoyingly knowledgeable and experienced.”
You mean the same men and women who lied us into the Iraq war? The same ones who routinely overthrow democratically elected governments and install tyrants and dictators? The ones who cheered for the Patriot Act, the AUMF, and every other advancement of war and the surveillance state? The ones who are now pushing the “fake news” meme to nudge the people to demand restrictions on social media and independent news outlets?
If this constitutes “knowledgeable and experienced”, I guess I’m starting to understand the appeal of Trump’s ignorance.
Since when was celebrating the CIA et al a liberal thing? Has everyone forgotten the Bush years? I’m feeling like Winston looking for proof that we really were at war with East Asia.
Anyway, I think this “About” statement from Consortium News is quite relevant and important: https://consortiumnews.com/about/
LikeLike
I agree. I hate Trump, but unchecked spying and/or war with nuclear power Russia is not a reasonable antithesis to his insane ranting. War bad. Peace good.
LikeLike
I love the false choices the certain elements of the left insist we must adhere to:
Either you are with Trump, or you are demanding we start a nuclear war with Russia.
What a bunch of malarkey. Those aren’t the choices. Trump is lying. It used to be the far right Nazi types who claimed that if you didn’t accept everything the President said as gospel, you were a traitor who were endangering the security of Americans. Now we have some on the left telling us we are not allowed to criticize Trump for his blatant lying because criticizing the President means we want nuclear war.
Maybe the far right and far left can get together and arrange to exterminate all of us evil people who refuse to keep quiet when we see blatant lying by the President. And you can tell yourselves you are exterminating us truth tellers to save the country from nuclear annihilation. I’m sure you’ll find plenty of people in the Trump administration who would happily agree.
LikeLike
^^sorry, Diane Ravitch, you can delete this post. I let my frustration at hearing yet another dishonest characterization of critics of Trump and Russia (now we are helping cause nuclear war so we should shut up!) get to me.
But the truth is that Obama could avoid war with Russia, could have meetings with Putin, but he could STILL make policy that was in favor of democracy and not “business”. Obama dealt in facts — he did not spend his time trying to insist reality was something other than what it was.
That is not happening with Trump, which is why most of us are quite alarmed. Instead, Trump is just denying the reality that Putin does anything wrong.
This is typical of other lies that Trump has said and we have called out those lies, too. Why should the fact that this particular lie of Trump’s is getting more coverage mean that therefore we should start pretending it is not alarming? All his lies are alarming and all should be called out.
LikeLike
Dienne,
Unlike you, I have worked in the federal government. There are career employees who are deeply committed to their work. They are true patriots. They are neither left nor right. They are knowledgeable and they will be there long after this fraud has gone.
Why do you always defend Trump?
LikeLiked by 1 person
Adding to Diane’s comments; the former CIA and DOJ folks on the news circuit who are speaking about their work and government employees are not political – they are non-partisan, service oriented, and protect us. AND SOME WHO ARE TWEETING “OMG’ ABOUT THE PRESIDENT WERE APPOINTED BY THE PRESIDENT.
AND as they’ve said, how are they supposed to recruit?
How are they supposed to tell a bright college grad or military transfer “we want you to spy… we want you to get assets… we want you to infiltrate gangs and ISIS… we want you to get intel on big time tax evasion… drugs… and whereever else we don’t know about – we want you to put your life at risk when your family thinks you’re out selling insurance – HOWEVER THE PRESIDENT WILL CRITICIZE YOU, QUESTION YOU IN FRONT OF THE KGB LEADER, AND PUT YOUR LIFE AT RISK.
LikeLike
BTW, Diane, you are conflating individuals with the system. I know you understand the difference. In relation to racism, for instance, structural racism does not mean that every individual – or even most individuals – in this country harbor racist feelings, intentions or ill will toward people of color. In fact, I’d say a strong majority have nothing but good will. Nonetheless, the structures that our country was built on and continue to function on are fundamentally racist, which is why whites consistently prosper at the expense of most other minorities.
Similarly, yes, there are very many very good, decent, honest people who have devoted and are devoting their lives to service in the intelligence community, who intend to do nothing less than a straightforward honest job as best they can. The fact remains, however, that the intelligence system is fundamentally corrupt and prone to abuse. There is no transparency, no oversight or accountability, certainly not to We The People. There are strong incentives to work for the interests of the powerful at the expense of the majority. I don’t blame individual intelligence officers/workers any more than I blame individual charter teachers. But the intelligence system, just like the charter system, is ripe for the abuses by the powerful, while the others within the system are along for the ride.
