Columnist E.J. Montini of the Arizona Republic is all over the charter scams that are common in his state.
One of his favorite subjects is the BASIS charter chain, which is regularly lauded by the national media as sponsor of the number one high schooling the nation, because of the AP courses that its students pass. Montini knows that BASIS regularly weeds out the students it doesn’t want by setting expectations higher than most students can meet.
He also knows that BASIS is a honeypot for its founders.
Look at the folks who founded Basis Charter Schools, Michael and Olga Block.
These are public schools.
They’re funded with tax dollars. Your money.
In fact, as The Arizona Republic’s Craig Harris pointed out in a May 7 article, Basis receives more in basic per-pupil funding than traditional public schools.
At the same time, Basis asks parents to “donate” at least $1,500 per child each year, which it says is used to improve teacher pay.
Sort of a de facto tuition that is way, way cheaper than private school (because taxpayers are funding the rest.)
Essentially, Basis Charter Schools, a tax-exempt non-profit corporation, gets to operate like a private company while using the public’s money. And the founders — among others affiliated with the operation — have done very well.
As Harris so succinctly pointed out:
As Scottsdale parents were receiving yet another solicitation for donations to pay teachers, the Blocks made a $1.68 million down payment on an $8.4 million condominium in New York City, property records show.
Their Manhattan home is in a 60-story building with “breathtaking panoramas” of the city, an infinity pool, and an indoor/outdoor theater, according to a sales brochure. It is located near two private Basis schools controlled by the Blocks. Tuition at those schools is more than $30,000 a year
.
Arizona has little to no accountability for charter schools. They can use public money to build new buildings, which then are private property. They can use public money to pay their family members or themselves. No one cares. The state makes rules, but if no one follows them, that’s okay. The audits are a joke or don’t happen. It’s a scam, Montini writes.
The owners get to pay themselves with your money, hire their relatives, avoid the bidding process for work and make very little of their financial practice available for you to see.
It’s the opposite of regular public schools
It’s a perfect scam. The opposite of regular public schools. Lawmakers and politicians like Gov. Doug Ducey go along with it because they hate teacher unions and because charter owners are big supporters of their careers.
But ask yourself this:
Who was the last person working in a regular public school who could afford a house in Tucson, a house in Scottsdale and an $8.4 million condo in New York City with “breathtaking panoramas?”
As long as their schools produce high test scores, who cares about the money, right?

Keep in mind what was happening on the public school side too, during this ed reform free for all.
State legislators in Arizona were so neglecting the public schools they disfavor that the public system is near to collapse.
ONLY teachers responded. Without those teachers these ed reform-captured lawmakers would still be spending every working hour promoting and funding charter chains.
They had to be DRAGGED, kicking and screaming, to do the work they are paid to do regarding public schools. Had the teachers not spoken up the unfashionable public schools would have continued to be neglected and ignored until they actually closed.
Boy, that Basis chain better be worth it. Politicians sacrificed every public school student in the state to promote, coddle and nurture it.
LikeLike
Shame on the dumb and dumbed down or indifferent citizenry of Arizona? Not enough water or rattle snake bites getting to their brains?
LikeLike
We all must remember that charter schools like the BASIS schools are exactly what DeVos is pushing. DeVos could care less if the rich get richer on the backs of the taxpayers who are funding public schools and the backs of public education Teachers. This is happening in every state in the Union, not just Arizona.
LikeLike
Maybe the end justify the means…
U.S. News Releases 2018 Best High Schools Rankings
Charter schools in Arizona topped the national rankings for the second year in a row.
“For the second year in a row, the No. 1 school in the country is BASIS Scottsdale. Public high schools in the BASIS charter school network in Arizona dominated the top of the national rankings, claiming the first five spots.”
https://www.usnews.com/education/best-high-schools/articles/us-news-ranks-best-high-schools
The top 10 high schools in the U.S. overall are:
1.BASIS Scottsdale (AZ)
2.BASIS Chandler (AZ)
3.BASIS Oro Valley (AZ)
4.BASIS Tucson North (AZ)
5.BASIS Flagstaff (AZ)
6.Meridian School (TX)
7.International Academy of Macomb (MI)
8.BASIS Peoria (AZ)
9.Baccalaureate School for Global Education (NY)
10.Thomas Jefferson High School for Science and Technology (VA)
LikeLike
According to Dr. Anabel Aportela, research director for the state school boards, “BASIS is receiving a lot of attention for its top spots in the rankings and that’s great, but collectively the five BASIS schools graduated just over 200 students, according to the latest data,” Aportela said. “Even if we invested in them, as the governor wants to do, they will have to multiply five-fold to reach 1,000 graduates, and 25-fold to reach 5,000 graduates.” ASIS is not scalable if the entrance criteria is so selecti
Arizona, generally on the wrong side of educational issues, wants to invest more in high achieving schools. This is the opposite of what is needed as test scores correlate to socio-economic levels. They are saying “let’s invest in the middle and wealthy class.” We already do this. Poor and language minority students require more funding, not less. https://azednews.com/governors-plan-reward-middle-higher-income-students-low-income-ones/
LikeLike
Correction: selective
LikeLike
Y’know what? Any idiot (even you) could duplicate those results if you do what BASIS does. If you select students based on the highest test scores, guess what? Your schools get the highest test scores and, hence, rank high in esteemed publications like U.S. News. Big Whoop.
