Henry Giroux places the recent wave of teacher strikes in historical perspective. The teachers are fighting a battle on behalf of the public good against an assault by reactionary neoliberalism.
He writes:
“The power of collective resistance is being mounted in full force against a neoliberal logic that unabashedly insists that the rule of the market is more important than the needs of teachers, students, young people, the poor and those deemed disposable by those with power in our society. Teachers are tired of being relentless victims of a casino capitalism in which they and their students are treated with little respect, dignity and value. They have had enough of corrupt politicians, hedge fund managers and civically illiterate pundits seduced by the power of the corporate and political demagogues who are waging a war on critical teaching, critical pedagogy and the creativity and autonomy of classroom teachers.
“Since the 1980s, an extreme form of capitalism — or what in the current moment I want to call neoliberal fascism — has waged a war against public education and all vestiges of the common good and social contract. In addition, this is a war rooted in class and gender discrimination — one that deskills teachers, exploits their labor and bears down particularly hard on women, who make up a dominant segment of the teaching force. In doing so, it not only undermines schooling as a public good, but also weaponizes and weakens the formative cultures, values and social relations that enable schools to create the conditions for students to become critical and engaged citizens.
“Schools have been underfunded, increasingly privatized and turned into testing factories that deliver poor students of color to the violence of the school-to-prison pipeline. Moreover, they have also been restructured in order to weaken unions, subject teachers to horrendous working conditions and expose students to overcrowded classrooms. In some cases, the dire working environment and dilapidated conditions of schools and classrooms appear incomprehensible in the richest nation in the world…
“Moreover, as state and corporate violence engulfs the entire society, schools have been subject to forms of extreme violence that in the past existed exclusively outside of their doors. Under such circumstances, youth are increasingly viewed as suspects and are targeted both by a gun culture that places profits above student lives and by a neoliberal machinery of cruelty, misery and violence dedicated to widespread educational failure. Instead of imbuing students with a sense of ethical and social responsibility while preparing them for a life of social and economic mobility, public schools have been converted into high-tech security spheres whose defining principles are fear, uncertainty and anxiety. In this view, a corporate vision of the U.S. has reduced the culture of schooling to the culture of business and an armed camp, and in doing so, imposed a real and symbolic threat of violence on schools, teachers and students. As such, thinking has become the enemy of freedom, and profits have become more important than human lives…
“Rejecting the idea that education is a commodity to be bought and sold, teachers and students across the country are reclaiming education as a public good and a human right, a protective space that should be free of violence and open to critical teaching and learning. Not only is it a place to think, engage in critical dialogue, encourage human potential and contribute to the vibrancy of a democratic polity, it is also a place in which the social flourishes, in that students and teachers learn to think and act together.”
BEAUTIFULLY STATED!!! People, children have become “its” rather than “thous”. Educators at all levels MUST get back to making them “:thous”. A person’s value is measured on written tests? Where in the world does this insane philosophy come from? Perhaps the same mentality that elected Trump and George W.
And that elected the Obomber.
Yup.
AND the many, many legislators across the nation who have happily stepped up to sign test-based legislation, over and over and over…
Segregation is returning to North Carolina. See
https://www.dailykos.com/stories/1772187
Clearly, publicly-operated schools have failed.
No, Charles. Public schools are integrated. Public schools have not failed.
Choice in NC is bringing back segregation. Segregated charters, segregated voucher schools.
My original post was unclear. Let me restate:
Clearly, publicly-operated schools have failed to integrate. According to recent data, (public) school segregation is getting worse. The number of children of color, who are attending publicly operated schools where at least 50% of the students are white, is declining . see this article, and tell me if you do not agree:
https://www.vox.com/2018/3/5/17080218/school-segregation-getting-worse-data
As a former statistician, for the US Dept of Commerce, I know that data can be manipulated, but I must agree with this author’s conclusions.
Segregation is increasing because of the withdrawal of the court’s and the growth of choice. Statisticians know the difference between between causation and correlation.
Public schools don’t cause segregation.
Q Public schools don’t cause segregation. END Q
I also don’t necessarily know the cause or causation. I know one incident.