LikeLike
“the intelligence system is fundamentally corrupt and prone to abuse….”
The Trump White House is fundamentally corrupt and prone to abuse….
There, I fixed it for you.
LikeLike
You make important points, Dienne. Shouts of “treason” against Trump–not for his xenophobic demonization of immigrants–not for his flauting of international law in pursing foreign wars–not for abandoning US citizens in PR and certainly not for continuing the Obama administration’s destruction of public education–but for opposing the “deep state”/US intelligence services which have been involved in years of dirty tricks, Murder Inc. abroad, etc. These types of charges for lack of patriotism, treason even, sound more like the John Birch Society or Joseph McCarthy — yet this is getting wide support throughout the Democratic Party. The fine men and women who oversaw “black sites”, “extraordinary rendition” and “weapons of mass destruction” now want us to think they are on our side? Do we forgot the attacks on the civil rights movement, the antiwar movement, of any previous movements for real justice… There is a major shift taking place within both Democratic and Republican parties towards authoritarianism and extreme right wing nationalism. We need a genuine socialist and internationalist alternative from below, from the working class … yes, sort of like West Virginia writ large.
LikeLike
Trump is not a friend to any concerns I have about our country and world. I haven’t decided if he is a fool, senile or a traitor. Whatever he is, he is a danger to world peace and national security.
LikeLike
Video: Is Donald Trump a Traitor?
Robert Reich
Published on Jul 18, 2018
Robert Reich examines Trump’s treasonous behavior towards Vladimir Putin.
LikeLike
Sigh. Again, Diane, just because Trump is no friend to any concerns does not mean that the CIA et al are either. I know you’re capable of understanding the fallacy there.
Nancy H – well said and thank you.
LikeLike
Just because Trump has lied to the Ameican people over and over again does not mean he should not be believed when he says that all the intelligence agencies are corrupt and lying to us. After all, Trump defenders say that when it comes to a choice between Trump and intelligence agencies, you should always believe Trump no matter how much evidence is presented.
I mean, that worked so well with Bush/Cheney who had to invent their own intelligence agency because the career officials wouldn’t cook the books for them. But Trump is so much more honest, so let’s believe him, say his defenders who embrace Trump over intelligence agencies just like they embraced Dick Cheney over them.
LikeLike
“Do we forgot the attacks on the civil rights movement, the antiwar movement, of any previous movements for real justice…”
To answer your questions: no we do not forget. That’s why we read and study history—at least some of us. what we learn from the history, especially if we read and discuss a broad range of sources, is that nothing comes easy, no victory is permanent, and vigilance is an essential virtue.
To refresh your memory: the civil rights movement changed the national discourse for the better of our nation and the world. Did it solve all problems? No. Have there been failures? Yes. Some catastrophic While the extreme right continues to vilify the anti-Vietnam War movement, there is no question that its legacy, seen from a long-term historical lens, was extremely positive for this nation. Has it stopped all wars? No. Does that mean it was a failure? Of course not. But the seeds of engaged resistance were planted in those movements. They significantly changed the public discourse and set standards, many of which are are being eroded daily. They are challenges to future generations, not settled questions.
And if one was my enemy once, does that make them a permanent enemy? If I vehemently disagree with a political figure on one issue, does that mean I give up on them altogether? If you answer yes, then democratically-based coalition building is an impossibility. If a devout Catholic were to use your reasoning, the teachings of St. Paul would be unacceptable because, after all, he was once Saul of Tarsus and did a lot of bad things.
You have a fundamental misunderstanding of the roles of citizens. In our system of governing, citizens do not participate in government—their representatives do. Our roles as citizens is to monitor and influence those in elected positions. The only time we engage in the process directly is by voting. And the best way to make fundamental change is to engage with others to influence the parties. Throwing up your hands and glibly parroting ideologically absolutist lines about “genuine socialist and internationalist alternative from below, from the working class” might be personally satisfying, but don’t expect sentient people to take you seriously. Unless, of course, you are willing to personally engage in doing that work. If you do, remember, the only place to make that change is in the Democratic Party, establishment warts and all.
LikeLike
The people who lied about the Iraqi War were the Republican political appointees who were placed there by Bush and Cheney.
It was the career CIA people — like Valerie Plame — who actually tried to tell the truth. They were thwarted by political appointees.
