Dana Milbank of the Washington Post is one of my favorite columnists. My only disagreement with this column is that he thinks we are not threatened by fascism. I have concluded that Trump’s racist, corporatist ideology, meshed with his demogogic rhetoric, looks, sounds, and feels like fascism.
In case it is behind a paywall:
Every 75 years or so in our history, Americans have renewed their commitment to freedom.
Divide our history into thirds, and you can see, at regular intervals, a rededication to our founding doctrine. In 1789, the framers drafted the Bill of Rights. Seventy-four years later, at the turning point in the Civil War, Abraham Lincoln called for “a new birth of freedom” to honor those who died.
Seventy-eight years after that, on the eve of U.S. entry into world war in 1941, Franklin D. Roosevelt declared the “four freedoms.”
That was 77 years ago, and we are due for another renewal. Neither fascism nor civil war threatens us, but Americans are united in fear. Much of the country fears the loss of basic freedoms under President Trump: free speech, press and religion, due process and control over their bodies. Trump, meanwhile, foments fears among his followers of crime, gangs, immigrants and civil servants. And Americans of all beliefs fear they are losing the American Dream and its promise of economic mobility.
Trump’s opponents are seemingly confused about how to respond in this election year. Do they appeal to whites or nonwhites, progressives or moderates, move to the left to rally the “base” or hew to the center to capture the swing voters? Should they make an economic argument or a social argument, target those concerned about jobs or those angry about the president?
These are false choices, though, because our salvation will be what it always has been. On this 242nd birthday of the United States, let’s rededicate ourselves to freedom:
Freedom from Trump’s constant attacks on women, immigrants, people of color, gay people and Muslims.
Freedom to work and live without discrimination, harassment and violence because of your gender, race or religion.
Freedom to get medical care when you or your children are sick.
Freedom to earn a living wage, to attend college or get job training, and to retire in security.
Freedom from a rigged economy in which the top 1 percent own more than the bottom 90 percent combined. Freedom to marry whom you choose.
Freedom to make decisions about your own body.
Freedom to send your kids to school without fear for their safety.
Freedom to breathe clean air, to drink clean water, to live on a habitable planet.
Freedom to elect your leaders without the rich, or foreign governments, choosing them for you.
And freedom to speak, to protest and to publish without the threat of violence.
Not only do such ideas unify the left (far more than quibbling about, say, which form of universal health care is best or what exactly should be done with U.S. Immigration and Customs Enforcement), but freedom appeals broadly to Americans regardless of politics. Ask us what it means to be American, and you will get one answer above all others: “to be free.”
Conservatives long claimed ownership of it. (Remember Operation Iraqi Freedom, Operation Enduring Freedom and freedom fries?) But Trump has essentially ceded the freedom agenda to his opponents. One measure, using a database of his speeches, tweets and Q&As, finds that he has used the word “freedom” 72 times this year (often dismissively, as in “we need freedom of the press, but . . .”). That’s far less than he has used, say, “respect” (252), “strong” (502), “win” (306), “border” (617), “taxes” (158), “Democrat” (560), “kill” (159), “country” (1,288), “illegal” (127), “crime” (250) and “great” (2,826).
IThis isn’t just a linguistic de-emphasis of freedom; Trump has made common cause with dictators and played down human rights abroad while starting a trade war with democratic allies. At home he has questioned due process for refugees, taken immigrant children from their parents, imposed a travel ban on several Muslim-majority nations and declared the media the enemy of the American people. He is now poised to shift the balance on the Supreme Court away from abortion rights and gay rights.
In a very real sense, the fight against Trump is a battle for freedom.
He hopes to make the midterm elections about sanctuary cities, MS-13, a socialist takeover, the “deep state,” a corrupt justice system and immigrants “invading and infesting’’ America. Rather than join him in the fear chamber, progressives and Democrats ought to respond with a variation of what FDR proposed for the world in a very different context in 1941, “freedom of speech and expression,” “freedom of every person to worship God in his own way,” “freedom from want” and — of new significance now — “freedom from fear.”
“This nation has placed its destiny in the hands and heads and hearts of its millions of free men and women,” Roosevelt said, “and its faith in freedom under the guidance of God.” This faith sustained America through those dark times. It will not fail us in our 243rd year. “

Again, Neoliberalism has gotten a shot of steroids under Der Trumpenfuhrer and, as David Harvey elaborates in his “Brief History of Neoliberalism”, it’s Trump’s rhetoric that ultimately sustains the elite’s maneuvering to continue dismantling a public state that helps the middle class and others. The enemy is simply an unfettered unrestrained rapacious Capitalism that’s parroted by the corporate media and their politician spokespeople as the key to everyone’s freedom.
LikeLike
Hear, hear.
LikeLike
I get the freedom thing – – – but we (and other nations) had to FIGHT FOR THOSE FREEDOMS! WHERE’S THAT? Blogs, marches, msnbc, and preaching to choirs at least keep issue out there – but NONE OF THAT COUNTERS THIS SOBs RANTS and attacks.
This is no way to beat a bully and his band of band of rich white boys and angry “regular Americans” – not to mention ownership of Fox/Pravda, hundreds of media outlets, appeals court justices.
WHY DO GOP reps and senators get to ignore calls and refuse public meetings? Have they already signed the loyalty oath? Force them to declare support for this racist; not just his exectutive orders.
