Ben Chapman of the New York Daily News reports on an outrage: Someone at DeWitt Clinton High School in the Bronx ordered painters to paint over a priceless mural created during the New Deal era, in anticipation of a visit to the school by then Schools’ Chancellor Carmen Farina. Farina never made the visit, but the painting by a noted artist was “slathered over” by “high-gloss cotton-candy blue paint.”
“Constellations” by German-born painter Alfred Floegel was installed on the ceiling outside DeWitt Clinton’s library in 1940. It depicted the stars in the heavens alongside another large-scale Floegel mural called “History of the World.”
The paintings, deemed Floegel’s masterpieces, were both used in history lessons. They also appear in the Department of Education’s online art collection, “Public Art for Public Schools.”
“It is a kind of Sistine Chapel of New Deal artworks,” wrote Richard Walker, a University of California/Berkley professor who directs the Living New Deal project, which aims to preserve New Deal-era artworks.
Floegel, who was born in 1894 and died in 1976, worked on the paintings for six years, Walker wrote in 2015 on his project’s website. At the time, he was teaching night courses at DeWitt Clinton, school staffers said.
Half of his masterpiece disappeared in November, when construction workers painted over the ceiling mural to spruce up for a visit by then-schools chancellor Carmen Farina, according to school staffers.
Farina never made the visit.
Education Department officials tell a different story — they say the painting was covered over as workers repaired damage to the building.
Whatever the reason, the loss of the mural stunned students and educators.
“It was like if you went to see the Mona Lisa and someone painted it blue,” one school staffer said. “People were devastated.”
This was not a matter of taste. This is bureaucratic vandalism. And no one will admit who issued the order.

More about the work in question is at the link below. The casual references to “restoration” are a sign of ignorance about the structural, technical and aesthetic issues. Greater New York has many experts, but this sounds like a challenge for staff at the Getty Conservation Institute in LA.
https://livingnewdeal.org/projects/dewitt-clinton-high-school-murals-new-york-ny/
LikeLike
Very depressing.
LikeLike
I have a low tolerance for stupid and it just may be my undoing one of these days.
LikeLike
Unfortunately, institutions like the DOE have a vary high tolerance for Stupid (as well as Malicious), which could be the undoing of us all.
LikeLike
Stop sparring, both of you.
Who needs fine art when you can just surf the net, play video games and spend half your life digesting small bites of information from a variety of addictive devices?
Why look at Titian, Goya, Renoir, or George de la Torche or read Conrad or Hawthorne or Marx when you can get hooked on technology’s addictive instantaneity of useless text and imagery, all to keep you dumbed down, distracted, and less and less able to connect the dots in order to critically think?
The other day, I spent 20 minutes learning about actors and actresses whose plastic surgery went all wrong. Therefore, scholars at Yale whose works are in peer reviewed journals now have competition from me…..
Murals?
SO overrated….
LikeLike
That’s what any government agency, deny, deny, push the blame around. None of them take responsibility.
LikeLike
The painting was directly associated with the New Deal, and part of a collection called Public Art for Public Schools. It was destroyed. Just a meaningful coincidence. A public artifact in a public school, created in an era of public works for the public good, was destroyed. I know the feeling I am experiencing on reading about it very well. It’s longtime experience with the Destroyers of Public Education. Pardon my lack of surprise. Give them another twenty or thirty years, and the DPE will have painted over everything and everyone public.
LikeLike
Exactly. Nothing stupid about it. Evil, yes, but not stupid. They sent exactly the message they intended to.
LikeLike
Non-New Yorkers (and New Yorkers, too, really) who aren’t familiar with this school should read a bit about it. Concise histories abound on the Internet. It’s got to be among the most impressive public schools in US history.
LikeLike
Stupid is as stupid does.
LikeLike
From a 2009 Times book review:
Its alumni include Ralph Lauren, James Baldwin, Stan Lee (creator of Spider-Man, the Fantastic Four and the X-Men), Richard Rodgers (writer of 42 Broadway scores, including “Oklahoma!”), Nate Archibald (the pro basketball player known as Tiny), Richard Condon (writer of “The Manchurian Candidate”), Seymour Berger (creator of the modern baseball card) and Tracy Morgan of “Saturday Night Live” — among many other writers, athletes, directors, chief executives and government officials.