LikeLike
Very sad. The US News rankings are essentially a sham. And yet, there are teachers and administrators and school board members and parents who eat them up.
LikeLike
US News Rankings are a hoax. It’s marketing strategy with zero valid information.
https://www.theatlantic.com/education/archive/2013/09/your-annual-reminder-to-ignore-the-em-us-news-world-report-em-college-rankings/279103/
“But surely there is something good to be said about the U.S. News rankings? Yes. For parents and prospective students who know almost nothing about America’s colleges and universities, the ranking provides a rough guide to the institutional landscape of American higher education. Using the U.S. News rankings for any more exacting purpose is about as good for you as eating potato chips and Gummy Bears for dinner. With maple syrup.”
LikeLike
New: Bernie Sanders is introducing bill to let workers unionize via card check, ban “right to work,” legalize secondary boycotts, & expand labor law definition of employee, w/ fellow 2020 contenders Warren, Gillibrand, Harris, Brown among cosponsors”
I don’t know how Democrats square this new-found enthusiasm for labor unions with the vehemently anti-union ed reform “movement”, I really don’t.
This is a problem for them. They can’t cheerlead the anti-union ed reform movement while telling the public they support expansion of rights for workers. They’re going to be asked about this contradiction.
LikeLike
I would love to see Bernie outsmart the 1%, but he will have to have a lot of like minded people with him to do this. How many Democrats will take the plunge with him?
LikeLike
None.
LikeLike
It’s like the readers of DianeRavitch.net don’t understand or choose to ignore basic economics. There is a demand in Arizona for high quality education and BASIS is supplying it. The top 5 high schools in the US are BASIS. So what if the owners of a business earn money (yes it’s publicly funded but the owners would never have opened the schools unless there were an economic incentive). Parents are lining up their bright kids to go to BASIS and happy to contribute a decent sum to keep the teacher salaries higher. It is open to all students folks, no entrance exams.
In all other respects, I think AZ iis terrible for education. The chronic underfunding has made AZ a difficult place for teachers, students and parents. I am totally supportive for #redfored.
LikeLike
Do you think that BASIS is a model for public schools everywhere?
LikeLike
Does BASIS claim it is a model for every student, everywhere? Seems like they don’t…
“”We are a very specific type of thing, for anyone who is willing to give it a shot, but not for every kid,” said Dr. Bezanson”
https://www.abc15.com/news/region-northeast-valley/scottsdale/watchdog-charter-school-group-takes-aim-at-best-high-school-ranking-list
Ms Ravitch, Can you name one District that is a model for “public schools everywhere”?
LikeLike
So, Cynthia, you are essentially saying BASIS is not a public school. So why should it be entitled to receive public financing?
LikeLike
“So, Cynthia, you are essentially saying BASIS is not a public school. So why should it be entitled to receive public financing?”
So magnet schools are not public schools?
LikeLike
Magnet schools are not the same as selective enrollment schools.
LikeLike
Cynthia, you give the same, tired false argument. Magnet schools are real public schools. Often they are schools within a school where “regular” students also attend the same classes with the same teachers. They are held to the same standards and regulations that all public schools are.
Charter schools are exempt from most of those standards and regulations, thus are not real public schools. They are publicly funded private schools that have little to no accountability to taxpayers. They certainly don’t take every kid that walks off the street like public schools must.
LikeLike
Magnet schools are part of a democratically governed system of public education. Charter schools are governed by private boards that are neither accountable nor transparent nor public.
LikeLike
Carrie and Ms Ravitch, Try and keep up with the discussion instead of falling back to the party line.
BASIS does not claim it is for all, just like magnet schools are not for all. At least charters take all comers unlike magnet schools. At least charters take all comers unlike district schools who only take those who can afford to live in its boundaries.
LikeLike
Ms. Weiss, as a spokesperson for the charter industry, you are very good at mouthing the party line.