The president is a master at:
* The big lie (Nazi tactic – say it enough it becomes true),
* Messaging (immigrants = rapists and MS13; NFL protest = being against our soldiers; school and other shootings = mentally ill; …),
*Fear mongering and scapegoats; and
* Mob tactics (“selling protection” to gop either support me or you’re out of business).
and add being above the law, lying, and cheating.
He parades victims of illegal immigrants.
Where’s the Dem parading a stage full of DACA college graduates, doctors, and teachers?
He’s met with N Korea and now Russia (behind closed doors) – – WHY ISN”T EVERY DEM GOVERNOR ASKING FOR A PUBLIC MEETING IN HIS/HER STATE?
His freaking base doesn’t care about any of that. He beat hillary, slams Obama, and yells at people. Period.
His elected cronies are too scared to say anything because they put their 2 or 6 year stint in DC ahead of ethics and principals.
Evagelicals sold their souls for the Supreme Court seat
We want freedom. Then THEY need to be tweeted, called out, filibustered.
Make them declare their loyalty to America over the President. Make they say it.
Rise up. Vote.
LikeLike
The only way to beat them is at the ballot box in November 2018 and 2020.
Send them packing and send their swamp creatures away too.
LikeLiked by 1 person
Diane,
I……wish I could agree with you there, I REALLY do……but I can’t. A good personal friend of mine who works for a very popular former republican senator as his own personal assistant at his own lobbying firm has told me repeatedly that elections are rigged and mean nothing and that they are anything but free. All of it is from our ruling elite who are dismantling everything considered democratic. It’s always darkest before dawn, right? We are starting at midnight my friend. We have to prepare for THAT.
Y
LikeLike
I don’t agree. Elections are not rigged. If you believe that, don’t bother to vote.
LikeLike
Swamp creatures.
LikeLike
Yossarian: I am concerned about the possibility of our high tech voting machines not being secure. Indiana has Apple iPads and I’m sure a good hacker could change elections if he/she wanted to. We have no paper trail and no way to prove how anyone voted.
Do others consider this a problem? A friend of mine when to some tech fair in the Chicago area and a hacker got into a similar voting machine in 10-15 minutes.
Wasn’t there something about how the exit polls didn’t match the polls in some areas in the presidential election?????
…………………………………………..
Hacking and the 2016 Presidential Election blog by Bruce Schneier
Was the 2016 presidential election hacked? It’s hard to tell. There were no obvious hacks on Election Day, but new reports have raised the question of whether voting machines were tampered with in three states that Donald Trump won this month: Wisconsin, Michigan and Pennsylvania.
The researchers behind these reports include voting rights lawyer John Bonifaz and J. Alex Halderman, the director of the University of Michigan Center for Computer Security and Society, both respected in the community. They have been talking with Hillary Clinton’s campaign, but their analysis is not yet public.
According to a report in New York magazine, the share of votes received by Clinton was significantly lower in precincts that used a particular type of voting machine: The magazine story suggested that Clinton had received 7 percent fewer votes in Wisconsin counties that used electronic machines, which could be hacked, than in counties that used paper ballots. That is exactly the sort of result we would expect to see if there had been some sort of voting machine hack. There are many different types of voting machines, and attacks against one type would not work against the others. So a voting anomaly correlated to machine type could be a red flag, although Trump did better across the entire Midwest than pre-election polls expected, and there are also some correlations between voting machine type and the demographics of the various precincts. Even Halderman wrote early Wednesday morning that “the most likely explanation is that the polls were systematically wrong, rather than that the election was hacked.”
What the allegations, and the ripples they’re causing on social media, really show is how fundamentally untrustworthy our hodgepodge election system is.
Accountability is a major problem for US elections…
……………..
About Bruce Schneier
Bruce Schneier
I’ve been writing about security issues on my blog since 2004, and in my monthly newsletter since 1998. I write books, articles, and academic papers. Currently, I’m the Chief Technology Officer of IBM Resilient, a fellow at Harvard’s Berkman Center, and a board member of EFF..
LikeLike
I am an IT professional, and I have worked as an election judge. I am certain that elections in the USA, are generally fair and there is no serious tampering, or interference. I do NOT believe that foreign governments are going into our election systems, and actively working to “throw” an election.
If you are displeased with the direction that this nation is taking, then by all means, vote for candidate of your choice.
LikeLike
There is no question in the judgment of our intelligence agencies that Russia interfered in our election to help Trump, as it interfered in BREXIT and other European elections. What do you know that the CIA does not? please contact them at once.
LikeLike
Election integrity is important, and paper ballots, hand counted in public, seem to be the best way to ensure fair elections. Tulsi Gabbard and Tim Canova, among others, are working on that issue.
Regarding Russian interference in the election:
The book Shattered explains that Clinton campaign operatives decided the night after the election in 2016 to blame Comey and Russia for the loss, rather than taking any responsibility (or career/financial consequences) themselves.
A former US Ambassador to Russia, Jack Matlock, just published a blog post saying the Jan 2017 joint intelligence memo alleging Russian interference has many issues, including being politicized, presenting opinions but not facts. and ignoring the judgement of the State Department intelligence office, which he claims did not agree with the assessment that Russia interfered.