I lived in Charlotte,NC in 1960. The school system was resisting integration. (The majority of the people in Charlotte/Mecklenburg were opposed). When my father learned that his children were going to have to go to school with the (use your imagination), he went all ballistic. He said that he would withdraw me, and send me to private school.
When integration came, this was the spur to the growth of all-white public schools. And the push for school choice vouchers was not far behind.
The result of this, is that public schools are becoming more segregated. Fewer children of color, are going to schools where there is 50% of more white children.
Here we are over a half century after the Brown decision, and we are going the wrong way on school integration.
I know the answer, Charles. Racism causes segregation. Whites are afraid of living next door to blacks. Whites are afraid of integrated schools. Racism.
Mistake: I mean forced integration was the spur to the growth of all-white PRIVATE schools. My mistake.
So, what you mean is that integration caused segregation.
In Charles-land , the best world is segregation.
Q I know the answer, Charles. Racism causes segregation. Whites are afraid of living next door to blacks. Whites are afraid of integrated schools. Racism. END Q
Wait a minute! Just calm down. I agree that racism causes segregation. No dispute.
You should not say that “whites” are afraid of living next door to blacks. That is like saying that all blacks can tap-dance.
I am Caucasian. I was in an interracial marriage. I have a black Air Force Master sergeant on one side of my home, and an interracial couple on the other side. There are Pakistanis across the street. My wife works in real estate, she can quote your the open housing laws. I do not live in fear.
“Whites” are not “afraid” of integrated (public) schools. Where did you get that idea?
White flight is caused by racism. Whites flee to prevent their children from going to integrated schools. Whites used to burn crosses on the lawns of blacks who moved into their neighborhood.
Read Richard Rothstein’s The Color of Law. Don’t come back until you have. Write a book report. I’m serious.
Q So, what you mean is that integration caused segregation.
In Charles-land , the best world is segregation. END Q
You do not know what I mean. When forced integration began, especially forced bussing (See Swann v. Mecklenburg,NC 1972), that was definitely a spur to many white families pulling their children out of integrated publicly-operated schools, and seeking alternatives.
I do NOT think that the best world is segregation. Please do not call me a racist/segregationist. I have been married to a woman from a different race.
Racism is a evil thing. It exists in our nation, no doubt at all.
Racism causes segregation. Public schools do not cause segregation.
Q White flight is caused by racism. Whites flee to prevent their children from going to integrated schools. Whites used to burn crosses on the lawns of blacks who moved into their neighborhood. END Q
White flight is indeed caused by racism, no doubt.
Some white people will flee from a public school, to prevent their children going to school with children of color. Some will seek public money (vouchers) to pay the cost of an alternate school. Some parents who cannot afford to move, and cannot afford a non-public school, will just “suck it up”.
Some racist white people used to join the KKK, and/or the “white citizen’s council”,etc. and object to people of color moving into “white” neighborhoods. (BTW- The KKK prefers the word “light” to “burn”)
When Louisville/Jefferson county (KY) brought in the integration and cross-town bussing, some white parents picked up and moved to Bullitt County and Oldham County. All of this is well-documented.
Charlotte Mecklenburg was a model of integration destroyed by racists and charters
“Late last year, the Associated Press analyzed America’s charter schools and determined that they are among the most segregated schools in the country”
Nice try, Charles. You didn’t read the whole article.
Do you have a link?
That’s a quote from the article that Charles linked. Classic.
I read the entire article. And I agree with you, that charter schools are (on the average) more segregated than publicly-operated schools. Of course they are. NO argument.
Many parents withdraw their children from publicly-operated schools, for various reasons. Racism is certainly one of the reasons.
Charles,
Read, then think, then comment before you write.
So you were a former statistician? Really?
Is there anything you have not been, done, anywhere where you have not worked or lived? Anyone you have not been married to?
You’ve done it all. You’re omnipotent . . . . I wish I were you.
I always read the articles I find here. Most are fascinating. I worked for the US Dept of Commerce Bureau of the Census, in computer admin, and statistical data collection/analysis. I used to tell people, that I “have a job that really counts”.