I have no idea why anyone would post such dishonest propaganda as claiming that all career officials “cheered for the Patriot Act” and that those very same career officials are the ones who “demand restrictions on social media and independent news outlets”. I have no idea why anyone would post that it was the career officials lying to get us into the Iraq War when it was Cheney’s own special White House Office of Special Plans that was specifically there to manipulate intelligence because that “deep state” was not providing the lies they wanted.
I feel like Winston trying to have an intelligent discussion with a propaganda maven working for Trump telling me that it was really the career CIA officials who forced Bush and Cheney to go to War in Iraq by claiming the Saddam had weapons of mass destruction. According to this propaganda maven worthy of 1984, poor Bush and Cheney and their friends Scooter Libby who were such peaceniks but were fooled by those “deep state” CIA agents who conned them into go to war in Iraq on false pretenses.
Poor Bush and Cheney, getting fooled by those evil “deep state” CIA agents, these propaganda mavens say. No wonder poor Trump can hardly continue his upright and admirable actions when that evil “deep state” is working against him.
LikeLike
Amen Gene Robinson. I am vigilant to too-much-government, but when the rival agencies within government all agree on a foreign threat and only the President can’t bring himself to believe it, I believe the government careerists. Even Putin has acknowledged some of Russia’s activities here. Trump still defends him. Putin has someone in the White House who chooses to believe a former KGB agent rather than USA intelligence. God help us.
LikeLike
Not to worry. Trump tweeted today that he invited Putin to visit D.C. in the fall.
Right before the midterm elections.
What was he thinking?
LikeLike
Trump likes dictators. Maybe he could convince Ergodan and Kim Jong Un to also come. He hasn’t make a big enough fool of himself yet.
Just how much damage does Trump have to do before Congress finally has had enough and does something to contain this IDIOT?
LikeLike
I hope it is another disgusting display of Trump pandering to Putin so that lots of patriots and concerned citizens show up to vote the untrustworthy Republicans out and somewhat neutralize the orange menace.
LikeLike
My worry is that some hyper patriot in the CIA, NSA, FBI or the military will go off the edge and take the law into his own hands as regards our unhinged inglorious leader. I am opposed to solving domestic problems through violence, we would be just another banana republic.Trump should be impeached and forced to resign or at the least be voted out of office in 2020. The damage that he has done, aided and abetted by the rotten to the core GOP, will take years to undo and correct.
LikeLike
The deepest state is the People but Ripofflichens prefer the shallow state — it’s so much easier to rip off.
LikeLike
Of course, in order to prove that Trump and Putin made some plans for future cooperation, Russia would have to admit that they have recordings of the session and can provide a transcript of these agreements. Since the meeting was not supposed to be recorded that would be slightly awkward. Translators are not in a position to provide that kind of transcript in addition to their duties as translators. “Agreements” generally are signed after lengthy discussions by underlings who hash out all the details.
I skimmed an online report on polls about the Helsinki meeting and was appalled at the level of support Trump actually got. People really have to pay attention to what knowledgeable people have to say about what happened. Ignorance may be bliss but it also extremely stupid.
LikeLike
cx; it is also
LikeLike
Reagan demanded a wall come down
Bush stood in the ashes of 9/11 and said we will fight (ok, wrong enemy but still)
the president who shall remain nameless refuses to believe Russia attacked us (no one has accused him of collusion) AND stands next to the KGB and believes him because he’s a good guy… and this person is a bad guy… and then digs deeper and deeper.
Putin’s got the goods on him.
And HISTORY WILL REFLECT THE LEGACY OF EVERY GOP OFFICIAL WHEN ASKED, “WHY DIDN’T YOU DO ANYTHING?”
Sadly, recent polls are vast majority of republicans thought the president’s press conference was just fine. All politics aside – THAT’S scary.
LikeLike
Interesting, sadly plausible, theory about kompromat.
https://www.google.com/amp/s/www.newyorker.com/news-desk/swamp-chronicles/a-theory-of-trump-kompromat/amp
LikeLike
I read the comments about this, “Thank GOD for the Deep State”. Interesting, I must say in the least. The writer, Eugene Robinson did more bloviating, than making any sense. I supported Trump and I was upset at a few times, especially with the Twitter account of his. Trump much like the other Republican presidents, trail-blazed into areas that Democrats refuse to go.
Who were the trail-blazers? Nixon went to China and established relations when people were saying NO! Ronald Reagan got the wall torn down when Gorbachev was in office. Now, Donald Trump went to North Korea and to Russia. I am watching those things unfolding on the Worlds’ Stage, that every Neo-Con wanted to go to war with.