You will probably not see Jack Matlock on MSNBC, which has been ginning up a new cold war with Russia at the expense of covering the Trump tax cuts, military spending, or anything else of substance, but there is actually no consensus and no evidence that Russia interfered in the 2016 election.
http://jackmatlock.com/2018/06/musings-ii-the-intellience-community-russian-interference-and-due-diligence/
LikeLike
Please note that Dan Coats, Trump’s Director of National Intelligence, warned that the Russians would attempt to interfere in the 2018 election, as they had already interfered in the 2016 election, and as they have done in several European countries.
http://www.atlanticcouncil.org/blogs/new-atlanticist/director-of-national-intelligence-dan-coats-russia-is-attempting-to-influence-us-midterms-divide-transatlantic-alliance
LikeLike
concerned citizen,
If you are going to willfully ignore the evidence that even the Republicans in the Senate who aren’t entirely Trump’s tools have acknowledged, then you have to be a troll.
It is a fact – beyond any doubt – that Russia was interfering. It was running troll factories and with help from Cambridge Analytica and the information that they helpfully received from Facebook, targeting certain voters. Russians offering dirt on Hillary were invited into Trump Tower and then Trump (while he was with Putin) drafted a document for his son that absolutely lied about why the Russians were invited to meet with the very top campaign officials.
The hack of the DNC was done by Russia. The selected release of those edited e-mails was timed exactly when it would help Trump the most. Paul Manafort was Trump’s campaign manager and he went to huge lengths to hide the sources of his money.
And Trump has shown a truly remarkable love for Putin and is planning to meet with Putin ALONE! Something that if any Democrat had suggested would have led to an immediate impeachment trial.
You have got to be kidding me that Russia wasn’t involved. Whether or not they had help directly from the Trump campaign, Cambridge Analytica (via Facebook where Trump campaign advisor Peter Thiel was involved with both Cambridge Analytica and Facebook) and other Trump associates remains to be seen. Whether or not their interference made a difference remains to be seen. But they were involved. If you deny that fact, you are simply repeating Trump propaganda and I can’t help wondering why you would do so when it is an outright lie.
LikeLike
NYC,
Rather than addressing the points I made, you accuse me of being a troll and “can’t help but wonder why” I dare to disagree with you.
FYI, the reason is that I read primary sources, diverse sources, and watch/read independent media. I don’t depend on MSNBC for partisan infotainment.
Insisting “this is a fact, all the important people agree, even some Republicans!” is not evidence. The things you insist are facts are actually opinions or disproven theories.
For example, both campaigns were offered embedded support as a paid service from Facebook, team Trump accepted the offer while team Clinton thought they didn’t need help.
Facebook initially said there were no political ads from Russia, after intense pressure from Democrats in congress, especially Mark Warner who visited Facebook in Palo Alto to lobby them, they “found” $100,000 (a drop in the bucket given the overall campaign ad spends) of ads from a private Russian clickbait farm (not the Russian government). Most of those ads were posted AFTER the election, and all featured odd and unpersuasive clickbait on hot-button issues like BLM, or cute memes like puppies and kittens.
The first 10 minutes of this video explains why Russiagate is a con:
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=W-wzsN3b_uk
LikeLike
The “clickbait farm” was a Russian government operation.
Trump is realizing all of Putin’s dearest goals: destroying the US as leader of the Democratic Western alliance; disrupting the Western alliance; bringing fascists to power in former Soviet satellites.
Putin famously said that the collapse of the despotic USSR was “the greatest eat geopolitical disaster of the 20th century.”
He was a KGB agent most of his life.
Putin meeting Trump is like sending a baby to negotiate with a grandmaster of foreign intrigue.
LikeLike
Concerned Citizen (CC), are you a concerned American Citizen or a Russian citizen?
CC commented, “The first 10 minutes of this video explains why Russiagate is a con”
But, but, but, the actual facts say something different.
“How Russian Facebook Ads Divided and Targeted US Voters Before the 2016 Election”
“In total, groups that had never filed a report with the Federal Election Commission placed four times as many ads as groups that had.” …
“Kim’s research showed that in fact, these unregulated ads made up the majority of issue-based ads on Facebook during the course of her study.” …
“Among the groups that were not associated with any FEC records, Kim went on to differentiate between run-of-the mill dark money groups (think: non-profits and astroturf groups) and what she called “suspicious” groups. The latter had Facebook Pages or other landing pages that had been taken down or hadn’t been active since election day. These suspicious groups also had no IRS record or online footprint to speak of at all. ‘Some groups, we were never able to track who they were,’ Kim says.”
https://www.wired.com/story/russian-facebook-ads-targeted-us-voters-before-2016-election/
https://www.wired.com/story/russian-facebook-ads-targeted-us-voters-before-2016-election/
“Russia-backed Facebook posts ‘reached 126m Americans’ during US election”
https://www.theguardian.com/technology/2017/oct/30/facebook-russia-fake-accounts-126-million
“Facebook says Russia did try to meddle in Brexit vote”
“See every single Russian Facebook ad that ran during the 2016 election cycle”
Democrats on the House Intelligence Committee released more than 3,000 Facebook ads that ran from 2015 to 2017, which were bought by Russia’s Internet Research Agency.
The agency used the ads to promote political chaos and damage to the country’s democracy, according to Congress.
