Susan Edelman, reporter at the New York Post, often gets scoops, and this one is a doozy.
Several principals have been accused of sexual harassment. Some have caused the city to pay out hundreds of thousands of dollars for their misconduct, but they are seldom punished. Instead they are reassigned to headquarters with their pay and pension intact.
When Shaunte Penniston complained that her principal was making sexual demands, the city Department of Education not only failed to investigate, she alleged, but immediately notified the principal — who promptly had her fired.
The teacher then filed a lawsuit, which has dragged on in court for five years, the city fighting it at every step. But even if Penniston wins her case, it’s too late for the DOE to punish her alleged tormentor, Antonio K’tori. Under state law, educators with tenure cannot be brought up on disciplinary charges more than three years after their alleged misconduct.
“It’s a system that gives predators a platform and access to victims,” Penniston told The Post. “Nothing is done, and there are protections for perpetrators.”
The loophole helps explain why principals have kept their six-figure DOE jobs despite multiple sex-harassment complaints and millions of dollars in taxpayer-funded settlements paid to accusers.
“It’s a terrible burden on the teachers who are complaining, and a terrible burden on taxpayers, because we have to pay large amounts to settle these cases — and then the salaries of the principals in perpetuity,” said education advocate Leonie Haimson.
In a shocking example, the city paid a total $830,000 to settle five lawsuits — including four for sexual harassment and retaliation — against Howard Kwait, principal of John Bowne HS in Flushing, Queens. One assistant principal claimed he asked her and female colleagues for threesomes, rubbed against her and offered her oral sex as a reward if she could produce a high graduation rate.
After The Post asked about the mounting payments, new Chancellor Richard Carranza removed Kwait from the school and “reassigned” him to an unspecified office where he won’t manage anyone, officials said.
But Kwait will still collect his $156,671 salary, get contractual raises and accumulate pension credits.
The DOE said it can’t discipline or terminate Kwait because the three-year statute of limitation for bringing charges against him has expired.
Activist Leonie Haimson blasts the Department of Education’s inaction here.
She writes that it is DOE policy to report accusations of sexual harassment to the principals, even when they are the one accused, and they fire or harass the accuser.
“DOE chronically ignores teachers’ claims and instead informs the principals of their accusations, who then retaliate by firing them or making their lives miserable. In one horrible case that Sue [Edelman]describes, the principal of PS 15 in Queens Antonio K’tori was protected by District 29 Superintendent Lenon Murray, who himself was subsequently accused of sexual harassment. Earlier, several young girls were molested by a teacher at PS 15, who is now in jail. The girls won a $16 million jury award against the city, with the parents blaming DOE and the K’tori for “negligent supervision.”
“Yet even now, after teacher Shaunte Pennington filed a civil lawsuit against K’tori in court, who fired her after she reported harassment starting in 2012, the DOE has delayed doing anything for so long about her complaints that the three year statute of limitations has lapsed and he can’t be dismissed.”

Not in New York, but these predators and their enablers should not be on the payroll.
LikeLike
Reblogged this on David R. Taylor-Thoughts on Education and commented:
This is sickening
LikeLike
Oh, this is well-known, and I could tell you many, many horror stories about inept, dimwitted school administrators in New York who are patently unqualified for their jobs. In my experience, in every school in which I have served in The Bronx and Manhattan, the school administration was a hindrance to good work, not a cause of it.
I’ve never understood, in the persistent press on “bad teachers who cannot be fired because of teachers’ unions,” administrators have been given a pass. Principals and Assistant Principals (and the sycophants they enable)–again, in my experience–are some of the worst people in the New York City Department of Education’s employ.
LikeLike
Adminimals are as adminimals do, eh!
LikeLiked by 1 person
swacker what is your opinion rather than always just responding to what others post, I would like to see original thoughts from ya instead of playing teacher and quoting everyone then correcting. 🙂
LikeLike
That’s an unfair comment. Duane freely shares his views.
Be careful. I kick out people who attack other readers instead of issues.
LikeLike
Quote,
If you were to go back to let’s say about May of 2012, and read my various (and at times way too many) postings you might get a pretty good flavor of my thinking.
I purposely give the quote about which I am commenting so that everyone can tell exactly what I am commenting on. Other times, yes, I do “correct” quotes, hopefully as a bit of levity, to get my point across. I believe that if you go back and read my comments you will see a difference in my “meant to be fun” quotes-I do like playing with language, nowhere near as good as someone like SDP but still like to play with thoughts-and those that I am more seriously trying to get a point across.
Go back and check and then get back with me, eh!
LikeLike
Although, now that I see the post on the page and it has a smiley face that didn’t come through on the wordpress notification of a response, I think I see your point. Anyway, welcome to Diane’s blog, hope you stick around.
And if I may ask a personal question: Are you an adminimal?
