This article by Amadou Diallo in The Hechinger Report describes schools in Philadelphia that rely on project based learning rather than standardized testing. Unlike many such articles, it acknowledges the differences between schools with selective admissions and those that accept all applicants.
A snippet:
An unqualified success for these new schools would be results like those at Science Leadership Academy, a magnet school that is home to the district’s longest-running project-based learning program, which opened in 2006. The school combines rigorous research with student-driven projects that have impact beyond the school building. One student project involved putting on a city-wide Ultimate Frisbee tournament. In the 2016-17 school year, 99 percent of its seniors graduated, and 84 percent attended college immediately afterward. Algebra, Biology and English literature proficiency scores at the school are more than double the district high school average.
“Projects are really hard, collaboration is really hard.”
“As a magnet school,” said Science Leadership Academy principal Chris Lehmann, “we need to be able to prove that the learning we engage in here shows up on the test … without falling into a teach-for-the-test problem. It’s a balancing act. It always has been.”
It may prove difficult for other schools to replicate Science Leadership Academy’s performance, however. As a magnet school, it has selective admissions and attracts students from a wider range of socioeconomic backgrounds (fewer than half its students receive free or reduced-price lunch, for example) than the city’s other project-based learning schools.
Lehmann acknowledges the inherent advantages at a school that’s able to choose its students — applicants must meet minimum grade requirements and sit for an interview — but, like his counterparts at Philadelphia’s nonselective project-based learning schools, he argues that we need to be taking a more holistic view of school performance. “How you judge a school is an incredibly nuanced thing,” he said. “The way that we take care of each other and the way that we learn are intertwined.” There may not be a quantitative metric to assess whether students are being provided with meaningful work in an environment that lets them know they are cared for, but Lehmann believes that without those components, grades and test scores become an end unto themselves.
“There’s no [statewide] assessment for being able to look people in the eye and speak clearly.”
Vaux Big Picture High School principal Gabriel Kuriloff
Tamir Harper is an 18-year-old senior at Science Leadership Academy whose passion is education reform: In 2017 he founded a nonprofit that advocates for quality urban education. He says that when he arrived at the school he was obsessed with grades. “I just wanted to know ‘How can I get an A?’ I didn’t care if I was learning, or comprehending,” he said. “Now I’m a student that wants to learn, and I don’t worry about the end result [grade]. I’m into the process.” He says a big part of that shift was the relationships he forged at school. “We’re not just project-based, we’re a community-driven school,” he said.
Fellow senior Madison Militello, 18, says her middle school was very strict, with no room for individual connections. “Here I don’t feel like the teachers are above me. I feel like we’re on the same level,” she said, noting that she’s still close with some teachers even though she doesn’t have their classes anymore. “You can’t teach a group of students you don’t have a connection with.”
That sentiment was a common refrain at Vaux, LINC and Workshop, each of which offer slightly different approaches to project-based learning in underserved communities. Educators at each are confident that the skills their students are acquiring — collaboration, critical thinking and problem-solving — will eventually manifest themselves in improved results on more traditional metrics like math and reading tests. More importantly, however, they believe that students will be much more prepared for the real world when they leave school. Whether project-based learning done on a larger scale can turn the tide in Philadelphia is another question.
“You can create the perfect school model and it’s still not going to solve American poverty,” Hauger said. “We’re moving the needle for every child who comes through the door and sometimes that doesn’t feel like enough.”

Reblogged this on David R. Taylor-Thoughts on Education.
LikeLike
Project-based learning is a sham. “collaboration, critical thinking and problem-solving” are new mantra to justify useless spending.
LikeLike
Right, that’s why all the wealthiest, most elite politicians and businesspeople send their kids to project based schools.
LikeLike
Those, who send their kids to any sort of school are not elite by definition. Elite kids have private tutors for everything, from reading and math to horseback-riding and fencing.
LikeLike
This was an interesting article. I am happy that Philadelphia is willing to implement some changes to improve opportunities for students, but these selective schools still do not help the students that are most at risk for failure.
I attended a selective public school in Philly long before the concept of magnet school was invented. In those days it was all about the grades and individual competition, not collaboration. I digress, but my old neighborhood is near the Link Academy, an area “with one of the highest rates of violent crimes in the city.”
The best way to evaluate these schools is to do a longitudinal study of what happens to the students post graduation. The results of the Science Academy are promising. If these young people can manage to make it in the real world, then the school is preparing them for it despite poverty.