The ads appeared on both Facebook and Instagram.
https://www.deseretnews.com/article/900018672/see-every-single-russian-facebook-ad-that-ran-during-the-2016-election-cycle.html
How Facebook helped elect Trump: a timeline — dated Sept. 2017
NOTE: This timeline starts in 2014 – October 30, 2017
https://mashable.com/2017/09/08/facebook-elect-trump-russia-election/#Z2RHAFQhzmqA
If CC honestly or dishonestly claims that Russiagate is a con, then I think CC has confirmed beyond a doubt that CC is a troll and/or an easily fooled deplorable supporter of Trump and the Alt-Right Deep State machine, the only real deep state machine working in the shadows to subvert the U.S. Constitution.
LikeLike
Lloyd, I agree with you.
LikeLike
Concerned Citizen,
If you know more than the CIA, the FBI, the Defense Intelligence Agency, and every other federal intelligence agency, I urge you to contact them and explain to them why they are wrong. Even Trump’s CIA Director Dan Coates said that the Russians interfered in the 2016 elections.
Be sure to let the Brits and the French know, too, that they are wrong. They seem to think that Russia interfered in their elections. You can set them right.
LikeLike
Diane, have you actually looked at the ads posted by the clickbait farm? If you do, you will see that they are not a sophisticated foreign government operation, they are on the level of “10 weird tricks dermatologists don’t want you to know.” Very obvious commercial clickbait. There is no chance these ads had any impact on the election…especially since most of them were posted AFTER the election.
Trump is also realizing the goals of Saudi Arabia and Israel.
LikeLike
Trump is Putin’s servant.
LikeLike
Yes, but . . .
Quoting Roosevelt this way – “freedom of every person to worship God in his own way” – is not helpful. While I recognize the importance of freedom to practice any faith, these constant assumptions that “every person” worships God in one way or another are tiresome. In an indirect way, I think this capitulation to universal theism is part of the problem.
Milbank adds, “Roosevelt said, ‘and its faith in freedom under the guidance of God.’ This faith sustained America through those dark times.”
I have no “faith in freedom,” nor do I find any freedom in faith. Stipulating that our freedom exists “under the guidance of God” is sliding toward the theocracy that must be resisted. Faith, particularly as practiced by Christian conservatives, is the antithesis of freedom.
LikeLiked by 1 person
It is dangerous and arrogant for anyone to declare “we are not threatened by fascism”. How does anyone KNOW whether we are threatened by fascism or not? How does one announce he has some superior knowledge of all future events and therefore is entitled to assure us that our future is perfectly safe?
The fact is that there are parallels to the earlier days of Hitler — when the Germans and their educated and assimilated Jewish population just knew there was absolutely no threat of fascism taking hold and Hitler would be defeated in the next election.
I would never had imagined we could be led by a President who could tell so many lies and have a Republican Congress doing all of his bidding. I would never imagined that major newspapers would be afraid to call a lie a lie for fear of being called “biased”.
We have had other Presidents I have disliked intensely, but I always felt that there would be future elections where that candidate could be defeated. Republicans had hateful policies but they still seemed to believe in democracy. Now we seem to be led by the John Birch Society and alt right neo-Nazis.
LikeLiked by 1 person
America’s problems didn’t start with Trump’s inauguration. And America’s problems will not be solved if Trump is impeached or voted out.
Trump’s crudeness is maddening, but so far, policy-wise, he hasn’t been as disastrous as George W Bush. I’d much rather have Trump meeting with Kim and Putin and declaring himself a negotiator who prevents war, vs. George W Bush murdering 500,000 – 1,500,000+ (countless, uncounted) innocent people in wars based on blatant lies.
85 Senators, Republicans AND Democrats, just voted for an enormous increase in military spending, with almost no debate, and almost no media scrutiny. The US government is 85% owned by donors from the military-industrial complex and a multitude of other industries and interest groups. Notice how easily Gates, DeVos, and other billionaires have raided and strip-mined public schools. We need to tax the rich at Ronald Reagan rates (or better yet, Eisenhower rates), and we need to get money out of politics.
More info:
https://www.justicedemocrats.com/
https://khanna.house.gov/media/press-releases/release-house-members-start-no-pac-money-caucus
LikeLike
Sorry, I disagree. Bush’s Wars were humanitarian disasters. Trump’s term is not over. Wait. Unlike Bush, he is insulting our allies and embracing those who are tyrants. His idiotic trade wars will not end well.
LikeLike
It has just come out that Trump was all on board for an invasion of Venezuela to overthrow the current president. He was dissuaded from this insanity by his military advisers. We should return to the top marginal tax rate of Ike (91%) or even of JFK through Carter (in the low 70% range). Reagan lowered the top marginal income tax rate from 70 percent in 1980 to 28 percent in 1988. However, Reagan did raise taxes 11 times in other areas, such as the Social security payroll tax.
LikeLike
Wait a minute. You just explained how you prefer Trump to Bush because of Bush’s involving us in an unjust war, and then go on to point out how the current congress has just voted a huge increase in military spending and is owned by the military industrial complex, among others…. And you like Trump better because he pals around with autocrats rather than inventing reasons, so far, to fight with them? What’s to like about a man who does his best to alienate allies, not to mention the majority of his own people?
LikeLike
Trump’s alienation of Justin Trudeau, Angela Merkel, or other allies is extremely unlikely to lead to hot wars.
I don’t like Trump, I was replying to the idea that Trump is the worst threat to freedom in 75 years.
The Iraq war, torture memos, Abu Ghraib, extra-judicial detentions, Jose Padilla, Guantanamo, drone assassinations of US citizens including a child, accidental? drone killing of innocent targets including journalists, NSA mass surveillance, and so much more happened under Bush (and Obama.) Mass incarceration spiked as a result of Clinton’s crime bill and continued under Bush and Obama.