LikeLike
Hilarious, “quote”! The first and only time we’ve seen you here, posting under a pseudonym (or at least I hope that’s not what your parents named you), responding to another commenter for “only” responding to other commenters. Good one!
You did intend the irony, no?
LikeLiked by 1 person
There’s been a notable spike in single-use, throwaway user names on the site recently. “quote” is probably the worst among them.
LikeLike
Thanks Duane…
LikeLiked by 1 person
What is WRONG with this country?
LikeLike
Not necessarily the country, Yvonne. The vast majority are good folks. Those who choose a path of gathering authority and power are usually not a part of that majority. And, as it is, and isn’t as much as it should be, when those in power/authority positions abuse said power, which is almost inevitable, and are caught we are shocked, just shocked-“Shocked, shocked to find that gambling is going on here”.
We Americans are good at turning the blind eye to malfeasance.
LikeLike
Take it from an NYC insider, the story is completely true and even worse than one thinks. The NYCDOE has run a muck her in NYC. They have all these qualified teachers sitting in teacher lounges not being utilized in the so called ATR status. These teachers came from schools that bloomberg closed strictly due to political crap.
Instead of using these highly qualified teachers the NYC DOe opts to instead hire newbie neophytes who now lead up most classrooms while the experienced teaches sit in the lounge only good for substitute situations!!! Yes, this organization is about as dysfunctional as human beings can possibly be.
LikeLike
I have a question for NYC teachers here:
Do you believe that the DOE is full of corrupt administrators who are only looking to cover up for corrupt principals? And if so, why? Why would Mayor de Blasio want to protect corrupt principals or those who are sexually harassing teachers and are the subject of numerous sexual harassment complaints?
I just want to be careful not to jump on the very same bandwagon that says that the DOE also protects corrupt teachers.
Obviously, something went terribly wrong. But I wonder if there is not more to this story than just a DOE full of corrupt and criminal administrators who try to cover up the wrongdoing of principals.
LikeLike
Calling all of them corrupt might be a stretch, but I think there is clearly a culture of ignorance and incompetence among administrators in the NYCDOE that is deleterious to teaching and learning.
LikeLike
Also, way too many NYCDOE administrators are drunk on their own sense of their power, and have an unfortunate and counterproductive tendency to treat teachers as their subordinates rather than their colleagues. One thing I’ve learned to do in job interviews is ask principals whether they regard teachers as their colleagues, or their subordinates, and whether they view teachers as professionals, or just employees on a shop floor, so to speak (I’ve been both, so I know whereof I speak).
Most of them are offended by the question, which basically tells me everything I need to know about why I wouldn’t work for them.
LikeLike
Thank you for this insight. It doesn’t surprise me that administrators may act as you describe and not respect those who work under them. That happens at many workplaces.
But that still doesn’t explain why people seem to be saying that the DOE headquarters has a policy of deliberately protecting male principals accused of sexual misconduct and completely ignores many, many complaints against them and instead intentionally looks to punish any teacher who dares to complain while covering up for principals despite multiple accusations against those men.
And that isn’t incompetence. That is implying that the administration at the DOE would cover up sexual wrongdoing by principals when they receive complaints about them and instead look to punish accusers.
And assuming that is true (and if so heads should roll), I just didn’t understand the motivation for the deliberate covering up of multiple accusations of sexual misconduct against principals and the punishment of their accusers. Is there a group of anti-female DOE officials who like promoting men who sexually harass teachers?
LikeLike
These principals accused of sexual harassment in NYC are not promoted. They are protected by a three year statute of limitations. By the time the DOE has paid hundreds of thousand to victims, by the time their complaints are heard, the statute of limitations runs out.
LikeLike
Is this three year statute of limitations part of the due process protections offered to employees of NYC Public? If so, perhaps these employees should not be given due process protections.
LikeLike
Diane,
But wasn’t there an implication that the accusers were punished and fired?
Although that brings up another question: Where is the NYC Teachers Union and why isn’t it protecting teachers who get fired if they accuse a principal of sexual harassment?
LikeLike
The original story said that the women who complained about sexual harassment by the principal were reported to the principal, who fired them.
LikeLike
Meanwhile, teachers in NYC who look cross-eyed at some important person are languishing in rubber rooms. I’m in Utah and I even know about them. A lot of the complaints are made-up or exaggerated, and yet they get fined and made ATRs, while these abusers keep their jobs.
WHERE is the justice here?
LikeLike
Unfortunately, too many assistant principals and principals in the NYCDOE have made a career out of harassment and bullying, and not just the sexual kind. It almost seems like to get your admin license you have to take the course “how to bully your underlings”. Its not good for the staff, and the fear among the staff easily translates into classrooms – the kids pick up on it (and a whole lot take advantage)
LikeLike