LikeLike
It seems to be an article of faith these days that project based learning is the holy grail of education. I, for one, am not a believer.
LikeLike
Projects are engaging and memorable. Testing and test prepping are repellent and forgettable. Students learn more creating projects. That said, all projects and no direct instruction is all fluff and no substance. Teach a concept, then have the students apply the knowledge with a project.
LikeLike
But testing “rigor” doesn’t allow the time to include projects.
LikeLike
I’ve visited “learner-centered” schools around the country. Since they are independent schools, they don’t have to teach to the standards or give the standardized tests. Several of them do “just for fun.” And guess what? Their students score 2-3 GRADE LEVELS above their public school counterparts. Why? They are learning to think deeply and in context. They learn the “standards” as part of their study of real-world issues rather than in isolation. It’s not so much PBL as it is the establishment of a learning environment that provides the three psychological needs identified by Ryan and Deci (Self-Development Theory) as necessary for the healthy development of the whole individual–namely, autonomy, competency, and relatedness.
Why do we still accept scores on standardized tests as a valid measure of student learning? Why are teachers trying to “sneak in” more effective activities whose value has long since been proven? When will educators stand up and say, “I won’t do this anymore because it is NOT in the best interest of my students?” And why are standards and standardized test mandated for “other people’s children” when the policy makers send their own students to schools that aren’t required to use them? I think we all know the answer to that one!
LikeLike
“And guess what? Their students score 2-3 GRADE LEVELS above their public school counterparts.”
Please, Judith, how is that determined?
LikeLike
Duane–I’ve been out of the classroom too long to understand how standardized test scores are reported. I understand why you’re asking the question, and I have absolutely no reason to doubt the people who told me this, so let me do this. I’ll contact them and ask how it’s determined and get back to you with a response. I guess the reason I didn’t follow up at the time was because I was so blown away with the maturity and depth of thinking of the students (middle school age range). Having taught students at those ages for 20+ years, and having seen the types of work these students were producing, there was no doubt in my mind…but again, I understand your question. I’ll respond to your question as soon as I hear from them.
LikeLiked by 1 person
Thanks for taking the time. What I am trying to understand are the parameters and methodology use. Any help is appreciated.
LikeLike
Duane–This isn’t the one I mentioned, but it’s about how students in another school I visited scored on a different type of test that measures learning a bit differently. Thought it might interest you. I’m still waiting on a response about the standardized tests.
https://theodawson.net/are-our-children-learning-robustly/
LikeLike
The lectical score used to supposedly determine those levels suffer all the onto-epistemological problems identified by Wilson. In other words, those scores are less than valid. It sure has the sheen of scientificity though-nice neat numbers.
LikeLike
Just received an answer. This school is “ungraded” so the “grade level” is just a ballpark. They give the Terra Nova test to students comparable to grades 4-8, and all of their students score in the 80-99% range. Their graduating group last year all scored in the 90-99% range. I guess one would have to compare these with the average results on the Terra Nova, but I suspect that scoring in the 90-99% range on any standardized test is fairly indicative that the students are learning at a high level. The director of the school was happy to explain, but wanted to stress that “We only use the Terra Nova as a dipstick, we are far more than that. We don’t set our worth by that… just an audit. Won’t close the doors or toss out a child if it is different, which is possible, because we don’t use metrics to enroll children. It’s not our focus!”
Hope that answers the question sufficiently. Thanks for asking.
LikeLiked by 1 person
I am very glad to read this “because we don’t use metrics to enroll children. It’s not our focus!”
Do you have the name of the school?
Again, thanks for getting the information for me!!
LikeLike
Hi Duane-
The school is the Renaissance School of Arts and Science in Portland, Oregon. If you’d like to read more about REN, as well as Rainbow and a play-based preschool in Seattle, you can check out this article. http://learninginmind.com/authentic-learning.php If you’re not interested in the history, just scroll down to the last section–Authentic Learning Today and you’ll find links to the three schools at the very end of the article. I know that “traditionalists” will find fault with all of these, but if I were 20 years younger, I’d move to Portland and take a job with REN. 🙂
LikeLiked by 1 person
Thanks for all the info, Judith.
LikeLike
There is a network of public schools that promotes project based learning. Expeditionary Learning: https://eleducation.org/
LikeLike
Here’s an example of a terrific district project based school in St. Paul. This is one of the nation’s first district options. https://www.spps.org/open It’s part of a national network of schools that “that allow students to investigate issues in our school, the community and the world.”
LikeLike