There are lots of things I have not done, many places I have not been.
I have only been married twice, I do not plan to marry again.
“Greed has poisoned men’s souls, has barricaded the world with hate, has goose-stepped us into misery and bloodshed. We have developed speed, but we have shut ourselves in. Machinery that gives abundance has left us in want. Our knowledge has made us cynical. Our cleverness, hard and unkind. We think too much and feel too little. More than machinery we need humanity. More than cleverness we need kindness and gentleness. Without these qualities, life will be violent and all will be lost….
…In the 17th Chapter of St Luke it is written: “the Kingdom of God is within man” – not one man nor a group of men, but in all men! In you! You, the people have the power – the power to create machines. The power to create happiness! You, the people, have the power to make this life free and beautiful, to make this life a wonderful adventure.
Then – in the name of democracy – let us use that power – let us all unite. Let us fight for a new world – a decent world that will give men a chance to work – that will give youth a future and old age a security. By the promise of these things, brutes have risen to power. But they lie! They do not fulfil that promise. They never will!
Dictators free themselves but they enslave the people! Now let us fight to fulfil that promise! Let us fight to free the world – to do away with national barriers – to do away with greed, with hate and intolerance. Let us fight for a world of reason, a world where science and progress will lead to all men’s happiness. Soldiers! in the name of democracy, let us all unite!”
https://www.charliechaplin.com/en/synopsis/articles/29-The-Great-Dictator-s-Speech
We have created a system that rewards those that already “have” with more, and prevents those who start with less from attaining success with anything less than a Herculean, single-focused effort. I don’t think that most of our leaders are sinister, but rather, narrow-focused. The system is terribly rigged, but outwardly, doesn’t appear so, so many don’t believe it or don’t see it.
There is a large part of a child’s success in school which is dependent upon the parent. But we’ve yet to solve the issue: how do we ensure that a child doesn’t pay the price for having been parented poorly? And nobody wants to pay to help all kids be successful; they just want their own kids to be successful. This is where “pull yourself up by your bootstraps” and the focus on success of the individual has not worked for our country. We need someone to talk about collective responsibility and collective success of the whole.
“But we’ve yet to solve the issue: how do we ensure that a child doesn’t pay the price for having been parented poorly?”
There are a lot of issues in your statement that are unstated but come into play in attempting to answer it.
What does “parented poorly” mean?
Who determines that definition?
Who determines who is or isn’t a “poorly parented” child.
Why should anyone believe that they have the right to tell others how to “parent properly”?
Is not parenting and choosing what one does as a parent a fundamental right?
Should the state (in whatever form and action) take precedence over the parents’ decisions? (talking about everyday conditions and not abuse situations-then again what constitutes abuse?)
I raise the questions because your question gets at a lot of very thorny issues that generally are not even addressed much less satisfactorily answered.
Hi Duane: Regardless, again, the argument as a whole points to the adult education system
(AAACE/AELS/NLA) that, like Laura says about Head Start, is long-already in place and only needs support and funding. It’s already research-heavy for the vibrant inter-generational transfer of education between child and parent.
It should be obvious that those parents who are racist, homophobic, or whatever, and whether they are aware of it or not, will find a “reason” to “choose” the segregation that charters offer covertly for their children.
Henry Giroux says:
“Rejecting the idea that education is a commodity to be bought and sold, teachers and students across the country are reclaiming education as a public good and a human right, a protective space that should be free of violence and open to critical teaching and learning.”
It is good to see that teachers, students, parents, and educators and a few others in civic and political life are pushing back against the people who have sought to demean teachers and aggrandize the importance of scores on standardized tests as if reliable predictors of everything else worthwhile in life. The pushback is important, but it is also a fact that profits are becoming more important than the quality of human life, literally.
Tafficking in humans, exploiting them for commercial gain, is one facet of a growth industry targeting almost every person, public good, and service as a profit-center. Public lands and infrastructures are no less exploited. We see this in Trump’s cabinet appointments. Polluting the air and water is now ok because it is an economic benefit to the polluters. Selling off and commercializing our national parks is ok, because those lands have untapped economic value. Ending net neutrality will allow ISP providers to “innovate” and profit from packages of online content and all of your data—biometric, biographic, and psychographic. Nothing is so sacred that it cannot be envisioned as a source of profit.