The worst threat to freedom is bigger than Trump. It is the intersection of violent institutional power and money: the military industrial complex, the spy agencies, the police/prison system, and the corrupting influence of money in politics.
LikeLiked by 1 person
Perhaps a saving truth about Trump and this particular far right moment in US history is that leaders of other countries who have an actual interest in history and philosophy know exactly who Trump is (they can see right through him) and they know very well what a far right political moment is (they have seen the rise and fall of far right movements in history). He can do much damage, but he is transparent.
LikeLike
Unfortunately, Trump’s rise has given strength to fascist movements across Europe, including Hungary and now Poland. This was Steve Bannon’s goal.
LikeLiked by 1 person
PAINFUL truth
LikeLike
“The worst threat to freedom is bigger than Trump. It is the intersection of violent institutional power and money: the military industrial complex, the spy agencies, the police/prison system, and the corrupting influence of money in politics.”
+1
LikeLike
“Trump’s alienation of Justin Trudeau, Angela Merkel, or other allies is extremely unlikely to lead to hot wars.”
But it does mean that hot wars are more likely with the U.S. going it alone in places that many Americans can’t identify on a map. Diplomacy is not valued or even an option. See the news that our Dear Leader considered invading Venezuela last year, for example.
LikeLike
@speduktr: Congress increased military spending AFTER the elections. At the time of the campaign Trump painted himself less hawky. From the Guardian’s comment page an opinion I agree with: “One thing I’ve noticed is that almost everybody who explains how Clinton is better than Trump focuses exclusively on the well-being of Americans. They don’t seem to care about people living outside of the USA. Clinton had a track record of being a warmonger while Trump campaigned as (in effect) an isolationist. So if you wanted to save poor brown people overseas from US bombing, I can see how Trump might have been the more appealing candidate. But to most Clinton supporters those poor brown people weren’t even on the radar – certainly they never appear in pro-Clinton arguments.”
LikeLike
“Clinton had a track record of being a warmonger”.
Really, that is such a ridiculous thing to say.
I guess you could also say “progressive leftists have a track record of preferring that children overseas die horrible deaths by chemical weapons than having to spend one iota of their tax dollars to protect them.”
I mean, warmonger?? I guess you’d just call the American Nazis who said “who cares if Hitler takes over Europe and Britain?” Jewish baby killers?
Clinton may have been more hawkish on some foreign policies, but she was no more a “warmonger” than Obama was. And seeing a situation and making one of two terrible choices doesn’t make them a warmonger. And your wish that they had not been involved does not make you a person who selfishly allows children to die horrible deaths in the name of “not getting involved when children in other countries are tortured and murdered because they aren’t Americans.”
We should be having debates about how to conduct foreign policy in a way that does the least harm. Not calling people who have similar values “warmongers” and praising Trump as a peaceful person because he will just enable Putin to kill whoever he wants and that’s all fine as long as it’s Putin doing it while America sits back and says nothing.
LikeLike
“[Trump] will just enable Putin to kill whoever he wants and that’s all fine as long as it’s Putin doing it while America sits back and says nothing.” – Heh, you think America has not done enough? Russian involvement in Syrian war is the first Russian foreign mission since the dissolution of the Soviet Union. Bashar al-Assad is recognized by other countries and by the UN as a legitimate president of the country, he represents the legitimate government. From the international law standpoint, it is legit.
Gaddafi was a recognized leader of Libya, Saddam was a recognized leader of Iraq. This did not stop the U.S. from overthrowing the governments of these countries, dragging these countries into prolonged civil wars, poisoning their soil with depleted uranium rounds (half-life is only 4.5 billion years). These children in “other countries”, they did not appear from nowhere. Instead of zooming into the Russian jets flying missions in the Syrian sky I suggest you to zoom out and get a bigger picture.
LikeLike
What is a “recognized leader”? I think US policy in the Middle East is and has been a disaster, but why defend Saddam and Ghaddafi? I had a friend on the civilian flight from London that Libyan agents exploded over Scotland, a flight loaded with students coming home for the holidays. Ghadaffi can burn in hell.
LikeLike
concerned citizen: I think you are right. I tend to see all the bad historical stuff you note through a practical lens: a steady drumbeat of legislative changes starting under Reagan (continuing to present) which untie the legislative knots created after the ’29 crash– which were designed to rein in untrammeled capitalism, & in so doing, right the balance in favor of democracy/ the value of one person-one vote.
LikeLike
The US voting system has been placed at risk by Russian operatives and the foot-dragging of Congress in verifying the security of voting. The compromised systems and hacks are most likely to be in swing states.
The Supremes have not been friendly to claims that gerrymandered districts have compromised voting, nor have they had any backbone on the systematic efforts to pare down eligibilities to vote and also disrupt voter turn out. Real vigilance at the local level is needed to get out the vote and also make sure the process of voting has integrity. Debates about who has provided the worst and best governance matter, but let’s keep our eye on election integrity. It is the only way to get the alligators out of the swamp and get restore hope for ourselves and the next generation.
https://www.axios.com/be-smart-there-is-more-than-one-way-to-hack-an-election-1529424861-1e0c75d9-32b8-4a85-98b3-47d5a853fdeb.html
LikeLike
According to Oxford Dictionaries.com, fascism means:
“An authoritarian and nationalistic right-wing system of government and social organization.”