In their new book, “The Castle on the Parkway: The Story of New York City’s DeWitt Clinton High School and its Extraordinary Influence on American Life,” Gerard J. Pelisson and James A. Garvey III, former Clinton teachers, embarked on an exhaustively researched telling of the Clinton story, from its establishment in 1897 in Midtown to its contemporary status as one of the largest public schools in the Bronx. But most important, the book is a tribute to the outstanding, often unsung alumni.
“Other Bronx schools tended to be stuck away on some street somewhere,” Mr. Pelisson said. “Here was a school that had its own swimming pool, football field, track field and a big avenue in front of it adorned with trees and plants. In the days of the Depression, it must have been quite the sight.”
A number of factors went into making Clinton an intellectual incubator to some of the nation’s finest names — most notably, its size and democratic ethos. Clinton was not a neighborhood school, so students from all over the Bronx and Harlem could choose to enroll. It amassed a peak enrollment of 12,000 students, making it the largest high school in the world, according to the 1963 Guinness Book of World Records.
“DeWitt Clinton might be a castle, but it never had a moat, never had something to protect it like an entrance exam,” Mr. Pelisson said. “The school never kept out any kind of nonacademic student. It was always very open.”
Eric Nadelstern (class of ’67), the City Department of Education’s chief school officer and a former teacher at Clinton, said the school’s high level of experimentation helped it gain recognition. “Clinton was a sociological experiment: take inner-city boys and send them to a country school,” Mr. Nadelstern said. “And the faculty of the school had more academic freedom given the numbers it attracted.”
Mr. Nadelstern cited the Bronx’s cheap and speculative housing in the 1930s as the reason the borough attracted such large numbers of working immigrants. Consequently, Clinton’s student body represented an amalgam of ethnic backgrounds from the beginning. “Children who went to school in the Bronx were the children of those immigrant populations who made their mark on society,” he said.
Paul Pitluk (class of ’49) remembers Clinton as a place boys could go to get away from their sometimes troubled domestic lives. “It was nice to have a different feeling than what they had at home,” Mr. Pitluk said. “The Clinton boys had a different environment — for many, an escape from a difficult neighborhood situation.”
Mr. Pelisson and Mr. Garvey researched more than 3,000 Clinton alumni and broke down their achievements by profession. Despite the book’s 373 pages, Mr. Garvey said it was not a comprehensive overview, as he projected that 200,000 students have gone through Dewitt Clinton.
Clinton remained an all-boys school until 1983, a time when the school was experiencing low enrollment and student retention, according to Mr. Garvey. The current principal, Geraldine Ambrosio, said that today girls constitute 56 percent of 4,200 students enrolled.
Robert Esnard (class of ’56), president of the Zucker Organization, a New York real estate company, said that when he was growing up in the Bronx, sports were a major part of his life. Since Clinton had a strong athletic program, he enrolled, and because “all the cool guys I knew went there.” Mr. Esnard reminisced about a Clinton memory that will be forever indelible. He said:
Mr. Pelisson said it was impossible to go through an entire day without interacting in some way with a Clinton graduate. “We couldn’t have this phone conversation today if it wasn’t for a Clinton guy,” Mr. Pelisson said. “You know closed caption? Invented by a Clinton guy. I could sit at a TV and flip the dial and in 10 stations I’d come up with six or seven Clinton connections. I don’t always finish the movies on TV, but I always read the credits.”
A six-page document with names of distinguished Clinton alumni follows.
LikeLike
The kind of high school Bloomberg and Klein hated and closed as soon and as often as possible
LikeLike
And Exhibit A in the social vandalism that is so-called education reform.
LikeLike
I absolutely agree.
These beautiful high schools should use Fort Hamilton High School in Brooklyn as their model and become district schools that have honors programs but serve ALL students, instead of pitting multiple smaller schools against one another to compete praise based on how many higher performing 8th graders they can attract.
LikeLike
It goes without saying that when Bloomberg and Klein took over, Dewitt Clinton was graduating only half its students and had many violent incidents and no one who is commenting or reading here would have for even one second contemplated sending their own kid or a loved one’s kid there.
LikeLike
Tim,
So Rudy Giuliani was the one who was personally responsible for the decline of DeWitt Clinton? You seem to be saying that he had 8 years to make it better and failed.