In addition to those profit-centered policies from elected officials and their designees, we must pay attention and resist the proliferation of a relatively new financial product designed to undermine social and civic programs. The product is called a pay-for-success contract or social impact bond (loan). The Obama administration put $200 million into incubating these financial products, and ESSA authorizes their use to address problems in education, specifically for “Prevention And Intervention Programs For Children And Youth Who Are Neglected, Delinquent, Or At-Risk” in Title I, Part D, Section 4108 (I).
Pay for success contracts date back to 2011, but are now marketed internationally. The contracts are designed to assert that social and civic services can be delivered better, and with more bang for the buck, if taken over by investors and their representatives who know to scale up worthy efforts, make them more efficient, and lower costs. If the public agency agrees to the terms of the contract, the “savings” from the improved service and lower costs are paid to the investors.
In theory, this is a win-win—better social and civic services at lower costs. But savvy intermediaries rig these contracts—lawyers, accountants, marketers, program managers, program evaluators—so there is little or no risk to the investors and a big loss of independent control of the programs. This is exactly what is happening with pay-for-success contracts for preschool programs in Utah and in Chicago, with others in the works internationally.
In the preschool programs, the “savings” gained and paid out to investors are coming from an enrollment process designed to rule out preschoolers who may require IEPs—costly special education services (among other strategies). Cohorts of students are tracked from entry into the program, with tests of readiness for Kindergarten, tests of progress in grades one and two, then read-by-grade three tests and others. The investors are fine with denial of special education services to those who might otherwise be in a preschool program. The monetary value of a student is all that matters.
I hope that readers of this blog will become informed about the really crass monetizing of human beings being put into play by the organized efforts of billionaire-funded foundations and venture capitalists who distain democratic governance and have complete faith in their power to do everything better that anyone else.
The most well documented source of information, including amazing graphics of interlocking relationships among the profit-seekers parading as do-gooders, comes from Wrench in the Gears. Try this and https://wrenchinthegears.com/2018/06/10/heckman-and-pritzker-pitch-apps-as-poverty-solutions-yielding-a-13-return-on-investment/ and others.
You will learn more than you probably want to know.
As usual, Laura, you have given us very detailed food for thought. It reminded me of two successful approaches to providing transportation for students.
A close boyhood friend had a father that was a dairy farmer and a member of the school board. The man was probably the most driven guy I ever met. He also shared that businessman love of the idea of competition and its value, long before Milton Friedman became a household word. While he was on the board, he suggested a plan that would make the bus service work better. He proposed increasing the amount the county paid to bus drivers so that they could own their own busses. Each driver was a sub-contractor with the county, and each was responsible to maintain the vehicle. It satisfied all parties. I knew a driver who liked it because short haul trips for non-school groups added to the purse a bit. Fifty years later, they still do it this way.
The other approach was almost completely opposite. When I moved to North Carolina, students who were driver age drove the busses. I do not know about compensation, but it was not competitive. It also seemed to work (I moved there in 1979). It was reported that the accident rate was very low, and the high school seniors who drove were very responsible.
The point, I think, in this is that both private and community solutions to the same problem shared one thing. They were intent on serving the community with the best possible service. I have no doubt that the board member who made the arrangement with individual owners would have pulled the plug on the program the minute he felt it was not serving the public.
I do not believe North Carolina does their program now, but I do not know why.
There is nothing wrong with public/private partnerships. Schools have always used such arrangements to the benefit of both. What is new in this equation is the degree to which big money pushes aside the community in the decision-making process. My friend the dairy farmer had nothing to gain by his private bus arrangement. There was no conflict of interest. Modern purveyors of tests and charters see the public as a cash cow. Sure is a different kind of dairy farming.