The current GOP and Trump fit that definition perfectly and everything they are doing is moving in that direction at a fast pace as if they plan to finish before the 2018 midterms.
LikeLike
This presidents WANTS a fight.
Come on folks.
We’re teachers and we know bullies.
And we know entitled private school bullies are the worst.
He baits enemies
He alienates allies
Yes Reagan Bush and Bush policies did not align with a lot of readers here…same as Obama’s education ….but not one of them would name call.. make fun of… disrespect…
And none rallied white supremacists and anti immigration activists and anti science scientists … …
And they did not declare A and then do B.
They didn’t cheat
They released their taxes.
And Congress was not afraid of to speak out against their them
This man is scary …. he knows it… he loves it…
So what does your teacher development say about bullies?
LikeLike
“And they did not declare A and then do B.” – they all have done it.
LikeLike
I am not a public-school teacher, but during early 2000’s when my boys were in public middle-school they got involved in a few incidents, & I was very impressed w/how admin handled.
The program was called “peer resolution” [perhaps still is], & involved a counselor walking the 2 combatants thro their feelings/ motivations etc. These situations are always about some sort of bullying, & counselor helped each understand his role & place himself in the other’s shoes.
My youngest was involved in a classroom incident where a girl felt threatened/ bullied by boys: in that situation they brought in parents as well, & a particlularly user[kid]-friendly cop to explore the ramifications. My son was ‘going along to get along’ – was chastened by the intervention, delivered an apology to the girl (who had been an elem-sch buddy & felt betrayed), & was changed by it — learned to speak from the heart despite peer pressure.
Such programs are useful & important — I expect even more so today (current teachers can advise), when we have a head of state modeling uncivil & bullying behavior, that has got to be trickling into the pubschs, & means teachers/admin need to spell out & hold fast to rules of behavior for their school.
LikeLike
Anyone think public education’s focus should be on democratic citizenship?
Not the SAT or ACT. Not Advanced Placement. Not STEM. Not “college and careers.”
…democratic citizenship.
LikeLike
Companies want to turn young people into human capital, nothing more. They want compliant drones that know their place.
LikeLike
I’m in agreement on this… and if we adopted this as the mission of public education it would end the notion of “running schools like a business”, a notion that has contributed to the “survival of the fittest” ideology that underpins the GOP’s “philosophy”.
LikeLike
ME!!!!!!!!!!!!!!! That’s why I keep pleading for social studies education in this forum, to my state, and anyone else within earshot.
LikeLike
When I was a kid, we learned not only how the govt was structured / how to pass a bill etc (in jr hi 1st, repeated in later yrs), & how we had to fight to make it that way (later in Amer Hist) — but I’m quite sure we practiced writing ltrs to our reps & even sent some… I think my kids got less of that 40 yrs later (but learned at our knee, so are not passive). Are you telling me none of that happens any more?
LikeLike
‘How to Prevent Future Trumps by Robert Reich
…But Trump’s racism and xenophobia focused the cumulative economic rage on scapegoats that had nothing to do with its causes. It was hardly the first time in history a demagogue has used this playbook.
If America doesn’t respond to the calamity that’s befallen the working class, we will have Trumps as far as the eye can see.
A few Democrats are getting the message – pushing ambitious ideas like government-guaranteed full employment, single-payer health care, industry-wide collective bargaining, and a universal basic income.
We also need ways to finance these things, such as a carbon tax, a tax on Wall Street trades, and a progressive tax on wealth.
To accomplish all this we have to get big money out of politics.
Even if “Citizens United” isn’t overruled, big money’s influence can be limited with generous public financing of elections, full disclosure of the source of all campaign contributions, and a clampdown on the revolving door between business and government.
Trump isn’t the cause of what’s happened to America. He’s the consequence – the product of years of stagnant wages and big money’s corruption of our democracy combined with a long legacy of racism and bigotry…
https://www.truthdig.com/articles/how-to-prevent-future-trumps/
LikeLike
Very good post, I completely agree, hits all the marks. This should be the Dem platform. I only hope that those Dem progressives/ Dem-Socialists/ Dems who run will be sure to focus on get-the-$-out/ campaign reform — & walk the talk by using crowd-funding/ many small donations to support their campaigns. It is the key to turning things around politically.
LikeLike
“”faith in freedom under the guidance of God.” This faith sustained America through those dark times. It will not fail us in our 243rd year.” – started with a bang and ended with a whimper.
LikeLike
The WH has been sending out emails bragging about how great the tax cut is working to bring back a thriving economy. BS The wealthy are making out just fine. According to the Evangelical ministers, the wealthy are being blessed by God. Trump is a form of god.
…………………….
Where Did Tax Benefits Trump Promised Average Americans Go? Straight to Big Oil, Big Pharma and Their Crappy Insurance @alternet
..Any tax cuts working families received this year after the Republican Party pushed through its tax law have likely been canceled out by higher costs of gas, healthcare, and other necessities, according to Americans for Tax Fairness (AFT), due to President Donald Trump’s policies.
The average American family is paying $420 more per year for fuel than they did before Trump entered office in January 2017, the group said this week, while Trump’s changes to the Affordable Care Act (ACA) will cost middle class households an average of $2,000 more in healthcare costs than they paid previously.