I noticed the NYT was mentioned. There was an NBC News special, I presume talking about Trump not trusting the intelligence community. Strangely enough, neither did President Kennedy. He talked about splintering the community. The comedic part of this is that one with an IQ of less than 75 would be well at home laughing, thinking it was a DEF Jam.
As for the Deep State, I am finding they are dredging the swamp and finding more players. These players need to be put on trial for treason and sedition. The best way to bust the back of the Deep State is to eliminate it, by any means necessary.
In an article I read today, Lisa Page stated, it was not Russia that interfered with the elections, it was the Chinese. I particularly would not trust her, but other sources are saying she is flipping on Comey, Strzok and a few others to save her backside.
In reference to the Russian spies indicted. Exactly, how do we know they were spies. They could have been hackers. But, I believe Putin has a point. He wants to question these people also. Since they are citizens of Russia, he has that right to do so. Of course, he could push for diplomatic immunity; whether it flies or not, it does not matter. Mueller has not been able to find anything on Trump and we all know that. Just think, if this was on the Democrats, there would be a lot of burying going on. Remember, it did happen. Four men went intentionally left to die in Syria and they blamed it on a video. Hogwash! That was trying to bury their gun running operation that got compromised.
LikeLike
By busting the Deep State, I assume you mean firing all the career employees and replacing them with Trump loyalists.
LikeLike
Busting the Deep state means, Arrest, arraign, charged with treason and sedition. When found guilty, incarceration for life, or the firing squad. Those who have held high positions are met with the firing squad. Just think, it will be the remake of the Nuernberg trials all over again.
LikeLike
Lloyd Becker,
You sound like a completely homicidal maniac. Please don’t return to my blog. I welcome rational discussion, not insanity.
LikeLike
Lloyd Becker:”Mueller has not been able to find anything on Trump and we all know that.”
No, we don’t ‘all know that’. The investigation isn’t over and many of us are worried that Trump will work with crooked Repubs to terminate the investigation. Why is Trump so worried and why won’t he show his tax returns if all is going great in Trumplandia?
LikeLike
One could argue that Trump’s election was an act of sedition.
There’s a difference between a trailblazer and an incompetent sociopath.
But, yes, crazy bullies get things done, destroy things and put everyone in jeopardy. This is how the mafia works.
Too many are too content with replacing one corruption with another, usually deeper and more vile, one. We must evolve beyond this. This is not how things get fixed.
LikeLike
You are looking at the Dumpsterfire presidency through rose colored glasses a mile thick. The consumption of alternate facts/reality from the many “implausible deniability” disinformation sources will do that to you. Simply watch both Donnie and Putins body language and facial tells during the press conference, and put that in the context of Donnies all but total lack of a solid public position on any policy area. Putin played him, easily, and the cloud of handlers and “translators” that have necessarily accumulated around Donnie jumped into action to mitigate another easily avoidable error on his part. Donnie did not mis-speak, repeated, as is too often his habit, the ideas of the last strong person he dealt with. Donnie trump remains what he was elected to be, a figurehead in the service of others agendas.
LikeLike
One has to wonder whether Trump is incredibly stupid or if Putin is holding something over him. I’d say money is one thing that Trump adores. It could lead him to do stupid things.
Senators are speaking out even if timidly. There is a slight ray of hope.
……………………………
The White House had left open the possibility that if special counsel Robert Mueller were allowed to travel to Moscow to interview the Russian intelligence agents he has indicted for election interference, Trump would in turn allow Russian investigators to come to the United States to question at least two of Putin’s foes.
Putin wants to interrogate Michael McFaul, the American ambassador to Russia under former President Obama, and William Browder, an investment fund manager who led an effort to pass the Magnitsky Act in 2012, which froze Russian assets and applied economic sanctions. Putin wants the U.S. to revoke the law, which is named after Browder’s lawyer, who died under mysterious circumstances in a Russian prison.
Lawmakers were chagrined that the Trump administration was considering allowing Russia to question a former U.S. diplomat and a renowned Putin critic. The White House backed away from the idea on Thursday, but the Senate proceeded to approve a resolution warning Trump against it anyway. The vote was 98-0.
Sen. John Cornyn (R-Texas) described the offer as “terrible.” Sen. Lindsey Graham (R-S.C.) called it “absurd and naive.” Sen. Bob Corker (R-Tenn.) said he has “no idea how that’s even come into consciousness.”