LikeLike
An almost difficult-to-fathom amount of white flight—in 1940, the Bronx was 98% white—and segregation is what took Clinton from a school that produced leaders in a bunch of different fields to a school that needed metal detectors. The insinuation that it was firing on all cylinders and succeeding only to be threatened by the dastardly Klein needed a correction.
LikeLike
Klein did nothing to help Clinton or any other majority minority high school. He set them up to die and killed them.
LikeLike
Tim,
Between Giuliani and Bloomberg, there were 20 YEARS for Mayors who have your approval to return DeWitt Clinton to some semblance of their former glory.
And you blame the demise on the fact that Bronx went from 98% white to a much smaller white population?
LikeLike
Bear in mind that Tim speaks for Eva. Only Eva can save the black and brown children of NYC, maybe the nation. She just produced 16 high school graduates!
LikeLike
Perhaps some of its distinguished alumni might make a big stink about this desecration and also raise some money for its restoration? I hear The Met knows about that kind of thing.
LikeLike
NYC has wonderful restoration experts. It is very expensive. I hope that a philanthropist restores this mural. The city is not likely to have funding.
LikeLike
That’s a kind of philoanthropy in education I’d be willing to endorse.
Boston has many school that were built in the late 1930’s – 40’s. Like DeWitt-Clinton, at the time they were built, they were showcases of pride in education and of the communities they served. One that I’m quite familiar with was the Woodrow Wilson Junior High School, later renamed a middle school, and now no longer in use as a school building. My mother attended it, I and one of my sisters attended it, and it was the first school I taught in, for seven years.
It’s located on a hill, and adding to its prestige it is sited up two wide sets of stairs. There are tall double doors at the front entrance, which open to a main marble staircase at the ground floor, leading to a double staircase to the left and the right, which lead to the second floor. The library was the room directly in front of the entrance (pride of place for a temple of learning), with administrative offices facing the library to the left and right. Along the first floor corridor, there were frescos above the drinking fountains, one depicting the Rape of the Sabine Women, an odd choice, it always seemed to me, but I guess it was intended to signify the classical period in history. Though the second floor was less grand, there were original paintings hung in frames along the main corridor and staircases.
Each classroom had a teacher’s closet and built-in oak book cabinets with glass doors above and drawers below. There were six floor to ceiling double hung windows to bring natural light into the 10 foot high rooms. The upper windows could be opened and closed with a window pole, which was stored in a niche and hung by the hook at its top. When I was a kid, a boy (naturally!) was assigned the task of opening and closing the windows. I always got a little thrill as a teacher using the window pole myself.
The building was an L shape, with the interior of the L overlooking the schoolyard, because we still had recess. The corridors were wide, well-lighted with hanging fixtures that chi-chi home furnishing outlets now have named “schoolhouse pendants”. There was an ample auditorium. In the basement, there were shop classes, a gym, a cafeteria, and the bathrooms (in Boston idiom, one did not ask for a pass to the bathroom, but more circumspectly for a pass to the basement). It was welcoming and human scaled, though by the time I began teaching more shabby-chic and neglected than I liked.
The city has been heedless about these older buildings, though developers eagerly buy them up and in every neighborhood, you see them transformed into condos for the well to do. The pro-privatizer Boston Globe weighed in this week with some hand-wringing over the state of affairs, with this tone-deaf tweet:
Meanwhile, Mayor Walsh keeps public school proponents in the dark about the BuildBPS facilities master plan, said to be an investment of $1 billion, as he makes deals to allow private parties to develop playing fields adjacent to two schools.
https://schoolyardnews.com/community-groups-demand-city-leaders-reveal-their-buildbps-plans-b9d23c6a2b3b
LikeLike
The City does not have funding because people buy 2 bedroom apartments that are 3 million dollars and town houses that are 20 million dollars and pay no luxury tax. With all the tax breaks the rich get, it is logical to think that a philanthropist will assume the responsibility of restoring the mural, as that person has to pay very little taxes between the City’s tax structure and Trump’s lowering the taxes on wealthy individuals across the country.
It’s a great and wonderful time here to be über rich and a terrible time to be middle class or lower.