LikeLike
Cynthia Weiss, I’m not debating you so don’t waste your time replying to me, because it is obvious “to me” (I don’t speak for everyone else) that you either are a paid-for minion of the privatize-everything-public movement out of ALEC and friends to turn the US into an autocratic kleptocracy or you have been willingly programmed to be fooled.
Since I’m going to answer this question, you don’t have to. Like I said, I’m not debating you because I think it would be as futile as attempting to convince a cement wall that it was redwood.
Why hasn’t the autocratic, kleptocracy movement to private everything let the public decide what they want … not individually but as a total population since public funds are public?
ANSWER: Because they already tried that and lost every time.
LikeLike
Ms Ravitch wrote:
“Ms. Weiss, as a spokesperson for the charter industry, you are very good at mouthing the party line.”
Is that all you have left, ad-hominine attacks when you know nothing about me. Still waiting to hear on what one district you think is a good model for “public schools everywhere”, why magnets can fulfill a niche, but charters can’t, and how district schools with its boundaries is better than charters who take all.
LikeLike
Are you or have you ever been a teacher? Teachers and Diane Ravitch understand what you seem to miss.
LikeLike
The Consortium public schools in New York City are a great model. They are non-selective and they are adamantly not charter schools. Unlike charters, they accept the same proportion of kids with disabilities and ELL students as the public schools and unlike Success Academy, they don’t push kids out and they get great results.
If you are looking for a district, check out San Diego. A great public school district despite the charter vultures trying to pull away funds and kids.
LikeLike
The consortium schools are very interesting with their collective emphasis on performance assessment (interested people can look here for more information: http://www.performanceassessment.org/memberschools/ ), but it seems to me that any individual school in the consortium is no more a model for public schools everywhere then is BASIS.
I rather think the point of the consortium schools is that no single kind of school is best for all students. A student who would thrive at Humanities Preparatory Academy would not, perhaps, do so well at the Brooklyn Academy (An NYC Outward Bound School), and perhaps students from both of those consortium schools would find the Lab School of Finance and Technology a poor fit. Harvest Collegiate High School, Gotham Professional Arts Academy, The School Without Walls, The School of the Future, The Facing History School all have different takes on education.
I think a district made up of such a diverse set of schools would be great, but that certainly would not work in a traditional catchment based admissions school district.
LikeLike
There is no one school that is a template for every school in the nation. The Consortium schools are PUBLIC schools. They accept children without regard to disability or ELL status. They get excellent results.
Why are you constantly nitpicking, TE?
You got kicked off this blog once before for your negativity. It may happen again. You and Charles are great wasters of my time.
LikeLike
Ms Ravitch,
Thank you so much for pointing out some models for public education everywhere.
As far as the Consortium, this does not sound like Non-Selective. If a charter school in AZ did this they would get slapped big time.
‘Member Schools – Members of The Consortium – Urban Academy’
http://www.urbanacademy.org/apply-to-urban/
Step Three: The Interview
The last stage is when you come back for an interview. You will meet with two teachers, or a teacher and a student, and have an informal talk about where you are in school currently, why you want to come to Urban, and so on.
Once these three steps have been completed, a committee makes a decision based on the student’s application, his or her transcript, and the number of spaces that we have open.
The Consortium seems like a large bunch of magnet schools all with their own admissions policy. Hardly a model that small\medium districts or CMOs could replicate.
LikeLike
The Consortium schools have the same demographic profile as NYC public schools.
That is not true of BASIS, where the majority of students are white and Asian.
LikeLike
Also, unlike BASIS, which requires students to take 12 AP exams, the Consortium doesn’t expect its students to take any AP exams. Its schools have waivers from the state and the only exam that kids take is the English Regents exam. Other than that, it is a performance assessment school. Unlike BASIS, it does not have a high rate of attrition. The kids who enter are the kids who graduate.
You are a troll, aren’t you? Which charter chain do you work for?
LikeLike
The irony is too rich, on the front page of this Consortium school is a plea for parent donations, exactly like the one the donations the $1,500 BASIS asks for, prompting this discussion…
http://www.ms223.org/
PLEASE DONATE
$1,500
Provides one student with 2 hours of daily after-school programming
$1,000
Provides one student with 9 hours of summer programming for 4 weeks
$300
Provides a student a tablet for 1:1 Digital Learning
$100
Provides a monthly stipend for high school tutors
LikeLike
Unlike BASIS, most of the kids in the Consortium schools are poor.
LikeLike
So a model is only worthwhile if it serves non Asians and non whites?
Disappointing that I am called a troll because of my vigorous debate, but I correcting the facts, and I and asking questions. I do not work for any charter if you must know. I am feel free to email me to learn more.