LikeLike
Apologies, Diane, I woke up this morning and I realized that you and Mr. Robinson are right. I thanked the heavens for the deep state – it’s truly a blessing to have the CIA run by a known torturer! Hallelujah that the FBI sets up disaffected black and Muslim youth to make it look like they’re fighting terrorism! Praise God for profiling and infiltrating of black and Muslim communities! Thank you Jesus for taking away those blasphemous civil liberties! Great glory to God for regime change! Praise the Lord!!!
I deeply repent of my evil ways. What is my penance?
LikeLike
dienne77: Go take a nap and come back in a better mood. God and Jesus do not endorse your statements.
Jesus: dienne77, I love mankind and view the actions of Trump as a blasphemy on society. I hope he gets impeached and the sooner he is out of office the better. Do not put my name on anything I will not accept as truth.
God:dienne77: Sorry that you woke up in such a bad mood. Please go and take another sleep and wake up praising the liberties that the US has. They are now in danger and I support my friend Carol and what she writes.
Sometimes you sound coherent and sometimes I wonder what happened to your thinking processes. Amen to a great day of getting more sleep.
LikeLike
I don’t understand why dienne77 never gives the democrats the benefit of the doubt she bends over backward to give Trump at every turn.
I mean, Trump has lied to us over and over again, and has acted in some of the most reprehensible and harmful ways by his actions and yet she insists that we should wait to judge him. Because we don’t have enough evidence yet.
LikeLike
I take issue with any labeling of career diplomats and government officials as being “the deep state” because, quite simply, it is not an accurate description. A better example, well understood by those here, is the co-ordination between some on Wall St., some in Silicon Valley, and those they have managed to place in high positions within government like Arne Dun-can’t and Butsy Devolved DeVos. That is a more accurate operational description. It is an insult to those working in government to tar them with the brush of some kind of subterfuge or hidden, malicious intent simply because, day in, day out, they do their jobs to the best of their ability on behalf of the American people based on their own experience and expertice. Call that a bureacracy, because it is, but not a deep state. If you want a more comprehensive description of the stucture of the actual deep state, google “Essay: Anatomy of the deep state” by Mike Lofgren. he has several pieces on the topic as well as others of interest to rational people. He worked as a congressional staffer for the GOP for some 28 years and left in disgust due to the insane direction his party took and continues on. I strongly suspect he would not cross the street to spit on the Dumpsterfire presidency. Aside from his writing on the deep state, he is a good example of what reality driven, honorable conservatism used to be, the kind that has been fun out of the Replutocrat party on a rail and dumped in a ditch. Sorry for the shameless sales pitch, but the guys is brilliant and if you ignore his political affiliation, has a lot in common policy wise with progressives, especially on corruption and money in politics because SHOCKER!!! There is still common ground to be had.
LikeLike
If you have doubts about reading the work of a republican, you should know that most of Lofgrens writting can be found on the Truthout site, not at all known for it’s right wing leanings. Here’s a link to the article I mentioned that was published on Bill Moyers site. http://billmoyers.com/2014/02/21/anatomy-of-the-deep-state/
LikeLike
Exactly, Jon. Good points all. One of the first and most important I learned in my college comparative government class was that bureaucracies provide stability in chaotic political times. That’s why Italy can survive and function when governments change more quickly than the seasons. Or Germany and France continued to function during postwar turmoil and power transitions. It’s why we have civil service protections. They are, by their very natures, small “c” conservative and stable. “Deep State” is nothing more than a reactionary myth designed to destabilize governmental institutions by filling them with narrow-minded ideologues to undermine the non-political functions of governing.
LikeLike
How is the Orange one going to wiggle out of this? ‘Fake news’ and ‘it’s not my voice’, says the Orange Monster. Can you imagine the uproar if Obama had done this? Why does the tRump always go free? It is past time for him to be held accountable for his horrific misdeeds.
……………….
In secret recording, Trump and Cohen discuss payments for story of ex-model who alleged affair with Trump
By Washington Post Today at 12:30 p.m.
Federal investigators have an audio recording in which then-presidential candidate Donald Trump and his personal attorney Michael Cohen discussed in the fall of 2016 making payments for the story of Playboy centerfold Karen McDougal, who allegedly had an extramarital affair with Trump, according to two people familiar with the tape.
Cohen recorded the conversation with Trump, which was seized by federal agents now investigating Trump’s longtime confidant for potential bank and campaign finance crimes, according to multiple familiar with the probe.
In a statement Friday, President Trump’s attorney Rudolph Giuliani confirmed the tape’s existence and said no payment was ever made. The New York Times first reported the existence of the recording.