LikeLike
Christine, raising money for art in private institutions is always sacred; doing it for art in a public institution would only bolster and fortify the importance of public institutions, the very message the Overclass does not want to send to the tax payer.
Please get your priorities straight. Privatization comes first.
LikeLike
I suppose it’s the natural consequence of the push to eliminate the arts as worthy of educational endeavor. Heck, who cares if the little buggers can just read and write (and code) well enough to make us look good on the high stakes tests? (snark alert)
LikeLike
You forgot math.
LikeLike
Thank you. Not intentional and certainly math should be included.
LikeLike
In my district in Utah, elementary students are learning to code in as young as Kindergarten.
BUT, they know very little of history and less of geography or civics.
Have to have the “right” priorities, eh?
LikeLike
As a graduate of De Witt C, I can only express sadness at the way it has been abused by the great minds who broke it into campuses. My fondest memories come from my days in Clinton’s halls with special affection for my English teacher, Mr. McConnell.
Mr. Pellison’s book is a true historical gem about this magnificent, comprehensive, democratic high school (on the same street as Bronx Science).
The destruction of the mural is another example of how far the Barbarians have breached our gates.
LikeLike
Eegad, this really pains me… But I was a NYC denizen for 20 yrs, & I remember how casually they closed my library branches, one by one — the places where I relished precious weekend hours… Now you guys know what it’s like to live in New Jersey, where I’ve been for 25 yrs… People here have so little respect for history that they sit by idly allowing planning boards to wink at developers razing the 80-yo homes that make this town what it is & replacing them with look-alike shoeboxes.
LikeLike
This is incredibly sad that part of the historical mural was painted over.
However, it seems a bit early to jump to conclusions based on a lightly reported story by avid anti-public school pro-charter cheerleader Ben Chapman. Chapman is one of the main purveyors of rewritten press release “exclusives” from Success Academy, and he is the same reporter who made it his personal mission to turn the Bronx Science “fight club” into a major scandal in which he personally ruined the life of a young student who acted like a stupid teen and responded with “I really liked your article for the Daily News about nerds who fight…I think you should drop by for an interview at Bronx Science. Be sure to bring a mouthguard, bulletproof vest and great life insurance.” (Not excusing that stupid comment, but it came after Chapman exploited and hyped his fight club story with no concern at all about the students as young as 14 who were pawns in his quest to destroy any good public school, and then he overhyped those angry and stupid reactions from students to present himself as the endangered victim of threats and the students as criminals so they were arrested and prosecuted for them.)
Getting back to this story:
“Half of his masterpiece disappeared in November, when construction workers painted over the ceiling mural to spruce up for a visit by then-schools chancellor Carmen Farina, according to school staffers.”
Since when does any painting work like that get done in a public school without a long approval process from the Schools Construction Authority?
Since when does a visit from the Chancellor — who I recall visits multiple schools a week – mean the SCA orders a paint job at the school?
And then the Chancellor doesn’t even show up on this visit that was supposedly so important it was scheduled far enough in advance to allow a fairly major paint job to happen (with scaffolding, etc.)?
Someone made a mistake and I doubt there was some intentional effort to destroy a mural by anyone at the DOE. Knowing how these things work (and how the SCA works), isn’t it more likely some guy sent a text or e-mail or made a phone call saying “We finished the work, want us to paint the ceiling?” without mentioning the ceiling was one of the .001% of ceilings in NYC public schools to have a historical mural on it, and the person approved it the way all ceiling paint jobs after construction are approved.
What is unlikely is that anyone asked “should we paint over this mural?” or even mentioned that there was a mural and not a typical green-painted ceiling at that very spot where they were offering to paint to make the construction work they did look nicer.
This is awful that it happened. But sometimes good people make mistakes. Maybe the DOE is trying to protect a genuinely good person who had no idea he or she was approving the painting over of a mural because 99.9% of the ceilings in NYC schools do not have murals and it never occurred to her that someone from the SCA would offer to paint a ceiling without mentioning that there was a historical mural on it! (No doubt Chapman would say that is no excuse and the administrator should be fired and publicly shamed and her life ruined.)
And maybe the DOE knew that Chapman would not let that little fact get in the way of his quest to destroy as many lives as he can as long as the life destroyed helped further his interest in bringing down public education and promoting charters.