LikeLike
Cynthia, you probably don’t know this, but more than half the kids in the U.S. are poor. We are approaching a point where nearly half are nonwhite. Public schools have to serve all the kids, not just those who are white and Asian and likely to get high test scores. Of course, if a charter school can pick off the smartest kids from the most advantaged homes, they will get higher test scores.
But we still have to educate all the kids. And taking the high performing peers away is bad for everyone.
LikeLike
The structure of your sentences in the previous comment strongly indicates you are not a native born English speaking American. In fact, the structure sounds like someone east of Germany … one of Putin’s Russian trolls maybe?
LikeLike
Someone here seems to believe that we can only teach Asians and whites as our first priority because it takes too much time and money to educate other students(and it’s not worthy!) I bet the founder of the BASIS program cooks the bowls of cram chowder to feed a selective number of students who are willing to subject to “Asian/White only” policy.
LikeLike
I remember back in 1988 when charters were going to solve intractable problems, close the achievement gap, and raise up the children left behind. Now we learn from a charter booster that it is okay to accept only the white and Asian kids (the ones who can pass 12 AP tests) and forget the rest.
LikeLike
“I bet the founder of the BASIS program cooks the bowls of cram chowder to feed a selective number of students who are willing to subject to “Asian/White only” policy”
BASIS DC
Enrollment By Race %
Asian 8.4
Black 35.8
Hispanic 8.5
Multitracial 8%
Pacific/Hawaiian <1
White 39%
LikeLike
We were discussing BASIS in Arizona, where the top-rated high schools are, not BASIS DC.
The data are in this article.
https://www.washingtonpost.com/news/answer-sheet/wp/2017/03/30/what-the-public-doesnt-know-about-high-performing-charter-schools-in-arizona/?utm_term=.0583eeb9e577
A quick look at the demographics of the 18 Arizona BASIS charter schools compared with the demographic profile of all Arizona students in the public and charter systems, however, should give pause that such differences are not accidental. The following enrollment figures are from the 2015-2016 school year.
Asian American Indian/Alaska Native Black Latino White Mixed
Arizona 3% 5% 5% 45% 39% 3%
BASIS 32% 0% 3% 10% 51% 2%
The proportional over-enrollment of Asian-American students and under-enrollment of Latino students in BASIS charter schools is startling. But differences in the students served do not end with race and ethnicity.
In 2015-16, only 1.23 percent of the students at BASIS had a learning disability, as compared to 11.3 percent of students in the state. BASIS schools had no English Language Learners. And in a state in which over 47 percent of all students received free or reduced- priced lunch, BASIS had none. Although BASIS may have some students from qualifying households, it chooses not to participate in the free or reduced-priced lunch program.
LikeLike
Since the columns may be hard to decipher with the naked eye, I will clarify.
The acclaimed BASIS schools of Arizona are 83% white and Asian, compared to 42% in the state.
BASIS has 0% Native American in a state whose students are 5%.
BASIS has 10% Latino in a state whose students are 45% Latino.
Slightly more than 1% of the students has a disability, and 0% are English language learners.
Give it up.
BASIS is an elite private school that is publicly funded.
LikeLike
“The structure of your sentences in the previous comment strongly indicates you are not a native born English speaking American.”
Sorry Mr Lofthouse, I was typing that post from my phone.
LikeLike
HOW is BASIS “supplying high quality education” when they only graduate a total of 200 students a year?
Where do all of the rest of the students that are pushed out of BASIS schools going? What about the students whose parents can’t afford to “donate” $1500 per year per child to the school?
LikeLike
“TOW wrote:
HOW is BASIS “supplying high quality education” when they only graduate a total of 200 students a year?”
For 2017 BASIS had 12,709 students and 364 12th graders across 18 schools. That is just AZ, and does not include charter schools in TX, DC, or LA.
2 more schools opened in 2018 in AZ.
http://www.azed.gov/accountability-research/data/
LikeLike
Cynthia – why such a small percentage of 12th graders? 12,709 divided by 13 grades should equal nearly a thousand kids per grade, if the kids were spread out evenly across grades. But they’re not. The vast majority of BASIS schools are sixth grade and up, so there really should be closer to two thousand 12th graders. Why only 364? Attrition?
LikeLike
“Cynthia – why such a small percentage of 12th graders? ”
The schools are new, some just opened, and some serve grades 5 through 12, only so much room in one building, BASIS just started serving K-4.
LikeLike
Right, you’re kind of proving my point. Their most established schools are the ones which serve the oldest kids. Therefore, there should be a lot more 12th graders than, say, fourth graders. Yet there are less than a quarter of the number of 12th graders one would expect unless attrition without backfill is a factor.