Trump and Cohen discussed the possible payment after AMI, the parent company of the National Enquirer, bought the rights to McDougal’s story for $150,000 in August 2016, then sat on it…
http://inforum.com/news/government-and-politics/4475294-secret-recording-trump-and-cohen-discuss-payments-story-ex#.W1InDT5ugaI.link
LikeLike
His rabid ignorant followers would follow him off the cliff. More likely he would send them to jump while he watched from his limo
LikeLike
I read a comment in one of many columns about the private meeting that I just can’t get out of my mind. I wish I would have saved it because I can’t seem to get back to it. But one person in Helsinki stated — regarding the secret meeting — maybe Trump suggested to Putin that we should let bygones be bygones and work together because we have a world to rule. Scary thought. And since then I’ve heard some other people being interviewed use the phrase “a world to run” or “they plan to rule the world”.
LikeLike
The master and his puppet
LikeLike
Dan Coats was a rotten Senator [IN-R] but he came through very well in an NBC interview. At least he has the guts to disagree with the President. Where is the rest of the GOP? [Cretins]
…………..
A top official just issued a stark warning about Russia. To this White House, he’s ‘gone rogue.’..Washington Post
Greg Sargent
THE MORNING PLUM:
White House advisers are in an “uproar” over an interview that Director of National Intelligence Dan Coats gave to NBC News, according to reporting in The Post this morning.
As well they should be. After all, Coats starkly warned that Russia is currently trying to “wreak havoc over our elections” — meaning Russia is trying to do this right now — and is working to “divide us” from our “allies.” No wonder White House advisers are worked up — after all, Russia already got away with sabotaging our last election, and they’re trying to do it again.
Okay, I’m kidding. Here’s what really upset them about this Coats interview:
Inside the White House, Trump’s advisers were in an uproar over Coats’s interview in Aspen, Colo. They said the optics were especially damaging, noting that at moments Coats appeared to be laughing at the president, playing to his audience of the intellectual elite in a manner that was sure to infuriate Trump.
“Coats has gone rogue,” said one senior White House official, who spoke on the condition of anonymity to provide a candid assessment.
The Director of National Intelligence issued an extensive warning that Russia is again trying to corrupt U.S. democracy, and White House advisers are worried that President Trump will be angered by his tone.
In that interview, Coats said a number of disturbing things. He said that he doesn’t “know what happened” in Trump’s meeting with Vladimir Putin. He said that we must be “relentless” in terms of continuing to call out Russia’s last round of electoral sabotage, and “ever vigilant” about the possibility of more to come.
[Please, Dan Coats. Don’t resign.]
The portion that might anger Trump came when NBC’s Andrea Mitchell surprised Coats by telling him that Trump had just announced that he had invited Putin to Washington this fall. “Say that again,” Coats said. “Did I hear you?” She repeated it. Coats responded: “That’s going to be special.”
In fairness, it’s not surprising that White House advisers might be upset about this, because even if Coats disagrees with the president, the expectation is understandably that senior officials will keep that concealed and won’t embarrass the president about it. But what’s particularly notable and revealing here is this notion that in saying all these things, Coats has “gone rogue.”
That’s because Coats has, in fact, “gone rogue,” in an important……..
© Washington Post
LikeLike
This was listed as news in Snopes. Aren’t we lucky that this meeting was so productive that Trump wants a second meeting with Putin. He also had stated that he wanted Kim Jong Un from N. Korea to visit the WH. Guess he wants to learn more on the ‘The Art of the Dictatorship”.
Many in the State Department have already left so the experts who would have normally prepared for this meeting haven’t been involved.
Why should any of us worry when Fox reassures us that its just our wild media that stirs up problems.
………………..
Did Trump and Putin Agree to Anything? Only They Know
Donald Trump and Vladimir Putin may have reached several historic agreements at their summit in Finland this week. Or, they may not have. It depends on who you talk to. Three days later no one was quite sure.
By MATTHEW LEE | Associated Press
…In the U.S., frustration with the lack of information has raised already heightened suspicions of Trump. Democratic lawmakers have pushed to subpoena the notes of the State Department interpreter who translated for Trump or compel her to testify. Republicans have blocked the move. Officials said Thursday the White House and State Department were also likely to fight such a move as a breach of executive authority, making the appearance of the notes unlikely until they are published in a historical record decades from now.
So for now, everyone but Trump and Putin and perhaps a handful of their close confidants are in the dark. Even Trump’s own intelligence chief, Dan Coats, said Thursday, “I don’t know what happened in that meeting.”
