The Network for Public Education and the Schott Foundation for Public Education released a report grading the states on their support for public education and documenting the extent to which states are allowing the privatization of public funds.
The report can be found here.It will be regularly updated to reflect changing events.
The livestream of the press briefing, featuring John Jackson, president of the Schott Foundation, Carol Burris of the Network for Public Education, and me is on the Schott Foundation Facebook page.
Here is my perspective on what we learned.
Currently, 9% of American students attend private and religious schools; 6% attend charter schools; and 85% attend public schools.
The public does not realize that every dollar spent for a charter or a voucher is a dollar subtracted from public schools. No state has added extra dollars for charters or vouchers. They simply take money away from public schools, which most students attend
Charters and vouchers are a substitute for fully funding our public schools.
As we saw in the dramatic wave of teacher strikes this past spring, our public schools, which educate 85% of all students, are being systematically underfunded.
Privatization is diverting money from public schools.
Take Indiana, for example. There are more than 1 million students in Indiana. Of that number, 35,000 use vouchers. This is 3.5% of the students in the state. Vouchers cost the state $153 million this past year, which causes budget cuts in every district. The Fort Wayne Community Schools alone lost $20 million. Nearly 60% of the voucher students never attended a public school. The voucher program is an explicit way for the state to fund religious schools. In addition, Indiana has 4% of its students in charter schools, another loss to district budgets. Please note that despite the rhetoric of the politicians, the overwhelming majority of students are choosing public schools, not using vouchers or enrolling in charters. This is the case even though more than half the students in the state are eligible for a voucher.
Consider Florida. Its state constitution explicitly bans the spending of public dollars in religious schools. In 2012, Jeb Bush pressed for a constitutional amendment that would remove that explicit ban (he called his amendment, Proposition 8, the “Religious Liberty Amendment”). Despite the appealing name, the voters decided by a margin of 55-45% NOT to repeal the ban on funding religious schools with public dollars. Nonetheless, Florida now has four different voucher programs. Their total cost, according to calculations done by Carol Burris, the executive director of NPE, is nearly $1 billion annually. Florida has 2.7 million school-age children. About 250,000 (10%) are in privately managed charter schools; another 140,000 (5%) use vouchers. Despite the widespread availability of charters and vouchers, despite the Legislature’s love affair with school choice, the overwhelming majority of students in Florida enroll in public schools.
While writing this privatization report, Burris calculated that about $2.4 billion is diverted from public schools to voucher schools, which are not accountable and are often evangelical schools that do not teach modern science or history and are not subject to civil rights protections.
Add to that the likely cost of charters. There are 3 million students currently enrolled in charters, out of a total student enrollment in the U.S. of 50 million. States vary in the amount they allot to charters. If the average state allotment is $5,000–and it could be higher–then that is another $15 billion subtracted from public schools to pay for privately managed charters.
That’s $17 Billion withdrawn from the public schools that enroll 85% of students.
In other words, the great majority of students are losing funding for their public school to support the choices of a very small minority.
Even in states where public officials are under the thumb of the choice lobbyists, there is no stampede for vouchers or charters. A small minority in every state are choosing to attend a charter or voucher, even in a state like Florida.
The vast majority are enrolled in public schools, and their public schools are cutting budgets, laying off teachers, increasing class sizes, and losing programs like the arts, so that a tiny minority can use public dollars to attend charter schools or voucher schools, where teachers are less qualified and less experienced.
This diversion of public dollars is hurting public schools whose doors are open to all.
The real cost of privatization is paid by the 47 million children who choose public schools.
Agreed, and I’m glad you did the study, but the public needs to ask ed reformers in government what they have contributed to PUBLIC schools.
We currently have a huge group of people in state government who add absolutely no value to the vast majority of schools in their states, because they object to public schools on ideological grounds.
This is unacceptable – they’re public employees.
Ask the ed reformers in government in your state to point to specific programs or policies they have brought in that improve any public school, anywhere. They can’t do it. That’s why they focus exclusively on charters and vouchers.
The same is true at the federal level. Public schools are dismissed as the “status quo” and ignored UNLESS they’re selling us ed tech product. They add no value. They seem to feel our kids are there to serve THEM. They no longer even offer any positive ideas- it’s a droning litany of loss and criticism. They are not doing their jobs.