LikeLike
The demand has been created by marketing, programming & brainwashing. While school districts were just working away big money came in when the alluring investment called.
And, yes, there are entrance exams.
LikeLike
It is the appeal of extreme elitism. However, maybe these outstanding young people would do just as well in a quality comprehensive high school, and no public budgets would have to be drained. Their stellar achievements would be a lot more cost effective, and the owners of BASIS would not be buying apartments in Manhattan.
LikeLike
AZ Parent
BASIS and similarly operated charters are not the only publicly funded schools in AZ delivering high quality education. We have many, many district schools delivering excellent education, and not just to children of highly motivated, mostly affluent families.
BASIS preys on the fears of understandably anxious parents. They’re exploiting Arizona’s environment of deeply underfunded public schools to attract customers through their doors. Parents too often mistake high test scores with quality education. Parents too often feel like being “ahead” in math or reading etc means a better education. Why the rush? To what end?
The Blocks are not doing anything magical. Anyone can look at the formula for determining “Best High school” and work backwards. Why should anyone be getting rich off public school funding when our traditional schools, the ones that serve students of all socioeconomic level and ability, are starving for funds?
The Blocks would never have been able to build their international school empire without the AZ taxpayer. It’s indefensible in my opinion.
LikeLike
Laura
Basis provided a significantly accelerated curriculum that the high schools in our district were not inclined to provide. Many of the parents @ Basis are professional & educated and have made a similar conclusion. It is not a product of anxiety or charter propaganda, but a considered choice. Why not provide students and parents with options?
LikeLike
To AZ parent
Our state has largely turned its back on all public school students, gifted or otherwise, and the charter system exacerbates our underfunding problem. I know you understand that if you’re a reader of this blog. I wish more people would reject the charter system. Without customers, the industry would shrink and we could work on directing funding more equitably among all students.
Gifted students deserve an education that meets their needs just as all children do. We don’t need a for-profit, private company to provide it. We do have districts with highly regarded gifted programs after all, but perhaps not in your area. You should do what you feel is best for your child, no question.
My worry is that the two-tier system of haves and have-nots we are rapidly creating is ultimately not good for anybody. My criticism is not for parents choosing charters, but really for our state and the charter profiteers exploiting our underfunded public system for their own gain.
“Educated professionals” do not necessarily make the best decisions regarding education. Education is often not their area of expertise. Parents should seek advice from actual educators over corporate marketing. I’m not an education expert, so I look to those that are. The BASIS elementary curriculum seems highly inappropriate for the vast majority of children from what I’ve been told by professional educators. Your child may very well be one of those in the exceptional minority, but plenty of kids attending are not. I understand BASIS kids are “so ahead.” I’m still waiting to understand why that is important. And at what cost to the kid.
LikeLike
AZ parent: you appear to be clueless about “basic economics.”
LikeLike
BASIS is the exclusionary model US public education teachers have been working to UNDO since Brown v BoEd & IDEA. Stop playing games & tell us how many kids with significant disabilities (IEPs w/ extensive related services) attend BASIS. How many have been expelled? How many are outright rejected based on their IDEA eligibility category?
If you want to talk about a model for education you’d best be honest about BASIS’ & every charter chain’s unapologetic discrimination against all children with disabilities.
LikeLike
Right ON!!! I doubt that BASIS would ever be willing to answer your questions and more along those same line. Yet, public schools, through the Freedom of Information Act, are required to provide that information. They can’t provide the names of Students but they can be forced to provide the statistics. BASIS may claim to be a public school but in reality it is not!!!!
LikeLike
Cynthia Weiss
What does DC stand for?—Devalue Curriculum!?
LikeLike
District of Columbia…
http://www.basised.com/washington-dc/
The point is not all schools are Asian\white.
LikeLike
Right. And it doesn’t belong to Arizona. BASIS DC = BASIS(AZ) is a DC(=Debunked Claim).
LikeLike
Basis, the #1 school in the nation by Newsweek Magazine, 2017, graduated 44 students. 18 whites, the rest mostly Asians. No ELL, No Special Ed. Less than 8% Black/Hispanics. No free or reduced lunch. So, basically we’re saying privileged, upper socio-economic, gifted students.
In my last year of teaching, I had 45 in one room with 30 desks, not enough old texts to teach. Didn’t stay that way all year, but enough to impact teaching & learning.
Basis only teaches the gifted. Look a little deeper.
LikeLike
Define “gifted”. Would a skilled carpenter be considered “gifted”? How many of those does BASIS graduate? How many Broadway actors/singers/dancers/musicians hail from BASIS? How many artists whose work hangs in museums and galleries hail from BASIS? Top chefs? World-ranked chess players?