While traveling around the country selling their tax proposal, Republicans including Trump and House Speaker Paul Ryan (R-Wis.) promised an average tax cut of $1,182 for the average American family—far less than the rising costs of necessities.
As AFT executive director Frank Clemente noted, the wealthiest Americans are enjoying a $51,000 tax cut this year alone while working families see little benefit to the so-called Tax Cuts and Jobs Act…
https://www.alternet.org/where-did-tax-benefits-trump-promised-average-americans-go-straight-big-oil-big-pharma-and-their#.Wz5y3utMudc.gmail
LikeLike
Joe Kennedy looks like someone to watch. Here is what he has to say about Pruitt’s resignation.
………….
Today, Environmental Protection Agency administrator Scott Pruitt finally resigned.
Pruitt’s spent his career attacking the environment on behalf of the world’s most careless polluters, giving them ever greater license to poison our air and water.
Over the last few months, he’s also come to represent the rampant arrogance and cronyism of the Trump administration, as we’ve learned of the millions of taxpayer dollars he’s wasted on unnecessary perks and privileges for himself.
His departure is good for America, Carol.
We can’t let up the pressure, though. No doubt Donald Trump will try to replace Pruitt with someone equally hostile to our values and our natural resources. It’ll be up to our grassroots movement to fight for clean air, water, and energy, and a healthier future for our country.
Joe
LikeLike
His #2 is/was a lobbyist for the coal industry
LikeLike
Diane, how horrible that a former coal lobbyist [Wheeler] is now in charge of the EPA. Trump is determined to roll back protections for clean air, clean water and has no problem with destruction to the planet. Even scientists are on Trump’s list to attack.
How did we ever get stuck with this ignorant creep?
LikeLike
Can’t get better than this, having someone in charge of the EPA with a ‘zeal to undo environmental regulations’. Trump’s intuitive abilities are the best!! [Sarcasm] In a sane world, this environmental disaster would be fired.
………………….
The departure of Mr. Pruitt means that the agency will be led in the coming months by his deputy, Andrew Wheeler, a former coal lobbyist who shares Mr. Pruitt’s zeal to undo environmental regulations. Mr. Wheeler is viewed as a consummate Washington insider who avoids the limelight and has spent years effectively navigating the rules.
LikeLike
Trump promised to bring back coal. No surprises here. He was not as vociferous about bringing back dirty air and fetid water.
LikeLike
Trump works to create new lows. Why do we have a president who is so degrading to anyone who criticizes him? Notice his lack of speaking ability even in his insults. He has to go to rallies regularly to charge up his ego. I doubt that he’d ever give a $ million to charity.
Of course he stands up for sexual predators. It takes one to know one.
It is sickening to realize that people support this creep. I wouldn’t go to hear him rattle.
…………………………
Trump mocks #MeToo movement in riff on Elizabeth Warren’s heritage during Montana rally…CNN
….But his most extended attack was aimed at Warren, a Democrat he has long targeted for claiming that she is part Native American and derisively nicknamed “Pocahontas,” after the 17th century historical figure. On Thursday, Trump mocked people who called on him to apologize for the remark and sarcastically apologized to the historic figure.
“I want to apologize. Pocahontas, I apologize to you. I apologize to you. To you I apologize,” he said. “To the fake Pocahontas, I won’t apologize.”
He went on to suggest that, should Warren win the Democratic nomination in 2020 and they were to debate, he would toss an ancestry test to her and dare her to take it. In doing so, he made light of the #MeToo movement.
“We’ll take that little kit and say, we have to go it gently because we are in the Me Too generation, and we will very gently take that kit, slowly toss it” to her, Trump said, adding that he would offer $1 million to charity if she took the test and it “shows you are an Indian.”
“I have a feeling she will say no,” he added.
In a tweet following his speech, Warren said, “Hey, @realDonaldTrump: While you obsess over my genes, your Admin is conducting DNA tests on little kids because you ripped them from their mamas & you are too incompetent to reunite them in time to meet a court order. Maybe you should focus on fixing the lives you’re destroying.”
Trump’s comments on #MeToo come on the heels of his hiring former Fox News executive Bill Shine, who left his role after being accused of mishandling a flurry of sexual harassment allegations within the network. Earlier Thursday on Air Force One, Trump also defended Republican Rep. Jim Jordan against allegations he overlooked sexual abuse during his time as a wrestling coach at Ohio State University.
“I don’t believe them at all. I believe him,” Trump said.
Warren was far from the only Democrat who drew Trump’s acidic rhetoric on Thursday, though. The President continued a long running fight with California Rep. Maxine Waters by slamming her intelligence.
“Democrats want anarchy. They really do. And they don’t know who they are playing with, folks,” Trump said. “I said it the other day, yes, she is a low IQ individual, Maxine Waters. I said it the other day. I mean, honestly she is somewhere in the mid-60s. I believe that.”…
Check out this story on CNN: https://www.cnn.com/2018/07/05/politics/trump-montana-rally-pruitt-resigns/index.html
LikeLike
Whoa! He gave $7 to the Boy Scouts. That was Don Jr’s fee. Paid by the “foundation.”
LikeLike
Trump’s hatred never stops.
….