“It is utterly amazing, utterly amazing, that no one knows what was said,” Chuck Schumer, the top-ranking Democrat in the Senate, said. “This is a democracy. If your president makes agreements with one of our leading — if not our leading — adversary, his Cabinet has to know about it and so do the American people.”
Typically, a summit, especially one between two major powers, will occur after weeks and months of meticulous planning at lower levels with an eye toward producing demonstrable results. Agenda topics, talking points, desired outcomes and even major portions of significant agreements are normally negotiated in advance so the relevant agencies of both countries are aware of any potential policy changes. In some cases, the actual summit meeting and leaders’ signatures on a piece of paper or a joint communique are mere formalities as the hard work has already been done by subordinates…
https://fxn.ws/2NuLKMG
LikeLike
Trump should meet with Putin and Kim together. They could form the Axis of Authoritarianism.
LikeLike
Kristin, MomsRising.org info@momsrising.org
Democrats, Republicans, Independents, and people across the political spectrum must stand together and condemn Donald Trump for his disloyalty to our own government and disregard of Russia’s threats to our nation’s electoral integrity.
Thank you for joining us in demanding that Congress take action now and censure the President by publicly condemning him for his statements at the summit with President Putin of Russia, as well as take immediate bipartisan action to protect our electoral integrity and advance investigations.
https://action.momsrising.org/sign/TrumpCensure_Helsinki?source=aae&aktmid=tm4960559.BkPDAr&akid=a21320014.39721.jvVe-K&t=2
Together we can raise many voices – thank you for all you do!
Kristin
LikeLike
What is spoken in this video is shown to be even more true today.
………..
State of the Uniom Part 2 Robin Riker WTF Productions
Evan N
Published on Feb 22, 2018
Robin RIker’s unique take on Donald Trumps State of the Union Speech
LikeLike
This is really weird. Trump’s face with a seal of approval is on a Russian asbestos company’s product. I wonder how much money Trump got from this deal. How wonderful that Trump, through Pruitt and the EPA, says that asbestos is no longer a health hazard. Nothing is a health hazard if it makes money for the Orange IDIOT.
……………………………………….
Snopes: Seal of approval. Did a Russian asbestos company put Trump’s face on their product? The company shared a photograph of their product to social media with a seal of Donald Trump’s face and the text “Approved by Donald Trump”. (True)
…Asbestos is a mineral that was once widely used in construction projects for its fire resistant properties, but research has since linked it to a variety of cancers, most notably lung cancer and mesothelioma.
The non-profit health and environmental protection Environmental Working Group, who first called attention to the Uralasbest post, provided an English translation of the text that was shared alongside the image:
Donald is on our side! … He supported the head of the United States Environmental Protection Agency, Scott Pruitt, who stated that his agency would no longer deal with negative effects potentially derived from products containing asbestos. Donald Trump supported a specialist and called asbestos “100% safe after application.”
https://news.google.com/news/url?sa=t&fd=R&ct2=us&usg=AFQjCNHm3wcA5bValLqD66888P2L0CywRQ&clid=c3a7d30bb8a4878e06b80cf16b898331&cid=52779969879364&ei=GJpSW9CvH9HtzAaaubSIBw&url=https://www.snopes.com/fact-check/russian-asbestos-trump_face/
LikeLike
This is absolutely freaky. It comes from WaPo and I am not a subscriber. After DuckDuckGo I got the article on a different site but not a URL. Trump is purposely misleading people based on what Fox news tells him. He is not interested in getting the facts from his intelligence sources. He wants to be admired and speaks unproven claims to his audience who eats it up and maligns the mainstream media and distrust our government.
Quote: “His tweets and off-the-cuff remarks constantly reference weird theories from the fringes of the right-wing media ecosystem, yet he exhibits little interest in the resources uniquely available to a president. He has asked for far-less-detailed daily briefings from the intelligence community than his predecessors got, and he reportedly ignores background material on policy decisions.”
………
Trump could get his intel from the government. Instead, he gets it from Fox News.
By theviralinfo –
July 20, 2018
President Trump’s performance at a joint news conference with Vladimir Putin this past week was a stark illustration not only of his strange and persistent deference to the Russian president, but also of his profound alienation from his own government. In command of the most powerful intelligence-gathering apparatus in the world, Trump still prefers to get his information from cable news pundits and right-wing websites.