Or does “gifted” only mean “gets high test scores”?
LikeLike
Good one. Gifted seems to means you can pass AP courses. Of course there are AP courses in art history and in studio performance, but not carpentry or plumbing.
“The society which scorns excellence in plumbing as a humble activity and tolerates shoddiness in philosophy because it is an exalted activity will have neither good plumbing nor good philosophy: neither its pipes nor its theories will hold water.” John W. Gardner.
For those who do not know, John W. Gardner was the Secretary of Health Education and Welfare under Lynden Johnson Gardner was a founder of Common Cause, credited with getting Medicare legislation among other achievements.
He also said—Life is the art of drawing without an eraser.
LikeLike
We also do not need to use public dollars to produce more people that disdain public education. We have enough prep schools and private schools for that. Wasn’t the whole argument for charters was to “rescue students from failing schools? If these students’ parents can afford a $1500 “donation,” I doubt they were in a failing school.
LikeLike
That stuff about “rescuing poor kids from failing public schools” was window dressing. Propaganda. They never meant it
LikeLike
Well, I see BASIS sent out their paid trolls. Another great use of Arizona tax dollars.
LikeLike
“As long as their schools produce high test scores, who cares about the money, right?”
I get the sarcasm, but let’s not concede anything here. Let’s not pretend that these schools actually “produce” high test scores (much less anything else). They just suck up all the kids that produce high test scores and exclude all the rest.
LikeLike
Yep.
LikeLike
Actually that is not quite right. They take everyone who dares to apply to schools that will require them to pass 12 AP exams. Then they start dropping students. They drop some every year until they finally get to the small number that meet the graduation requirement.
It is a distilling process, like making fine wine or bourbon.
LikeLike
More like a sifting process – finding the “best” wine or bourbon that’s already been made. If wine or bourbon could be judged by test scores.
LikeLike
“They take everyone who dares to apply to schools that will require them to pass 12 AP exams.”
This is not quite right. BASIS pays the fees for all AP tests, students are required to take six tests, and pass one to graduate. Facts matter.
LikeLike
What does it take to get through to voters that charters who make a lot of money are scams? Public school teachers have to go on strike for better salaries, supplies for students and try to get money to repair crumbing schools. Where is the media to blast such an injustice?
…”BASIS charter chain, which is regularly lauded by the national media as sponsor of the number one high schooling the nation, because of the AP courses that its students pass.” Blah, blah, blah…
LikeLike
Reblogged this on David R. Taylor-Thoughts on Education and commented:
Special
LikeLike
5/9/2018 Arizona Republic This Morning, “At Basis schools, parents urged to chip in for teacher’s pay,” ……………”Barrett, the Basis chairman, in response to questions from The Republic about how the company uses the management fee it takes, said it’s no one’s business how much the Blocks were paid or how much profit they made.”…………………….
from Block………..”My wife and I have spent a lifetime working and have multiple business interests,” Michael Block stated. “Our personal finances are exactly that: personal. For two decades, the state of Arizona has contracted with Basis schools to provide a serve, and taxpayers have received a remarkable return on their investment.
So, there! We take the State’s money & you don’t have any right to know how we spend it.
LikeLike
The pendulum has swung so far to the right, it broke through the kleptocracy barrier.
LikeLike
Good one!
LikeLike
The GOP that President Lincoln led does not exist anymore. Eisenhower and Nixonian Republicans have been locked out. If any are still alive, they are in shock and have lost their voices and/or minds and walk around in a daze mumbling about the good old days.
The alleged Republicans in power today have mutated into an alien species and should rename their party “The Kleptocrats” that originated from another planet orbiting another star.
LikeLike
Self fulfilling prophecy. If any parent in an area thinks that a certain school is the best, then those who value education will send their kids to that school. The school can then choose which children will work toward their goals, narrowly defined, and pitch the rest out. Elite private schools have done this for years. Of course the schools are good. All the kids are a perfect fit. All the kids are self motivated. What could go wrong?
Oh. I forgot to mention the hundreds of children who are ignored, warehoused in underfunded schools elsewhere and thrown the bones after the meal.
LikeLike
The BASIS charter schools have some tight ties to the very conservative Goldwater Institute, which is a pretty creepy outfit that peddles all kinds of right-wing nonsense. BASIS schools pay “merit bonuses” to teachers for “learning gains,” and push – relentlessly – the College Board’s Advanced Placement (AP) program.
The chairman of BASIS schools is Craig Barrett, former CEO of Intel. For years Barrett has spread the STEM “crisis” myth. Meanwhile, Intel was laying off thousands of STEM workers. Just two short years ago, Intel laid off 15,000 STEM workers, which was considered to be “only the beginning.”