‘THIS DECISION MUST BE REVERSED NOW’ The U.S. Army has begun discharging immigrants who enlisted in the military with promises that their service would lead to U.S. citizenship, according to a report by The Associated Press. [HuffPost]
LikeLike
Our Great Leader puts down 75% of the journalists and says he’s been preparing for this meeting with Putin all of his life. Putin was in the KGB and very possibly has something on Trump. What will the US be giving up while getting nothing in return? What will Trump get for himself…a Trump Tower in Moscow? The pee tapes?
Why should we trust Trump to be alone with Putin. This is a recipe for a disaster. Neither man can be trusted. It is sickening to watch his loyal supporters cheer at his every word.
[You do not need to be a NYT subscriber to watch their videos.]
……………………………………
Video; “Putin’s fine. He’s Fine. We’re All Fine”
While mocking journalists, President Trump told a crowd that even though the news media says “President Putin is K.G.B., and this and that,” he’s “totally prepared” for his summit with the Russian leader.
https://www.nytimes.com/video/players/offsite/index.html?videoId=100000005993959
LikeLike
‘Resettling fewer refugees than the rest of the world’ is something we are supposed to be proud of? Jordan has a refugee camp that has 86,000 people. Muslim refugees have had to live in this camp for years since it is not safe to return to their home countries. Jordan is helping. The US isn’t. Trump is actively working to undue everything Obama achieved.
This was just posted from the WH:
Trump Beats Promise to Cut New Refugees, Down 66% from Obama
– Washington Examiner
“The Trump administration beat the president’s goal of trimming new refugee admissions from the 100,000 brought in by former President Obama, slashing the population by 66 percent. In fact, for the first time, the U.S. resettled fewer refugees than the rest of the world,” Paul Bedard reports in the Washington Examiner.
LikeLike
This has to be one of the stupidest things Trump has ever said. It comes from Snopes and is labeled ‘True’. It’s hard to imagine anyone clapping and screaming approval of this idiot speaking what is in his loosely wired ‘brain’. Narcissistic dementia is in his brain.
…….
Did Trump Refer To His Mouth As a Musical Instrument ‘Hopefully’ Attached to the Brain?
During a rally in Montana, President Trump went on a tangent about crowd size in which he compared his speeches to the performances of Sir Elton John.
Snopes: RATING
TRUE
During a 5 July 2018 rally in Montana, President Trump delivered a speech that complimented Russian President Vladimir Putin, attacked the press, and mocked the #metoo movement. As he is wont to do, the president spent a portion of the evening discussing the prodigious crowds his rallies inspire.
While attempting to begin a point about immigration policy, Trump veered off course to compliment his own rhetorical skills:
In a fairly nonsensical aside, Trump speculated about the reasons why he has (allegedly) broken so many crowd-size records held previously by musical artist Sir Elton John, adding that he has been able to do so without the help of an organ, guitar, or any other musical instrument:
“I have broken more Elton John records, he seems to have a lot of records. And I, by the way, I don’t have a musical instrument. I don’t have a guitar or an organ. No organ. Elton has an organ. And lots of other people helping. No we’ve broken a lot of records. We’ve broken virtually every record.”
Part of it, he continued to speculate, is that his rallies might allow more space for crowds compared to Elton John or to sporting events:
“Because you know, look, I only need this space. They need much more room. For basketball, for hockey and all of the sports, they need a lot of room. We don’t need it. We have people in that space. So we break all of these records.”
Then, bringing things full-circle, he insisted that the only musical instrument he required was his mouth, which he made special care to note was also part of a package that included the brain:
“Really we do it without like, the musical instruments. This is the only musical: the mouth. And hopefully the brain attached to the mouth. Right? The brain, more important than the mouth, is the brain. The brain is much more important.”
LikeLike
California’s Vineyard Workers Already Faced Long Hours, Low Pay, and Harsh Conditions. Then Came Trump’s Immigration Crackdown.
It’s Sunday night of Labor Day weekend, but any barbecues died down hours ago, and the rural back roads of this southern Napa County neighborhood are a dark and silent maze. Around midnight, the lights of the Robert Sinskey Vineyards’ shop blink on. In the center of its gravel driveway, workers coax tractors to life and…
President Donald Trump has called for a crackdown on immigrants because he says they “compete directly against vulnerable American workers.” But to California’s grape growers, this claim is laughable. According to Manuel Rios, the owner of the company supplying Sinskey with its contract labor, “Nobody wants these jobs.”…
The Trump administration’s stance on immigration could scare off even more workers. President Barack Obama’s administration deported more than 5 million people over the course of eight years, but it prioritized those with criminal records. During Trump’s first year in office, deportation arrests of undocumented immigrants without rap sheets more than doubled. Immigration policy advocate Ed Kissam, who has led studies on farmworkers for the Labor Department, analyzed Trump’s proposed immigration policies and found that they pose a “major threat” to California’s economic well-being. If all the orders were to take effect, he concluded, the state could lose 5 to 10 percent of its agricultural labor force by 2020. In March, a large sweep by Immigration and Customs Enforcement agents across Central and Northern California sent 26 farmworkers into deportation proceedings, many of whom appeared to have no criminal history, the Los Angeles Times reported. Juan Hernandez, executive director of Sonoma’s La Luz Center, a nonprofit supporting immigrant families, told me that it’s hard for his clients to separate rumors of raids from reality, so they’re always on alert. “Are we fearful in Sonoma Valley? Of course.”
[…]https://www.motherjones.com/food/2018/07/californias-vineyard-workers-wine-labor-shortage-guestworker-visas-immigration-crackdown/
LikeLike