I’m guessing a visit from Farina had nothing to do with why the mural was painted over. And if Chapman was held to normal journalistic standards, he’d be fired for putting in that bit of unchecked accusation because anonymous “school staffers” said it and he did not bother to check.
After all, how much better to write a story that insinuates that the DOE ordered the painting over of a famous mural because Farina was coming and she wouldn’t like it.
Anyone who knows anything about the NYC Schools Construction Authority would question a lot of what Chapman insinuates in that story.
LikeLike
You argue against yourself. “Since when does any painting work like that get done in a public school without a long approval process from the Schools Construction Authority?”
But yet, at the same time, this was just a hapless mistake made by one person who didn’t know there was a mural there? If it’s such a long approval process, not one person in that process knew about the mural (I mean, what would the Schools Construction Authority know about that, right?) or bothered to do a site visit?
How those two arguments can simultaneously exist in your mind is rather baffling, but does explain a lot.
(P.S…. Countdown to your next use of “spidey senses” in 3, 2, ….
LikeLike
I have no doubt there was a mistake by someone.
I strongly doubt that anyone who knew about the mural “approved” the work to paint it over because they didn’t like it or thought it would look better being painted over to prepare for Farina’s visit.
The workers who actually opened a can of paint and took the paint rollers and lay paint on the ceiling obviously knew there was a mural they were destroying as they painted over it.
You are doing your innuendo thing again.
Just say it straight out. You are attacking me because I am questioning the idea that an ignorant DOE principal (who was most likely a former union teacher so just isn’t very smart) ordered the destruction of the mural because they thought painting it over would please Carmen Farina and Mayor de Blasio?
You attack me for doubting that Mayor de Blasio is secretly trying to destroy all remnants of WPA projects that make public schools beautiful and figured why not start with this one?
It seems obvious to me that there was work being done in that area that didn’t involve painting. And then it did. My guess would be that something on the ceiling got damaged. I doubt very much if any principal at the school looked at the mural and said “paint it over”.
But that’s just me. Feel free to have your own theories about how former union teachers who now work as principals or DOE administrators would be told that a WPA mural was being painted over and happily approve it.
LikeLike
Somebody made the decision to paint over a WPA mural with solid blue glossy paint. I doubt that it was the painters.
LikeLike
^^and it is this kind of innuendo I was addressing:
“Exactly. Nothing stupid about it. Evil, yes, but not stupid. They sent exactly the message they intended to.”
Instead of engaging with that, I read the article closely and separately gave my thoughts about it.
But if I am going to be attacked about it by people who are certain that this was an evil action to intentionally send a message, then I will reply.
It may turn out you are right and this was an intentional evil action to destroy an important work of art, and it was done in order to “send a message”.
I prefer to have a few more facts at hand before expressing knowledge of evil with the same certainty that you do.
LikeLike
Diane,
Somehow the continuation of my post makes it appear that I was replying to your comment, but that wasn’t my intention.
I am not blaming the painters. I am theorizing — and it is only a theory — that there was some other construction work being done around that ceiling like fixing a leak or electrical work. That work caused some damage and someone asked “should we paint the ceiling?” without bothering to mention that this was the one in a hundred thousand case where the ceiling in question had a famous WPA mural. And it never occurred to whoever approved it that anyone would put in a paint request for painting over a ceiling damaged by construction work without mentioning the ceiling they intended to paint over contained a famous mural. There are likely 100 ceilings in DeWitt High School that don’t have murals. Maybe twice that.
And I’m theorizing that a lot of things that might have stopped this didn’t happen. Like any one of the painters doing the work saying “we are painting over this beautiful mural, should we double check that they know there is a mural here and that this is really what they want us to do?”
But again, all of my theories presuppose that no one decided to intentionally destroy a work of art because they thought it would be nice to do so to celebrate Farina’s visit.
And I think it is possible that things like this happen not because someone is stupidly incompetent but because an important fact is left out of a request and it is only in hindsight that it’s easy to say “but the person should have known to always check even if it wasn’t mentioned.”
Maybe it will turn out this is an example of the evil administration at the DOE “sending a message” as dienne77 seems to believe. I always read Ben Chapman’s articles wondering what he has left out of the story and this one has a lot of missing information before I embrace her view.