I think the privatizers search for ways to insert themselves into a public service or common good and pay the right people to make it happen. It often costs more for less as in Emanuel’s privatizing Chicago’s public parking. In many cases there is no need for the change as in the case of the post office where many newer employees are paid less and work for a private subcontractor. The goal is to pocket the money at the top, and pay the workers less. We have seen this play out in many charters.
Fred Klonsky wrote about SIBs in 2015 when Rahm & then Gov. Pat Quinn brought them to Chicago. The formula is simple. Each year that fewer kids are enrolled in SPED or children in SPED get fewer related services, the bankers get bonuses.
It’s a slick con to bypass IDEA’s mandatory funding of IEP service requirements. Without ever explicitly denying services SPED gets less & less money. The pressure will be on school districts & local school boards to take the heat for budget cuts while the people who set up the con milk more & more from education coffers.
https://preaprez.wordpress.com/2015/10/12/social-impact-bonds-are-just-another-form-of-privatization-bad-news-for-special-needs-students/
It’s disappointing to see James Heckman spearheading this consortium of profiteers. He was one of the earliest researchers of the High Scope PreK program that began in Ypslanti, MI. His research on High Scope outcomes in particular & PreK in general propelled public awareness of the widespread benefits of child-centered, experiential learning.
If these men really wanted the US & the world to benefit from universal preK they would expand Head Start to all children. No means testing, no income limits. Head Start’s infrastructure is already in place. Its funding comes directly from the federal government- no bankers or hedge funds in between the money stream.
“I hope that readers of this blog will become informed about the really crass monetizing of human beings being put into play by the organized efforts of billionaire-funded foundations and venture capitalists who distain democratic governance and have complete faith in their power to do everything better that anyone else.”
While I’d say that most readers here understand that “crass monetization”, the vast majority of citizens have no clue as none of the lame stream media will touch that issue. If it ain’t on the tube or a screen it doesn’t exist.
There was a good segment, “Teacher Problems” on HBO’s new show (& the first season finale), “Wyatt Cenac’s Problem Areas.” (If someone has a link, please post: you all should see this!) He talks about teachers not making enough money, having to buy school supplies, etc., & having to get 2nd jobs. He suggests that those teachers driving for Uber as a second job should ask their passengers to help them grade papers while sitting in the back seat (in part, to show others how much hard work it is to teach). He mentions that the teacher is probably driving “a 6-year-old Hyundai.”
I’d say it’s probably an older car, & it’s STILL being financed!
I dispute several of this author’s conclusions. One of them is that education spending (overall) has declined, and that schools are underfunded. That is not the case. Education spending (K-12) by states/municipalities is at an all-time high. (This is OVERALL, and not just one state) see
https://marketbrief.edweek.org/marketplace-k-12/state-spending-on-k-12-rises-slightly-in-2017-despite-headwinds/
First, does that account for inflation? I mean, yes, in whole dollar terms, I certainly hope we spend more on education than we did in 1960. In 1960 you could buy a hamburger for fifteen cents.
Second, do these figures look at what “education spending” is spent on? How much did we spend on administration and educational consultants and testing and computerized gliztery in 1970 vs. 1990 vs. today? I think if you look at those inconvenient things called facts, you’ll see that the percentage of the educational budget spent on teacher/librarian/nurse/paraprofessional salaries, textbooks and supplies, facilities maintenance and other necessary areas has plummeted while admins, consultants and ed tech firms have profited handsomely.
“In 1960 you could buy a hamburger for fifteen cents.”
Like this: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=xs1kLkxOmqY
It’s easily understood why that spending would be “at an all-time high”–the number of students is at an all-time high.
That too.
I thought this was a wonderful, thought provoking article. I knew I was making a fool of myself, as I went to the original source, and posted the entire article….5 posts….at the education is not worth discussing or reporting st. louis post dispatch. (current affairs forum is the only place I am allowed to say anything). My title was “Wonder what McCaskill thinks of this article about teachers” My opening sentence was “Feel free to speak for her. She is not about to say anything”. 19 views (at least six of them my own, as I posted). No replies. I added an additional post saying that some sentences were spotlighted in the margins, using my title as bait: “teachers were displaying “a thug mentality,”