Helsinki was only the latest example of a pattern that has marked his administration from the outset. His tweets and off-the-cuff remarks constantly reference weird theories from the fringes of the right-wing media ecosystem, yet he exhibits little interest in the resources uniquely available to a president. He has asked for far-less-detailed daily briefings from the intelligence community than his predecessors got, and he reportedly ignores background material on policy decisions. Cut off from systems designed to inform him Trump instead echoes dubious narratives crafted to energize his supporters.
Invited by a reporter at Monday’s news conference to denounce Russian electoral interference, Trump’s first response was a rhetorical question based on a false premise: “You have groups that are wondering why the FBI never took the server. Why haven’t they taken the server?”
To those not steeped in Trump-friendly blogs and cable programs, it might have seemed like a bizarre non sequitur. But regular viewers of Fox News would have understood “where is the server?” as shorthand for a fanciful theory that it was not Russian hackers but an insider at the Democratic National Committee who made off with DNC emails that were published by WikiLeaks. According to this narrative, DNC officials have denied law enforcement access to their computer systems to conceal an “inside job,” and the attribution of the theft to Russian intelligence was made without this obviously crucial piece of evidence. Trump has raised questions about the supposedly “missing” server again and again on Twitter.
Yet the answer to those questions is embarrassingly simple: The FBI did get all the relevant information from the DNC’s network…
So Trump made two clear signals to regular viewers of television hosts like Hannity and Lou Dobbs or to readers of conservative websites, that Russia was framed. Most jarring, both would have been instantly debunked in a brief conversation with any of his intelligence chiefs. If Trump had posed the question “where is the server?” to the FBI rather than his Twitter followers, he would have immediately received an answer.
But of course Trump won’t seek the truth from intelligence agencies: Most of the dubious theories he espouses imagine a “deep state” cabal working to bring him down…
But it remains striking that Trump seems so uninterested in using the vast resources of the presidency to discover whether there’s any validity to the stories he broadcasts to his online audience of millions…
If Trump sincerely believes these stories, that ought to be cause for intense concern: We expect a president to rely on solid intelligence, not blogs and cable news, when making life-and-death national security decisions. But a more cynical interpretation is that the truth or falsehood of these claims is beside the point for Trump: His symbiotic relationship with right-wing media permits him to have it both ways in his public pronouncements…
LikeLike
Pence’s Family Business Cost Taxpayers Over $20 Million In Environmental Cleanup. Make Them Pay Us Back!
The family business of Vice President Mike Pence, Kiel Bros. Oil Co, went under in 2004, making millions for the Pences but leaving a trail of environmental wreckage and dangerous chemicals behind. Almost a decade and a half later, the cleanup cost has exceeded $22 million and counting.
And guess who’s paying the majority of the Pences’ tab — taxpayers. We refuse to stand for it and demand Mike Pence and his family fully reimburse the public for the fallout from their reckless business practices.
Pence and his Republican Party claim to loathe government spending and love “personal responsibility,” using that ideology to deny millions of Americans lifesaving healthcare, food assistance, and housing — among other things.
But that is clearly a lie. When it comes to cleaning up the mistakes of businessmen born to privilege, Pence and his ilk are more than happy to let us pay their debts.
We think it’s time for the Vice President to take a little personal responsibility of his own. Add your name to demand the Pence family pay back the tens of millions that taxpayers have paid to clean up their toxic mess!
https://www.thepetitionsite.com/embed.js
LikeLike
Dear Professor Ravitch,
As a fellow-critic of the present deceitful educational and destructive reform movement, I would like to send you a book I wrote which my grad classes edited.
Itâs titled Education Under Siege: Frauds, Fads, Fantasies and Fictions in Educational Reform.
My latest book just sent to the publisher is titled Combat Zone: The Continuing War Against the Public Schools. I want to thank you for the huge number of your articles and blogs which I was fortunate to find and cite as sources.
Iâve just completed a long article for the Oxford Encyclopedia of Educational Administration titled, The Impact of the Neoliberal Revolution on Society and Education, which gets at some of the causes of the attack on our public schools.
To send the book, I would need your address, if you wish to provide it.
I have been a teacher, principal, assistant superintendent and superintendent usually in lighthouse districts (Long Beach, NY as an example), and have been in the university for the last several decades, George Peabody College, Vanderbilt, the University of Tennessee and the University of South Florida.
Again, I want to thank your for the large number of sources for my books and articles.
Most cordially,
Arthur Shapiro
LikeLike
Arthur Shapiro,
I can’t provide my address on a public site for obvious reasons.
LikeLike