LikeLike
Just curious, NYCPSP, but would your defense here be quite as vigorous if Bloomberg, Klein et al were still in charge?
LikeLike
winner winner chicken dinner
LikeLike
dienne77,
You don’t know me at all if you think I jumped on every wrongdoing by a principal during the Bloomberg/Klein years and claimed it was evidence of evil intent.
I did criticize actions that deserved criticism. For example,if a principal in the Bronx got caught doing something bad, I did not start screaming that Bloomberg and Klein knew in advance that the principal in question would do that evil thing but decided to overlook it (and cover it up) because the principal agreed to help them destroy the public school system.
But if Klein – without having any legal obligation to do so – gave free space in a public school located in one of the very wealthiest neighborhoods in the city despite that charter being granted for an entirely different — and much much poorer — school district, then I would criticize an action that was specifically taken to benefit a charter and harm a public school.
When I read this story, I think “wow, this is terrible, who benefits by painting over this one-of-a-kind mural?” And then I consider all the players.
And I didn’t come up with your theory that the people benefitting were those evil DOE officials who knew painting over this mural would “send a message” (of course, you never bothered to say what this message is and innuendo about this evil message they are sending is so much more powerful if you don’t have to think about how unlikely it is.)
Your nasty insinuation that I would have jumped through hoops as you did and insist without a shred of evidence that the action was intentional for some evil purpose just because it happened under the Bloomberg regime is truly absurd.
I’m not sure why FLERP! feels the need to make another one of his/her gratuitous comments, but let’s assume that FLERP! agrees with you, dienne77, and FLERP! is absolutely certain, as you are, that this mural was intentionally painted over to send a message to public schools that nice art like this would not be allowed in public schools.
dienne77, I will let you and FLERP! offer up your own theories as to why the DOE wants to intentionally destroy beautiful artwork in the schools.
No doubt FLERP! has a theory that would help you both convince more readers that the painting over of the mural was an intentional act designed to send a message about how much the Mayor wants to destroy public schools as a favor to his billionaire reformer masters.
LikeLike
Oh, for God’s sake. Not that I’ve said that, I’m frankly surprised this sort of thing doesn’t happen more often. Most school administrators I’ve dealt with are, at their core, vandals, and obstacles to good work rather than the cause or inspiration for it.
LikeLike
You have described the adminimal quite well.
LikeLiked by 1 person
That’s very sad because there are a lot of great admistrators out there, and their songs go unsung.
LikeLiked by 1 person
I’m sure you’re right, Mr. Rendo; unfortunately, I have yet to encounter one here in New York City. And of the four under whom I’ve served, all were enthusiastic about singing their own songs, in spite their bullying, moral cretinism, and professional squalor: two ran schools into the ground, one was investigated for financial improprieties and corporal punishment (I left the school), and the principal under whom I currently serve appears ignorant of much of what he should know and be able to do as the leader of of a school.
Hence my basically malignant skepticism about school administrators, particularly here in New York City.
LikeLike
I’m very sorry you’ve had those experiences. It’s not fair to you, and your students.
Every day, there are leaders who create more and more protection for teachers without any advertisement to their staff so that their staff can just focus on teaching; many leaders take a lot on the chin behind the scenes in order to insulate the staff from bad politics. Nonetheless, it takes a true collaboration between building leadership and staff, and that means distributing leadership among expert teachers as well.
We’re in this together, and you deserve better leadership than the one you’ve experienced. I have been very fortunate in having worked with most leaders who have been fair, engaging, and incredibly supportive.
One of the worst situations to be in is having a leader who is personally insecure about themselves and having that manifest itself in the leadership style.
I wish you positive energy in your pursuit of excellence for yourself and your students. You really deserve that!
LikeLike
I suspect that NYC Publics employ…Sodexo Magic to maintain their schools!
Seriously, Chicago Public Schools (Mayor appointed) Board privatized the janitorial services, & now (because the company has grossly understaffed each school to, of course, make their profit margin greater, & more money for execs, as usual), these schools are filthy & festering in disrepair.
This was reported on extensively by the Chicago Sun-Times. You can read, here, that many of the maintenance personnel even have had to spend their own money on cleaning supplies.
Methinks this outrageous Clinton School cover-up (literally) started all the way at the top.
LikeLike