It’s worthwhile to note that out of all the taxpayer money that BASIS schools receive, about 12 percent is skimmed off the top as a “management fee” for the BASIS owners, Michael and Olga Block. BASIS CEO Barrett told the Arizona Republic that “it’s no one’s business how much the Blocks were paid or how much profit they made.”
It’s also worth pointing out that when BASIS schools are asked about teacher salaries and pay structures, they keep declining “repeated requests to confirm information about teacher pay.” Because BASIS focuses so much on AP, it pays teachers bonuses for student AP test scores. It isn’t hard, then, to figure out exactly what the BASIS curriculum really is.
The Goldwater Institute advocates all the kinds of economic policies that piled up deficits and debt and broke the economy. Incredibly, its directors make the claim that it “is staffed by the brightest minds” (eye roll and laugh out loud).
Its ideas for education “reform” are more charter schools, merit pay, more testing, and vouchers. It wants to privatize public education.
The research on AP –– despite the nonsense dispensed by The Washington Post’s Jay Mathews –- is quite clear. It is grossly overhyped. But it is the core and key to BASIS schools. Largely, it’s a sham.
A 2002 National Research Council study of AP courses and tests found them to be a “mile wide and an inch deep” and inconsistent with research-based principles of learning.
A 2004 study found that “the best predictor of both first- and second-year college grades” is unweighted high school grade point average, and a high school grade point average “weighted with a full bonus point for AP…is invariably the worst predictor of college performance.”
A 2005 study found AP students “…generally no more likely than non-AP students to return to school for a second year or to have higher first semester grades.” Moreover, the authors wrote that “close inspection of the [College Board] studies cited reveals that the existing evidence regarding the benefits of AP experience is questionable,” and “AP courses are not a necessary component of a rigorous curriculum.”
A 2006 MIT faculty report noted ““there is ‘a growing body of research’ that students who earn top AP scores and place out of institute introductory courses end up having ‘difficulty’ when taking the next course.”
The 2010 book “AP: A Critical Examination” noted that “Students see AP courses on their transcripts as the ticket ensuring entry into the college of their choice,” yet, “there is a shortage of evidence about the efficacy, cost, and value of these programs.” And this: AP has become “the juggernaut of American high school education,” but “ the research evidence on its value is minimal.”
A (2013) study from Stanford pointed out that “increasingly, universities seem
to be moving away from awarding credit for AP courses.” The study said that “the impact of the AP program on various measures of college success was found to be negligible.” And it adds this: “definitive claims about the AP program and its impact on students and schools are difficult to substantiate.” But not at the BASIS schools.
BASIS schools are ranked highly by US News & World Report (and by The Post’s Jay Mathews). The research on AP suggests strongly that those lists – US News and The Challenge Index – are flat-out bogus.
But people believe those lists. And belief is a powerful thing. Some people believe the Biblical account of creation in Genesis, despite the overwhelming scientific consensus to the contrary. Some people (still) believe that trickle-down tax cuts actually promote economic growth. Academic studies have repeatedly concluded that fraud at the ballot box — the sort that photo identification requirements might reduce — is already vanishingly rare, but some people want even greater voter restrictions. A gun kept in the home is 43 times more likely to kill a member of the household, or a friend, than an actual intruder, and the U.S. is responsible for 80% of all firearm deaths, 86% of all female firearm deaths, and 87% of all child firearm deaths in the developed world. Some people believe this is just a coincidence. Some people believe that torture actually works.
And some people still buy into the belief that the SAT and ACT measure “intelligence” and that AP courses are better than mushroom, artichoke, and spinach pizza, and that BASIS schools are super-duper and worth replicating.
Sadly, there do not seem to be that many people – educators included – who believe in the democratic citizenship mission of public education.
LikeLike
So AZ is one of the bottom states for per pupil funding, the Blocks are skimming off 12%, and there are few certified teachers in the classroom, yet the students perform among the best in the nation.
How is that possible?
Democracy wrote…
“And some people still buy into the belief that the SAT and ACT measure “intelligence” and that AP courses are better than mushroom, artichoke, and spinach pizza….”
You can blame College Board and higher education for this. Don’t hate the players, hate the game. You can bet that if Colleges wanted something else, BASIS, TJ High, etc would all pivot in a heart beat.
LikeLike
BASIS schools get high scores because they weed out the kids who can’t pass 11-12 AP exams. Their enrollment does not reflect the demographics of AZ. It is overwhelmingly Asian and white. Their attrition rates, like Success Academy, are sky high.