We must keep reminding public officials that 85% of our students are in public schools, not in charters or vouchers.
Even where charters and vouchers are easily available, like Florida and Indiana, 85% of the kids choose public schools.
Keep that in mind.
I suggest you do an internet search. You will find that 61% of the school children in Gary, Indiana are attending alternate schools. see
http://www.chicagotribune.com/suburbs/post-tribune/news/ct-ptb-data-transfer-schools-idoe-st-0120-20180119-story.html
That may be true, Charles,but only because the city or state is replacing public d hoops with charters. Statewide in Indiana, a tiny proportion of students attend charters or voucher schools. 3.5% enroll in voucher schools. Stealing $20 Million from Fort Wayne Community Schools and every other school district in the state
“We must keep reminding public officials that 85% of our students are in public schools, not in charters or vouchers.”
An effective way of reminding them of the number 85 would be to reduce their salaries to 85% of their current one. Reminding them and the parents who forgot what the nature and role of tax dollars is to increase all their taxes by 15% so that they can remember better the 15% they took away from public schools.
Ed reformers in Ohio use public schools to push their agenda and that’s ALL they do.
We have elected officials in this state who came out of the ed reform “movement” and believe it is THEIR JOB to eradicate our schools. No one hired them for that. No one wants to pay them for that.
They should get off the public payroll if they don’t support the schools in their districts. Let some ed reform billionaire pay them- I’m sick of funding attacks on my son’s school.
Our kids deserve better advocates, and they could have them. We could hire new people, people who aren’t captured by this “movement” and people who come to work intending to contribute something of value to schools that exist.
If we don’t value our kids and our schools they won’t either, and they don’t. They have gotten away with this lousy, slap-dash approach to the disfavored public schools far too long. No more.
This information needs to be shared with multiple media outlets. Calculating the costs, the loss of funds to public schools, the meager results, enhanced segregation and the small number of students served, indicate that all this so-called choice is taking away from the many to serve the few. It is clearly not worth the disruption and all the waste and fraud. The use of public funds for religious schools in another area of concern. If a baker can refuse to bake a cake for a gay wedding because it offends their religion, why should agnostic, atheist or taxpayers of any religious sect be forced to pay for any other religious education in which they do not believe? Shouldn’t they have the same rights as the baker? Also, if the rough cost per privatized student could be determined for each state, taxpayers could ask the bigger question of is all this “choice” worth the expenditures. Most states do not want anyone to calculate these estimates as it will reveal the extent of the recklessness with which state representatives have squandered tax dollars.
As I’d stated on your previous post RE: this great report, ILL-Annoy received a solid, well-deserved F. Wonderful bill, they passed, allowing (wealthy, of course) tax “credits” for donations to private schools, including parochials. Twice the stab-to-the-heart of the meaning of “public,” as in public funds should not go to private entities, & they most certainly should not go to religious institutions.
So 15% is missing from public school funds as the result of charters and vouchers?
Then how about reducing by 15% the pay and perks of those politicians who vote for vouchers and charter schools? Then they may start understanding what it means to take public money away.
I of course have additional ideas: for example, increase the income and property taxes by 15% for these politicians and those parents who send their kids to charter schools or use vouchers.
Put back what you take out, I say.
Public education is an investment in one’s own community. Quality schools enhance property values. Charters and vouchers generally remove local tax dollars from the local community. Privatization shifts public money into private pockets.
Reblogged this on Network Schools – Wayne Gersen and commented:
Here’s the most telling quote: “No state has added extra dollars for charters or vouchers. They simply take money away from public schools, which most students attend.” School funding is a zero sum game… and public schools are losing.
Straight & to the point. Well-said, wgersen.
exactly
Twitter posting:
Underlying Trump’s proposal to combine the U.S. Departments of Education and Labor is:
-A disregard for the services the agencies should provide
-A desire to dismantle government without regard to consequences
-A belief that children and workers are fodder for big corporations
3 replies 91 retweets 119 likes
A sort of 1800s view that poor/middle-class children are perfectly useful workers, why waste time making them into anything else…