LikeLike
“BASIS schools get high scores because they weed out the kids who can’t pass 11-12 AP exams. ”
Not true, see above, confusing why you choose to repeat it.
LikeLike
Hey Cynthia,
You are quite adept at lying, but your arguments about BASIS just do not stand up. As many have noted, the attrition rates at BASIS schools are incredibly high, BASIS schools do not have a cross-section of students that mirror Arizona’s population, and BASIS ” students tend to be higher academic achievers than the average Arizona student population.”
That’s how it happens.
Oh yeah, and the BASIS “players” – the Blocks – are laughing all the way to the bank.
LikeLike
democracy wrote:
“You are quite adept at lying, but your arguments about BASIS just do not stand up. As many have noted, the attrition rates at BASIS schools are incredibly high, BASIS schools do not have a cross-section of students that mirror Arizona’s population, and BASIS ” students tend to be higher academic achievers than the average Arizona student population.”
Wow, been called a liar by democracy, a troll by Ms Ravitch, and an idiot AND a troll by dienne77. Too bad you all cannot welcome debate and opposing views here.
If you point out my lies, I would be happy to correct them and apologize.
LikeLike
During the recent AZ budget negotiations, I listened to an argument by one of the state representatives that charter schools SHOULD NOT be subject to the same scrutiny and accountability standards as the public schools even though they get state money. His comment was that once that money was paid to the schools it was no longer the state’s money and they could use it as they see fit without having to show their books. He likened it to state employees who get a paycheck. Once they’re paid, we have no say over how that money is spent. That’s the mentality of some of the jokers we have elected here!
LikeLike
Diane asked here if Cynthia Weiss was a troll. That’s one name for her. In searching around for Weiss, I came across two distinct possibilities. One is a right-wing job in Idaho. The other better choice is a right-wing job in Arizona.
And guess what. She’s the director of communications for the Arizona Department of Child Safety, an agency that has had plenty of problems. Some of those problems intensified when the new governor, Doug Ducey, took office.As several employees at DCS recently stated, the culture at DCS is “entirely driven by the State of Arizona politics of the moment,” and “if management finds anything out about you it can be used against you.”
Doug Ducey is a real piece of work. He lies. He does not like public education. He thinks monuments that “honor” Confederate generals are perfectly fine on public property because “It’s important that people know our history” (sigh). He appointed Clinton Bolick from the Goldwater Institute (see my comment above) to the state Supreme Court. Bolick is a Clarence Tomas protege, if that tells you anything.
But guess what? On Cynthia Weiss’ twitter feed, she’s all about Doug Ducey. She adores Doug Ducey. She must think the dude really has it, because she retweets him constantly. She also appears to really like Jonathan Gelbart, the former “director of charter school development for Basis Charter Schools” as the guy who should be the next state superintendent of public instruction. Gelbart says that all public schools can “learn from BASIS.”
Even more interesting is that Cynthia Weiss is the president of the Cave Creek Unified School District in the Scottsdale area. Cave Creek has about 5400 students; its demographic breakdown is 86 percent white, 9 percent Hispanic, 3 percent Asian, and 1 percent black. Its poverty level (free/reduced lunch) is less than 10 percent. It has a lot of “Choice” schools, and it touts its “gifted” and AP programs. Cave Creek is in Maricopa County, the wealthiest county in Arizona, and its median family income mirrors that of Scottsdale, the 4th wealthiest locality in Arizona. Based on its test scores, SchoolDigger ranks Cave Creek 48th in the state. Cave Creek spends about $8,000 per student, with only 53 percent going to instruction.
But, check out the kinds of houses one can purchase in that school district:
https://www.realtor.com/realestateandhomes-search/85266?cid=prt_niche_k12_profile_map-cta
More importantly, take a peek at the Twitter feed here, when Cynthia Weiss dissed the teachers who walked out to make their concerns known regarding the deteriorated state of education in Arizona by saying “I took an oath to serve (for free). You signed a contract to serve (for pay+bennies). For the love of God and children, honor your word.” The blowback was not kind.
https://mobile.twitter.com/cynthiaweissaz/status/987190892854325248
So, is this you, Cynthia? Let us know, won’t you?
LikeLike
Hi democracy, Sorry I am not that Cynthia Weiss. I doubt the other Cynthia Weiss is a charter school supporter and observer like me.
Email me if would like to understand my stance on things. Ms Ravitch has my email address.
LikeLike
It’s a shame you’re not the Arizona Cynthia Weiss. Because she makes the same kinds of goofy statements that you do. If your comments on this blog (and elsewhere) reflect your “stance,” then I think I’ve grasp pretty clearly what you “think.”
You don’t like public education, do you? Were you a Trump supporter?
LikeLike